BRPD: One killed when teens play with gun

“Gun violence is something we’re always worried about. Even with education,  stuff like this happens.” CPL. TOMMY Stubbs, Baton Rouge police

A 16-year-old boy turned himself in Sunday to Baton Rouge police detectives in the death Saturday of a 17-year-old Baton Rouge teenager who was shot in the back while the two teens played with a gun, a police spokesman said.

It was the fourth shooting death in the area since Dec. 29 that involved teenagers playing or passing around a gun.

Marcus Williams, 474 Bernardo Drive, was shot Saturday and died later at a hospital, spokesman Cpl. Tommy Stubbs said in a news release.

The shooting occurred while Williams was visiting a house at 1527 N. 24th St., he said.

Police booked the 16-year-old, who was not identified because he is a juvenile, into the East Baton Rouge Parish Juvenile Detention Center on one count of negligent homicide, Stubbs said.

The incident occurred when Williams and the 16-year-old were playing with a handgun and it discharged, striking Williams in the back, Stubbs said.

Police are not calling the shooting accidental, he said.

“There was criminal negligence,” Stubbs said, adding that if the shooting had been accidental, an arrest would not have been made.

There were others in the house when the shooting occurred, Stubbs said, but he would not identify them because they are witnesses to the shooting.

Officers arrived at the house at about 3 p.m. Saturday — after they were tipped off to the shooting by an anonymous caller — and found Williams wounded, Stubbs said.

The 16-year-old shooter already had left the house with the gun, he said.

Dorothy McClinton, 56, who lives on Cherry Street near 24th Street said violence in the area has increased lately and the community needs to come together and mentor juveniles to stop the violence.

“There’s gonna be a killing before the end of the next week because kids got access to guns,” she said. “They think it’s cute to have guns.”

Williams’ death was the fourth fatal shooting to occur since Dec. 29 in which a gun discharged when teenagers were playing or passing one around: Three occurred in Baton Rouge and one in Prairieville.

Stubbs said the recent rash of shootings is “unexplainable.”

The Police Department continuously tries to educate people about storing guns safely, he said.

“Gun violence is something we’re always worried about,” he said. “Even with education, stuff like this happens. We’ll continue to do what we can to educate the community on the proper way to store their weapons.”

Travin Varise, 2, was shot in the chest Jan. 21 when he walked into the room while his older brother Terrance J. Varise, 18, 5108 Jean St., was playing with a .357-caliber handgun.

He died in a hospital early Tuesday morning.

Varise admitted to detectives “that he was carelessly playing with the gun when it accidentally discharged,” according to court documents.

Varise was booked into Parish Prison on one count each of negligent homicide, cruelty to a juvenile and felon in possession of a firearm.

On Jan. 20, a rifle accidentally discharged, hitting Trevon Wilson, 18, 8639 Forrest Delatte Road, Denham Springs, in the chest while he was at a house on Main Street in Baton Rouge. He later died at a hospital from the wound.

The rifle went off when five to six people in the house were examining it.

As of Sunday, no arrests have been made in Wilson’s shooting, Stubbs said.

On Dec. 29, deputies in Ascension Parish arrested a 14-year-old boy accused of accidentally shooting 13-year-old Christian Crain in the head while playing with a stolen .38 special revolver with Crain and another teenager in the bedroom of a Prairieville trailer.

The 14-year-old was booked into the St. James Parish Youth Detention Center on counts of negligent homicide, possession of a stolen firearm, possession of marijuana and possession of a handgun by a minor.


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (55)


1) Comment by nimby? - 29/01/2013

still reaching . this happened in the home. adults there had knowledge to prevent this but didn't . an 18 year old knew he was breaking the law , so did his uncle , what's the excuse ?

2) Comment by DMJ - 29/01/2013

Well...if the store sold him the gun, then yes, they broke the law. And "breaking the law" and "bearing responsibility" aren't necessarily the same thing. And if the manufacturers and the NRA prevented safeguards that might have prevented this kid getting the gun, then they're culpable as well. Morally, if not legally.

3) Comment by nimby? - 29/01/2013

correct . not the manufacturer , not the store , not the NRA , not society .

4) Comment by DMJ - 29/01/2013

Who broke the law? The kid with the gun and whoever gave it to him.

5) Comment by nimby? - 29/01/2013

"The man’s uncle] said the teen had armed himself due to “environmental pressure” from neighborhood friends" . so the uncle admits he knew his nephew , a felon , was illegally in possession of a weapon ? perhaps if he had intervened the toddler would still be alive . another example of lack of responsibility/breakdown in the home . so , who broke the law here ?

