White’s civil service status disputed

White’s ability to appeal depends on civil service classification

The attorney for ousted Baton Rouge Police Chief Dewayne White said she is pursuing at least two avenues of appeal and has not ruled out filing a lawsuit to remedy what she considers a questionable termination.

After months of clashing with the local police union, White was fired Wednesday, less than two years into his tenure. White’s attorney, Jill Craft, has said White will appear before Mayor-President Kip Holden next week to argue he should be allowed to continue as police chief.

Craft said she also is preparing an appeal to the local Municipal Fire and Police Civil Service Board, a five-member panel that could vote to reinstate White.

But the question of whether White is legally entitled to a civil service appeal has become as divisive an issue as his abrupt dismissal.

City-parish officials maintained last week that White is considered an “unclassified employee” under the local Plan of Government.

“He serves at the pleasure of the mayor,” said Murphy J. Foster III, an attorney representing Holden in White’s termination. “The responsibility of the mayor-president is to refer first to the Plan of Government, and our position is that he is not a classified employee.”

Robert S. Lawrence, deputy state examiner of the Louisiana Municipal Fire and Police Civil Service, said the distinction between classified and unclassified is critical, as unclassified employees have no standing to appeal to the civil service board.

“The law is very clear,” Lawrence said. “Chief White is very definitely in the classified service of the Municipal Fire and Police Civil Service System as the police chief of the city of Baton Rouge.”

Lawrence cited a state statute — R.S. 33:2481 — that lists police chiefs and assistant chiefs among classified positions.

“If there is a provision under the local ordinances that provides that the police chief is unclassified with respect to the Municipal Fire and Police Civil Service System and his benefits that are afforded him as a classified employee, that would be an incorrect assumption inasmuch as the local ordinance, in my understanding, cannot supersede state law,” Lawrence said.

But Foster said Lawrence had “obviously” failed to read the city-parish Plan of Government.

“We’re reviewing all the circumstances,” Foster said. “But our position at this point is that he is not a classified servant.”

Parish Attorney Mary E. Roper referred questions to Foster about whether White is classified.

“That matter is being handled by the mayor’s office,” she said, “and we really were not involved so I really cannot give an opinion on that.”

Lawrence said White has a window of 15 days from his dismissal in which to appeal to the civil service board.

“After that, he has no standing,” he said.

The civil service board has 30 days to grant an appeal hearing, though Lawrence said boards have differed in their interpretations of whether the hearing must be held or merely granted within that time frame.

White would have the opportunity to call witnesses during the public hearing. Holden also would be given the opportunity to present reasons White was terminated.

“The hearing and investigation that the board will hold will allow both sides to give their side of the story in a sense, and the civil service board will determine, based upon the preponderance of evidence that is presented to them during the hearing, whether or not the appointing authority (Holden) acted in good faith for cause,” Lawrence said. “That is the test that they’re looking at.”

Bryan Taylor, chairman of the local Municipal Fire and Police Civil Service Board, did not return calls seeking comment last week but said in a text message he is aware of the conflicting positions on whether White is entitled to an appeal.

“If it is determined that Chief White’s appeal will be presented before the Municipal Fire and Police Civil Service Board, then he will be afforded the same as all classified employees that have appealed before him,” Taylor said in the text message.

The civil service board is made up of five members. LSU, Southern University and the mayor-president’s office each have appointments approved by the Metro Council. The Police Department and Fire Department elect one representative each.

White appeared before the civil service board last month to answer a claim that he failed to discipline a police captain accused of committing perjury during a previous civil service board meeting. He asked for a continuance to prepare his case, but the board voted unanimously against opening an investigation, saying the complainant had chosen the wrong venue for the criminal allegations.

But the civil service board also has reversed actions take by White.

In December, board members overturned a 15-day suspension given to Sgt. Robert Schilling, who had been accused of pulling a woman out of a ditch by her hair after an altercation that led to her arrest.

White had suspended Schilling for allegedly violating two departmental policies: Command of temper and conduct unbecoming of an officer. He told the board Schilling’s conduct had been “egregious and warranted disciplinary action.”

But the board voted unanimously to vacate the officer’s suspension.

Asked how she feels about White’s chances before the civil service board, Craft said, “It’s like any civil service hearing — you don’t know until the board votes.”

If White does not get the answer he’s looking for, Craft said, he can appeal to the courts.

“For better or for worse, our court system has always been the great equalizer,” Craft said. “It’s not full of political appointees. There are folks who are elected and accountable not only to the citizenry, but also to the law.”


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (15)


1) Comment by On_The_Fence - 11/02/2013

White knew he would be accountable to the Mayor when he accepted the Mayor's appointment. The reason Chiefs are appointed is it is implied that the two shall get along well together (meaning Holden would have the last say on Dept. matters) Something happened but no matter what it was, it's still the Mayor's decision. White should fight it if it's on principle but know he is fired and nothing will change that. Meanwhile a new Chief is needed to complete Holden's control over the City/Parish. Is it right? Who's to say. Bring the matter up before the Council and change the law NOW.

2) Comment by Hello Baton Rouge - 11/02/2013

You cannot write local ordinances that trump state ordinances much like you cannot write state laws that trump federal laws. The funniest part of this entire debacle will be when the city realizes that the Mayor has no idea what he's doing, other than trading support from the union for the head of Chief White, which will be over turned. Whats wrong Holden, you didn't learn about Civil Service Procedure while tossing back a few mixed drinks every night on 3rd street?

