Income gap high in state

Show caption
/

Louisiana ranks sixth among states with the largest income disparity between the rich and the poor, according to a report released Wednesday by a national policy group.

The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, which examines policies affecting low- and moderate-income families and individuals, found that the average income of the richest 5 percent of households in Louisiana is 14.1 times larger than the income of the bottom 20 percent of households.

“The divide between the poorest and richest households in Louisiana is among the worst in the country,” said Elizabeth McNichol, who co-authored the report.

The report ranked Louisiana sixth in the greatest disparity between the top and bottom income households in the late 2000s. The gap was greater in New Mexico, Arizona, California, Georgia and New York.

Jan Moller, director of the Baton Rouge-based Louisiana Budget Project, said Louisiana’s tax code is tilted toward the wealthy.

The Louisiana Budget Project is an arm of the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.

He said the state gives away hundreds of millions of dollars a year in tax breaks while relying heavily on sales tax revenue, which penalizes the poor.

Moller suggested legislators could consider doubling the state earned income tax credit or increasing a child care tax credit during next year’s session.

Gov. Bobby Jindal already said the session will focus on the state’s tax code. Exactly what changes the governor will push is unclear.

“We hope this report serves as a wake-up call to legislators and policy makers,” Moller said.

The earned income tax credit benefits low- and middle-income taxpayers who work. The child care tax credit helps parents with child care expenses.

Tim Barfield, executive counsel for the state Department of Revenue, declined to comment on the report.

Barfield’s communications director, Douglas Baker, said the governor’s package will focus on making the state’s tax code fairer, flatter and simpler for all citizens. “The best way to lift the poor out of poverty is a job, and that is our hope as we look toward the upcoming legislative session,” Baker said in a prepared statement.

Moller said he hopes the legislative debate will be undertaken with the state’s lower income households in mind.

He said increasing the earned income tax credit would help struggling households pay for car repairs, school clothes, rent and debt. The money would go back into the economy, he said.

Moller said the report took a snapshot of income after federal, but not state, taxes were removed. He said the income analyzed for the report takes into account federal benefits such as food stamps.

He said the governor needs to boost the income of people in the bottom class rather than lower tax rates for corporations that already do well.

Moller said he has not raised his ideas with the Governor’s Office. “Our point of view is certainly no secret,” he said.

McNichol said the gap between rich households and low- to middle-income households is growing nationwide.

The report blames the gap on stagnant or modest growth in wages for the nonwealthy and a decline in the real value of the minimum wage.

The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities said states can close the gap by:

  • Raising the minimum wage.
  • Undoing cuts to unemployment insurance benefits.
  • Ending states’ heavy reliance on sales taxes and user fees.

Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (37)


1) Comment by Chucky - 16/11/2012

Some people have oil on their land and some do not, some own a lot of good land and some do not, some have a really good job and some do not, some have a great education and some do not, instead of suggesting we give the $ away ( Raising the minimum wage. Undoing cuts to unemployment insurance benefits.) i did like the 3rd idea,(Ending states’ heavy reliance on sales taxes and user fees) am open to ending other tax's also. Strive harder so that your children can do better, you probably will not.

2) Comment by nimby? - 16/11/2012

NearBarbarian , we are all afforded the same opportunities , allowed to choose the path we wish . should I be asked to bear the burden of someone one half/third my age , stronger than me , just as smart because they chose to be irresponsible ?

3) Comment by gofigger - 16/11/2012

NB- How long should this lifestyle be allowed? I hear the best way out of alcoholism is cold turkey.......and it can be done, if you have the will. Government finacial help should be just for people who have the will to move on, not to hang drapes and make it a home.

4) Comment by NearBarbarian - 16/11/2012

I see, gf, nothing to add but dog whistles and straw men (or straw women in this case). DMJ is not alone in being tired of the tired fallacies. And nimby?, so not really--because many of the people who need jobs the most do not have reliable transportation, have money to buy a whole new wardrobe, have the best educations, have the best home environments, and so on. I can already predict the kind of reaction people such as you, gf, and others will present. But if you're going to insist that everyone else deal with the cold, hard facts of reality, then so are you.