6) Comment by DMJ - 29/01/2013

Hey look, everyone...Baton Rouge made national news!....http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/29/opinion/nocera-and-in-last-weeks-gun-news.html?ref=opinion

7) Comment by DMJ - 29/01/2013

This whole "we need guns to defend ourselves against the government" is silly. It's also self-serving. Think about it... people say that they have guns to prevent tyranny, the manifestation and means of which would be the confiscation of guns....and the fact that the government hasn't tried to confiscate guns is proof of the policy's success. They never stop to think that maybe, just maybe, the reason the government hasn't tried to confiscate guns is because they don't want to and no one in government has ever suggested doing so. Just a though. "You keep saying no one is after all of the guns." You're right. I do keep saying that....'cause apparently, not everyone has let that sink in just yet.

8) Comment by nimby? - 29/01/2013

Dec.29 , 1890 ; 200 men , women and children are murdered after being disarmed by the U.S. army ....

9) Comment by nimby? - 29/01/2013

there are those among us who will never bear any personal responsibility , not obey the law . then there are those apologize/make excuses that we as a society should do more to accommodate them . the government knows who I am, where I live , what weaponsI have , their make and model , serial numbers . they also know I could be carrying . what more do you want ? why not go after the bad guys with the same enthusiasm ? Brave says they know who the culprits in EBR are , where they are . yet they prefer dialogue . can't go after them without cause or the ACLU will step in . laws protecting those who don't obey them while restricting those who do . when Barbara Nortons legislation is enacted will we see door to door sweeps of high crime areas ? or will we see citizens in safe areas disarmed ?

10) Comment by gman70726 - 29/01/2013

Let's just face it. DMJ and many like him want all guns gone from the face of the earth. You keep saying no one is after all of the guns. Your responses have been about guns: not assault weapons. By the way, the HSD just ordered 7000 PDW(Personal Defense Weapons) with 30 round clips. Why is it that if the government orders these they are PDW and if a private citizen does, it is an assault weapon? If you think it is far fetched that our government may want us to be the sheep and it could never occur, just remember what our government did with the Tuscegee Institute by deliberately subjecting black men to syphyllis without their knowledge..

11) Comment by DMJ - 29/01/2013

Me? none. But I'm not a danger to myself or anyone else.

12) Comment by nimby? - 29/01/2013

DMJ ;"more should be done to keep guns out of the hands of those who shouldn't have them how do we do this without further restricting those who have broken no laws." You can't. ".just how are we able to enforce existing laws? Answer: we can't" . so the answer is more control over those who abide by the law , right ? "so what rights have you lost today ? "

13) Comment by DMJ - 29/01/2013

"you will not keep the guns out of the hands of those intent on using them to commit crimes" ... Not if we don't try. And by the way, that 2 second reloading time could be enough to stop someone. Jared Loughner (Tuscon) was tackled while reloading...but not before getting off 33 rounds. He could have been tackled after 10. Think about it. And wtf-over, " You have to understand that it will take a lifetime for there to be any real changes in gun related deaths." You're right. Let's start now...by enforcing the laws on the books. There's one problem: we can't. If you look at all the protections afforded to dealers and all the restrictions placed on the FBI and ATF, you'd realize this is a fool's errand. Dealers don't have to keep inventory, report background checks (even failed ones), private "dealers" don't have to perform background checks, dealers don't have to report sales, even sales of multiple weapons to the same person in a short amount of time (which is how straw buyers work), dealers are not required to cooperate with law enforcement, dealers can destroy background checks after 24 hours. And get this....the ATF is legally prohibited (thanks to the Patriot Act, of all things) from keeping a computerized database. I'm sure I'm missing a few as well. In light of all this...just how are we able to enforce existing laws? Answer: we can't....so....we don't. Which is why we have a vast black market for guns despite having the most lenient gun laws in the civilized world. It's insane. You're right about one thing though... the problem is the gun culture, and that culture, for many people, is more valuable and worthwhile than trying to prevent gun violence. Of course, it's most definitely a supply problem too, which is why you have people saying things like, "There are already so many guns, we can't keep track of them, so why try?" And why blame manufacturers? Just look at their marketing. Lastly, how many of those 80 murders in BR were committed with guns with a clip that holds more than 10 rounds? Quite a few, I suspect.

