Five reasons LSU should  leave the Southeastern Conference

In this photo taken Jan. 9, 2012, Alabama fans cheer during the second half of the BCS championship game against LSU in New Orleans. (AP Photo/Dave Martin) Show caption
In this photo taken Jan. 9, 2012, Alabama fans cheer during the second half of the BCS championship game against LSU in New Orleans. (AP Photo/Dave Martin)

The time has come.
Imbalanced, arbitrary football schedules, unfavorable bowl politics and a conference office that frequently indicates it is ignoring LSU’s concerns and needs have led the school and its athletic program to this point:

It is time to consider seceding from the Southeastern Conference.

LSU is a charter member of the SEC dating to 1933, but that doesn’t mean it has to stay there forever. Not if there are other, appealing options out there.

Where could LSU go? With the Big East dissolving, the ACC in flux, the Big Ten and Pac-12 too far away and independent status not a viable option for scheduling and economic reasons, LSU’s only real option would be to join the Big 12. It’s the conference closest to LSU in terms of physical location and philosophy.

Here are five reasons why there’s no better time for LSU to leave the SEC:

1 Unfair football scheduling

The newly expanded SEC goes into 2013 with a temporary schedule in place for the second straight year as the conference grapples with how to set up a long-term scheduling format. The SEC slapped a bandage on this upcoming season’s schedule, but it hardly attempts to cover the wounds the 2012 temporary schedule created.

The main problem, from LSU’s perspective, is a schedule that puts the Tigers at a competitive disadvantage to its chief rival for SEC West supremacy (with apologies to Texas A&M and Johnny Heisman), Alabama. Not only does LSU have to play at Alabama in 2013 as it usually does in odd-numbered years, but the Tigers also have to play at Georgia and host Florida, teams that tied for first in the SEC East this past season with 7-1 marks.

Alabama’s two opponents out of the East? Tennessee in Tuscaloosa and Kentucky on the road, teams that went a combined 1-15 in conference play and are breaking in new coaches.

The SEC did LSU a disservice and cannot be unaware of that. The Tigers have the chance to field another prime BCS title contender in 2013 (one early poll puts LSU as preseason No. 3), but the Tigers will have a much tougher road to Pasadena and the final non-playoff BCS Championship Game playing the Bulldogs and Gators than will the Crimson Tide playing the Volunteers and Wildcats.

National championship seasons are hard to come by. And LSU’s may get short-circuited before it even starts.

2 Permanent opponents

The biggest continuing flaw in SEC football scheduling is the concept of permanent, opposite-division opponents. Permanent opponents are the SEC’s hide-bound attempt to cling to traditional rivalries that would otherwise be disrupted by East and West divisions, primarily Alabama/Tennessee and Auburn/Georgia.

One can argue those are rivalries worth preserving, but since everyone is required to have a permanent opponent, the SEC also has given us such non-stimulating annual showdowns as Ole Miss/Vanderbilt and Mississippi State/Kentucky.

LSU is saddled with Florida as its permanent opponent, while Alabama has Tennessee. Florida has finished with a better record than Tennessee in six of the past seven seasons, with the Vols having failed to post even an above-.500 SEC record since winning the SEC East in 2007.

LSU lobbied at the SEC Spring Meeting in May to eliminate permanent opponents but was soundly defeated. The school will push again at the next meeting in May. Failing that, LSU Athletic Director Joe Alleva proposes that the SEC adopt the Pac-12 model, which allows those schools that want permanent opponents to have them and those that do not to rotate.

The 10-member Big 12 does not have divisions — all of its members play everyone else in a nine-game conference schedule. When the Big 12 did have 12 members split into six-team North and South divisions, schools played the five teams in their division, three teams from the other division for two years, then the other three teams for two years. Fair and balanced.

3 Escaping the Alabama shadow

The football scheduling plan comes out of an SEC office in Birmingham, Ala., that fairly or not has long been seen as being too close to the Alabama campus — geographically and philosophically — for the rest of the conference’s good. Certainly it is not a one-sport league, but football drives the SEC’s economic train and is the face of the conference nation-wide.

LSU’s hopes and desires when it comes to football have been routinely ignored, especially of late when it comes to permanent opponents (which Alabama favors) and in terms of this season’s bowl landscape.

The SEC protected championship-game loser Georgia by convincing the Capital One Bowl to take the Bulldogs; allowed the Cotton Bowl to choose Texas A&M over LSU; and discouraged the Outback Bowl from taking LSU (for a first-ever game with Michigan) to avoid a Chick-fil-A Bowl rematch between South Carolina and Clemson. Had the SEC urged the Cotton to take LSU over A&M — the Tigers beat the Aggies and are higher ranked — and sent A&M to the Chick-fil-A, it would have been a more equitable arrangement.

