BRAVE grant to pay for research, data analysis

Research, data focus of project

The bulk of a three-year, $1.5 million federal grant to run a nationally acclaimed anti-violence program will be spent on research and data analysis conducted by LSU, officials said at a Wednesday news conference formally announcing the grant approval.

Members of the Baton Rouge Area Violence Elimination Project will use the research and data analysis to identify the people they want to target, East Baton Rouge Parish Mayor-President Kip Holden said.

Using data from law enforcement, LSU researchers will create a Top 10 violent offender list, said Matthew Lee, associate vice chancellor of the university’s office of research and economic development.

Researchers also will use “cutting edge geographic and spacial analytical techniques” to determine where and when crimes are occurring on a daily or a weekly basis, Lee said. Those techniques also will be used to track long-term crime trends, he said.

The most technical research will involve data collected from a detailed review of homicide and nonfatal shooting incidents, Lee said. The information will help researchers identify social networks of criminals and which ones are most likely to be volatile, he said.

“Acts of violence don’t happen in a vacuum,” Lee said. “They occur in a social context.”

BRAVE is designed to break up such networks using the same group violence reduction strategies that have been successfully used by Operation Ceasefire programs in cities such as Boston and Los Angeles, Holden said.

The premise behind Operation Ceasefire, according to program literature, is that crime can be dramatically reduced when law enforcement, residents and social service providers engage with the street groups and gangs to communicate three messages:

  • Any future violence will be met with clear, predictable and certain consequences.
  • A moral message against violence by the right community representatives.
  • An offer of help for those who want it.

BRAVE initially will target violent offenders as well as drug offenders in the city’s 70805 ZIP code, Holden said. That area — bordered by Airline Highway to the north and the east, Choctaw Drive to the south and the Mississippi River to the west — accounts for 13 percent of the city’s population but traditionally 30 percent of its homicides.

“In recent months, BRAVE project organizers have met with many different organizations across Baton Rouge in their attempt to focus on ZIP code 70805,” Holden said. “As a result, the BRAVE project now has support not only from law enforcement and local government, but also from the faith-based community, business and industry, social service and nonprofit organizations, and the academic, educational, and recreation community.”

Remaining grant funds will go toward such support, Holden said.

The money will fund caseworkers and resources to provide substance abuse, mentoring and job training to 25 youth a year who choose to leave crime behind, the mayor said.

Grant money also will pay for support staff for BRAVE Director Herbert “Tweety” Anny to maintain grant records and conduct media and community outreach, Holden said.

As the mayor held his formal announcement of the grant award Wednesday, the political wrangling continued with an opponent in this year’s mayoral race over who deserves credit for the grant. Metro Councilman Mike Walker disputed Holden’s statement on Tuesday that Walker played no part in securing the federal funds.

Walker, who serves as the council’s chairman and is challenging Holden in the Nov. 6 election, said Louisiana’s congressional delegation deserves the credit for the $1.5 million grant award. But Walker said he took the initiative and reached out to the delegation and sought their help.

“It didn’t take a lobbyist. It didn’t take a press conference,” Walker said. “All it took was for someone like me to pick up the phone and ask for help — just like when I asked Metro Council members to appropriate $150,000 of the mayor’s slush fund to start the BRAVE Project.”

Walker, in April, proposed the Metro Council use part of a discretionary fund it took over from Holden for seed money for the BRAVE program. Holden’s administration had asked the council to use the fund for a lobbyist as originally budgeted, saying the mayor’s office already had plans to give BRAVE $250,000.

The council ultimately rejected the administration’s pleas and voted to allocate the money from the discretionary fund.

Holden made no mention of Walker at Wednesday’s news conference but pointed out several people, primarily East Baton Rouge Parish District Attorney Hillar Moore III, who he said were responsible for making the BRAVE grant happen.

“Building a strong team required working together and that takes discipline, trust and a commitment to working for the greater good of the community and not for individual glory,” Holden said. “This is not a political issue although it may be played out in the political arena. It is a matter of public safety.”

