Jindal says tax plan still being prepared

Gov. Bobby Jindal said Thursday everything is on the table as he tries to develop a plan that eliminates personal and corporate income taxes in a “revenue neutral” way.

“We don’t have a proposal yet,” Jindal said.

Jindal met briefly with local reporters following an event at the Governor’s Mansion honoring couples who had been married in excess of 70 years.

He fielded a half-dozen questions in his first availability to State Capitol reporters in about four months.

Questions ranged from tax plan development to Medicaid expansion — he continues to oppose it — and his poor showing in a national public opinion poll.

Jindal said he continues to meet with legislators and others to get their ideas before settling on a bill he will ask a legislator to submit for consideration in the legislative session, which begins April 8.

“It’s way too early to make decisions on what’s in and out of the plan,” he said.

Jindal said he is looking to develop a “flatter and simpler” tax system.

He said any proposal will provide subsidies to offset any negative impact on “vulnerable” populations.

Jindal repeated his general goals when asked whether the redistribution of taxes would result in a tax increase on military and state retirees as well as those drawing Social Security who don’t pay income tax currently or whether removing exemptions on severance taxes was under consideration.

A proposal to eliminate exemptions allowed to the severance tax, which is levied mostly on oil and gas producers, was listed on a handout Jindal shares with legislators at meetings in the Governor’s Mansion. He asks legislators to return the memos after the meetings.

The proposals also include an increase in the tax by about $1 on a pack of cigarettes, and increasing the state sales tax from 4 cents per dollar spent to nearly 6 cents. Current sales tax exemptions on food, drugs and utilities would continue, according to the handouts.

“Everything is on the table,” Jindal said, including the severance tax exemption and other credits. “That’s the way it should be.”

Louisiana has the fourth-lowest taxes in the U.S. when state and local taxes are combined, Jindal said. But the state is ranked as having the 32nd worse tax code, he said. “That makes no sense,” Jindal said.

He said the current tax code is “complicated and filled with exemptions, filled with loopholes ... Our goal is to simplify that.”

Jindal said the administration is looking at different ways to protect “vulnerable populations.” He said there could be something like an earned income tax credit or tax rebates.

The goal is to come up with a plan that insures that people in the low- to middle-income brackets “are not made worse off as a result of tax reform,” he said.

Jindal said he hopes to meet with President Barack Obama in the next couple of weeks.

Jindal said he has not changed his mind about Louisiana expanding Medicaid to cover some 400,000 uninsured residents even as other Republican governors have changed course.

He said he favors bringing health care access to more people but not through the “outdated” Medicaid program.

Jindal said the changes could be made to improve the current system, including in such areas as benefit design, eligibility determination, cost-sharing, premium assistance and using the private insurance model. He said something good could be developed if “the administration works with us.”

Asked about a poll released Tuesday showing his favorable job rating at 37 percent, Jindal said he’s never worried about voter surveys.

“The only poll I care about is the BCS poll and I’m glad to see the Tigers are ranked again high in the preseason,” Jindal said, referring to early football program rankings of the Bowl Championship Series.

“What we are focusing on is the future of Louisiana,” Jindal said.


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (17)


1) Comment by Warp7 - 15/02/2013

@folgers: seems like we have a clone of Jindal commenting here claiming he is not a fan of Jindal. Yet here we have him trying his best to critize the President in defense of little Bobby. This is probably a big time Jindal supporter, once again doing his best to spread the typical right wing propaganda as fact.

