Letter: Educator supports Compass program

As an educator, I want to publicly thank the state and Legislature for providing teachers with an evaluation tool (Compass) that supports our work in an objective way.

This tool gives teachers insight into their practice and helps us know exactly how we’re doing in our efforts to improve student achievement.

For the first time, teachers have a tool that makes sure those of us who are excelling are recognized and rewarded.

With the recent ruling by a judge that Act I contained too many provisions, there has never been a more important time for us to stand together, put the needs of children in Louisiana first and take action to make sure the teacher evaluation system remains strong so great teachers can be identified and so that principals have decision-making authority on hiring and firing so they can easily reward great teachers.

It is a moral imperative to ensure that each classroom is equipped with an effective teacher. It is what our children deserve.

We must continue the public conversations about the teacher evaluation system so we can make changes that make the system stronger and have the ability to identify the tools and support needed by teachers in order to implement it successfully.

As I talk with other teachers in my school, they tell me they are not opposed to Compass.

In fact, they appreciate that they now have a professional development tool to help them improve and are pleased that legislation was passed that required adoption of new local salary schedules that reward effective performance and student growth and allows principals to reward effective teachers for their great work.

Now is the time for us to provide greater clarity throughout the state about Compass and make sure that teachers know that this is not a tool meant to penalize them or control their teaching.

This is a tool designed to support teachers in their practice and allow them the flexibility and the opportunity to teach the children in their classrooms in a way that will radically advance their academic outcomes.

We know the No. 1 thing we can give children to help them learn is a highly effective teacher. And the best thing we can give teachers is accurate, timely information and the support they need to implement this system effectively. If we work together, we can create a world class education system that provides all students with an effective teacher every year.

Maya Bennett

reading interventionist

Baton Rouge


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (27)


1) Comment by twinkie1cat - 23/03/2013

Teacherguy: I hope you are not one who retires early. It looks like you have mastered a big section of what it takes to survive right now: Keep the principal busy elsewhere so you can teach. Shut the door and do it, brother. Bet that's one of the unintentional results of Jindal's school destruction.

2) Comment by twinkie1cat - 23/03/2013

MBW I have explained that several times. It takes about 3 years. ( Maybe a little more for special education) The first year you are really struggling. The job can give you nightmares. The second you are getting comfortable. It is not as hard. The third you start to know what you are doing. This is WITH an education degree. And if you want to become a consumate professional you go back to school and get a Masters. When you take graduate work you are only taking courses related to your chosen field. There is no repeat of high school, nothing not related to your profession. I found grad school very enjoyable. No, teachers with education degrees are not "phonies" when they start out. They are beginners. They need a lot of guidance, help, professional development, and personal studies just like any beginner. The problem is, there is no "entry level" into education, a less challenging class for new teachers. The very children who are the most challenging, the ones who desperately need knowledge, creativity, and stability are the ones the beginners and TFAs are hired to teach. I never said there were not real teachers who were lazy. There are a few who are lazy. There are a few who are incompetent. I knew some racists and classists, both black and white. This does not mean they should be replaced by beginners and non- teachers. I have known one good TFA. She is going back to get her Masters in Special Education. Her friend I suspect is pretty good too. She seems dedicated to what she is doing, but I am not sure she will stay in the field. However, there was an alternate certified (no education degree but not a TFA) in Ascension Parish who was a bully and verbally abusive toward her students, her fellow teachers, and the paraprofessionals, to the extent that the new principal reportedly had to call her out. She was teaching moderately mentally handicapped students at a high school and had managed to get the former principal to consider her a goddess who could do no wrong. She did not even know her disability characteristics and how to use them to figure out the best way to teach her students! That is crucial in special education, to know your syndromes. I take my profession very seriously and did it for 27 years, getting a Masters in Severe Disabilities/Multihandicapped as well as an undergrad in Special Education and nearly an Ed.S. I taught mostly Severe/Profound If you would not take your child to a cashier at Walmart to have his tonsils removed, why would you have an amateur educate him! A young intern might do the job under close supervision, but there had better be a resident nearby. Our kids are too precious to waste.

3) Comment by 1ryben - 20/03/2013

If a teacher behaved as you describe. That teacher should be fired. Every teacher would agree. Tenure does not protect against malfeasance. The administrator at that school did though.

4) Comment by MBW - 20/03/2013

I was in TFA several years ago. It's not a perfect program (and I see that more so now that I'm several years removed). But I resent the notion that I was somehow less of a teacher.....especially when I had to watch some of my "real teacher" colleagues hand out worksheets and play videos all day every day. But yet, they were supposed to be the "real" teachers? I call ***** I worked my rear end off only to discover that my school was full of teachers on autopilot collecting a check and getting results that were no better than mine.

5) Comment by MBW - 20/03/2013

I'm not going to defend TFA...it has it's share of flaws. But judging from the comments on this board, I see yet another batch of teachers who see no urgency in dealing with educational inequality, and who buy into the false notion that they're powerless to do anything unless every child in the school comes from a perfect family.

