Letter: Recruiting doesn’t make ‘select’ teams

The Louisiana High School Athletic Association recently voted to split football playoffs between “select” and “nonselect” schools. One of the more outspoken member-principals addressing the matter at their meeting was Winnfield Principal Jane Griffin, who complained about “select” schools dominating football because LHSAA fails to police “recruiting.”

The 2012-2013 LSU football roster suggests the “recruiting” argument is a fallacy. If the LHSAA majority’s accusation were correct, if the “select” schools were recruiting all of the state’s best athletes, one would see a plethora of Catholic and private school grads playing every week in top programs such as LSU’s.

However, on LSU’s roster of 90-odd student-athletes, there is only one John Curtis grad and only one Evangel grad. There is a total of maybe 22 players from faith-based and/or private schools. Of those, only about four or five saw any significant playing time this past season. The rest are essentially practice-squad kids, there for the love of the game. There must be another explanation for the “select” schools’ domination.

Griffin further lamented: “Things are not fair and equitable.”

Life is not fair and equitable. Griffin and the LHSAA will never change that. Some parents will do whatever it takes, make whatever sacrifices are necessary, to send their children to the best schools they can afford. Many parents will do only the minimum to get their kids to the most-convenient schools available.

I am a parent of two middle-school children, enrolled in a New Orleans Catholic school.

We forgo luxuries, skip vacation trips and drive 10-year-old cars, so we can provide this for our children. Both are honor students; both are avid athletes.

Thousands of like-minded parents, who sacrifice for their children’s education, also spend countless hours each week with their children at the playground or gym, for football, baseball, softball, soccer, basketball and volleyball practices and games. Many of us also sacrifice to afford our children the advantages club sports (“travel teams”) offer, beyond that offered by parish recreation departments.

Ours are not necessarily the best athletes in our communities. Very few will ever run through the tunnel at Tiger Stadium, even as “squad men.”

However, by the time they reach their “select” high schools, they will have developed skills necessary for competition, and they will be disciplined in a manner entirely foreign to the culture of “nonselect” schools.

Consequently, their “select” schools will continue to dominate, not because they are recruiting the best athletes, but because “select” school parents are the kind who enable their children to be the best they can be. And no action by the LHSAA can or will ever change that fact.

Michael L. Martin

lawyer

New Orleans


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (70)


1) Comment by mthomason1975 - 06/02/2013

You know it appears to me the LHSAA is trying to go back to something the fought to get rid of years ago. Anyone remembers the Louisiana Independent School Association (LISA) from years past? LHSAA disliked them because they were a coalition of the private schools athletic programs and took away from LHSAA attention. See Wikipedia link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Louisiana_Independent_School_Association LISA if I remembered correctly was focused and founded locally and worked specifically with local private schools and smaller independent schools only so this wasn't an issue.

2) Comment by Sidwit - 06/02/2013

In these discussions, no one mentions West Monroe High or even Neville. Both are public schools and both have tremendous football programs. Their programs recruit for themselves. Remember a few years back when either Vandebilt or ED White was ranked number 1 and lost in the first round to West St. Mary, the number 32 seed. That's what dreams are made of. The bottom line is not everybody is a winner and as Grantland Rice said, winning isn't everything, it's how you play the game. There's more to life than winning a state championship. Henderson needs to be replaced and someone with backbone and common sense needs to take over the LSHAA. And Winnfield, get a grip and hit the weights.

3) Comment by bourbon-soda - 06/02/2013

@ coach - Granting myself a dispensation on usual policy of not commenting on the person of commenters, you impress me as an example of sanity in an insane place. My only speculation about a solution is that there seem to be provisions among the welter of laws and regulations to the effect that students are entitled to an appropriate academic curriculum, pleading that athletes have 'special needs'. If sports are an extension of the curriculum (as LHSAA likes to say) maybe there is some relief there (but I doubt it - too reasonable). I think the LHSAA position on curriculum and sports is reasonable; splitting the body from the mind seems artificial, to me, but that's just me.