Instead, LSU is left to make its fifth trip to the Chick-fil-A since 1996 and 11th trip to Atlanta in that span to play a game that, despite an excellent matchup, has failed to whip LSU fans into a ticket-buying frenzy.

LSU at last count had sold a little more than 10,000 of its 16,000 tickets for the Chick-fil-A Bowl. LSU took more than 16,000 orders for 12,500 Cotton Bowl tickets — a bowl that has a Big 12 tie-in opposite the SEC.

4 TIMING IS
EVERYTHING

Conference realignment is trendier these days than even Johnny Heisman. The past couple of years have seen schools leave traditional conference homes for new affiliations that once would have seemed impossible: Nebraska to the Big Ten, West Virginia to the Big 12, Utah to the Pac-12 — and don’t forget Missouri to the SEC.

Eventually, college athletics is likely to be dominated by four 16-team super-conferences. The blocks of those super-conferences are now shifting. It makes sense to go now before the blocks are set in place.

5 GEOGRAPHY IS OVERRATED

Certainly leaving the SEC for Big 12 would mean longer road trips — Ames, Iowa, for instance, over Starkville, Miss.; or Stillwater, Okla., instead of Knoxville, Tenn. It seems impossible to consider until you watched West Virginia play a Big 12 game at Texas Tech last season.

Traditional geographic lines have not only been blurred in big-time college athletics, they have been obliterated. It is no longer an unwritten requirement that conference members be from states that border each other — although Louisiana does border Texas.

Before Arkansas and A&M joined the SEC, LSU was forever the SEC’s westernmost outpost. What would be so odd about being the Big 12’s southernmost? Not at all as unfathomable as it once seemed.

Certainly were LSU to leave the SEC for the Big 12, it would come with some huge issues.

But after years of mounting frustration in the SEC, perhaps a fresh start would be best for LSU under the right circumstances.


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (20)


1) Comment by JohnRingaux - 03/03/2013

It's ridiculous to even suggest LSU should leave the SEC. As long as Les Miles is the coach at LSU and Nick Saban is the coach at Alabama, LSU will continue to lose to Alabama. Miles makes dumb decisions, and despite having better players than Alabama, his dumb decisions will continue to result in losses in the big games. I've been a Tiger fan since Bernie Moore's head coaching days at LSU, and I've seen some bad coaches and some dumb coaches, and while Miles is not the worst or the dumbest, Saban and Alabama will continue to get the best of Miles and LSU.

2) Comment by TigerChuck - 28/12/2012

While I agree that the scheduling appears lopsided for 2013, I would also like to point out a few positive things ... 1) I live in FL now so as a remote alumni I always want to watch LSU play the BEST opponents possible. I am excited about getting to watch LSU play FL, GA, AL & A&M. We GET to play 4 of the top 10 teams in the country. 2) When you want to be the best, you don't hide from the best and hope to play lesser teams. 3) If you are a recruit looking at the schedules, would you rather get to play FL, GA, A&M and AL or would you rather get to play TN, KY, Vandy and Chattanooga for goodness sake? 4) LSU will be on TV nationally at least 2 more times than AL and possibly more. Obviously I live a sunny place now, but maybe Scott R might like to join me here for a few minutes and think about what we would be missing if we moved to the Big 12.

3) Comment by Dudebro2 - 27/12/2012

Scott, thank you for writing about what is happening to LSU and other schools in the SEC. The only way to affect change is to make sure it is known loud and clear what is unfair and to do it as often as possible. Basically the squeaky wheel gets the grease. Understand that LSU is not the only team affected look UF has to play LSU every year they can't be happy about that. But going to the Big 12, not a great idea why do you think A&M left the Big 12 because of Texas and IMO Texas is worse than Bama. The SEC can be affected and change can be affected but people "like you Scott" have to continue to write about the unfairness of the situation. The process of affecting change will not be a quick process and we have to realize that, but if enough people write about the wrong's in the SEC eventually change can be affected. If enough sports writers and enough SEC college administrators complain loud and long enough change will be affected. But to affect the change the sports writers can not stop the pressure, they have to continue to point out the unfairness of the SEC. So Scott please don't stop writing about the unfairness of the SEC, the change starts with people like you.

