Murder suspect wasn’t  monitored

A convicted rapist accused of fatally stabbing a Baton Rouge woman this month had been tapped for lifelong electronic monitoring and other stringent reporting requirements, records show.

But a state panel withdrew its recommendation that he be deemed a “sexually violent predator” amid shifting criteria for the designation, corrections officials said.

The prisoner, Jerome M. Mellion, 51, was booked Jan. 11 with first-degree murder in the death of 48-year-old Wanda Ortiz, police said. Ortiz’s family members allege that Mellion had been stalking Ortiz in the days before her death and had tried to sexually assault her.

“Apparently, there had been at least three to four different instances with this man,” said Shawana Morales, Ortiz’s 32-year-old daughter.

Morales said Ortiz’s boyfriend had reported the behavior to police. The warrant for Mellion’s arrest on murder charges refers to a Jan. 4 incident in which Mellion allegedly arrived at Ortiz’s home with a shotgun and threatened to kill her boyfriend.

Mellion has a lengthy criminal history, court records show, and his alleged attack at Ortiz’s Plank Road apartment was not his first involving a local woman.

In 1989, Mellion broke into a woman’s bedroom window and raped her while holding a .38-caliber pistol against her head, threatening to kill her entire family if she made a noise, according to court records. The victim in that case did not know Mellion well but “had seen him and knew part of his name,” police said at the time.

On the second day of trial, Mellion pleaded guilty to a lesser forcible-rape charge and was sentenced to 20 years in prison, court records show. After being released three times on parole — his parole was revoked each time — Mellion was freed from state custody in October 2011, said Pam Laborde, a Department of Public Safety and Corrections spokeswoman.

Laborde said Mellion had completed his term and “was not required to be under supervision with DOC.”

Casey Rayborn Hicks, an East Baton Rouge Parish Sheriff’s Office spokeswoman, said Mellion was a registered sex offender and was up to date on his registration at the time of his arrest.

The Louisiana Sex Offender Assessment Panel, which evaluates sex offenders and child predators upon their release, initially recommended a 19th Judicial District Court judge deem Mellion a “sexually violent predator,” a designation reserved for criminals who pose a public safety risk because of an inability to control their behavior.

State law defines a sexually violent predator as someone convicted of a sex crime “who has a mental abnormality or antisocial personality disorder that makes the offender likely to engage in predatory sexually violent offenses.”

Mellion had been recommended for the designation based on criteria that changed after a court challenge, Laborde said. After the Louisiana Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the panel in 2011, reversing a lower court’s ruling, corrections officials revised those criteria “to reflect evidence-based practices and other research, taking into account how and why other states made these determinations,” Laborde said.

Seeking a more-scientific approach in their deliberations, corrections officials looked to other states such as Texas that had similar laws, as the number of Louisiana prisoners deemed by the panel to be sexually violent predators or child sex predators was unusually high.

“Panels were convened to reconsider all cases that were previously recommended to the courts as either a SVP or CSP,” Laborde added. “When the panel reconsidered Mellion’s case, it determined that he did not meet the revised criteria for a (sexually violent predator) and therefore withdrew the initial recommendation.”

The panel’s administrator sent a letter to Judge Chip Moore on Oct. 28, 2011, rescinding its recommendation. “As such, the Department of Public Safety and Corrections requests that no hearing be scheduled in this matter,” the letter says.

Laborde declined to release information considered during the panel’s re-evaluation of Mellion, citing confidentiality laws.

“That determination did not affect his status as a convicted sex offender,” Laborde said, “and thus he was still subject to registration and notification requirements.”

Louisiana law subjects sexually violent predators to an extensive list of monitoring requirements — including electronic monitoring for life — but Laborde noted a judge must first hold a hearing and approve the panel’s recommendation. Critics of the law have contended that such monitoring cannot prevent a crime before it happens.

Mellion is accused of fatally stabbing Ortiz and wounding a 46-year-old neighbor who sought to help her after hearing her in distress. The 46-year-old man was stabbed in the chest and taken to a local hospital, according to the warrant for Ortiz’s arrest.

Cpl. Tommy Stubbs, a police spokesman, said police erroneously reported this month that Mellion had been a former boyfriend of Ortiz. The two had not been in a romantic relationship, Stubbs said.

Morales said Ortiz was as a loving and compassionate person who was kind to strangers.

“She talked to anyone,” Morales said of her mother, “and I guess that’s what might have caused the problem she was in. She didn’t care who you were. She loved life and she was very giving.”


