Our Views: Jindal switch on cigarettes

Then: Gov. Bobby Jindal vetoed four-cent renewal of the state tax on a pack of cigarettes.

Now: Gov. Bobby Jindal says he’s open to a significant increase in cigarette taxes.

No wonder many of his critics, and not a few of his friends, wonder at the apparent inconsistency. They wonder because he was against cigarette taxes when he was seeking re-election, and now is for them, having been safely re-elected.

The liberal critics, Louisiana Progress, called it “tax whiplash.”

For Jindal, though, it is not an inconsistency. As a part of a larger tax swap — higher consumption taxes to replace revenue lost from income tax cuts — it is not an ideological problem.

“We’ve always said that we would be fine (with) it if it was done in a revenue-neutral way, and we are willing to consider this and other changes as part of a larger effort to eliminate the income tax in a revenue-neutral way,” the governor said in a prepared statement.

Leaving aside the merit of a tobacco tax increase — and we think there is a lot of merit in it — this sort of then-and-now approach to policy is bound to be disconcerting for smokers, and everyone else. After all, Jindal was the only governor in the nation we’re aware of who championed lowering the tax on cigarettes. Almost every other governor was in favor of raising cigarette taxes, on both revenue and public-health grounds.

But implicit in all this is the false premise of Jindal’s previous stand on the renewal. It was not a new tax, but an old one, and the revenue was part of keeping the budget “revenue-neutral,” to borrow Jindal’s phrase.

If that rationale sounded phony then, it seems more so in light of that-was-then.


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (10)


1) Comment by bourbon-soda - 29/01/2013

Still, he is doing the right thing and we should rejoice at even minimal reform by the sinner. Dedicated funds in Louisiana seem almost always to be subtracted from the general appropriation for whatever they are dedicated to, so I don't see where that would do much good. isn't that what happened with gambling - excuse me, gaming - funds for education?

2) Comment by twinkie1cat - 29/01/2013

bourbon-soda: What do you expect for someone who is as big a hypocrite as Jindal is......... Now what would really be good is if he not only raised the tax but that the tax was dedicated to health care and education. And it is not that he cares about smokers or about raising revenue for the state. The only thing he cares about is his standing with the GOP. He would probably sell his wife and children if it meant he would become president.

3) Comment by bourbon-soda - 29/01/2013

You would think this would be like the prodigal son returning to the progressive fold, only in this version he gets dumped on for seeing the light.

4) Comment by simbatigercat - 29/01/2013

WE smokers have been picked on enough! if the state needs more $ then slam shut some of loop holes enjoyed by big business. stop picking on the working man.

5) Comment by Mygulfbleedsforu - 29/01/2013

I don't believe Our Views is having a problem with the tax now. I believe Our Views has a problem with the inconsistencies and the explanations that ring false.

6) Comment by rgeraldwallace@cox.net - 29/01/2013

I don't remember "Our Views" having a problem with such taxes before this instance. Could it be that inconsistency is rampant?

7) Comment by cezadream - 29/01/2013

Liar, liar pants on fire........caused by a lit cigarette!

8) Comment by SuzanneMS - 29/01/2013

It's not an inconsistency. It's yet another example of Jindal doing whatever he thinks will best improve his chances at the Republication nomination. He vetoed the cigarette tax renewal in order to pander to the Grover Norquist crowd. He's in favor now in order to pander to his wealthy contributors who can't wait to stop paying income taxes.

9) Comment by bourbon-soda - 29/01/2013

Obviously a ploy by the vast right wing conspiracy, expanding the war on drugs and bankrupting Social Security and Medicare with increased longevity of the poor.

10) Comment by tradewinns - 28/01/2013

people who smoke given the known dangers to their, and anyone around them, health, are dumb enough to pay more in taxes. if the tax goes up enough perhaps a few will stop smoking and some may never start due to the total price. so ill use the ***** democrats normal argument for more taxes, if it saves just one life, isn't it worth it?