4) Comment by bubbabrunt - 27/12/2012

Suggesting LSU secede from the SEC is absurd, but the SEC office should be in Atlanta, not Birmingham. Alabama does appear to have undue influence with Slive. The SEC Presidents and A.D.'s should exert more control and influence over SEC office decisions, e.g., the bowl destinations of its member teams, scheduling, and the permanent opponent dilemma. Other SEC members, e.g., Ole Miss, see many of the same problems raised by Mr. Rabalais, and the fact that the SEC office remains in Birmingham only adds to the suspicion and perception. Mr. Slive needs to take off his blinders and address the above concerns before he retires, or maybe, just retire.

5) Comment by alarmdog1961 - 27/12/2012

LSU has a legitmate complaint , the sec office should be moved out of bama ham , it is something that sec schools have been dealing with for years. AUBURN has been a victim of the bama turf and sec office special treatment forever. the refs are even bama in the sec office of officals. it is a joke. leaks of other team secrets and confidental documents leak out. that office is a joke. until it is moved out of that dead town of bama ham , nothing will change only getting worse. LSU should be considered 100 % right. I agree. T town mens wear whatever happen to that. ? but until the presidents of the sec schools join coach Steve Spurrier and his stand nothing will change. so whats next ? who will stand up and challenge the sec office.?

6) Comment by geaux34102 - 27/12/2012

Would love to be in a Big XII that looks like this: SOUTH: LSU, FSU, Texas, TCU, Baylor, Texas Tech NORTH: Oklahoma, Oklahoma St, Kansas St, West Virginia, Iowa St, Kansas Sounds way better than: WEST: Bama, Auburn, Ole Miss, State, Arky, A&M, Mizzou EAST: UGA, UF, UT, USC, Vandy, UK, VT

7) Comment by HerbF - 26/12/2012

Absurd. Scott, you're the only person even slightly interested in the idea that LSU would consider leaving the SEC. Deadline right?

8) Comment by Michaelht52 - 26/12/2012

Cry me a river Scott. LSU will not leave the SEC but if they do who cares. RTR!!!

9) Comment by spqr - 26/12/2012

Anybody but LSU...even you can put aside your jealosy and understand LSU and others in the SEC are being taken advantage of by the league office and it has gone on for years. I would not care if LSU left the SEC or not. But joining the Big 12 has its own problems not mentioned...TEXAS ARROGANCE. It is far worse than the shoeless Forrest Gumps in Alabama.

10) Comment by Milesthebest - 25/12/2012

BTW, to spiderman's suggestion about switching Alabama to the East and Missouri to the west, the problem with that suggestion is it removes the Iron Bowl from being a yearly game unless then you reshuffle the permanent opponents around. Sooo, his suggestion is to remove one of the best rivalries in college football...oh yeah, clever idea. To get around this obvious flaw, that is why you move Auburn AND Alabama to the East. Not only does it maintain Auburn vs Alabama but it also automatically maintains the oldest rivalry in the south in Auburn vs Georgia and Alabama vs Tennessee while removing the incredibly STUPID permanent opponent.

11) Comment by Milesthebest - 25/12/2012

I love it when the football ignorant such as Spiderman proves what a fool it is when it questions the difference in the schedule which is apparent to anyone having more intelligence than a carrot...apparently leaving outside spiderman. The solution is to schedule FAIRLY which the SEC has not done since they split the league into 2 divisions. Not only is it not fair to the teams but not to the fans. As I correctly stated but is too much for spiderman to comprehend given its limited intelligence, right now the way the SEC is doing it. Florida will NOT play A&M again at Kyle Field for literally 14 years. That is absurd and forgetting the difference in the schedule, that is ridiculous for the fans in College Station. Using my method of realignment, there would be 2 rotational games since the permanent opponent would go away. That would of course cut the time to visit any venue in the other division down to 7 years from 14 years. Anyone here who thinks this entire deal is not political needs to take an IQ test....but I doubt they would like the results.

12) Comment by spiderman - 25/12/2012

I love it when the Bama conspiracy theorist come out. It's all about Bama and LSU get the shaft. Give me a break. The simple solution is win. PERIOD. The SEC "mafia" can do nothing to stop you if you win enough games. They did not cause the Bama game loss this year, poor decisions did. So what if we play Florida every year. Beat them and it's a giant feather in your hat especially if you loose a game. If you want to re align, put Mizzou in the west and send Bama packing. Not that it will ever happen but so what. Just win baby.

13) Comment by Milesthebest - 25/12/2012

BTW, I don't like criticizing without giving a solution, and here it is. The SEC SHOULD be reealigned in the following way which preserves the interdivisional rivals currently in a natural manner, is a geographic match, etc. SEC East - Florida, Georgia, S Carolina, Tennessee, Vanderbilt, Auburn, and Alabama SEC West - LSU, Arkansas, Texas A&M, Missouri, Miss State, Mississippi, Kentucky This makes the most sense geograhically and more important the natural rivalries are maintained....Alabama vs Tennessee, Auburn vs Georgia, etc. And the SEC can then have 2 rotational interdivisional games per year and it wouldn't be 14 years between LSU playing Tennessee at Knoxvile like it would be as it is right now.