5) Comment by nimby? - 16/11/2012

and some families are entering a 4th generation of the cycle of poverty , in many cases living under the same roof , still voting D , apparently not learning from the mistakes of the previous , sad .

6) Comment by DMJ - 16/11/2012

The conspiracy theory that Democrats look out for the needy because such help will keep them needy and, thus, in debted to the Democrats is getting really tired. It's not based on reason and it's offensive in a number of ways. Enough already.

7) Comment by nimby? - 16/11/2012

there are jobs in the state . employers are looking for qualified applicants . you know , people who are prompt , reliable , know how to dress , act , speak , can read , write , understand math , have knowledge in the pertaining field , good attitude , work ethic ....

8) Comment by gofigger - 16/11/2012

NB - how many do not enter a marriage, afraid to lose government support for their brood. This kind of support has been in place long enough to prove it doesn't work, but it sure provides a good voting base.

9) Comment by DMJ - 16/11/2012

Some interesting points. Let me offer a (real life) liberal's perspective. 1. We don't want redistribution for the sake of redistribution. It has practical benefits- education, health care, infrastructure, etc. It's not punishment. 2. We don't like anyone abusing the system any more than you do. We're just not willing to forsake the people who are genuinely in need in order to stick it to the "slugs." 3. Income inequality is bad for capitalism. Don't believe me? Read up on the various communist revolutions If it seems like the few have too much at the expense of too many, history has shown us that we can expect trouble 4. Liberals aren't communists. We might be Social Democrats (to borrow from the British) but we're not communists. Sure, there are some communists, but they are very few and far between and have very little political sway, even with us far-lefties. 5. We believe in hard work, family and morality just like you do. We just have different views on how to best govern.

10) Comment by NearBarbarian - 16/11/2012

I think Agagent is implying that he and others of his set are prepared to hire people, offering them living wages, benefits, and an opportunity to enter the middle class. Now we're talking!

11) Comment by agagent - 16/11/2012

Envy and blaming the rich sounds a lot like the community organizer’s theory on poverty . . . You are poor because someone else is rich and your form of justice dictates using political power to take back the wealth you “deserve.”

12) Comment by agagent - 16/11/2012

Current public assistance programs fail to lift people from poverty, and redistributing wealth has never worked. We are only a couple of generations removed from when everyone had fewer material things than those in poverty today. More than material things, many in poverty lack personal responsibility, education, employable skills, values, work ethics, etc. Living on public assistance is usually a waste of a life. We need more to be productive and help the economy and support government services.

13) Comment by NearBarbarian - 16/11/2012

Before getting back on topic, some brief replies to comments below: 1) Many poor people do work, multiple jobs, and that is still not enough to make ends meet. 2) Some poor people will not take a job/increase in hours because doing so will put them in a higher pay bracket, which will cause them to lose assistance, even though the extra job/pay increase will not reach sustenance level. 3) The majority of people who receive assistance do not abuse it. 4) The amount of the budget that goes to assistance is negligible when compared to other budget expenditures, such as multi-million and -billion dollar tax cuts, kick backs, and subsidies to various companies/contractors/special interests. Back on topic: what is remarkable, if not disturbing, is that more people are not outraged by an environment in which such an income disparity is possible. Here we are in a state that is home to a major international port; has one of the most important waterways in the country flowing through it; contains incredible amounts of renewable natural resources; has a diverse geography that could support all sorts of innovative, non-petroleum-based industries; has more post-secondary education sites than you can shake a stick at; is home to a culturally diverse and unique population; and boasts a vibrant history. Regardless of all that potential and positivity, Louisiana is at the bottom of almost every national list--as well as at the top of lists that should not bring pride. Scapegoating the poor, minorities, and people down and out on their luck will not hide the deeper problems; nor will it raise Louisiana out of the sinkhole that, in many ways, the state's most economically and politically affluent citizens have created.