Advocate staff writer Rebekah Allen contributed to this report.


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (22)


1) Comment by foldgers - 06/09/2012

@DMJ: That is why they are spending the MAJORITY of this grant to figure out. Analysis and all, where all they need to do is skim over the report they published in the paper the other day. Cost? 50 cents. I would love to see all the charts and graphs and data analysis they come up with using that much money... and these so called top 10 violent criminals they will target who are NOT in jail apparently...

2) Comment by DMJ - 06/09/2012

70802 has twice as many homicides as 70805. It seems BRAVE is concentrating in the wrong zip code, at least for now. Did I miss something?

3) Comment by zealer99 - 06/09/2012

Welcome to the consequences of 50 years of diminishing personal responsibility and accountability, it gets much worse from here on. It is obvious that catching the criminals and locking them up, like animals, only makes them more animal -like. The cost socially and economically of having such a large number of people in the "criminal justice system" is a heavy drain on our "system" is more than we can bear with the many other issues. We have too many laws and there are so many special interest laws that the special provisions factor out. But the question under consideration is "why is the level crime increasing?" is easy to answer and there are a couple of principles that makes the answer simple. People loose respect for the criminal justice system in general when there are laws that they consider "silly". The Public Service Announcements that depict the police as bad guys who will see you before you see them", the system has failed when the general public follows laws from fear of enforcement and not social consciousness. The stigma of having a criminal record is rapidly diminishing, just as the stigma of having a child out of wedlock faded and vanished. So we have developed a system with stupid laws where having a record of violating stupid laws has very little meaning (or at least is working its way there. There are a lot of other factors involved but the number of scope of laws have to be reduce to what is necessary or we are going to go out of business.

4) Comment by foldgers - 06/09/2012

Get a list of the top SIXTY violent repeat criminals/drug dealers and give them each $25,000 of that grant money to move out of the STATE. Once they relocate and are officially moved out, give them the money. Also, at least 3 states away. Poof. Gone. :)

5) Comment by Chucky - 06/09/2012

I love you, you love me, we just a happy family ,rub my back shack my hand, soke my feet, I just love the new police.

6) Comment by nimby? - 06/09/2012

thank you Mildred Citizen , my sentiment , exactly ; more of your tax dollars hardly at work ....

7) Comment by free_market - 06/09/2012

All of that money to study what causes the problem and map out where and when the crimes occur. This publication has a homicide map, maybe the mayor, DA and Chief of Police should take a look at it, they might even learn something. Top 10 violent offender list, I assume LSU is going to get that data from the Sheriff and Police office to put that together. "Any future violence will be met with clear, predictable, and certan consequences." I guess the thugs get a free pass on the past crimes and violence committed, yeah, that'll show them. IMHO, this is just another attempt to try to make it look like something is being done. I fear it will fail miserably and it frustrates me that our tax dollars are being wasted. I still think a better use of the money would be to build more jails. Getting these animals off of the street is the only answer.

8) Comment by Chucky - 06/09/2012

It is Law-Enforcement , you the police enforce the law DUH you have a gun and handcuffs use them ! What is it that you are not understanding ?

9) Comment by Mildred Citizen - 05/09/2012

Oh yeah. Congratulation to Sgt. "Tweety" on his extra little payroll bump.

10) Comment by Mildred Citizen - 05/09/2012

$1.5M to research the problem. Excellent idea. In three years, we will have a spatial analysis of where violent crime is occuring and who the most violent criminals that have been caught are. What a bargain! Thank you, Mike Walker. This is exactly how to stop crime. Some other folks have suggested crazy ideas like keeping kids in school, more effectively fighting truancy, increasing technical/trade school opportunities, increased community policing, and social programs to encourage young women not to get pregnant before they can support a family and to encourage young men & women to respect traditional marriage. More study, that's what's needed. How stupid of me! I should have known.

