Your editorial “The opposite of science” fails in disproving creation or proving evolution.
Empirical science by definition is observable and there is NO empirical evidence to prove evolution. So it is evolution that is the opposite of science.
Presuppositional apologists’ arguments for creation use the same scientific facts to bolster their faith in a Creator that “scientists” use to bolster their faith in a teaching they cannot prove. With the discovery of DNA and the limits set by the information contained within, “scientists” are having to lengthen their assessment of the Earth’s age and theories disproved by its existence.
Some scientists have gone so far as to say that if Darwin had known about the information contained within DNA, he would have never postulated evolution as a possibility.