6) Comment by MBW - 20/03/2013

twinkie1cat- How long does it take for a teacher to become a "real" teacher in your eyes? 5 years? 10 years? 20 years? Are people employed as teachers just phonies until then? You're yet another teacher who equates longevity with talent.

7) Comment by teacherguy - 19/03/2013

I am not opposed to COMPASS...it has created enough paperwork for my principal...I now only see him in my room twice a year! (He used to pop in unannounced throughout the year for 5-10 minutes every 2-3 weeks!) He also pulled up my VAM score to make sure that his COMPASS rating matches my VAM rating so he won't be placed in "remediation" for scoring my COMPASS too high, or too low. As long as my students don't score in the bottom 10% of the state, making me a bottom feeder...I can relax a lot more in my classroom than I used to!!! These reforms have done nothing but place blinders on what I need to teach to get the kids through their standardized testing, placed more busy work on my principal taking him further away from directly impacting my classroom curriculum, put the kids on a fast track to knowing a lot of facts without much ability to apply them, created unintentional "holes" in their skills (by assuming students have mastered certain skills because it was taught in an earlier grade), decreased the attractiveness of a career in education, caused courtroom battles, lowered teacher morale to an all-time low, taken money from public schools in order to experiment with "options" that do not have to live up to the public school accountability scrutiny, placed control of the LDoE in the hands of "weekend warrior educators", etc. But I will agree with Maya on one thing...Compass has more potential for the classroom teacher than any of the other reforms that have passed. The problem is...they are going to play havoc trying to get teachers to try/trust ANYTHING they offer to us FOR MANY YEARS TO COME. A little respect, cooperation with teachers, and dignity would have taken these reforms a LONG way...

8) Comment by bourbon-soda - 19/03/2013

@Tea_Slayer - everything I post here is hereby released into public domain, unless there is something in TOS where the Advocate can claim it. I am trying to think of an equivalent phrase for "teacher college graduate teachers." Maybe "conventionally certified teachers."

9) Comment by twinkie1cat - 19/03/2013

Ok, a teacher is always a teacher, but you are not really a teacher unless you make a career of it. It's a calling. You remain a teacher even if you don't work as one. Many teachers have other jobs or other professions also. I knew one in Ascension who painted houses. Maya, I am not sure is a teacher, not if she left the profession without getting an education degree. 2 years will not cut it. It takes at least three to learn your job WITH an education degree, as much as 5 for special education. The one TFA I have ever been impressed with is working on her Masters in Special Education. This is her 3rd year and she knows it is what she wants to do. I suggested she get at least 5 years in the classroom before she goes into administration, however, or she won't be respected. 10 would be better. >>>>>>>>> Education is a very difficult and complex field in which to work and that is one of the problems with TFA. There are no "entry level" jobs. And the easiest jobs are certainly not with disadvantaged children. You either do it satisfactorily or you struggle. You certainly cannot mentor. Most struggle although there are occasionally "naturals" who are newbies. Generally they come from families of teachers and just know how by instict. If they are special ed. newbies who just know, they have a close relative with a disability. The other option is a paraprofessional who is a retired teacher. That's what a friend of mine did in New Orleans. The TFA was teaching special ed. My friend was not a special ed teacher, but would call me for questions.>>>>>> No, Teaslayer, 2 years in the classroom does not make one an educator. And she has no business being any kind of specialist. This was part of the problem teachers had with the earlier TFAs. They had been told they were smarter and more capable than the real teachers, brainwashed like a child who is praised no matter what they do.

10) Comment by Tea_Slayer - 19/03/2013

total teaching time - 2 years in EBRPSS... Again, not a partial truth, 2 years teaching does not make her an educator....

11) Comment by Tea_Slayer - 19/03/2013

and her time in E Feliciana was spent coaching and mentoring actual teachers, not teaching.

12) Comment by Tea_Slayer - 19/03/2013

"I know teacher college graduate teachers who have real estate licenses and use them" She isn't teaching and doing real estate simultaneously. again..partial truth???? And you should trademark your "teacher college graduate teachers" term. As if going through 5 weeks of training in TFA is even close to what a "teacher college graduate teacher" gets in college.

13) Comment by Tea_Slayer - 19/03/2013

bourbon-soda, partial truth? look to your response. her page clearly states the dates of her various employments. She left Jackson Elementary School in July 2012 and began her real estate career that same month. "claims almost all the time since graduation from Wake Forest University involved in education" Her involvement in education (not necessarily as an educator) 2+ years TFA, then 2 years at Advance Innovative Education, a charter front group (any surprises there?), then Jackson Elementary for 2 years. She left teaching at the end of the 2011-2012 school year. To claim she is an "educator" is ridiculous.

14) Comment by bourbon-soda - 19/03/2013

Partial truth. Assuming it's hers, the linkedin page also claims almost all the time since graduation from Wake Forest University involved in education, although not pedigreed as most teacher college graduates might like. I know teacher college graduate teachers who have real estate licenses and use them. It never occurred to me that this initiative would discredit them as teachers. It is very difficult to show that the preferred preferred credentials confer any superiority at imparting measurable educational outcomes anyway.