14) Comment by gofigger - 16/11/2012

DMJ - I think agagent is referring to slugs who have learned to USE the system and are living a easier life than those working to support the system. Is that too hard to comprehend?

15) Comment by DMJ - 16/11/2012

You've got a dark, twisted view of the world, agagent.

16) Comment by agagent - 16/11/2012

Studies have shown that a typical family living in poverty could be consuming more resources than a typical working family. The official measure of poverty uses cash income only and does include non-cash benefits. A realistic view of poverty in America should include all benefits received. The huge amounts of public and private money thrown at poverty has created a poverty advocacy industry. They need poverty, or at least the appearance of poverty, to continue to exist.

17) Comment by agagent - 16/11/2012

People receive Earned Income Tax Credit based on cash earned and not counting the value of other public assistance. Taxpayers pay about $60,000 per family in poverty so taxpayers could already be paying for food, clothes, shelter, medical costs, Obamaphones, heating, and transportation for EITC recipients. Public assistance should be consolidated, not divided up into more programs.

18) Comment by agagent - 16/11/2012

The Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) has transferred more than $60 billion in FY2011 from taxpayers to about twenty-five million households. Illegal immigrants receive a disproportionate share. Up to one-third of all EITC returns could be fraudulent because of: illegal multiple returns, phony Social Security numbers, or claims of non-existent children or spouses.

19) Comment by bourbon-soda - 16/11/2012

Uncoupling economic productivity from income is ultimately bad for business and everything else.

20) Comment by DMJ - 15/11/2012

I know this may seem hard to believe for some, but did you ever consider that income inequality could be BAD for business? Think about it.

21) Comment by DMJ - 15/11/2012

How does the earned income tax credit, which is just that- a tax credit, also known as less taxes paid by taxpayers, simultaneously cost taxpayers too? This makes absolutely no sense. And I'm sorry...but you can't honestly think that our economic system is NOT biased towards those that have more money, can you? This defies all logic and reason. It's not a myth. It's common sense. If you have more money, it's easier to make money. If you don't have money...it's hard to make money. Duh. I remember learning about this using paper coins in kindergarten. I'm not uneducated. I'm not ignorant. Care to explain yourself, jeff? (this should be good...)

22) Comment by jeffsadow - 15/11/2012

@agagent you are very correct about the leftist CPPB/LBP and the deleterious effects of the EITC, which costs LA taxpayers $50 million a year.Income inequality means absoluty nothing. What matters is absolute income levels. Obsessing over relative distances implies somehow that an economic system is biased towards the higher earners, largely a myth in America (outside of a bit of minor crony capitalism) but, regrettably, a powerful myth entrancing the uneducated, ignorant, and ideologically motivated, as recent election results show.

23) Comment by bourbon-soda - 15/11/2012

According to [ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_U.S._states_by_GDP_per_ca pita_(nominal) ] Louisiana ranks 24th out of 50 states plus Puerto Rico and the District of Columbia, putting it above the median in economic productivity. According to [ http://www.people.vcu.edu/~mamcdani/Publications/McDaniel% 20(2006)%20Estimating%20state%20IQ.pdf ] Louisiana has an estimated mean IQ of 95.3, below the median. According to [ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Household_income_in_the_United_S tates ] Louisiana ranks 41st, below the median. The above implies a right-skewed curve. A low median household income with high mean GDP per capita and low mean IQ suggests that some Louisianians are seriously overachieving. Effort should be made to find out what they are doing and get the rest of the populace to do likewise rather than punish those pulling Louisiana's part of the GDP above the national average.

24) Comment by dday198 - 15/11/2012

no no no Attila you got me wrong brother. i say give'm another tax break, repeal davis bacon or any other wage law abolish OSHA let them police themselves is that good for you?

