LSU to lose money on Chick-fil-A Bowl

A 25-24 defeat at the hands of Clemson on New Year’s Eve wasn’t LSU’s only loss from its appearance in the Chick-fil-A Bowl.

Because fans fell far short of selling out LSU’s allotment of 16,000 tickets to the Dec. 31 game, the athletic department is currently facing an estimated $154,500 deficit from the Tigers’ trip to Atlanta.

The financial shortfall from the bowl game certainly isn’t about to cripple LSU’s athletic department, whose budget will likely run to about $98 million by the end of the 2012-13 fiscal year.

Mark Ewing, LSU’s senior associate athletic director for business, said the school’s share of bowl revenue from the SEC that’s still outstanding will eventually make up most of that deficit.

However, LSU Athletic Director Joe Alleva said the school did try to rein in expenses on the trip as much as possible, knowing there would likely be a shortfall.

“It’s a significant amount of money,” Alleva said. “The biggest factor is the amount of guaranteed tickets you have to buy and the fact that we didn’t sell them all. That’s really the bottom line this year.”

LSU sold about 10,500 of its 16,000 ticket allotment for the Chick-fil-A Bowl, which the school was contractually bound to purchase before then trying to resell tickets to fans.

A Southeastern Conference insurance policy reimbursed LSU for the cost of about 4,000 tickets, but the school still had to pay for $176,300 in unsold tickets.

The SEC allocated $1,230,000 to LSU for the Chick-fil-A Bowl, but Ewing said the school spent a total of $1,384,500 on unsold tickets and such expenses as hotel rooms and meals for the team and LSU’s band.

The $1.23 million comes from the SEC team’s share of $3.3 million guaranteed by the Chick-fil-A Bowl, Ewing said. The rest of the money, about $2.1 million, is divided into 15 shares between LSU, the other 13 SEC member schools and the conference office.

That one-fifteenth share — about $140,000 — will come back to LSU at the end of the fiscal year, Ewing said. In all, LSU’s net loss for the Chick-fil-A Bowl should drop to about $15,000 once all the books are balanced.

By comparison, even if LSU had sold all of its 16,000 Chick-fil-A Bowl tickets, Ewing estimates the school would have turned a profit of only $21,800 before that one-fifteenth share reimbursement.

If LSU had gone to another bowl, say the Cotton in Arlington, Texas, the school would likely have turned a profit.

LSU season-ticket holders pre-ordered more than 16,500 Cotton Bowl tickets, outstripping the allotment of 12,500 that the school would have received from that game.

“If we had gone to the Cotton Bowl or one of those Florida bowls,” Alleva said, “I think we would have sold out.”

SEC Commissioner Mike Slive said at the BCS Championship Game that future bowl contracts are likely to include smaller ticket allotments that schools are required to purchase, an idea Alleva endorsed.

“I think when the SEC puts out (requests for proposals) to bowls in the future, part of those RFPs need to be with much-reduced guarantees for the tickets you have to buy,” Alleva said.


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (10)


1) Comment by Gusto - 19/02/2013

I'm suprised this even made the sports headline that LSU/Alleva loses money in the Chic Filet Bowl. What a joke. He thinks that LSU would have sold out tickets going to other bowls. Well Mr. Alleva, that is a no brainer. So instead of having an article written that LSU lost a few small dollars, next time just have the balls to say no thanks to a lower class bowl so you won't have to speak about losing a few thousand dollars next time and save money. LSU is worth way more than that, and all LSU fans know it.

2) Comment by Milesthebest - 19/02/2013

foldgers, everyone knows how the bowl game revenues are split, but of course that was not the point of the article. But to comment on your topic, the old joke in the SEC was that in the days when Vandy never made a bowl game, it was said Vanderbilt made out like a bandit in the SEC during bowl football season. They didn't make a bowl thus didn't lose any money there and got a split on everyone elses' bowl games. This situation has only gotten worse and worse since IMO there are far too many bowl games which helps explain the decrease in bowl attendance and also the decrease in TV ratings for many bowl games. Did you see the Sun Bowl on CBS this year? That used to be a pretty darn major bowl game and I believe is the only one CBS broadcasts. You could have thrown a hand grenade in many areas of that stadium and not hurt anyone. That also included Georgia Tech which of course was the opponent vs Florida State in the ACC CG I brought up.

3) Comment by foldgers - 19/02/2013

OR, the TAF will look at it as a loss and just raise a fee here, a ticket price there, the cost of a hotdog will now be $20 and so on. Not to mention the nice raise Les just received as well. You think they will suck up those costs??? Or just pass them to those who provide the money in the first place?

4) Comment by foldgers - 19/02/2013

*split, not plait (I wonder how that happened)

5) Comment by foldgers - 19/02/2013

Boo hoo LSU. Let me ask you this, LSU had to split $2.1 million of the money it was guaranteed from the bowl game, right? Split it with the other SEC teams. That is about $140k going to each of the other 15 SEC teams. Ok, so??? Any of you thinking what I am now? How many OTHER SEC teams went to bowl games? Each of those teams had to plait about 2/3 of their money with all of the other SEC teams. So, Bama in the Champ bowl, that pays a lot more. Let's just say $4 million, I am guessing. That alone is over $175k that LSU will be getting. Done, ticket sales loss covered. Not to mention that LSU receives from A&M in the Cotton bowl and all the other SEC teams in bowl games. LSU isn't losing a DIME in this deal.

6) Comment by nimby? - 19/02/2013

seeing the financial losses bowls and schools experienced this year perhaps La. Tech was wise to stay home ...

7) Comment by Milesthebest - 19/02/2013

Giantkiller, LSU pretty much has a gutless AD in Alleva right now. The SEC office pretty much convinced the bowls to take THEIR preference for SEC teams going to each bowl. Add that to being walked all over on the SEC football East schedule that LSU has to play every year where they play the best in the East vs the cupcakes that Alabama gets assigned, and it is obvious that Alleva has 0 backbone. He should have said on both of these occasions, "listen guys, our school is getting tired ot this sh-t where you treat teams like Florida, Alabama, and Georgia differently than you treat us." As far as the $150k loss, that is chicken feed not only to LSU's total athletic budget but to the loss that Florida State had in the ACC Championship game vs Georgia Tech. FSU sold a grand total of 2000 tickets through the athletic department. Hey lost 450k so 150k is peanuts compared to that. Ironically, Florida State got the prestige of winning their division in the ACC and absolutely took a bath financially by doing it. BTW, I believe this was the first time that the game had not sold out and apparently the stadium was only half full.

8) Comment by Giantkiller - 19/02/2013

EVERYBODY know LSU would lose money on a Chick-Fil-A Bowl appearance except I guess LSU. I don't know what idiot agreed to take that invite, or at least not fight Slive for making us go there, but it was in the cards before the game - LSU fans are sick of going to Atlanta, Mr. Alleva. I can tell you without a crystal ball that if you put us in that bowl again in the next 5 years, the same thing is going to happen.

9) Comment by nimby? - 19/02/2013

LSU usually travels well to Atlanta, Clemson is only a couple of hrs away from ATL . neither sold their allotment . could be the economy . not to mention if you wanted to watch the game it was on a TV somewhere close ...

10) Comment by tball - 19/02/2013

Maybe people are getting tired of bowl games that don't mean anything or prove anything!!! I know it's about $$$$$$$...