4) Comment by coachblades - 05/02/2013

You could be right. But as a coach of a public school when i looked across the field at parkview baptist i knew my boys didnt stand a chance with our "low calorie and carb" lunches and their steak and chicken high protein nutrition program. I watched springfield highschool a little 2a public school that made it farthest they ever had in the playoffs and easily could have made it to the dome get their brains beat in by John Curtis in the semi finals game.

5) Comment by bourbon-soda - 05/02/2013

@coach - thanks for another good comment. I think I agree with the last sentences in your next-to-last post - this will result in even more disparity between "nonselect" and "select" football, and not only because they will have to pull in more select athletes, but select athletes will have the perception that select schools are where you attain credibility with colleges. This will influence even boys who are not real candidates for college football, because none of them sees himself that way. I think the "nonselect" majority at LHSAA has shot itself in the foot with this.

6) Comment by coachblades - 05/02/2013

Yes 1ryben it includes magnet and charters. The wording states that any school without an attendance zone is considered , not just "private schools"

7) Comment by coachblades - 05/02/2013

Bourbon yes TOO much Gov is the problem. America had the greatest public school system in the world until every gov official (mostly non teachers and none with education degrees) decided they "knew" how to improve education. Believe it or not it is the party of small government (republicans) that continuously push new regulations, restrictions and more government into our schools. George W gave us NCLB and what a failure its been , wonderful behavior plans, and inclusion (i can tell you about those later) In my parish they are thinking of implementing a "go where you want" system to satisfy a deseg lawsuit. And yes michelle's "get healthy" initiative put her in with whatever federal agency (i think FDA not sure though) to enforce "healthier" eating at public schools. we cant even put a vending machine on campus unless the snacks are approved. As for voting for the prez, must be teachers at other schools bc at mine we are overwhelmingly republican including myself. @nimby i see what your saying but in no way is this rule change gonna keep kids from leaving public schools for private. They can still go and get the private education on scholarships. these rule changes only say that private schools will play only other private schools if anything this will increase competition between private schools to get more and better players and as a result give out more scholarships. If its the education you are concerned with this will actually promote giving out more scholarships...

8) Comment by 1ryben - 05/02/2013

If a school wants to help a kid with a scholarship be it academic, athletic, left handed, whatever. Fine go ahead. Go all the way and recruit just like colleges. Just don't tell me it's a fair playing field to play against those that can't. Form your own division within LHSAA or even a completely different association. (Seems like that may be happening) Just like comparing academics, you can not compare schools that get to choose their populations with those that are legally forbidden. I could be wrong, but does t the wording include any school that selects their students considered a select school? This would include magnet and charter schools. Back to the topic, yes sports help kids. Just like the arts and cheer and dance and so on. That's not the point this is about creating fair and balanced competition in athletic events. That's all. To try to twist this into anything else is trying to promote a different agenda.

9) Comment by coachblades - 05/02/2013

****Comment Removed for Violation of Terms of Use****

10) Comment by nimby? - 05/02/2013

coachblades , I understand the logic , emotions behind this . as a former teacher in the parish I've had students who because of their abilities were able to benefit from such . they had to make the grades to play ball . in order to do this some received extra attention that a public school could not give . none of them ever went to the pros but all went to college , attained degrees . to me this is more important .

11) Comment by bourbon-soda - 05/02/2013

@coachblades - thanks, I appreciate your posts. Sounds like the government schools' main problem, is government. Why not do away with school zones and let people apply for where they want to go to school? As for the Michelle Obama dietary problem - I didn't know about that - didn't most teachers vote for her husband, and what has she ever been elected to that allows this authority?