14) Comment by mh1949 - 28/01/2013

DMJ, if you can't control gun violence if large cities with strict gun laws just how are you going to control it on a national level. Criminals don't follow laws period. No matter how many laws you make nor where, you will not keep the guns out of the hands of those intent on using them to commit crimes.You will only be playing into the criminal's hand by making it harder for law abiding citizens to be able to defend themselves and their families. Anyone with ( other than obamacrats ) should clearly see this is not about safety and saving lives but about being able to control people. Give me some sensible reasoning considering limiting a magazine to 10 rounds. If my magazine is loaded with10 rounds I would be perefectly legal. However if I add 1 more bullet then I am a criminal. At the same time I could carry of my person 8-10 ten round magazines and be legal. What's your take on this scenario ? By the way it takes less than 2 seconds to drop one magazine and insert another.

15) Comment by wtf-over - 28/01/2013

I am even ok with banning 30 round clips. The assault weapons have a bad rep because of the recent mass murders. Those events were horrible, but they are no more horrible to a mother who lost her son from a hand gun. And that happens about 80 times a year in baton rouge. Banning large clips isn't going to do much for the rest of the murders, or accidental shootings, that happen with hand guns, which are by far the majority.

16) Comment by wtf-over - 28/01/2013

DMJ, you are not being consistent with any of your messages, except that you're against guns. You are assuming that I'm against doing something about a problem, but I have given you no reason to assume that. You can't make things up for the convenience of your argument. I asked, why blame manufacturers. I did not say anything about dealers. Please, read correctly and respond appropriately or we will not be able to make any progress. That being said, I understand alcohol-related vehicle deaths has decreased over years, and that's a good point. But still, someone dies about every 53 minutes in this country from drunk driving. What else would you suppose we could do about this, without taking alcohol away. Is it ok because it's better then it was 20 years ago? I understand if we had no guns in this country we would probably have no gun deaths. The fact is, we have guns and we have a lot of them. If you are asking that we make them illegal, like you seem to suggest with the knifing story(China also regulates how many kids you can have, so you take the good with the bad I guess), I don't think many people are going to go along with that. You have to understand that it will take a lifetime for there to be any real changes in gun related deaths. And during that time a lot of good people will be defenseless among the criminals who illegally hold guns. It is a culture problem, not a supply problem. We have laws to regulate who has them, and I am all for enforcing those laws. So lets start there.

17) Comment by DMJ - 28/01/2013

Also, any gun control would take decades to take effect. It's taken decades to dig ourselves in to this hole; it'll take decades to get ourselves out. But we have to start somewhere.

18) Comment by DMJ - 28/01/2013

mh1949, D.C. and Chicago are cities. Those cities are surrounded by states, which are surrounded by other states, making up a whole big country. What good are strict gun laws in one city when that city is surrounded by a country with lax gun laws? You're only making my point that gun control needs to be on a national scale.

19) Comment by DMJ - 28/01/2013

"manufacturers broke no laws , nor did gun dealers , everything was legal." That's my point. It's too easy to distribute guns. "more should be done to keep guns out of the hands of those who shouldn't have them how do we do this without further restricting those who have broken no laws." You can't. In order for it to be slightly harder for criminals and madmen to get guns, it must be slightly harder for everyone. I understand if you and others don't think it's worth it. Personally, I think it's not only worth it, but necessary. (bear in mind, that I'm not advocating confiscation or the revoking of law-abiding citizens' right to have a gun) But something's gotta give. I'm less concerned with a gun enthusiast not being able to get a 100 round magazine than I am about a gun enthusiast/would-be-murderer who IS able to get that same magazine.

20) Comment by mh1949 - 28/01/2013

Now people we must all live by DMJ's wored as he/she is the authority on all topics on these posts whether in be a race issue or gun issue. And for those of you that don't believe gun control and gun bans work in curbing violence and death all you need to do is look at the stats in Chicago and D.C. which have the toughest gun laws in the United States of obama.

21) Comment by nimby? - 28/01/2013

if you will examine recent events such as the Conn. mass shooting gun manufacturers broke no laws , nor did gun dealers , everything was legal , according to Conn. laws . the breakdown occurred in the home . also as in Conn. the shooter has no intent to be taken alive . while I agree more should be done to keep guns out of the hands of those who shouldn't have them how do we do this without further restricting those who have broken no laws , without going door to door making sure parents are being responsible ? rather than a blanket solution to make all pay for the sins of a few who will never care ?

