Good report, bad statistic

With significant new hiring in the private sector in February and a lower unemployment rate, there was considerable good news in a new jobs report from the U.S. Labor Department. But one of the bad numbers was the stubbornly high level of those out of work for a long time — officially defined as 27 weeks or more.

That number rose to 4.8 million in February from 4.7 million in January. People out of work for that long-term period now account for 40 percent of the unemployed.

It’s data that worries Ben Bernanke, head of the Federal Reserve.

“High unemployment has substantial costs, including not only the hardship faced by the unemployed and their families, but also the harm done to the vitality and productive potential of our economy as a whole,” Bernanke told the U.S. Senate last month, before this newest report.

However, given the large amounts of data crunched by the Fed and its member banks, it’s quite likely that Bernanke knew that the problem wasn’t likely to be fixed in the February report.

“Lengthy periods of unemployment and underemployment can erode workers’ skills and attachment to the labor force or prevent young people from gaining skills and experience in the first place — developments that could significantly reduce their productivity and earnings in the longer term,” Bernanke said.

It’s a significant worry, and ought to put a more positive light on the Fed’s strategy of trying to keep interest rates extremely low in the hopes of gradually improving the employment picture.

The Fed’s job is to look at the long term, and with inflation so far not a threat, the issue of getting people to work deserves priority.


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (7)


1) Comment by tradewinns - 12/03/2013

most of those termed "long term unemployed" do have real job skills. unfortunately those jobs are no longer available. i hav no real answer for them except to continue to seek and hope things turn around for our economy to nake it easier. to those i was talking about that won't do those types of jobs, those are the professionally welfare connected workers who aren't intewrested in working. they have no or few real job skills to sell so they do just as well or better on welfare than if they took one of those low skill, low paying, usually a dirty duty job. i'd allow those folks to not only go hungry but to starve if they so desire, it's their choice.

2) Comment by 8point6 - 12/03/2013

@agagent: You're making too much sense for my "progressive" friends to comprehend.

3) Comment by agagent - 12/03/2013

Get rid of Obama policies that hurt job creation: allow the Keystone pipeline; reinstate the rescinded permits from the Bush administration; open up federal lands to oil and gas exploration and wind energy; set reasonable limits on unemployment benefits to lower the cost of unemployment insurance; use generating plants until new ones come on line; eliminate the useless red tape; allow more use of clean coal until we have an alternative; stop the bailouts and let incompetent businesses go through the normal bankruptcy process; stop discriminating against non-union labor; don’t subsidize risky mortgages and risky college loans; get rid of Fannie and Freddie; stop wasting money on ineffective mortgage rescue and cash for clunkers programs; recover unspent TARP and stimulus funds; tighten eligibility for food stamps and disability; close the border and deport illegal aliens; and repeal Obamacare.

4) Comment by agagent - 12/03/2013

As another post said, the unemployment rate is worst than the BLS unemployment rate indicates. If the labor participation rate were the same as when Obama first took office, the unemployment rate would be well above 10%. BLS does not count the millions no longer looking for work as unemployed. Another reason the unemployment rate is not higher is that people are taking part time work even though they need full time employment.

5) Comment by DMJ - 12/03/2013

Sadly, it's hard to get a new job if you don't already have one. Anyone who's been out of work can attest to this.

6) Comment by rgeraldwallace@cox.net - 12/03/2013

Yes tradewinns, and what about the people who have stopped looking for work and the severe decline in the total number of jobs? The real unemployment number is around 14.7 %.

7) Comment by tradewinns - 12/03/2013

what about the 13 million illegals who are only here because there are jobs americans "just won't do". if it came down to going hungry. thristy, and without shelter or doing one of these jobs, those jobs would be taken by americans. that would assist in two different problems.