14) Comment by Milesthebest - 25/12/2012

I have been advocating this for years. First, since when do Florida and LSU has ANY rivalry? Answer, they don't yet LSU got stuck with probably the strongest SEC East team as their permanent interdivisional rival. Second, the 2012 and 2013 rotational opponents are ridiculous for LSU vs Alabama. LSU could beat Alabama and STILL lose the SEC West when playing Florida and Georgia while Alabama get cupcakes Tennessee and Kentucky. And it isn't just the Alabama bias. I assume everyone has noticed that the SEC CG get played in the Georgia dome. Why is that? Georgia is NOT located in Atlanta. LSU has as much right to demand some CG in the Superdome as the SEC has in putting that game in Atlanta. And the baseball tournaments are located east ALWAYS also. Anyone who doesn't think that Alabama, Georgia, and Florida run the SEC is brain dead. When that 2013 schedule was announced, I said if I was AD I would have contacted the SEC immediately and said "sorry, but we won't be playing Georgia and Florida while Alabama gets special treatment with two of the worst teams in the SEC.

15) Comment by anonomous - 25/12/2012

I was pleased to see Rabalais noted the philosophy shared by the SEC and the 12 which is Athletics trump Academics. LSU's 148th scholastic ranking testifies to this. Admittedly it could be an easier transition to the 2nd weakest academic conference. Here it comes ....wait for it.....follow the TAF and Tiger fans throughout Leezeeanna, ignore the poor, spend more, and allow football to be your legacy. The Athletic problem is solved by beating Alabama which is not all THAT important.

16) Comment by mistert - 25/12/2012

Of course LSU is getting hosed by Slive, Alabama Mafia and media outlets. This has been going on since the schedule has been hijacked by a political cabal. Noting is on the surface, and its all surreptitious. If you have this inegalitarian mode of doing business, the majority will be placated and pleased. LSU has been effetively isolated and should have the leadership to take this to the media, and create a din and cacaphony, until justice is meted out. Alabama has an advantage, and most of the schools are getting perks to keep quiet. We do not have an AD to lead us in this endeavor. He seems to be aligned with the "contented sheep." He is fat, content and not going to rock the boat. He and his staff are geting what they want for now. LSU has not been served and this is true for quite some time.. With real leadership, we can work our way out of this unfair wasteland, but I reiterate, we need a real LSU leader. Honestly, it is not meant to disparage, but I think our AD needs to be replaced, when our new President/Chancellor iw appointed. Thank you Rabalais, it is your first piece, in a long time, that shows courage and leadership in journalism. It could be the "first proverbial shot," to lead the LSU AThletics Revolt. Why not align with Texas/Oklahoma and others to forge a new path?

17) Comment by Bighug - 25/12/2012

I must admit Scott had me going on a rampage before I turned the page! The SEC has been tops ever since the days when the University of the South at Sewanee was a member. I'd wager that Georgia Tech people now wish they had never left.

18) Comment by southlatiger - 25/12/2012

Unfair scheduling and Alabama's penchant for number one recruiting classes (fueled in no small part by a constant outflow of superstars from Louisiana) pretty much has our destiny sealed in the SEC. It looks like the Cholly Mac days of old are something we're going to have to get used to. Except now it will be Nick Saban filling the shoes of Bear Bryant.. That said, there is no better place outside the SEC for LSU to go. We may as well take our lumps and hope for the best.

19) Comment by AnyBodybutLSU - 25/12/2012

Boo Hoo Hoo, Ever since the Hated Nic Saban brought you guys out of the cellar you think you are something really special. Sounds to me like you're tired of getting you rear end kicked by Alabama, when it counts. Everybody in the world and especially the SEC doesnt want to kiss LSU's butt. You're only special in your own back yard. Everybody else is special in their own back yard. You guys think you should get whatever you want and we all should just bow down. Bull malarkey. LSU is a nationally prominent program in most sports, be satisfied and love it. Nobody is going to give you anything that you dont earn, just because you think you deserve it. Boo Hoo Hoo, we didnt beat Bama and Saban, we should take our ball and leave. Good-Bye, nobody is crying for you but you...

20) Comment by AnyBodybutLSU - 25/12/2012

****Comment Removed for Violation of Terms of Use****