22) Comment by Springer98 - 28/01/2013

The FBI estimates that there are upwards of 300 million guns in this country. There is no way to get a really accurate estimate of the number of guns in the U. S. Trying to stop or limit gun ownership in this country is like closing the gate after the cows are out!! @ Buck749, Nobody should ever play with guns, children or adult. My dad bought me a bb gun when I was 6 years old & a pellet gun, when I was 8. He taught me the safe & proper way to handle a gun & I have never harmed anyone or done any damage to any property. Ignorance of the safe use of weapons will not help your children, because some day they are likely to come in contact with a gun & have no clue about gun safety.

23) Comment by Elderly Man - 28/01/2013

We need to have firearm training in our schools. All children need such training in some form.

24) Comment by DMJ - 28/01/2013

Wtf-over, yes people still drink and drive and cause accidents, but less so than they used to. By your logic, if we can't completely eliminate a problem, then we shouldn't even try to lessen it? I'd call that making the perfect the enemy of the good. Gman, the story of Cain and Abel was a parable; but still....I'd wager that he used a rock or maybe a bone like in 2001: A Space Odyssey. That being said, the type of weapon matters. Case in point: the same day as Newtown, some wacko in China decided to take out a bunch of students with a knife (you can't get guns in China); all 23 of his victims survived. How many gunshot victims at Newtown survived? None? Right. How many stray knifings have ever happened? How many accidental knife deaths were there in the U.S. last year? How many of the murders in EBR last year were committed with guns? The type of weapon matters; if it didn't, then there'd be no dustup about confiscating guns, 'cause people could just use knives and rocks or whatever. Think about it. And iH8Mud, it may not be your intent to protect gun industry profits, but that's what you are doing, like it nor not. No offense intended. I guess the reason I assume you guys are shilling for the gun industry is because when I say that the 2nd Amendment doesn't protect gun sellers, people get their shorts in a wad. I'm pretty sure I'm not imagining this.

25) Comment by IH8Mud - 28/01/2013

@DMJ, why do you generalize all people who argue for gun rights as sticking up for the gun industry? As for me, you couldn't be further from the truth. I formulate my opinion and speak for myself and definitely not for a gun company. And why do you tell us that if we feel strongly about a constitutional right that it must be because we are afraid? Fear has nothing to do with my opinion. Why is it that we have to be fear if we want to be proactive in protecting our lives, family, and property?It is very presumptuous of you to try to tell us "how we feel" or "what motivates us". It is absurd and/or ignorant of you to assume that defenders of run rights do so "to stick up for the gun industry". In reality, I understand that this is your way of calling others sheeple and still try to claim that you are not name-calling. However, this is exactly what you are doing. You need to stick with making your arguments and let us make ours and call it a day.

26) Comment by gman70726 - 28/01/2013

DMJ;first driving is a privilege - not a right. Second, yes the idea set forth is the eventual confiscation of citizen's legal weapons. Where do many murderers get their guns? From most of the reports from police, they are stolen by criminals that use them or resell them to other criminals for purposes against law adiding citizens. One of the authorities in SanDiego has already stated, per Clarence Buggs show, if the government handles this correctly that all guns will be confiscated by the next generation. Third, the other common link in the mass shootings are the mentally unstable people. People who will kill by any means available. Again, what caliber did Cain use to kill Abel?

27) Comment by wtf-over - 28/01/2013

DMJ, thank you for making my point clear. Driving drunk is certainly illegal, and people are still killed by drunk drivers, who do not obey the law, almost everyday in Louisiana. Now apply that to making guns illegal. And if you don't want to take guns away, then what exactly is your point when you say "more guns = more shootings"? I'm not arguing against enforcing the existing laws that crooked dealers break, but you can't really bring manufacturers into that same category.

28) Comment by Buck749 - 28/01/2013

I have never believed in children playing with guns. I took water guns, bb guns, pellet guns, cap guns, guns that shot nerf balls, and any other kind of gun that my nephews had away from them. Children always are curious about shooting guns. STOP buying them toy guns!!!