12) Comment by coachblades - 05/02/2013

Nimby yes parents do fudge addresses to send their kids to certain schools but in the case of the LHSAA and sports this doesnt work. The LHSAA actually conducts home visits to determine a childs eligibility status. There must be a house with furniture the house must appear to be lived in with bills going to that house in the legal guardians name. They conduct several visits some announced some unannounced. The LHSAA does a better job of enforcing district lines than the school district does. However these visits/rules/regulations only apply to who???public schools. All private schools have to do is draw themselves up an official District line and they can play in the regular playoffs. I have nothing against private schools but why is it that in this case all the LHSAA is saying is private schools with no boundary lines many with nutrition programs just for athletes will have to play other private schools with no boundary lines and nutrition programs for athletes you guys complain? If we feed our kids ANYTHING other than michelle obama approved food we are in serious violation of many federal guidelines. Im sorry but this goes back to the voucher debate as well private schools love competing with public schools just as long as private schools have to follow few if any rules and public schools get the most rules and regulations.

13) Comment by nimby? - 05/02/2013

and parents never fudge addresses so there kids can attend other schools ? pardon my "density" , but if a school's cheating gives a few good kids a better chance at life by keeping them in the classroom I say bravo . on this we'll agree to disagree ...

14) Comment by bourbon-soda - 05/02/2013

I forgot one my amateur sociological observations: people who hold the LSU football culture in contempt are in a swivet over sports.

15) Comment by Sandy - 05/02/2013

If they are going to separate them, they should do it completely. What they are doing is making them second class citizens. They want to be able to use the "select" schools to fill the schedule during the regular season, but don't want to have to watch them win championships, so they send them to the back of the bus. Select schools should split completely and form their own athletic association. It would be fairer for them.

16) Comment by Tea_Slayer - 05/02/2013

sour grapes? hardly. You just have a reading comprehension problem. Team A (private) playing Team B (private) in a state championship game has absolutely nothing to do with academics. "many use football to continue their education" good for them but trouncing a public school team because that team can't "recruit" or give "scholarships" like the private school can teaches what? You are being as dense as bourbon-soda by absolutely ignoring the basis for separating "select" schools from public.

17) Comment by nimby? - 05/02/2013

and you sound like sour grapes ! if a child excels in academics they have the option of magnet schools to further prepare them for continued education . some are only good students who excel in athletics . BRHS doesn't have a football team . many use football to continue their education . I've had a number of former students who took advantage of such situations . they've done well for themselves , kept a couple of them from returning to the streets . where's your heart , your compassion . what happens on the field has a lot to do whether a child stays in school or not ...

18) Comment by Tea_Slayer - 05/02/2013

nimby?: more twisting, thanks for proving my point yet again. This has NOTHING to do with a classroom but keeping athletics on a level playing field. it's the same as putting a 5A school against a 2A. So why would you compare the academics of the 5A school and 2A school? It has nothing to do with what happens on the field, no matter how much you or bourbon-soda twist it.

19) Comment by coachblades - 05/02/2013

People ask your fellow coaches...For years the powerhouse athletic programs have been pushing for a "super class". Now the private school supporters are complaining because you dont like the "super class" you got. Seems unfair doesnt it???? kinda like those educational standards we public schools have but the private schools....well we will just take your word for it that you are educating our voucher kids.

20) Comment by nimby? - 05/02/2013

Tea_Slayer , no twist . the object is to get kids in school , keep them there . if a child is "drafted" by Catholic high because he can play ball , he will need to maintain grades to do such . he will stand a better chance once reaching college . is this not better for the child ? remember the name Warrick Dunn ? don't magnet schools pick and choose their students ? no politicking or preferential treatment ?

21) Comment by Tea_Slayer - 05/02/2013

I see nimby has joined bourbon-soda in twisting the argument. Schools that can select their pupils (private) have an advantage over those that can't (public) in athletics. LHSAA recognizes that and has acted accordingly. If a parent want to send his kid to a private school, who cares? But these schools will now be competing with similar schools.

22) Comment by Tea_Slayer - 05/02/2013

Hmm, not one of your posts points to LHSAA as being responsible for curriculum. Yet you still persist in derailing the discussion. You aren't nearly as clever as you think you are. Keep trying, little engine.