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (29)


1) Comment by Widdy - 30/01/2013

****Comment Removed for Violation of Terms of Use****

2) Comment by Melisse3 - 30/01/2013

Why was he NOT in prison??? Paroled 3 times? Or was it 4? I don't generally advocate for more governament spending, but I make an exception for more prisons. We need to double our prison capacity, and lock up violent criminals and leave them there. Why is that hard to understand?

3) Comment by wherearewegoing - 30/01/2013

Correction on my earlier post: proven guilty *rapists*

4) Comment by Ivy - 30/01/2013

The first victim was probably too poor and too insignificant to raise much of a stink. That is the way our criminal system works.

5) Comment by Chucky - 29/01/2013

Ok Chip Moore is one but who took the guilty plea ?

6) Comment by Chucky - 29/01/2013

Who was the Judge and who did the presentence investigation ?

7) Comment by Whatnow - 29/01/2013

morales_s, my prayers are with you and your family. Justice was not served and hopefully there will be an outcry for it in this case. Judges should be held accountable and not only at the voting booth. This was incompetence and should be looked in to not only with the judges but with the people who you should have been able to trust. I am so sorry for your loss.

8) Comment by Whatnow - 29/01/2013

HRoark, I did not assume one thing. I said if. Evidently the court system is not working as you can see also by this evening's news about the man caught in Ascension Parish for a murder who was arrested 19 times, and arrests include one in 2006 on a count of attempted second-degree murder, and in 2007 on one count of first-degree murder and three counts of attempted first-degree murder. If we allow our courts to handle thing the way they have, you will have more people wanting to protect themselves with guns. And if the assailant has a gun and you have a dog, guess which one usually wins? Do criminals follow the laws that we use or do they use their own set of rules? Do you think criminals will have a dog? This kind of scum certainly deserves his head plucked off his shoulders. Just don't do it with a gun. And my point of view is just as valid as yours unless you don't agree with the First Amendment either.

9) Comment by mh1949 - 29/01/2013

morales_s my prayers are surely with you and your family at this terrible time. The justice system has for sure failed you and your family and society in general. It is only a shame you cannot hold the judges that released this scum back into society accountable for what was done to this lady and her family.As we all know there are more rights and compassion for the criminal than their victims.

10) Comment by wherearewegoing - 29/01/2013

This is not a gun issue, it's a justice issue. This guy should've become an involuntary organ donor after his first rape. Why do we EVER let proven guilty racists out on the streets again. This is a choice/mistake/sickness....whatever you want to call it....that is UNFORGIVABLE. Pluck their head off their shoulders and give the rest of the spare parts to innocent people that could use them to be decent members of society.

11) Comment by HRoark - 29/01/2013

Whatnow, how do you know the victim did not have a gun? Failure to use a weapon is not evidence that she did not have one, so stop making assumptions to support your point of view. And yes, I am totally on board with the effectiveness of dogs as a deterrent to burglaries and home invasions. Taking them to the mall seems a little over the top, but still better than armed shoppers.

12) Comment by Bouncer - 29/01/2013

This kind of thing is becoming distressingly commonplace.

13) Comment by morales_s - 29/01/2013

Thks 4 every1's comments. I have really no say in the gun issue but I do know that my mom wouldn't have carried 1 anyway. She did once when I was a child & it went off by accident so after that she never wanted another 1. I just wish our justice system would have done their job in protecting her and all the citizens this animal came in contact with. Not only by not letting him out in 2011 but by also following up on the stalking reports that were made against him. Now my mom has payed the price 4 our messed up justice system. Now it is us as her family 2 make sure he gets the death penalty so he will never get the chance 2 take another mother from her children, a grandmother from her grandchildren ,daughter from her mother!! I ask every1 that reads this 2 keep her & our family in ur prayers 2 have the strength 2 get through this & c that there is justice 4 her! R.I.P. My Angel In Heaven! U will always love u my hero!!

14) Comment by mh1949 - 29/01/2013

Amen whatnow. Obamacrats don't want to see that though. Had she had a gun, killed that useless ***** and lived, the obamacrats would have wanted to prosecute her for having a gun and using it to defend herself.

15) Comment by Whatnow - 29/01/2013

Liberals want control of it all. Where are this woman's freedoms now? You would want her defenseless while her assailant is coddled. No wonder people want guns to protect themselves. The courts do not work. Who said that there was a shortage of guns? If the woman had a gun, she MIGHT still be alive and justice served.

16) Comment by foldgers - 29/01/2013

By the way HR, I was not being sarcastic. Although I do agree with people able to carry guns, I think it would be more of a deterrent if a criminal saw someone with a dog willing to attack at a moments notice. This should really be thought about...