29) Comment by nimby? - 28/01/2013

"you people" , "you guys" , " people like me" . yeah , "we" get it . let me explain a little redneck logic . I don't want or need an AR 15 . used them in S E Asia , didn't like them then . I don't need an extended magazine , I'll probably hit my target within the 1st three shots . but when some pencil necked , 4 eyed geek who's never owned a gun , never held one , doesn't like them comes on a sunday morning TV saying he knows what is best for me I want to purchase 3 , legally . I'll provide proper ID , jump thru all the hoops , by the law . I'm not asking for anything extra , just what I already have . there are more guns in my household(fewer people) than most , none have ever shot anyone or been used in a crime . this is nothing more than the continued excuse/apology for those who don't play by the rules already in existence . perhaps we should not have home security systems or car alarms , shouldn't lock our doors or window , take care walking to our vehicles after dark . respect and caution for the world we live in has nothing to do with fear .

30) Comment by markedwardmarchiafava - 28/01/2013

Gee, DMJ, I own and actually bear arms, I've never shot anyone. Must be something defective about my weapons.

31) Comment by markedwardmarchiafava - 28/01/2013

For the 1,000,000,000,000 time, yes, they ARE talking about taking away legally acquired guns and the right to have a gun in the first place. How could you NOT notice? You people just cannot stand the thought of others peacefully living their lives beyond your control. You people want some Utopia where there are no risks associated with life. Get over it, it's not gonna happen.

32) Comment by DMJ - 28/01/2013

And why are you people sticking up for the gun industry? They don't care about you. They want you to be afraid. Fear, violence, paranoia, misinformation and yes, shootings.... all that is good for their business and bad for us. "You need a gun to protect yourself," they tell you. Protect yourself from what? People with guns? They've created a problem and they've sold you the solution, which is the same as the problem itself. Don't you guys get it? Your dislike of people like me and your general fear of imagined threats (an intruder, an invasion, a U.S. takeover of....the U.S.) is preventing you (and all of us) from dealing with the very real and observable problem of gun violence. When does more guns stop being the answer? Ever?

33) Comment by DMJ - 28/01/2013

wtf-over, last I checked, it's illegal to consume alcohol and drive. And for the 1,000,000,000,000th time....no one is talking about taking away anyone's legally acquired guns or the right to have a gun in the first place. (Whatnow, write that 1,000 times on the board, please) But to simply object to any and all regulations? And I'm the one who's unreasonable? Why crack down on gun dealers, you ask? Because of the incredibly obvious ease with which one can obtain a gun, that's why. How did these kids get their hands on guns? We must at least try to answer this question and factor that answer into our policies. Are guns the only cause of shootings? Of course not. But they are the common denominator in ALL shootings. We, as sentient beings, must realize this and act accordingly. And no, I do not carry a gun officially...or unofficially. Will gun control stop all gun violence? No. No one claims it will. But it can reduce it, much like harsher laws and increased education about drunk driving have achieved over the past three decades.

34) Comment by markedwardmarchiafava - 28/01/2013

If DMJ is a male with all body parts intact, does that equate to him being an "escort?"

35) Comment by markedwardmarchiafava - 28/01/2013

****Comment Removed for Violation of Terms of Use****

36) Comment by Whatnow - 28/01/2013

Please watch if you don't understand what can happen without guns to protect yourself...(http://videos.allinnra.com/share/a-defenseless-population.aspx#.UQazNGfjCwR) DMJ, you are being unreasonable. The Second Amendment is not about leaving us defenseless. It is all about protecting ourselves against the evil out there. What is wrong with people who have their guns just in case of that evil coming to them? It's all about "what if" to a lot of people. Are you going to take that freedom from them just because of the idiots and the deranged and those who do not value life? We want protected from those types. The police usually can only get there after the damage is done.

37) Comment by Bighug - 28/01/2013

Right, mh 1949! Have you noticed that in all the news stories about these accidental killings it states that the gun accidentally fired? Never a person accidentally fired it. I wonder when the Advocate will start reporting traffic accidents and telling us the automobile accidentally did something stupid. From your postings, DMJ, I get the feeling that you carry a weapon officially, but object to others doing so.

38) Comment by wtf-over - 28/01/2013

Why "crack down" on them? Do you really think it's the manufacturers' fault that kids play with guns? I don't know how the anti-gun folks can put blame on guns, but have nothing to say about alcohol killing people. I know, alcohol doesn't kill people; people kill people. Alcohol sure makes it a lot easier to drive drunk though. Or maybe you just don't want to give up drinking. Alcohol has even less practical purpose then guns have. To be clear, I'm not at all against alcohol. I'm just playing the devil's advocate so people can see how stupid it is to blame guns. So, if you really believe in removing tools from society that make preventable death possible, don't half-a$$ it. Have some principles and go all in. At least then I would believe you mean well, rather then just regurgitating what you hear from some left wing talking head.