23) Comment by nimby? - 05/02/2013

athletics are the only reason a lot of kids stay in school , further their education . seems this would be a positive endeavor . nothing wrong with a parent wanting whats best for their child .

24) Comment by bourbon-soda - 05/02/2013

This may help explain why parents or guardians of a high school athlete would select a select school - that the decision is actually made on the basis of academic superiority is a viable hypothesis. Lower levels of criminality among the students of select schools is a viable alternative or complementary hypothesis. At least some athletes don't have to wait for Superman.

25) Comment by bourbon-soda - 05/02/2013

http://www.zacharytoday.com/view/full_story/20844923/article- LHSAA-2012-All-Academic-teams-for-Fall-sports "LHSAA Executive Director, Kenny Henderson stated, “... We are convinced that participation in high school sports can serve as an extension of the high school classroom and as after-school laboratory classrooms for students in their present and later lives.... this association stresses the qualities that are important for successful living; in fact, we want the entire state to realize the LHSAA’s commitment to all-around excellence in our schools,” he added.

26) Comment by bourbon-soda - 05/02/2013

http://lhsaa.org/news/directors-column/recognizing-athletes-on- off-the-field/ "high school sports are an extension of our student- athletes’ total educational experience"

27) Comment by Tea_Slayer - 05/02/2013

Last time I checked, LHSAA doesn't make policy concerning classroom activities. That is the purview of school boards and BESE. As soon as LHSAA starts making classroom policy, then you can claim that confining this discussion to athletics is arbitrary. Until then, just continue to think you are being clever and go about your business.

28) Comment by bourbon-soda - 05/02/2013

The comma after "principals" is a mistake. Sorry.

29) Comment by bourbon-soda - 05/02/2013

It is not a stretch the LHSAA does to the academic side. Last time I looked, the LHSAA was essentially an organization of school principals, with authority over and responsibility for both the academic and athletic sides of their schools. Last time I looked, the LHSAA had something in their official documents to the effect that athletics is/are something like "an extension of the classroom." It is not inappropriate to consider the interplay of athletic and academic achievement for the individual as well as for the school. Select schools dominate in both arenas. The nature of this correlation is a valid question. To circumscribe the discussion in the way suggested, is arbitrary.

30) Comment by 1ryben - 05/02/2013

Though I can't speak to all private schools, but the few I did teach in did have a scholarship program. Many of these scholarships went to students of need, academics, etc. but many also went to students because of service to the school. By service to the school, many of these students competed in athletics. I can't give you a specific article or website but again, I assure you it did and does happen. That being said, I certainly wouldnt fault the parents for making any decision that they feel is in the best interest of their child. I'm not certain my personal feelings on this decision by the LHSAA but I've read and understand the nonselect side of the argument.

31) Comment by Whatchange - 05/02/2013

1ryben; to be fair, someone did mention academic scholarship in a earlier post. I put "private/catholic/christian schools" to cover all private schools, not to bring religion into the discussion. Now for my question, you said "Yes, I know for a fact that some, maybe not all, private schools give scholarships". Again, I ask for proof positive and not hear say, please provide the proof positive, give me a web site, give me an article, give me something that says private schools give free education to some at the expenses of the other parents. If I'm paying $5,000 a semester/year to send my child to a private school and someone else's child goes for free because they are good at a sport, I want to know about it.

32) Comment by Tea_Slayer - 05/02/2013

1ryben: told ya... LHSAA has nothing to do with academics but bourbon-soda is framing his posts in that manner (being obtuse). The only reference any of his posts make to athletics is to mention volleyball. He knows he has no leg to stand on with the actual argument at hand so attempts (poorly, I might add) to shift the discussion to academics or demographics or merit finalists, etc. He enjoys this because he thinks he is being clever in annoying us. Oh well...

