Our Views: Caution for tax overhaul

If Gov. Bobby Jindal has done nothing else with his proposal to eliminate income taxes and pay for it by raising sales taxes, he has opened up a healthy discussion about how Louisiana pays for services.

However, legislators — not to mention others — are right to be very cautious about embracing the so-far quite vague notions advanced by the governor. For one thing, the saying the devil is in the details does not begin to address the difficulties of assessing, much less passing through the Legislature, such a sweeping change to state finance.

Louisiana already has one of the nation’s highest rates of sales tax, state and local. It also has, for collateral reasons, one of the nation’s lowest levies of property taxes for local governments.

Throw into that mix an end to personal and corporate income taxes, and two things are likely to occur: the steepest sales taxes in the country, even if the administration raises more money by reducing some of the exemptions in the current tax code. A second thing is that local government becomes hamstrung, with sales taxes essentially off the political table for local government finance.

That has consequences down the road, as people forget that Texas ‑— a giant state of immense resources — has high property taxes compared to Louisiana, and substantial state-level business taxes that are the functional equivalent of Louisiana’s corporate income tax.

All this means that we can’t declare that prosperity akin to Texas’ will come to us from an ill-thought-out copying of part of Texas’ tax scheme.

We also have some concern about the regressive nature of sales taxes, which pose special hardships for the poor, although Jindal administration officials have suggested that their tax plan would have measures to address this problem.

Late last year, LSU Professor Jim Richardson, an expert in Louisiana public administration, told the Press Club of Baton Rouge that Louisiana’s state and local tax burden is pretty close to that of Texas and Florida. It is the perception that is different, he said.

Until the governor demonstrates the benefits of a drastic revision of the state tax code, as well as the mechanical details, it’s best to withhold judgment for a while.


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (9)


1) Comment by Attila - 19/01/2013

DMJ: I guess that would depend on your definition of "rich" people. Rich people pay 70% of the income taxes in this country...how much is their "fair share"? If this plan passes you can believe that the middle class will be hit with the bulk the tax increases. The poor will be given "rebates". I have not been told how the amount due them would be calculated or administered; maybe another department of state government? I guess will sort of be like the EITC where people get refunds for taxes they do not pay,. Has anyone brought up the subject of sales taxes on "services" How would you like to pay an extra 13-14% to your doctor, dentist, attorney, accountant, etc.? Can you even imagine paying sales taxes on state services such as the DMV? Where will it stop. People who embrace this proposal better stop and think about where it could lead. We may have an answer to that commercial that asks "What's in your wallet"? The answer will be nothing.

2) Comment by Scrooge - 18/01/2013

ok eliminate 90% of state workers, then what happens? Without competitive educational systems Louisiana still will be third world. Texas has supported and funded its educational systems. "... much more prosperous neighbor, i.e. Texas...Why is that I wonder?" Duh.

3) Comment by rgeraldwallace@cox.net - 18/01/2013

I still say that there is a glimmer of a problem in that we here in Louisiana have as many state employees as does our Giant and much more prosperous neighbor, i.e. Texas. Why is that I wonder?

4) Comment by agagent - 18/01/2013

Eliminating income taxes will decrease government control and government corruption. The more the government controls the greater chance of corruption and greater the influence of lobbyists and special interest group. The bureaucracy devoted to enforcing income tax laws can be eliminated, and taxpayers will save the cost of filing income taxes. Politicians try manging the economy through the tax code and they are not good at it. The government must collect too much private information in the income tax system. No income taxes makes Louisiana more competitive for new businesses and will mean more jobs and a better economy.

5) Comment by Ivy - 17/01/2013

We are not Texas...I really don't understand why Jindal thinks we can do what they do.

6) Comment by DMJ - 17/01/2013

Is there any problem we can't blame on poor people and that can also be solved by giving rich people more money? Just curious.

7) Comment by rgeraldwallace@cox.net - 17/01/2013

agagent has a point, and a good one. Louisiana pays for a lot more than "services". With a declining population it's time to take a look at what "services" for which we are shelling out taxpayer money.

8) Comment by Attila - 17/01/2013

agagent, just EXACTLY what is the evidence to support the plan. So far all I have seen is it will work and be good for the state because Lil Booby says it will.

9) Comment by agagent - 17/01/2013

The editorial writers have routinely endorsed many ineffective and wasteful government social services programs without any evidence to support those endorsements. Now they say to move with caution on the new revenue plan. There is plenty of evidence to support the plan which the journalist did not cite. Objectivity in journalism is lost.