15) Comment by Tea_Slayer - 19/03/2013

According to her Linkedin page, Maya is actually a real estate agent... did her 2 years in TFA then became the reading consultant for E Feliciana, and now is a real estate agent. Why would she misrepresent herself? -- http://www.linkedin.com/pub/maya- bennett/18/182/112

16) Comment by twinkie1cat - 19/03/2013

Glad I read down on the comments before I said anything. I thought Maya sounded too much like a Teach for America to be an actual teacher. How old are you girl, 23?? Can you speak Southern? How many years do you have in the classroom? It used to be that jobs like Reading Coach or Interventionist was something given to teachers with Master's degrees and certification in Reading and a lot of experience, professionals who knew what they were doing. If a teacher is going to specialize she needs to be a specialist or she can seriously screw up the kids. >>>>>>Your naivete give you away, baby. The Compass is not meant to be diagnostic/prescriptive and it is not being used in Louisiana the way the developer meant it to be used. It is being used to punish teachers and weed out the veterans who cost more to employ. You also gave yourself away by enthusing about pay for performance. It has been shown repeatedly that extra pay does not improve teaching. Teaching is not a job. It's a calling. We teach because we are teachers. The money allows us to do what God called us to. Do your research. Learn your trade. Get a Masters in Reading if that is what you want as a career. But don't tell us that Jindal's efforts to destroy the schools and turn them over to his supporters is a good thing.

17) Comment by Bouncer - 19/03/2013

Reading interventionist? OK. Students, the word for the day is "shill." Our next word is "toady." The final word is "brazen." Let's use our words together in a sentence. The brazen toadying of this TFA shill astonishes all legitimate teachers.

18) Comment by Concerned_Parent - 19/03/2013

#1 You are a reading interventionist and not a homeroom teacher, thus your opinion of the new system is not the same as others. It does not affect you the same way. Not saying that what you do is not needed. As a matter of fact, I think they need more interventionist that spend 1 on 1 time with struggling students. #2 I think one of the largest objections is the so called "reward" system. Sounds good in principle, but where is the money? There are MANY parishes on salary freezes. The state has once again put a freeze on spending. Who is going to reward the teachers?? Where is the money coming from? I've posed this question to BESE members, John White, and several members of the legislature. I've yet to get an answer in 9 months since my first request. Thus you see reports coming from school superintendants and the teacher retirement system of an increase in early retirees. They can make more money to provide for their families if they leave b/c they are guaranteed not to make more money if they stay.

19) Comment by tradewinns - 19/03/2013

perhaps the state could provide our useless school districts with a parent version of this program. if one truly wanted to correct our failing situation in our schools, they would come down hard on the useless parents of our useless students in our useless system. but they don't.

20) Comment by bourbon-soda - 19/03/2013

rgeraldwallace - A reading interventionist is probably like the "science instigator" who admits she doesn't know much about science, in the Advocate article the other day about the dead sharks "laying" on a table. At least that was a private school paying for its own boondoggle.

21) Comment by bourbon-soda - 19/03/2013

Scrooge - good post. Thanks. Double edged sword, the assertion that any particular program will "radically advance academic outcomes." Part of the steam for the so-called reforms, is that radically advanced academic outcomes have been advertised for many decades as right around the corner. The reforms won't work and will soon be just another educationist beer can on the side of the "road of education," IMO.

22) Comment by rgeraldwallace@cox.net - 19/03/2013

Now, just what is a "reading interventionist"? If I'm reading I don't want anyone to intervene. It's not another one of these "Moby Dick" type of interpreters, is it? See Bob run. Maybe that doesn't mean Bob's feet actually moved in a bi-pedal motion quickly forward; maybe it means that Bob is considering a run for the Senate?

23) Comment by Scrooge - 19/03/2013

Surely a person as enlightened as a TFA reading interventionist would understand that claims to "radically advance their academic outcomes" are meaningless without evidence? One could just as easily say that ideology will radically advance academic outcomes. The whole historical road of education is littered with the stinking offal of unsubstantiated radically advanced programs and the vast amounts of money wasted on them. They do serve to temporarily advance the careers of persons who hysterically embrace their use, as long as the person moves on before the farce is discovered.

24) Comment by Scrooge - 19/03/2013

"radically advance their academic outcomes" Does anyone have information as to the research and evidence for this claim?

25) Comment by mikedoughty - 19/03/2013

Ms. Bennett is in fact TFA. I defy any of those 5-week-wonders to justify being called an "educator". This "letter" is just a regurgitation of their standard line.

26) Comment by 1ryben - 18/03/2013

I sense lots of reformer speak and buzz words in the letter. I would t be surprised to find that Ms. Bennett is TFA. Are reading Interventionists included in VAM scoring? Or SLT?

27) Comment by 1ryben - 18/03/2013

Teachers at my school feel quite differently. There are many holes in the compass evaluation system. Even one of the creators of the system says the evaluations are invalid because the state thought it too cumbersome to use the entire system. Please read the Louisiana Educator blog, and Mercedes Schneider's blog (they comment here periodically). Then come back and tell me you'd still agree to be judged by that instrument.