33) Comment by 1ryben - 05/02/2013

This has nothing to do with religion or academics, only athletics. It is abundantly clear that the private schools have an advantage. Yes, I know for a fact that some, maybe not all, private schools give scholarships for some, maybe not all, athletes. I am not saying that the private schools should stop that practice, but don't claim that it is the same as or fair to the public schools. The number of championships that the private schools win is no where near the proportion to the number of the schools.

34) Comment by bourbon-soda - 05/02/2013

This discussion is a sketch in itself. People who, I infer, implore for more education, and especially more funding for education, dump on someone who, I infer, has taken advantage of educational opportunities to better himself, when he has the temerity to write a letter to the editor. People who, I infer, would strenuously object to being religiously proselytized regarding, say, adultery or illegitimacy, have no hesitation to impose a requirement that one redistribute one's wealth or earnings, in order for an opinion to be taken seriously.

35) Comment by bourbon-soda - 05/02/2013

@tryben & Tea_Slayer - my proclivities and opinions are irrelevant, but if anyone can find any work on the choices made by athletes and their parents/guardians re private v. public school, I would bet on the lower level of criminality in the former, rather than the number of National Merit qualifiers or state literary rally honors, but in what appears to be a vacuum of information on the question, that's just a guess. @Whatchange - check out volleyball.

36) Comment by unevahno - 05/02/2013

Mr Martin, how saintly of you to take a pass on your vacations and drive a 10 year old car. You failed to mention the make and model of that car. A vacation to most people is spending the weekend at a relative's house within driving distance. Also, if you follow football at all, you'll know that the elite players from Curtis and Evangel leave the state to play football. Booty, Berlin or McKnight ring any bells? The one Evengel player who came to LSU did not think Nick Saban could coach as well as his dad. They were shown the door ... together.

37) Comment by Whatchange - 05/02/2013

So, do any of y'all claiming free scholarships to private/catholic/christian schools know of a student who is attending a private/catholic/christian school on a sports/academic scholarship. Not saying they aren't, but if they are recruiting the best athletes in the state with the offer of a free education to a private/catholic/christian school wouldn't they dominate in all sports, the only place I see private/catholic/christian schools dominating is wrestling with exception to John Curtis. I have checked on the Internet and found nothing about private/catholic/christian schools offering sports/academic scholarship. I would be interested in proof positive of this going on and not just hear say.

38) Comment by Clem - 04/02/2013

First off let me state that I am not in full agreement of the current LHSAA changes but if I'm reading this all correctly the majority vote was in favor of the changes. SO BE IT! Mr. Martin does represent a percentage of the population who want their children to be successful in the future and that is honorable. But, He is way off the mark if He doesn't think that public school parents don't want that same outcome. And you know what Mr. Martin some of us do hit the mark being public school members. And to boot a good many of us struggled like He did to get some positive results for our beloved children. And We also strongly believe that there is an Almighty God. Public school grad, Vietnam Viet, Retiree after 40 years of work in the private sector. Been there done that!

39) Comment by Tea_Slayer - 04/02/2013

1ryben, i've come to realize that bourbon-soda enjoys being obtuse. Of course, he would claim that he is only being inquisitive...wink wink...

40) Comment by bourbon-soda - 04/02/2013

@ 1ryben - I'm just trying to figure out why the athlete and parents or guardians take the private school scholarship instead of the public school scholarship.

41) Comment by Tea_Slayer - 04/02/2013

whatnow, care to address any of my posts or are you just upset that I haven't addressed your rants in a while? Such a sad existence if you rely on me to justify it...

42) Comment by 1ryben - 04/02/2013

Oh, a d Soda, we know you are tryi g to bait someone into saying that the private schools just must be better academically. Not so fast, but that's not the topic at hand.

43) Comment by 1ryben - 04/02/2013

Sorry Soda, your reasoning doesn't hold muster. A public gives a "scholarship" (free tuition to each a d every kid in a given geographic area. They can not give scholarships to any gifted athlete from outside that boundary. Private schools get to select gifted athletes from anywhere they chose. There are no boundaries. Now it a private school identifies a gifted athlete and that athlete accepts their scholarship, they gain a great athlete while the public school loses one. That's a net change of two. The private school gains one while the public school loses one. So buy the best players, brag about your success, be proud, etc, but fair, no, it's not.

