Our Views: Action needed for ‘old’ cities

An AARP survey suggests that more than four of five older Americans expect to stay in their homes when they retire.

What happens to them in Baton Rouge when they are no longer able to drive?

That’s a question that is pregnant with trouble for many cities across the country with the tradition of suburban sprawl. Planners across the nation, as well as in Baton Rouge and other Louisiana cities, grapple with the problems that are coming.

And ensuing they are. Against time and tide man struggles in vain — and time is against older drivers, and the tide of traffic will overwhelm their vision and reflexes sooner or later.

People are living longer and more-active lives, according to planners cited by Governing magazine. “It isn’t your grandmother’s aging,” quipped Terri Lynch of the Arlington (Va.) County Agency on Aging.

Arlington was the jurisdiction, just outside Washington, D.C., where Governing surveyed the extensive actions — more than just the talk you hear around most city halls — to adjust to an aging population. By 2030, the county’s over-65 population is projected to double, and its over-85 group is set to almost triple.

Modifications to street crossings to make them safer to pedestrians, buses that don’t require a big step up to get into, biking lessons for seniors — all are relatively small-budget items but have required the always-conservative government to change its policies.

One bigger issue: zoning. The large suburban subdivision is a function of government power, with zoning laws traditionally requiring sprawl; mixed uses found in older neighborhoods were forbidden.

In Arlington, the zoning law is allowing homeowners to build additions to their homes — “granny flats” — that can provide housing for older family members. In the past, homeowners’ associations invoked zoning to prevent that type of construction in many cities.

Alan DeLaTorre, project coordinator at Portland State University’s Institute on Aging, told Governing that housing construction must change. “For the last 50 to 100 years, we’ve been building Peter Pan housing,” he said. “It assumes you’re not going to grow up and grow old.”

“We’re in a period of transition that’s pretty dramatic,” added David Dixon, who leads the planning and urban design practice at the Boston-based firm Goody Clancy. “You look at major metro areas, and sometimes a third or more of their growth for the next 30 years is folks over 65. That’s a hugely (significant) and rapid transition.”

Driving is, of course, a critical matter in places — Baton Rouge prime among them — where sidewalks and bike paths are rare, and pedestrians of any age are trekking through mud when it rains, and have little shade when the sun shines. The issue is how legions of older people can get around safely in coming years, because people can walk much longer than they can safely drive.

Governing quoted the planning director of Westchester County in New York. “In all of the surveys that we do of seniors and the outreach to the senior community, we find that their No. 1 concern about getting older is transportation,” director Naomi Klein said. “They don’t want to lose their independence. There’s real concern about having to give up driving.”

It is a real issue when the older citizen is a fast-growing demographic.

The Governing piece highlighted suburban jurisdictions where officials are taking significant action, instead of the endless task forces and studies and do-nothing “achievements” of Baton Rouge’s city hall. Here, every change is treated as requiring an Act of Congress, and every significant change is prejudged as too costly.

There is some better news elsewhere in the state, as “smart growth” policies are being pushed by leaders in Lafayette and New Orleans. In the latter a “complete streets” ordinance seeks to ensure that the needs of everyone using a street — not just drivers — are planned for in design and construction. Better funding, both state and local, for public transit does make a difference. Voters in Baton Rouge have passed a first-ever property tax for the support of transit. State support remains limited.

Increasingly clear, though, is the cost of acting as if time and tide do not matter.


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (9)


1) Comment by phil - 20/02/2013

Smart growth is another name for Agenda 21 and it is actually mentioned in some of their own documents. Now we bring rail into this conversation too? I guess old folks will need passenger rail from Baton Rouge to New Orleans so they can walk to the rail station and hop on a train and go to New Orleans to buy groceries? Bringing up rail is just another example of an illogical response to a totally different topic. Passenger rail will cost taxpayers a fortune to subsidize every year, and that fact is backed up by real studies that have already been done. I will say one more thing now. When I get old(er) I will be so broke paying taxes for all of this junk, I plan to go on welfare, medicaid etc and just let the government cart me around for "free". Is that the real solution the "smart" growth people are looking for? DMJ how about you might plan to help your OWN parents if they are still here, like has already been done for years and years by others in the past.

2) Comment by DMJ - 18/02/2013

This is another reason a completely auto-centric culture is not sustainable. Sidewalks, bike lanes, public transit, rail, zoning law reform... we need all of these desperately. It's too late for today's seniors; they will simply drive until they or someone close to them realizes it's dangerous, which is usually right after an accident. However, if we start planning for the next generation of seniors, we might have a chance. FutureBR is a step in the right direction for sure.

3) Comment by healthbudget - 17/02/2013

the biggest issue is lack of mass transit and Booby not developing rail

4) Comment by bourbon-soda - 16/02/2013

Also, why no mention of crime and deterioration of expected behavior in "the public square" as deterrents to cycling and walking?

5) Comment by bourbon-soda - 16/02/2013

Why is old people's voting such a potent force nationally, making "third rails" of Medicare and SS, but impotent regionally and locally? My guess is, they see federal programs as being subsidized by other people's money; local and regional projects, with their own sales and property taxes, but that's just a guess.

6) Comment by rgeraldwallace@cox.net - 16/02/2013

Yep, a valid issue and one that anybody can see needs to be addressed. Sidewalks are a necessity that has been overlooked because most of the taxpayer money is directed to other things more politically convenient.

7) Comment by agagent - 16/02/2013

Actually the editorial writer has it backwards. If you want to live in a “senior friendly” community move to an old city or community which has retained its old mixed-use development, a traditional street grid with sidewalks, and needed services within walking distance. The modern permitting process has separated land uses and helped Baton Rouge change its tradition grid pattern of streets to a network of high speed highways which separates suburbs from many services.

8) Comment by phil - 15/02/2013

Over the past centuries people never got old so this is a totally new concept - right? Another pretend problem is being created so that even more and more expensive studies etc for solutions to non- issues can be started. I guess all of these old folks never had any children that will help care for them? Maybe the new progressive generation just plans to leave their old parents at home alone to fend for themselves? Our society might have problems, but having old folks around is not a new one.

9) Comment by twinkie1cat - 15/02/2013

What will happen to seniors when they can no longer drive? They will get locked up in nursing homes that are run as for-profit businesses, that's what. You can't expect anything good to happen in a state that allowed its governor to fire the department head over the Councils on Aging, and tried to deny hospice care to anyone one Medicaid outside of these prisons for the unwanted. Jindal only cares about the wealthy and the conservative.