Letter: Gun-control restrictions reasonable

Congratulations to the Central School District for taking one of the most-effective means of preventing school massacres — making sure that the classroom school doors have locks that can be locked from the inside. The effectiveness of this measure was surely demonstrated in Newtown where life and death depended on the turn of a key. The teachers who locked their doors or, if that was impossible, were locked in by the school custodian lived, along with their students. Those unable to lock their doors died.

To those who protest that fire codes prohibit locking classroom doors, it isn’t true. The general requirement of fire codes is that fire exits be openable from the inside to allow escape in a fire. Panic hardware that allows fire exits to be opened from the inside, but not the outside, have long been standard features of modern buildings, except apparently schools.

Congratulations also to all legislators who support reasonable restrictions on weapons, such as the proposed legislation mandating more-secure storage of weapons. If there has been a boom in sales of gun lockers (not display cases) to match the post-Newtown surge in sales of assault weapons, I sure haven’t heard of it. This is something that all owners of weapons should support without being compelled, but don’t.

On the other hand, the most-persuasive evidence for greater restrictions on weapons comes, not from the proponents of restrictions, but from the free-floating fear and anxiety and the lack of empathy of many of the supporters of unrestricted weapon possession. We see them in innumerable legions in all media touting how necessary weapons are to protect their lives, liberty and pursuit of happiness. Absent from their arguments is any appreciation that the children of Newtown also had a right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.

President Barack Obama’s featuring a child at a press conference who wrote that he wanted to be safe and happy goes to the heart of the issue. The NRA has it half right — people kill people including children, and they do it most effectively with military weapons designed for killing people en masse.

Mattie Coxe

geographer

Baton Rouge


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (12)


1) Comment by Whatnow - 04/02/2013

DMJ, do you own any guns?

2) Comment by DMJ - 04/02/2013

Bighug, no I don't carry, offically or unofficially. And I wasn't calling you a moron; I was saying that only a moron would think leaving your gun around unlocked is a good idea. If that describes you, then it's purely unintentional.

3) Comment by nimby? - 04/02/2013

Oh, please. You guys should go somewhere, unzip, examine your gender . Sheesh. Get OVER yourselves!

4) Comment by Bouncer - 03/02/2013

Oh, please. You guys should go somewhere, unzip, and compare sizes. Sheesh. Get OVER yourselves!

5) Comment by Whatnow - 02/02/2013

The weapons used where classified by the Dept. of Homeland Security as "home defense" weapons. These weapons were not "military weapons" as touted by Feinstien, the MSM and opponents of guns. And the sad thing is they use that term to further their agenda and confused the uninformed. (http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=NyYYgLzF6zU)

6) Comment by Bighug - 02/02/2013

DMJ, you sound like a member of the police or court system. Do you have an official weapon? As for being a moron, I will challenge you to a comparison of your IQ with mine and wager you whatever you name that mine is higher than yours.

7) Comment by nimby? - 02/02/2013

the government knows who I am , where I live . they know what weapons I own , their make , model and serial #s . they know I am certified to carry , and must maintain such . what else is there ? how about consistent enforcement of gun laws ?

8) Comment by twinkie1cat - 02/02/2013

The locking door idea is great and should have done been on the schools. I am surprised they didn't already have them as we did in Atlanta where the principal sometimes called for locking doors to allow him to catch students who were chronically late for class. The gun stuff, however is off the wall. I doubt that many teachers would be willing to carry guns. It is against our nature to kill and dangerous to us and our students. Rather I suggest remote controlled locks, namely a button that the teacher can wear around her neck to lock the door.

9) Comment by jdk944 - 02/02/2013

Ms. Coxe, you started out with some good thoughts and comments in your letter but then went downhill from there. Question to you and DMJ, who once again has to resort to name calling: If an intruder breaks into your home in the dead of night, how are you going to defend yourself while trying to find your revolver/pistol locked in some device??? And to you and DMJ, evidence shows Sandy Hook killings were done by hand guns and not "defensive" weapons, as they are really called. Yep, don't let the facts/truth, get in the way from your misguided compassion!!

10) Comment by DMJ - 02/02/2013

Bighug, had Lanza not been able to unlock his mother's gun safe, which she didn't have, he wouldn't have gotten his hands on those particular guns, one of which was an assault rifle. Now....would he have gotten other guns from somewhere else? Who knows? The thing is...he didn't have to. No offense, but only a moron would argue against locking up a gun when not using it. Great letter, Mattie.

11) Comment by rgeraldwallace@cox.net - 02/02/2013

Cower and hide; beg for life. This is in line with the new American norm established by this administration for our nation's policy. Give up our guns and our weapons and our enemies will love, honor, and respect us. Ms. Coxe is blinded by compassion, but that's not the way to go.

12) Comment by Bighug - 02/02/2013

In which case would gun safes have prevented the killings? Do you believe that the mother who owned the guns in one of the incidents would have refused her adult son access to them? In other cases, it is the owners of the guns who committed the crimes. We must concentrate on stopping the crimes, not the tools used.