44) Comment by Whatnow - 04/02/2013

Tea_Slayer, why didn't you ask twinkie1cat the same question with her blathering about her racism, parenting and John White?

45) Comment by bourbon-soda - 04/02/2013

How would a public school offer a "scholarship" when they are already free at the point of consumption? The "scholarship" from the private school puts them on equal footing with the public school in this regard.

46) Comment by nimby? - 04/02/2013

it is assumed the Martin family is well off . does anyone know this for a fact . if my child showed athletic skills , maybe able to play ball on the college level I'd want him/her to be prepared to continue their education , in case that NBA , NFL , MLB career didn't pan out . lot of deserving kids are passed over for the magnet schools . and there's no politics in this ?

47) Comment by Tea_Slayer - 04/02/2013

"I agree with Mr. Martin, my parents did the same things to put my brother and I [sic] through a private Catholic school thank God." What does that statement have to do with the competitiveness among private schools that offer athletic scholarships and public schools that can't?

48) Comment by 8point6 - 04/02/2013

Thank you, Mr. Martin for an excellent letter!

49) Comment by Tigerman66 - 04/02/2013

I agree with Mr. Martin, my parents did the same things to put my brother and I through a private Catholic school thank God. The LHSAA is anti-Catholic/Private Schools?

50) Comment by twinkie1cat - 04/02/2013

Mr Martin stated that life is not fair in response to Winnfield's principal that recruiting is not fair. As a moneyed person witth a good education, I think Mr. Martin should use his means to make life a little more fair for those whom God loves. Apparently he is Catholic if he sends his chlidren to their schools. He knows what the Bible says we should do if we are followers of Christ.

51) Comment by coachblades - 04/02/2013

If "recruiting doesnt make selct teams" then please explain to me how John Curtis won state titles in 7 sports last year.

52) Comment by twinkie1cat - 04/02/2013

Private schools offer athletic scholarships. I remember a school begun as a segregation academy in middle Georgia offered scholarships to the first black students they ever had because they felt the wanted to improve their football team. But these "select" schools, why would they object to playing against their own kind, especially in play offs. It seems to me that since they consider themselves so much better than the public schools that they would not want their little darlings getting cooties from the poorer students. I notice Mr. Martin in a lawyer. The sacrifices he has made for his children to go to private school are made possible by his undoubtedly gargantuan salary. I don't fault him for having money if he earned it honestly. However, driving a 10 year old car is not commensurate with the public school parent who rides the bus to her minimum wage job and then spends the evening ensuring her child gets his homework done and doesn't hang out on the corner. All good parents make huge sacrifices for their children. Good parenting is not based on how much green is in one's pocket. Whether those sacrifices are of vacations and new cars or working extra shifts, riding the bus and gettting up early on parents' day off so their child gets to church and Sunday School, the important thing is that they are made so they can help their children be the best they can be, rich or poor. ........A final thought. Public schools have good teachers, certified teachers at least the ones John White has not run off yet. What they don't have is the money to fund small classes and the extras like the privates do.Private school is a choice for those who can afford it. But they are not anything good if they teach a child to look down on others as inferior as it appears Mr. Martin does.

53) Comment by Tea_Slayer - 04/02/2013

1. The letter and the discussion is about high school SPORTS, not curriculum. 2. Private schools offer sports scholarships while public schools can not. 3. This gives the private schools an advantage in SPORTS since they can poach athletes from public (as well as other private) schools.

54) Comment by bourbon-soda - 04/02/2013

You are right; I don't get it. If tuition is zero either place and the non- select school is geographically convenient, why would the parent want the kid to go to the Catholic school? If the parents aren't Catholic (or, in the case of non-Catholic private school, if they are Catholic), then the religion would be a deterrent to some, and the fundamentalist schools might not even teach biology correctly. The religious schools should be at a disadvantage.