25) Comment by phil - 15/11/2012

Generally speaking when you have government officials that make more than $250,000 a year (RDA) and we give about $450,000 a year in taxes to an affiliate of the BRAC and then you have all of these NMTCs and other tax credit schemes and add the state projects that were created (with high salaries) just to create jobs and the high sales taxes and the high fees for government services, then add all of the darn studies that keep being made over and over, then add all of those TIF areas and subsidies for the rich, then add increasing property taxes that poor people also pay directly or indirectly - maybe you might start figuring out why the poor are poor in this area and in the state. Also you might even start to realize where the money is actually going to. Take from the poor and give to the rich??

26) Comment by Attila - 15/11/2012

@Terdguy and dday: How about doing a little research before you make erroneous statements and try to pass them off as facts. Go to the IRS website and research the EITC. You will find that a family of 5 making 49.5K per year are eligible for over 5K in EITC....dday...I see that you are quick to down those entities that actually do create most of the jobs, that being small business AND large companies....but you don't offer any solutions to your percieved problem...I surmise that it would be raising corporate taxes and taxes on the wealthy but that is the same old suggestions that have been tried and failed...how 'bout it dd...suggestions?

27) Comment by RobertBigelow - 15/11/2012

Due in no small part to an extended out-migration of well-educated and highly-skilled young adults who are looking for something better.

28) Comment by DMJ - 15/11/2012

This is what Trickle Down looks like - relatively low unemployment, high income disparity. Also, Louisiana being a "right-to-work" state has a lot to do with it. Unions were the biggest driver of middle-class economic mobility over the past century. Now, they've lost relevance/prevalence. In a state like Louisiana, that has a high % of blue collar and service indudstry workers, employers are not forced or even likely to offer high wages or good benefits. This is the result.

29) Comment by tball - 15/11/2012

Right on Ducklyluve! Obama, Proud Mary Landrieu, Richmond are tremendous in creating jobs, Huh dday198..

30) Comment by Shihan - 15/11/2012

Thoughtful community collaboration that includes: local schools; youth, and families; business, government; faith based and health institutions, and law enforcement, will decrease the income gap, arrest crime and promote pro-social human development. Human Development is a holistic concept and measured by the presence or absence of illnesses, disease, unmet needs, and all the other factors which contribute to the ability to live a long and healthy life, to have access to knowledge, and to have a decent standard of living. Other capabilities and freedoms that many view as essential to a fulfilling life include personal and community security, spirituality, a healthy living environment and access to services and necessities, cultural identity, political participation, self-confidence, community bonds, dignity, and equality.

31) Comment by Duckyluve - 15/11/2012

How about get up off your lazy rearend and go to work. Get an education so you can get a better job that pays more money.

32) Comment by dday198 - 15/11/2012

surrounded by chem. plants and refineries and the 6th poorest state in the country. just keep on taking care of the job creators and we'll be ok. let's keep on electing the vitters the landrys the cassidys and the jindals.

33) Comment by agagent - 15/11/2012

Some of our users fees do not pay the cost of administering them.

34) Comment by agagent - 15/11/2012

I agree that we are too dependent on sales taxes for government revenue.

35) Comment by agagent - 15/11/2012

Earned income credit is full of abuse and difficult to police. Streamlining assistance makes more sense. Their data ignores the value of public assistance received by the low wage earners. Take the number of families living in poverty divided into what government spends on public assistance and an average family living in poverty receives more than $60,000. Those assistance programs are not doing what they were designed to do: provide temporary assistance for those living in poverty until they can re-enter the work force.

36) Comment by agagent - 15/11/2012

The agenda of CBPP is definitely partisan, and the “research” is not scientific evidence supporting their preconceived solutions. They believe in wealth redistribution and increasing government interference in the economy . . . the agenda of one political party. Increasing the same failed public assistance programs like earned income credit will not increase prosperity for anyone except those who depend on the poor for their votes.

37) Comment by Terd Handler - 15/11/2012

This report is stating the obvious. The big question is what to do about it. The earned income credit is a misnomer because the people who qualify for it don't really have any income or pay any taxes, so it is basically a giveaway funded by the middle class.