17) Comment by nenie - 29/01/2013

Chucky is right, he needs even more than Angola. He needs a death sentence. Our laws keep catering to the criminal not the victim. Gun control, HA HA. Criminals don't go by gun control, REMEMBER THEY ARE CRIMINALS.

18) Comment by Chucky - 29/01/2013

monitored ? He needed 24 hour guards, like Angola. Rape and murder oh yea make him a trustee, This is just sick but the politicians get a pass as always no heads will roll , oh well

19) Comment by HRoark - 29/01/2013

I doubt if the straws we Obamacrats are grasping are any smaller than the ones the NRA uses to animate its puppets.

20) Comment by mh1949 - 29/01/2013

Duckyluve I agree with you. He had already raped a woman while holding a gun to her head yet was charged with a reduced crime and not considered a violent sexual predator.Hr you sound like a true obamacrat. No one stated that more guns would have stopped this. However a well aimed firearm could have prevented this thing from playing the system so he may be released by the bleeding heart judges and prey on another woman. You, like all hussein puppets , are grasping at any little straw in order to further your anti-gun agendas on the American people.Call frankenfeinstein so she can add that little 38 revolver he used in his previous rape to her list.

21) Comment by Duckyluve - 29/01/2013

So he raped a woman at gunpoint and they didnt think he was violent? Sounds like somebody at the state needs to be criminally charged in this case

22) Comment by HRoark - 29/01/2013

I think we have an area of agreement. I would endorse guard dogs at the mall, though I suspect a lot of unprovoked dog bites would occur. Still safer than everybody having a gun. I rarely go there anyway.

23) Comment by foldgers - 29/01/2013

HR, I can guarantee you that this perp was quite mental already when he was released, so you have a point, even if she had a gun and he knew, he probably would not have cared, but at least she would have had a chance against this insane man. I guess I meant to say, that if criminals knew a person was carrying a gun, they may still attack that person, but I would ALMOST guarantee that they would at least think twice about it. I guess that is what I meant. I think I just had a good idea though... before I say this, I want people to know I am pro-gun...pro- ALLguns that are legal at this time. But, what if people just always started walking around with their own guard dogs?? Imagine a mall full of people walking with German Shepards or something. Bringing them to the movies, stores, football games...almost anywhere. I would GUESS that about 98% of people who are looking to mug or attack someone would NOT do so if that person had a bad looking dog with them. Maybe we should look into that???

24) Comment by HRoark - 29/01/2013

Yes, certainly plenty of guns are around. My point was that the previous posters simply assumed, with no basis other than what was written, that because the victims didn't shoot him, they didn't have guns. Thus, they conjured up an argument to defend their assertion that is more people had guns, these things wouldn't happen. I can almost guarantee you that the perp was not into rational decision making when he was stalking her. We should be careful with our guarantees.

25) Comment by foldgers - 29/01/2013

HR, there is not a shortage of guns, there is a shortage of people with concealed carry permits and a shortage of people who do not open carry, which is legal here without a permit. True, I do not "carry," open or concealed. But I will tell you this, if a criminal comes after me while I am sitting in my car or my home... they will get a pleasant surprise. :) Anyway, I would almost guarantee that this man knew she was not carrying a gun, as he was STALKING her. But, if he realized she was carrying when he was stalking her, I would almost guarantee you that he would have moved on to another woman. That is just my humble opinion. But, no, there are no shortage of guns. I promise you that. :)

26) Comment by HRoark - 29/01/2013

Here comes the gun toting peanut gallery blaming all crimes great and small on a shortage of guns. How do they know the victims did not have guns? They don't. They make up the facts to suit their worldview.

27) Comment by Whatnow - 29/01/2013

****Comment Removed for Violation of Terms of Use****

28) Comment by arin - 29/01/2013

Another reason why we need to arm ourselves. The justice system does not necessarily operate efficiently.

29) Comment by tradewinns - 29/01/2013

this woman paid with her life for other's errors. wouldn't it be better to err on the side of safety for the innocent instead of worrying about the "rights" of criminals. another fine example of our failed legal system. if the panel and all others involved on the "safety" side of this incidence were personally responsible for the health and welfare of the public they are suppose to serve, they would be less cavaliar in their judgements. sure the criminals may face a harsher "rehabilitation" but they are not there for spending too much time in church.

30) Comment by Chucky - 29/01/2013

Never should have been on the street. Blood on the hands of DA and Judge and Assessment Panel.