55) Comment by Tea_Slayer - 04/02/2013

I knew I shouldn't have bothered. bourbon-soda is beyond comprehending even the simplest statements... as far as "reverse snob" being on dictionary.com, so what? Dictionary.com also has truthiness on it

56) Comment by nimby? - 04/02/2013

Warrick Dunn , model citizen , good son .

57) Comment by bourbon-soda - 04/02/2013

Correction: "latter" should be "letter."

58) Comment by bourbon-soda - 04/02/2013

But why would the athlete or his parents prefer the Catholic school? Or, why is free tuition there more valuable to them than at the public school? Also worth noting, there may be more reverse snobbery in the comments than snobbery in the latter ("reverse snob noun a person overly proud of being one of or sympathetic to the common people, and who denigrates or shuns those of superior ability, education, social standing, etc." - from dictionary.com)

59) Comment by Tea_Slayer - 04/02/2013

bourbon-soda: if you don't know why offering an athletic scholarship to a catholic school creates an unfair advantage, then there is no point explaining it to you. I know this is pointless, but here goes... the scholarship students are pulled away from the public school because of their athletic ability. Public schools can't pull students from other public schools based on their athletic abilities. THAT is the difference.

60) Comment by bourbon-soda - 04/02/2013

How is a "'scholarship'" to a private school different from free a free public school?

61) Comment by nimby? - 04/02/2013

parents who do without so their kids have a chance at a better education also pay taxes for public schools ....

62) Comment by Tea_Slayer - 04/02/2013

Select schools like Catholic and Episcopal(as I am sure many Catholic High Schools in New Orleans do) give athletic "scholarships" therefore they have an unfair advantage over public schools. Get over yourself, Mr Martin.

63) Comment by simbatigercat - 04/02/2013

@ P.S 56: A big steaming pile of snobbery with eliteisim on top for breakfast!...

64) Comment by rgeraldwallace@cox.net - 04/02/2013

A good letter, and I think Mr. Martin is not being critical of others but defending his own decisions, which is as it should be. I agree with bourbon-soda's comment because I know that some parents of students with superior athletic skills spend money and go to a lot of trouble to get their child into a public school program that will, in their opinion, offer the best results. Many buy trailers, rent rooms or homes etc. to establish a residence in order to qualify for a certain school district. So I say if people are following the rules, what they do is their business.

65) Comment by bourbon-soda - 04/02/2013

1) Just looked up state volleyball brackets for 2012, and it appears at least as urgent to set up a non-select ghetto there as for football. The Literary Rally (actually including mathematics and science, in case anyone missed the headlines and broadcasts) for 2012 is also skewed in favor of private and select schools, suggesting unfair academic recruiting as well. At least one allegedly fundamentalist Christian school did well in biology despite teaching creationism, which should trigger some kind of investigation. 2) Suggested sociology term paper: do Louisiana socialists and progressives complain more about anti- intellectualism or people who send children to select schools?

66) Comment by for_reals - 04/02/2013

My family also forgoes luxuries, skips vacations and drives 15-year-old cars... and my kids go to public school... i must not be doing something right....

67) Comment by bourbon-soda - 04/02/2013

How is "free tuition" at a private school a greater incentive than is "free tuition" at a public school?

68) Comment by postscript56 - 04/02/2013

Nothing like a lttle snobbery with my coffee this morning. Who knew private school parents were better human beings than public school parents, who I supose Mr. Martin believes are just laying about waiting for a government check.

69) Comment by Bighug - 04/02/2013

Are the "select" schools allowed to give incentives, such as free tuition, to get good athletes to come to the school? If so, then it is an unfair advantage. The number of athletes who go on to college programs from "select" versus public schools would have to be considered according to the total number of students from each type of school. Imagine there are 50 times as many students in public schools as in "select" schools, then look at the stats again. The writer may be correct, but there isn't enough information in the letter to make a fair judgement.

70) Comment by gary - 04/02/2013

Excellent letter.