2) Comment by foldgers - 15/02/2013

I find it funny how when Obama says his increase in spending will not cost us a dime, when they actually do, people believe him and think it is possible. But when Bobby says it, he is lying and it is impossible. The dems believe that republicans are attacking the poor for not paying enough and then turn around and attack the rich for not paying enough. The loopholes that the "rich" use to lower their rates were all put there by politicians on both sides. You think there are no millionaire or billionaire democrats out there that do NOT use these evil loopholes? I don't see this plan as an attack on the poor or middle class. I see it as a way to get those who do not, but SHOULD, pay taxes to pay their taxes. With this kind of tax, you...YOU ALONE, can decide how much you pay in taxes by limiting the number of things you buy that you do not need, but just want because they are cool... like an Xbox or an Ipod or a $$50,000 car or whatever. The necessities, the items that the poor NEED to live, will NOT be taxed more than they are now. NOW, disclosure time, I am NOT a fan of Bobby. I do not like how he promised tansparancy, yet since elected has made almost everything he does behind closed doors a secret and not available for public records...but hey, Obama promised the same thing and has done the exact same thing Bobby has done. Remember before the Obamacare passed? Obama said the debates and discussions on it would be aired on CSPAN. He said it many many many times, in fact I think the said it about every bill that would be proposed while he is president...NOPE, never happened. With that said, yes, I am VERY interested in this tax plan. I want the drug dealers, the strippers, the ones who abuse welfare, the one who abuse unemployment, the people who work under the table for cash to never report income, to pay their share. If you do not want to pay more taxes, don't buy that $50,000 car. Settle for a $40,000 car. Simple. If I didn't want to pay property taxes, I wouldn't buy any. If I didn't want to pay to register a car, I wouldn't buy one, or I would buy a used small car to pay less. What is wrong with deciding how much you pay? Not to mention, having NO state income taxes taken out of my checks, no state income taxes when I win something big at the casino, no state income tax returns to file every year... How will this affect those who are less wealthy? Guess what? The wealthy would be paying much more in taxes when they buy their $100,000 cars, or private jets, or name brand clothing, or diamond jewelry or million plus dollar homes.... just my opinion.

3) Comment by for real - 15/02/2013

Why no tax plan YET, because Governor is out of state on the campaign tail drumming up money for GOP, touting his imaginary education reforms in Virginia.

4) Comment by markedwardmarchiafava - 15/02/2013

Notice it's his TAX plan, not SPENDING CUT plan.

5) Comment by RODEO CLOWN - 15/02/2013

BOBBY KNOWS BEST The true implications, meaning of Jindal's statement “Louisiana has the fourth-lowest taxes in the U.S. when state and local taxes are combined, … But the state is ranked as having the 32nd worse tax code...That makes no sense” is the bulk of Louisiana's tax burden should be the responsibility of local governments, not the state. This one statement presents Jindal's “revenue” plan in a nutshell and is emblematic of his “reinventing the wheel” approach to state revenue affairs. When Jindal talks “revenue neutral”, one should ask revenue neutral for who and what? In a Bobby Jindal world, state support for local government should be severed. The bulk of local expenditures should be paid out of revenue generated at the parish and city level through higher property taxes, higher sales taxes and possibly even local income taxes. This one admission is a “tell” on Jindal's part. Jindal is pulling a political ponzi scheme the ultimate goal of which is to adjust the revenue model of Louisiana in such a way as to place the tax burden of Louisiana squarely on the backs of the citizens, local and parish governments(on the backs of the citizens) and exempting corporations, businesses from any/all tax responsibility.

6) Comment by LiveStrongBR - 15/02/2013

All - "revenue neutral" by definition will include some winners and some losers. The overall outcome of my paying more and your paying less (or the reverse) is what makes a thing "revenue neutral". It does NOT mean that everyone wins and no one loses.

7) Comment by phil - 15/02/2013

If they get rid of the state income tax, clean up government, and then leave the sales and property tax where it is, I would personally be happy.

8) Comment by phil - 15/02/2013

It seems as if comments on local BR news stories keep disappearing or there are no comments allowed. Maybe that is a news story?

9) Comment by DMJ - 15/02/2013

Anyone who thinks Jindal has any intention of making this "revenue neutral" is a giant rube. This plan has two goals: shifting the cost of government from those with the most money to those with less and further exacerbating our ongoing budget shortfalls. Just watch....

10) Comment by Toldyouso - 15/02/2013

All this is is a shameless, selfish, newfound interest in appearing to care, now that he sees the poll numbers. When was the last time he deigned to talk to the local reporters? All of a sudden, he tals to the local media about not wanting to hurt vulnerable populations? (Him talking about "vulnerable populations is as sinister as a pedophile talking about "young, innocent children.") Gimme a break.

11) Comment by swinham - 15/02/2013

It's good to see the governor admit that there is no actual plan beyond elimination of income and franchise taxes. He will look good and the legislature bad when it comes time to actually come up with the balancing side of this equation.