39) Comment by nimby? - 28/01/2013

I meant use of bank cards , credit , drafts mandatory for purchases . the sale recorded by the gun store and the bank . will need proper identification , banks tend to be more strict on this ...

40) Comment by nimby? - 28/01/2013

I've got some questions ; what is a 16 year old doing out on the street on a school night in possession of a weapon . why did he shoot someone of his own race for a bicycle , probably not a schwinn racer . who allowed a weapon in the home of a known felon , where a toddler is present ? I'm sure there are logical answers to all . more than likely the gun did not come a gun show . it came from a pawn shop , a cash purchase . it has passed thru several owners , already been involved in a crime . a 38 , or knock off 9mm , chinese , not very well made . two progressive suggestions ; ban cash sales of guns , bank card ,draft , etc. ban the sale of foreign made weapons . nothing left but the black market ....

41) Comment by DMJ - 28/01/2013

By the way, we can crack down on manufacturers, dealers and "private sellers" without infringing on anyone's 2nd Amendment Rights. No where in the 2nd Amendment is the right to sell a gun. Think about it.

42) Comment by DMJ - 28/01/2013

mh1949, reel it in a bit, bub. No one is saying the guns were possessed by a poltergeist and fired themselves. What we are saying is that these shootings (and all shootings) can not happen without guns. Obviously, these kids should have never had a gun to begin with. How'd they get them? Where'd they steal them from? Where's that person get them? These questions need to be asked, do they not?

43) Comment by mh1949 - 28/01/2013

This was purely the fault of the gun and nothing or no one else. If you don't believe me ask the authority DMJ who uses an 'ASSAULT BUTTER KNIFE " for protection. Any obamacrat will tell you that gun magically jumped up and shot that person without any help from anyone so we must ban all guns including corkguns. After all many children have been injured by the cork when the corkgun suddenly jumped up and shot them.

44) Comment by wherearewegoing - 28/01/2013

@nimby? Nailed it!

45) Comment by nimby? - 28/01/2013

I'd venture to say there are more guns outside the city limits in EBR than within , ratio or number , yet where are the shootings , of whom by whom ? character of the individual holding the gun could have some bearing ...

46) Comment by wherearewegoing - 28/01/2013

Now this one seems more similar to a car killing someone, as this was an accident. I don't know that you can blame the 2nd amendment for this one any more than you can blame the privilege of driving for car accidents. Both can and do happen when people make mistakes that they should not have made. Guns are always to be treated as loaded, never to be pointed at something you don't intend to shoot, and your finger should never even touch the trigger (notice I said touch, not pull) until you are ready to fire. When the rules are broken, people can get hurt. These children should have been parented better. (http://www.nssf.org/safety/basics/)

47) Comment by DMJ - 28/01/2013

Depressingly predictable. More guns = more shootings. One hopes that, eventually, we'll be able to connect these two very easily connectable dots. Meanwhile, another 2nd Amendment casualty... Very sad.

48) Comment by tradewinns - 28/01/2013

we can anticipate a lwa suit by the family against the evil gun manufactuer for failure to warn "if trigger pulled gun will discharge". wait for it.

49) Comment by wherearewegoing - 28/01/2013

@wadep66 The owner MAY have been a "law-abiding citizen" but was CLEARLY not "responsible." THAT is the problem!

50) Comment by BoiledCrabs - 28/01/2013

Stolen guns and drugs, no mention of assault rifles, no mention of any statements by distaught fathers torn with grief, and yet somehow more gun laws might prevent this? Gun violence is a result of criminal activities, mental illness and kids without fathers with self respect, honor, or any love to share with their children.

51) Comment by Stephen - 27/01/2013

I want to thank Officer Stubbs for refusing to call this shooting accidental.

52) Comment by wadep66 - 27/01/2013

I'm sure the owner was a responsible "law-abiding citizen".

53) Comment by markedwardmarchiafava - 27/01/2013

Gee, all those laws and millions spent on "law enforcement" sure seemed to fail, again. Disband "law enforcement" agencies, keep your tax dollars in your own pocket.

54) Comment by BRYankee - 27/01/2013

Another Baton Rouge youth failed by... irresponsible parents!

55) Comment by Springer98 - 27/01/2013

16 & 17 year olds playing with a loaded gun? How dumb can you get?