Jindal offers plan to collect debts

The Jindal administration vowed Friday to step up efforts to collect more than $1 billion owed to state government for environmental quality monitoring, income taxes, college tuition and other expenses.

Commissioner of Administration Paul Rainwater, the governor’s chief budget aide, outlined a three-point plan that calls for creating more robust collection efforts, setting firm payment deadlines and punishing debtors.

To put teeth into the efforts, Rainwater said the state needs to consider withholding tax refunds and establishing late penalties.

“Any revenue that’s out there, we want to capture,” he told the Cash Management Review Board during a meeting at the State Capitol.

As part of the new approach, the Jindal administration advertised for “private-sector expertise” in collecting and analyzing what is owed by college students, private insurance companies and others.

Amid state government struggling to scrape together dollars for public services, the Cash Management Review Board is tackling the issue of money owed to the state. In accounting terms, the unpaid bills are known as receivables.

The receivables range from college tuition installment payments to medical charges. Totaled, they added up to more than $1 billion on March 31.

Initially, different ideas emerged to deal with the problem.

State Rep. Chris Broadwater, R-Hammond, successfully sponsored legislation earlier this year to establish a pilot program to sell, securitize or auction portions of the state’s long-term delinquent accounts, or receivables.

State Treasurer John Kennedy pushed to build a centralized debt collection agency within state government.

The Jindal administration produced its own plan Friday and promised to consider selling a portion of the state’s debt at a discount in order to generate cash.

By selling the debt, collecting it would become someone else’s problem.

“This is fantastic,” Broadwater said after listening to Rainwater’s presentation. “It’s comprehensive. It’s strategic.”

Rainwater said he wants to select a consultant in October and then spend six months developing policies to streamline collections, set up payment schedules and establish new penalties and fines.

One problem, Rainwater said, is that state agencies’ accountants operate by different rules when it comes to demanding payment. Early action needs to be taken on delinquent payments instead of waiting until they are 180 days past due, he said. Timelines need to be set for debts to be forwarded to collection agents, he said.

“Our accountants ... don’t have the expertise that’s needed to collect some of these debts,” Rainwater said.

The penalties under consideration include withholding tax refunds and state work contracts from people and companies who owe the state money.

Rainwater said state government needs to make paying debt easier by embracing electronic payment methods.

Debts that reach “adolescence” need to be tackled either by full-time collection agents within state government or by a private company hired by the state, Rainwater said.

Kennedy said the problem of collecting receivables predates Gov. Bobby Jindal, who took office in 2008.

“As long as I can remember we’ve carried between $1 billion and $1.6 billion in receivables. If we can just improve that a fraction, that’s substantial money,” Kennedy said.

Rainwater said the problem will be resolved over time instead of at once.

He said a budget deficit is not resolved overnight.

“We’re working together,” Kennedy told him. “This is kind of like ‘The Love Boat.’ ”


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (9)


1) Comment by Bouncer - 16/09/2012

And a P.S. to my last post. Everyone should bear in mind that Sadow (as far as I can determine) has a Ph.D. in "political science".....not rocket science. You do not have to be especially intellectually gifted to earn a doctorate in political science. You simply have to be willing to leap through all the academic hoops and jump all of the hurdles. In other words, hang in there. Anyone of average intelligence can do so. Besides, if he were a scholar of any tremendous capability, he would have a job at an Ivy League school, instead of rotting away at LSU-Shreveport. I'd say that he has risen to his level of incompetence. Of course, I mean that in the nicest possible way. :-)

2) Comment by Bouncer - 16/09/2012

Speaking of Sadow, on a 5 point scale, his students have ranked him 2.5 on "overall quality." (Source: ratemyprofessors dot com). In other words, he's around a C+. Here are a few excerpts from his student evaluations: "I emailed him several times about different things, and his responses were short, rude, and not helpful. He's very boring, but the weekly quizzes are straight from the notes. Take this class with Dr. Pederson instead! When asked for in depth explanations & guidance excuses and insults are made. I find him to be sarcastic and not very helpful when it comes to valid student pleas for clarity." These are from several different students, and although there are some positive reviews, the negatives far outweigh them. I could go on, but the samples speak for themselves. Students do not say such things just because they can. Where there's smoke, there's fire. Evidently, the arrogant persona he projects in this forum is a fairly accurate indicator of his true self.

3) Comment by ex-louisianian - 15/09/2012

It is beyond me how people can defend such terrible government as has been produced from the Jindal administration, unless, of course, they were paid to or simply ignorant of alternatives.

4) Comment by danielf - 15/09/2012

Why does the administration act like this is going out for bid? They have already given the project to Deloitte and Touche. I know for a fact that they've flown D&T people in from Texas already to give them all the details.

5) Comment by ex-louisianian - 15/09/2012

This from a political scientist who doesn't even know what a communist is, and uses "socialist" as a strawman to buttress strings of bad arguments. It is small wonder how this individual even has tenure, but he clearly reflects the level of professionalism that one can expect out of a (non-Tulane, non-LSU) Louisiana institution. No, I take that back: I had wonderful teachers in elementary school and professors in LSU who exposed me to alternative viewpoints (i.e., an education), and I expect that the smaller schools have professors who are as dedicated. But this state is dismantling through attrition its education system, and this dishonest fellow defends the process.

6) Comment by jeffsadow - 15/09/2012

@whatnow Yes, from the half-baked argumentation and deficit of knowledge inherent in his posts (here and elsewhere), I'd say the state's overall IQ went up when he left!

7) Comment by ex-louisianian - 15/09/2012

Truth be told, I have little care how you all mismanage your state government, except to say that many innocent people suffer the calamitous, entirely predictable consequences of it. But the GOP has seen fit to consider Jindal a future presidential candidate. Even if Jindal is not nominated, the GOP intends to inflict "Jindalism" -- i.e, false economy and bad government misnamed "limited government" -- in one way or another onto the US at large. In that sense, as stated by another blogger, Louisiana is "Coming Attractions" for a future GOP administration or Congress.

8) Comment by Whatnow - 15/09/2012

@ex-louisianian, by the way you constantly belittle the people of our state, I am so glad that you are a ex-louisianian!

9) Comment by ex-louisianian - 15/09/2012

The crux of the article is this: "State Treasurer John Kennedy pushed to build a centralized debt collection agency within state government. The Jindal administration produced its own plan Friday and promised to consider selling a portion of the state’s debt at a discount in order to generate cash." Kennedy's plan will put debt collection, both the unpaid bills and the amounts successfully recovered, onto the state budget. Jindal's plan will sell the state debt at pennies per dollar to private debt collectors (always and up-and-up bunch) so that "the state" (ahem) will receive its cut when/if the debt is paid. The first plan is honest government; the second gives well-connected cronies myriad opportunities for untraceable kickbacks from the contracted collection agency. That this is considered a choice only stems from the irreducible stupidity of this state's population.