12) Comment by crazycajun - 15/02/2013

If you believe anything coming out of this boy's mouth after all he's pulled you need to have ur head examined. NOTHING turns out to be what he says it is. He's a firm believer in the Karl Rove school of politics. "If u say it enough times they will believe it" seems to work just fine for booby.

13) Comment by Bouncer - 15/02/2013

The Further Adventures of Brownie the Clowny.

14) Comment by postscript56 - 15/02/2013

Why does no one call the governor on the way he talks about this stuff. Flatter is not fairer. Broading the tax base sound good but what he means is getting money from poor people who are currently not taxed "enough." Revenue neutral is a matter of perspective - the state might end up with about the same dollars, but if more comes out of my pocket so that some guy making a six figure income can escape the burden of income taxes, then that's not neutral at all. Why do we let the governor get away with this false rhetoric?

15) Comment by zealer99 - 14/02/2013

Getting the public to buy into any new plan is essential to getting their support and the public's support will be needed because it sounds like "his" plan will require Constitutional Amendments. Preparing a plan without public input will face automatic resentment and opposition at some level.

16) Comment by KilgoreTrout - 14/02/2013

Why would anyone in other states listen?> After 6 years, the results: LA is 1st in rates of gonorrhea and syphilis LA is 1st in auto loan defaults LA is the 2nd most miserable state. LA contains the area with the Highest Level of Senior Citizens Living in Poverty. LA Most Violent state (20 years in a row as of 2012) LA last in Camelot Index LA 1st in corruption convictions per capita LA 49th in student performance and progress LA has worst drivers LA least peaceful state LA 50TH in women’s health LA 49th in Health LA 1st in Murders per 100,000 population. LA 1st in Laziness. LA has least affordable auto insurance LA 2nd worst lawsuit climate LA gets an ‘F’ for Children’s Dental Health LA 1st in deaths from diabetes. LA 1st in Personal Income drop. LA 1st in the number of forms of legalized gambling. LA 1st in rate of children under 5 on the brink of hunger. LA 2nd Most Dangerous State LA Worst State for Nursing Homes LA 1st in Homeless Children LA 1st in Percentage of Homeless Veterans. LA 52nd in population gain LA 2nd in bad auto loans LA 49th in Higher Education LA 2nd WORST state for businesses LA 49TH in Business competitiveness and retention LA 47TH in child well-being LA has highest auto insurance rates in the nation LA 1st in the rate of corruption LA LAST in attracting college-educated workers LA 51st in child care LA 2nd in Black Homicides LA roads WORST in the nation. LA 49th in Savings LA 49TH in Longevity LA 50TH in per capita income LA 50TH in livability. LA 4th Highest Rate of Adult Obesity LA 1ST in wasting Medicare dollars LA 2ND in rate of men killing women LA 48TH in places to die LA 2ND in rate of healthcare uninsureds LA 49TH in social health LA 1ST in high school dropout rate LA public schools are 4TH worst LA 2ND cost of Homeowner’s Insurance LA 1ST in net population loss LA is ONLY southern state to lose population LA 1st in people moving out LA 1ST in Southeast in population exodus LA 1ST in rate of incarceration LA 1ST in number of child living in poverty LA 48TH in educational attainment of the population 25 years and over LA 1ST in number of women living in poverty LA LAST in bond ratings LA LAST in healthcare for seniors LA 1ST in abandoning public schools LA 2ND in DWI fatalities LA 46TH in Integrity LA is the 49TH “smartest state” LA WORST for healthcare for the elderly and disabled LA LAST in wealth of our citizens LA’s economy 49th out of 50 LA LAST in cash for research LA 1ST in teen use of steroids LA 1ST in the percentage of income used to pay rent LA 2ND in rate of poverty

17) Comment by Toldyouso - 14/02/2013

Here we go again... Jindal trying to reinvent himself to suit the occasion and trying to play the press and public. The poll comes out with bad news for him and all of a sudden he has a newfound interest in talking to the local press, protecting the vulnerable populations, not hurting the low and middle income groups. Can we just get this selfish monster out if office? Anyone starting a recall drive?