Our Views: King legacy unfinished

As the nation marks another observance of the Rev. Martin Luther King holiday, much remains to be done in advancing King’s message of unity, tolerance and nonviolence.

This month includes the second inaugural ceremonies for America’s first black president — a development that might have even surprised King if he were still around. King’s death at the hands of an assassin in 1968 underscored the depths of racial hatred sweeping the country in those days. The United States as a whole is more tolerant today, more comfortable with its ethnic diversity. Diversity itself has become a more-vivid reality in this republic, with the population including more Americans of Asian and Hispanic ancestry. The election and re-election of Bobby Jindal, who is of East Indian descent, to serve as Louisiana’s governor are a testament to how much things have changed in this country since King’s day.

But racial and political disharmony and violence remain much too common in our country, as even the most-casual glance at the headlines reveals. We think that King would be most aggrieved, though, at the prevalence of black-on-black crime plaguing our inner cities, including troubled neighborhoods in Baton Rouge and New Orleans. Homicides in which young black men kill other young black men make up most of the murder statistics in Baton Rouge and New Orleans. That’s a terrible response to the message of love and peace that King preached.

A big new statue of King stands in Washington. But the best monument to King is an embrace of his desire to “transform the jangling discords of our nation into a beautiful symphony of brotherhood.”


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (23)


1) Comment by gvm - 29/01/2013

Dr. King intended that all people be judged by the content of their character - not just some. You point to incompetent people being put in positions based on skin color. My question to you is: were they white or black? Incompetent people come in a variety of shapes, sizes, ethnicities and colors. I suspect that you are at least my age (I'm 52) or older, therefore you cannot deny that qualified minorities have been systematically excluded from good jobs solely on the basis of skin color. In fact, I'm sure you've seen it. Don't you think those individuals should've been judged on the basis of character alone? The argument that only minorities have benefited from preferential treatment is a false one. Past unfair practices brought about the need for Affirmative Action - parroting platitudes will not erase that fact.

2) Comment by Whatnow - 25/01/2013

Just like any program that started with good intentions, Affirmative Action has been going overboard. gvm, I have see the reverse of what you described. People put in positions because of the color of their skin and not their qualifications. This has caused a lot of problems. It is opposite of what Dr. King said. Character is the main point of his speech. I used to think AA was a good thing, but the excuse of racial discrimination when firing an incompetent has brought this country down. When you can't fire a minority person for incompetence because of the color of their skin, that is screwed up and not what Dr. King was talking about. So yes, his legacy is unfinished. There has to be a compromise and a stop to frivolous lawsuits by incompetents to keep their positions only because of the color of their skin. Too many times I have seen companies just bear with the incompetence because they couldn't afford the lawsuits. Yes, we still have a long way to go, and I look for the day when character is the main component of any judgement of the hiring process.

3) Comment by gvm - 22/01/2013

Minorities have never needed Affirmative Action. It was actually needed by those persons who consistently denied eminently qualified minority applicants access to decent jobs solely on the basis of race, gender, religious background and so forth. This type of behavior was the norm in many mainstream businesses that, coincidentally, were the beneficiaries of the government's largesse. And, if a hiring manager was inclined to hire a minority applicant, it was often in a position well below the applicant's ability and they often ended up reporting to someone who should've been reporting to them. I have seen this time and time again.

4) Comment by prbeav - 22/01/2013

I care a lot about the Advocate--consider it a beacon of thoughtfulness in an industry plagued by many a diverse agenDUMB (thanks to Mr. Finklea for the neologism).>>>>The word "tolerance" galls me in its common use. Consider yourself: how do you feel when you perceive that someone is tolerating you?>>>>>The moment I sense toleration, I quickly move away. I am simply intolerant of tolerance. If I am not appreciated, I escape into small talk or silence. The other party has only shown me his/her social ignorance.>>>>How can one part of We the People be tolerant of another part of We the People? Or, referring to President Obama's speech of yesterday, do "we, the people," merely tolerate We the People defined in the preamble to the US Constitution?>>>>I just reviewed Dr. King's "I Have a Dream" speech, and I see no evidence that he wanted tolerance for anyone. I think he advocated appreciation.

5) Comment by DMJ - 22/01/2013

Amazing how so many people who never met King (and were probably born after he was killed) attempt to attribute beliefs to him, the purpose of which being to legitimize their own beliefs. Some yahoo on Fox was talking about how King would sympathize with gun owners because they too are victims of civil rights violations. Seriously. The guy said that....without even realizing the irony, considering how he King killed. ScotB thinks MLK would be anti-choice. Perhaps. Or maybe, he would realize that abortion, especially safe, legal abortion, is a godsend to those unprepared to deal with the costs associated with pregnancy and parenthood. I never knew King. Not too many people did. Let's not pretend we know how he would feel about current political issues. It's disrespectful.

6) Comment by ScotB - 22/01/2013

Speaking of non-sensical, did you know that every member of the Congressional Black Caucus in congress supports abortion? In all of history, there has been no more devastating program to the black community that has been endorsed by society than the systematic elimination of 1/3 of the black population through abortion.

7) Comment by Tea_Slayer - 22/01/2013

nimby?: very appropriate quote... the black community does need to do a great deal of soul searching

8) Comment by nimby? - 22/01/2013

"There can be no black-white unity until there is first some black unity.... We cannot think of uniting with others, until after we have first united among ourselves. We cannot think of being acceptable to others until we have first proven acceptable to ourselves." , Malcom X ...