3) Comment by Chucky - 11/02/2013

The Plan of Government for the City Of Baton Rouge does not trump State Law, nor should it, what is decent and right. Hope the Chief gets his job back does not resign, but kicks both street and internal back door that should not hit them in the behind. Uh, I mean, I support Chief White. Last post on this till the 18th.

4) Comment by Duckyluve - 11/02/2013

Why would white want to try and keep this job? It obvious that the useless mayor is going to protect the useless union president. All 3 of them are pitiful leaders

5) Comment by phil - 11/02/2013

The issue of classified vs unclassified might have to be settled in a court also. However, the following is from the Plan of Government. so I think Mr. White still gets a chance to speak regardless: - " In the case of any officer or employee who is not a member of the classified service as provided by Chapter 9 of the Plan of Government or by any general laws applicable to the City of Baton Rouge, the Mayor-President shall, before he may exercise the power of removal, first serve on the officer or employee sought to be removed a notice in writing setting forth the grounds of the proposed removal and fixing a time and place, not less than ten days after the service of such notice, at which the officer or employee shall be given an opportunity to be heard thereon. After such hearing, which shall be public at the option of the officer or employee, the action of the Mayor-President shall be final. The Mayor-President may suspend from duty for not more than sixty days any such officer or employee pending final action. (As amended October 20, 2007)"

6) Comment by gary - 11/02/2013

Speakthetruth: Hate to break it to you - Chief White works for the Mayor - if you don't believe me read the The Plan of Government for the City Of Baton Rouge - it is very amusing that some council members wanted to be informed about the Mayor's decision to fire White. He can dismiss department heads anytime (for reason) he feels like it.

7) Comment by speakthetruth - 11/02/2013

White, and the other applicants, took a Civil Service test they had to pass before he could be considered for Police Chief. The test scores are approved by the Civil Service Board before they are released. White was called before the Civil Service Board to answer allegations of not administering punishment to a civil servant that worked for him. Now the mayor says White is not covered by Civil Service. Hmmmm, something really stinks here and the smell is coming from the union office. The Chief of Police is covered by Civil Service so he doesn't have to answer to the mayor, and so the Chief's office won't become a part of the mayor's (and union) corruption. The Chief of Police is selected by the mayor only after passing a oral and written test. From that point on the mayor should have no influence. Electing a chief? I am concerned the same people that re- elected Kippy would elect a chief just like him. If the chief is elected he then becomes a politician..... You could get another leduff, who knows what to say and how to lie without blinking. Politicians are the bottom feeders of America.

8) Comment by phil - 11/02/2013

On a broader issue, concerning merging the 2 police forces, I think this issue needs to be considered in that discussion. We certainly do NOT want to have a merged system that is controlled by local politics and one local politician. By the way, you might look up the constitutionalsheriffs.com website.

9) Comment by localgal - 11/02/2013

This is all so damaging to our city and our parish's reputation. We are already getting known as the murder capital of Louisiana, much less the United States. Whenever someone stonewalls as Kip Holden has done and then hires outside counsel to boot, you can bet there are a whole slew of issues and conflicts that someone does not want to come to light. Holden is digging a political hole even deeper than he needed to. Just say why you fired him, unless, of course, it's not a good reason. I am with Councilwoman Marcelle. Let's make the police chief an elected postion, just like the Sheriff. That way, if the public, the police union or the Mayor doesn't like the job he's done, then they can speak with their vote at the next election. Holden has a history of poor communication and micro-managing, plus paying unbelievable amounts of money to the yes men he has in his administration. He's like a Democratic mini-version of Jindal. You do his bidding or you're fired. That's why the parish attorney isn't about to say anything. The B.R. police have to start doing their job better. White was trying to make that happen, but he stepped on too many good ole boy toes and it cost him his job.

10) Comment by Bouncer - 11/02/2013

I figured the powers that be would pull some kind of dirty trick like this. If you cannot do things on the up and up, then search out loopholes. If no loophole exists, then create one.

11) Comment by ABayouBoy - 11/02/2013

“He serves at the pleasure of the mayor,” said Murphy J. Foster III, In other words, his actions are supposed to please Kippy, or else.... Take the politics out of it, give the man his job back, and let the union know who's the boss. I'm not against unions, but let there be a balance of power that is best for all concerned.

12) Comment by Chucky - 11/02/2013

I believe that Chief' Whit's foremost attention and focus was to the safety and welfare of Baton Rouge and his jurisdiction. I believe Holden and the Union was to them selves first and others afterward.

13) Comment by phil - 11/02/2013

What does the Plan of Government say about contracting out an Assistant Chief Administrative Officer and paying him over $100,000 per year? I think State law has to be followed in this situation and if there is a conflict with the Plan of Government then that should be settled as a separate issue before Mr. White can just be fired. Also, if the Mayor does not want Mr. White to talk in a meeting where both can tell their sides of this story, then maybe Mr. White can hold a meeting of his own with a reporter and just tell his side of the story. I think it is too late for Mr. White to just resign into the sunset without the public knowing ALL of what is going on.

14) Comment by gary - 11/02/2013

On, dis gonna be gud. Mr. Mike's (AKA Governor Foster) son versus JIll Craft. Better than a off Broadway show!

15) Comment by imjussayin - 11/02/2013

So we have a Parish Attorney's office - yet the Mayor's Office hires outside council?