11) Comment by phil - 05/09/2012

Personally I am not a naysayer relative to the BRAVE project, but is LSU going to run BRAVE and eliminate crime in BR? How many MORE years do we have to give it a rest and give someone a chance to succeed?? Maybe BRAVE will actually be a good program, but I think it is the leadership in BR that needs to give it a rest (like maybe retirement), and not the "naysayers" who are paying taxes for all of this.

12) Comment by TheAgonyOfTruth - 05/09/2012

Well here we go again throwing slurs and prepetuating the idea the BRAVE project is a lost cause before it has begun. All you people think as far as I can tell is that the police chief , sheriff and district attorney are catering to criminals to try to reform them. That is not what I see. It looks like a concerted effort to use multiple tactics to stop the criminal elements with outreach being just a part of the overall effort. Unlike our national governmental officials,I am glad our police and sheriff are not relating details openly which would doom the project. Why don't you naysayers give it a rest and in turn give these public servants a chance to succeed. P.S. Senator Vitter is a Republican to my knowledge unless you know something I don't.

13) Comment by phil - 05/09/2012

DID I READ THAT CORRECTLY?? - "The bulk of a three-year, $1.5 million federal grant to run a nationally acclaimed anti- violence program will be spent on research and data analysis conducted by LSU, officials said at a Wednesday news conference formally announcing the grant approval." The only research that needs to be done is to read some previous news articles about murders in Baton Rouge and where they took place. Also perhaps some research into why violent criminals and others shoot each other?? What a waste of money! I think the research that should be done is to research where all of that money will go to at LSU and what it will be used for. How about someone do a public records request for that? No wonder the federal government is about $16 trillion in debt. Sure we need something done about crime in BR - but spend it on more research? Get real - this will be a waste of taxpayer funds.

14) Comment by Mr. T - 05/09/2012

So Mr Walker and his Republican buddies were able to get this grant just by making a few phones calls to the Democrats in the Obama Administration? Somebody doesn't know what they are talking about. I mean, besides the person who wrote this article.

15) Comment by Bouncer - 05/09/2012

Prediction. The money will by and large simply line the pockets of officials and their cronies. Next prediction. This taxpayer-footed bonanza will have ZERO effect on the amount of crime in Baton Rouge.

16) Comment by markedwardmarchiafava - 05/09/2012

That isn't "grant" money, it's money stolen from taxpayers in all 57 states. What's the difference between the city council and someone arrested for receiving stolen goods?

17) Comment by nimby? - 05/09/2012

don't know if I'd be bragging about something that isn't working . time to dissolve the city-parish government ...

18) Comment by Whatnow - 05/09/2012

Sorry, Who cares...

19) Comment by Whatnow - 05/09/2012

Who care, you morons! Just stop the crime!

20) Comment by BRmoderate - 05/09/2012

let's see if these two airheads will be accepting responsibility when BRAVE fails as enthusiastically as they are fighting for credit now

21) Comment by nouveaurouge - 05/09/2012

You two crybabies can throw sand back and forth, but that does nothing to further this project. Have you seen the documentary The Interrupters, about Chicago's Cease Fire program? It's not about the politicians or the police, it is about the reformed gang bangers and criminals trying very hard to show young kids that there is a different way. BTW, the administrator in Chicago is not a cop, nor is he white. I should reserve judgment, but I already sense failure of BRAVE because of bureaucracy regardless of who our next mayor is. Y'all just don't GET it.

22) Comment by speakthetruth - 05/09/2012

Its a shame we have to run to the federal government begging for money to help with our crime problem, especially since money thrown at the problem is not going to fix it. Street patrols, whether using the Elite BRAVE Unit or the non-elite regular patrol units, it is the same resources of the police department. The federal money will not add to them. Oh, the overtime, we had the money for that but the cash cow paying $300,000 to create 3 new positions on the Police Department took that. 3 positions that will have nothing to do with solving the crime problem, but takes care of a few friends and clique members. The politics continues, and when politics gets involved the citizens lose. I speak the truth.