Nine charged in synthetic marijuana indictment

Show caption
BRYAN TUCK /
Daniel Stanford

LAFAYETTE — A federal grand jury indicted nine men, including two Lafayette lawyers, and a local business in a multistate synthetic marijuana trafficking ring that generated millions of dollars over a 10-month period, according to the indictment.

Those charged in the 16-count indictment filed Sept. 4 and unsealed Tuesday were: Daniel James Stanford, 54, of Lafayette; Barry L. Domingue, 52, Carencro; Richard Joseph Buswell, 44, Lafayette; Alexander Derrick Reece, 40, Gainesville, Fla.; Drew T. Green, 38, Roswell, Ga.; Thomas William Malone Jr., 45, Roswell, Ga.; Boyd Anthony Barrow, 43, Canton, Ga.; Joshua Espinoza, 49, Marietta, Ga.; and Daniel Paul Francis, 42, Dawsonville, Ga.

Stanford and Domingue are Lafayette lawyers.

Also charged in the 27-page indictment was Curious Goods, which includes five smoke shops owned by Buswell in the Acadiana area where tobacco products, pipes, bongs and rolling papers are sold. There are three Curious Goods stores in Lafayette, one in Vermilion Parish and one in Iberia Parish.

The Curious Goods stores sold $5 million worth of a product called “Mr. Miyagi” throughout the Acadiana area from March 1, 2011, until Dec. 31, according to the indictment.

The product was sold as potpourri but was in fact infused with synthetic cannabinoids, which provide a marijuanalike high and are considered controlled and dangerous substances, the indictment says.

The indictment comes after the December seizure of $1.6 million worth of goods containing synthetic marijuana from Curious Goods and its warehouse during a raid by the Lafayette Metro Narcotics Task Force.

About 90 percent of the items seized were labeled “Mr. Miyagi Timeout,” authorities have said.

The indictment says Reece, Green, Malone, Barrow and Espinoza served as suppliers of the synthetic cannabinoids.

The document says Stanford is director and Francis is president of Retail Compliance Association, a Louisiana company that Stanford and Francis used to train, advise and instruct the owners of Curious Goods and their employees “on how to store, display and sell the ‘Mr. Miyagi’ products, on how to detect and evade law enforcement, and how to respond to customers who asked questions about how to use the ‘Mr. Miyagi’ products and/or the physiological effects of the ‘Mr. Miyagi’ products.”

According to the indictment, Stanford and Francis are accused of holding a meeting at Buswell’s home on Dec. 7, 2011, at which they held such a training session for Domingue, Barrow, Espinoza, Buswell and others involved with Curious Goods.

A day after the meeting, Stanford was paid $80,000 by an unindicted co-conspirator, the indictment says.

The indictment further alleges Stanford received checks totaling $156,921 from Pinnacle Products, which is controlled by Espinoza and Barrow, and Curious Goods.

Meanwhile, the indictment says, Domingue received checks totaling $91,319 from the two companies.

The indictment says Pinnacle Products manufactured “Mr. Miyagi” for sale at Curious Goods.

Domingue did not return a call to his office Tuesday.

Stanford, reached by phone Tuesday, said he is representing himself in the criminal case.

“I’ve done nothing wrong. At all times, I was representing my client,” said Stanford, who, up until June 25, represented Buswell in an unrelated, pending federal criminal case involving Buswell’s former company, Bowman Investment Group.

Stanford rents an office suite in lawyer Bill Goode’s office building.

“I was dismayed that the government indicted Daniel Stanford and Barry Domingue,” Goode said Tuesday. “I’ve known them both professionally for many years, and from everything I know about them, they are honorable, honest and hardworking lawyers who would never commit a crime because to do so would cost them their license.”

Being a lawyer is what Stanford’s life is about, Goode said.

“He would never do anything to jeopardize his ability to practice law,” Goode said.

Baton Rouge attorney Ian Hipwell is now representing Buswell.

“Mr. Buswell looks forward to having his day in court,” Hipwell said in reference to the recent charges. “He has asserted his innocence and is anxious to prove it.”

The indictment also indicates the federal government will pursue forfeitures of $20 million in proceeds derived from the drug trafficking violations, $462,239 seized from three checking accounts, a 2006 Mercedes Benz X65 Sedan, a 2005 Baja Outlaw Speed Boat, a 2002 Pontiac Firebird and land in Lafayette Parish.