9) Comment by Tea_Slayer - 22/01/2013

You guys are hilarious. You prove my point with each subsequent nonsensical rants you post. Keep up the good work of marginalizing the Republican Party.

10) Comment by InPVille - 22/01/2013

Doctor King sought a nation where people were judged by the content of their character and not by their skin color. We seek to implement this goal by affirmative action programs. We focus on the very thing we are trying to remove the focus from in order to place the focus on something else. Only in America.

11) Comment by ScotB - 21/01/2013

Dr. King died at the hands of an assasin in 1968, five years before Roe vs Wade. As distressed as he might have been over the homicides of young black men by other young black men, I believe the hopeful Christian minister that Dr. King was would have been more distressed over the 16 million black babies "aborted" by their own mothers since 1973. A number which reflects over a third of the existing black population today. RIP Dr. King.

12) Comment by gvm - 21/01/2013

President Obama is no more of a divider than were any of his predecessors. The simple fact is that his opponents, especially those on the right, have sought unceasingly to marginalize his presidency. To the extent that he has simply smashed their opposition when left with no other choice, he has been labeled a divider. The answer is simple, compromise or be decimated.

13) Comment by Whatnow - 21/01/2013

Tea_Slayer, if don't see it, you never will. You are one of those that would wear Obama's toe jam for perfume. I'm not going to waste my time with someone who refuses to see something right in front of their face. Go back to your cave.

14) Comment by billynurse - 21/01/2013

Tea_Saver , you HAVE to be kidding!..Or are you just that brain-washed to not see the forest for the trees? The conservative response to being attacked in the left-wing media was understandable. It's true that Dr King's goals have not been realized. At every turn, Mr. Al Sharpton, Big Jesse, etc. have whipped up a racial frenzy. If racial lines weren't constantly drawn up like battlelines, we could become more "colorblind". Reverend King clearly didn't want divisiveness,...from EITHER race. If one can't see that this President has stirred up SO much antagonism, that person can't be reached with reason.

15) Comment by Tea_Slayer - 21/01/2013

"He only divides and division has become worse under this President." How, pray tell, has he "divided" the country? Or is it the fringe "christian" folks that compare a political party to plantation owners who have divided this country...

16) Comment by Whatnow - 21/01/2013

The problem is that a lot of people don't know what Dr. King meant by "character". I don't think Dr. King would be impressed at all with the character of America’s first black president. He only divides and division has become worse under this President. There are better black men of good character out there who would try to impress Dr. King's message of love, unity and brotherhood. The black leaders of today have totally missed Dr. King's points and have taken us back to pre-civil rights days. They don't want to instill the "character" that Dr. King wanted. They just stay in the past with blaming and taking and demanding with no effort on their own. They would rather be taken care of by the Democrat plantation owners. Dr. King's message was distorted by these leaders. I don't think Dr. King would like what we have now at all.

17) Comment by bourbon-soda - 21/01/2013

"While opportunities are equal by law, racism will always exist at some level." Opportunities are not equal by law - check out affirmative action. Where opportunity is equal, racial disproportions often emerge - check out the NBA.

18) Comment by swinham - 21/01/2013

In the 60s we college kids could see the literal interpretation of Dr. King's "dream" speech becoming a reality within a decade. In the 70s, I still believed it would within another decade. At some point between then and now, I woke up to the reality that, while opportunities are equal by law, racism will always exist at some level. Attempts have been made to oppress Jews for many centuries and strong anti-Jewish sentiment exists today at varying levels world-wide. As the story on page 2 of today's ADVOCATE points out, racism is hard to conquer. It is a personal concept based on not just indoctrination, but on every day experiences. Efforts to actively eliminate it often backfire, as perhaps reflected in some of the other comments here. Jews seem to have accepted this reality, as have other ethnic groups. Jews and African-Americans share a history of slavery. Slavery in America was horrible and antithetical to our Raison d'etre as a country. While we should never forget it, it is counter-productive to dwell on it. Resentment over slavery and the decades of discrimination that followed are alive today and clearly contribute to the current racial divide. I believe Dr. King's dream ["I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character."] can be interpreted literally. But we must remember it is a dream and translating dreams to reality is often difficult. Does that mean we should abandon our dreams? Certainly not.

19) Comment by bourbon-soda - 21/01/2013

The front-page story http://theadvocate.com/home/4969956- 125/monumental-king-quote-inspires-debate suggests that no one knows exactly what the "legacy" is. The KKK might well be pleased with some of the unanticipated consequences.

20) Comment by Being_Stupid - 21/01/2013

Democrat Party = Racist Party = Party of Division. Last I checked, I have never stepped foot on the continent Africa, or the islands of Hispaniola, and I don't speak Latin. So why does the Democrat Party insist on labeling me an "African, Hispanic, Latino - American"? Why can't I just be an American? I am not a "minority", And I don't need a special handout or shortcut to be a successful American. I have done it own my own, without any help from the Democrat Socialist Party Elites and without their Affirmative Action Welfare Social Programs.

21) Comment by Being_Stupid - 21/01/2013

The dream is a nightmare. Thanks to the Democrat Socialist Party.

22) Comment by rgeraldwallace@cox.net - 21/01/2013

Personally I'm weary of hearing ad infinitum about "social injustice", racial discrimination and empowerment, and the rest of that claptrap. MLK was right in what he did but those trading on him are mostly charlatans.

23) Comment by tradewinns - 20/01/2013

king preached equality. everyone since has preached "they owe you".