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (20)


1) Comment by dobnerk - 04/10/2012

I started a foundation after my beautiful son died from synthetic marijuana. He was the most perfect human being I had ever met in my entire life. He never hurt a sole and did nothing but good every day of his life. Since his death, I've had call nearly everyday from victims and their families who are suffering like you can't imagine. Side effects are seizures, hallucinations, paranoia, respiratory distress, rapid heart rate and heart attacks, organ failure, temporary paralysis, inability to feel pain, vomiting, panic attacks and anxiety disorders, to name just a few. The To The Maximus Foundation educates the public about the dangers of synthetic marijuana. Many of the people in the organization have lost children, siblings, and parents. For more information about this terrible drug and what you can do about it, please find To The Maximus on Facebook, on Twitter @fakeweed, our website tothemaxumus.org or our blog at http://tothemaximusblog.org. Protect your son, daughter, bother, sister, nephew, niece, grandson, granddaughter, cousin, friend, or community and join us to learn, share and act!

2) Comment by DMJ - 04/10/2012

Don't smoke fake weed. Smoke real weed. The risk of arrest is worth it for health reasons. There's no telling what synthetic chemicals are in fake weed.

3) Comment by gmanderson - 04/10/2012

It would be very helpful if the article informed us of what illegal chemicals were found in this product.

4) Comment by KC5DXT - 03/10/2012

Take your meds, go back to bed and dream about McVeigh again, Marchiafava.

5) Comment by markedwardmarchiafava - 03/10/2012

But if the War on Drugs (people) ended, the Amerikan Empire would have relinquished a major source of control and revenue. If history teaches one thing, it's this: tyrants rarely relinquish power voluntarily. Beside, all those Amerikan statists who are wrapped so tightly with the flag would be so outdone, their favorite politicians would lose the vote.

6) Comment by Being_Stupid - 03/10/2012

Look at all the police and military resources & energy spent to fight the war on drugs, a victimless crime. If drugs were legal, all those resources could instead be diverted to fighting real crimes with real victims like murder, rape, burglary, robbery, and theft.

7) Comment by Being_Stupid - 03/10/2012

The real victims of illegal drug use is the innocent ghetto kid who is shot by a stray bullet during a gang turf war while riding his bike on a public street, or the nine year old girl and grandmother that are buried alive in a coffin in a Mexico Desert because a relative is wanted by a cartel. Let the drug users buy their drugs and use them, so that innocent people do not get killed by thugs trying to evade the law and protect their turf. Law Enforcement can still make it illegal to get behind the wheel of car under the influence, and Private Companies can still enforce a strict no drug policy and drug testing on their employees to ensure they are clean. Drug users can seek help and recovery without the stigma. There are better ways to prevent drug use. Prohibition does not work. Just causes a lot of innocent people to get murdered by thugs so drug users can get their fix.

8) Comment by markedwardmarchiafava - 03/10/2012

the correct word is re-legalize, there is a huge difference.

9) Comment by DMJ - 03/10/2012

Legalize actual weed and people won't want this fake stuff. If Barney Frank and Ron Paul can agree on something, then why can't the rest of us? If we keep doing this silly state-by-state thing, Louisiana will be the very last. Well....maybe Utah...

10) Comment by KC5DXT - 03/10/2012

Are you a pothead, Marchiafava?

11) Comment by markedwardmarchiafava - 03/10/2012

Excellent idea, LSUinVail, but as you well know, Amerikans just aren't that astute.

12) Comment by LSUinVail - 03/10/2012

Milton Friedman for President!

13) Comment by markedwardmarchiafava - 03/10/2012

Typical statist response: spend tens of thousands of dollars, coupled with an equal amount of time, trying to force government to obey the law and respect the rights of it's masters.

14) Comment by tradewinns - 03/10/2012

if you don't like a law then try and have it repealed, don't just break it. at last two lawyers are showing their true colors. the rest would do the same but for getting caught.

15) Comment by markedwardmarchiafava - 02/10/2012

The correct word is RE-legalize.

16) Comment by Being_Stupid - 02/10/2012

I agree with MEM. This is not a crime. Watch Milton Friedman on You Tube - Why Drugs Should Be Legalized = www.youtube.com/watch?v=nLsCC0LZxkY

17) Comment by jedleland - 02/10/2012

its gonna be a heck of a long time as long as jefferson is waiting on a bunch of keyboard warriors and old gun nuts with ED to do anything about it besides calling in telephone threats to legislators and getting banged up in the mental unit for a couple of weeks as a result. yep thats a real revolution there. what a joke but ill see you at shoneys like last time.

18) Comment by markedwardmarchiafava - 02/10/2012

When this once-great Republic was founded, this type of "crime" didn't exist. As per the warnings of the founders, government gradually assumed more and more power never given it. Hence, we now have "laws" which conflict with the rights the founders enjoyed. How much longer till it's time for Jefferson's Rx for this malady which plagues us?

19) Comment by Frustrated - 02/10/2012

Sorry Mark but it's still illegal. Someday the drug laws may change but for the time being it's still a crime.

20) Comment by markedwardmarchiafava - 02/10/2012

Typical media, demonizing the peaceful activities of consenting adults voluntarily entering into mutual agreements. True to form, the media must include the investment fraud to further demonize the persons involved, regardless of the fact the fraud had nothing to do with the other activity mentioned.