Letter: Clinton won a third term

Once again, President Bill Clinton has proven that he could spin out from any trouble — even for President Barack Obama, who was in deep water in defending his poor economic recovery record, the stubborn high unemployment rate and the alarming, rising national debt that grew from under $10 trillion four years ago to over $16 trillion today because of reckless spending and borrowing.

In Clinton’s keynote Democratic convention speech, he said that given the circumstances of the terrible economic conditions inherited from President George Bush, no president, including himself, could do any better job than President Baracl Obama.

With that speech, he not only excited the Democratic base but also expanded the base in the battleground states by convincing the fair-minded undecided voters to give Obama another chance because he alone was not to blame for the troubled economy. To be precise, with that speech he freed Obama from getting the fatal beating by Romney for the failure of Obama’s economic policy.

Clinton literally changed the campaign issue for Obama, who could now focus on his popular campaign issue that, in fairness, rich people should pay more taxes. This was a winning issue which appealed to young people and many minorities.

It was a big mistake for Mitt Romney not to respond to Clinton’s false claim that given the circumstances no president, including himself, could do a better job than President Obama. As we know, President Ronald Reagan, who inherited President Jimmy Carter’s deep recession and terrible economic conditions, turned it around to get the economy into a big recovery in his first term.

Perhaps Romney didn’t see this was coming because of lack of imagination. Unfortunately Romney’s team was not sophisticated enough to understand the impact of this false spin. In fact, Romney’s campaign team was no match for the Chicago’s way of character assassination Romney was painted as a selfish and greedy rich man, tax evader, outsourcer, and murderer.

To tell the truth, I was glad President Obama won the election and now I can breathe easier. If he had lost by a small margin I don’t know what would have happened to the nation, because I had seen and heard the threatening tone and the scary campaign ads from the president’s side. I became very concerned. They sounded like we are in the Third World. This is not good for democracy and for our nation.

Rather than say President Obama won a second term, Clinton was the one to win himself a third term. He is really and truly a shrewd politician and the best spin doctor the world has ever seen and America has ever produced. What a man!

Chris Hsu

retired state employee

Baton Rouge


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (12)


1) Comment by Whatnow - 30/11/2012

Sorry, I forget to acknowledge my source. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Read_my_lips:_no_new_taxes

2) Comment by Whatnow - 30/11/2012

Once he became president, however, Bush raised taxes as a way to reduce the national budget deficit. Bush refused many times but was making no progress with a Senate and House that was controlled by Democrats. Bush eventually agreed to a compromise with Congressional Democrats to raise several taxes as part of a 1990 budget agreement.

3) Comment by DMJ - 30/11/2012

By the way, unemployment was over 7% in October of 1982. Oops. Were his economic polices failures as well?

4) Comment by gvm - 29/11/2012

I wonder if Mr. Hsu realizes that President Reagan's "big recovery" was due to unrestrained deficit spending?

5) Comment by Scrooge - 29/11/2012

Good thing mr hsu retired before Jindal took over

6) Comment by gvm - 29/11/2012

After reading Mr. Hsu's remarks as well as some from many regular posters in this forum, I've come to the conclusion that most older, conservative, primarily white men are absolutely unable to give the president (or any black man for that matter) credit for any accomplishment. I suppose this tendency must be the product of their congenital half-wittedness. Without question Bill Clinton aided the president's re-election efforts. However, to imply that he was solely responsible for President Obama's re-election is just pure silliness. The fact of the matter is this: President Obama was an infinitely better candidate, tactician and leader than Mitt Romney was. It's just that simple. Mr. Hsu and his ilk are in such a state of denial I am actually beginning to fear for their sanity. The collective howling and yelping from these guys about the "good ole days" is getting to be tiresome. The country rejected your party's candidate and vision. Either repackage your brand and revise your message or go away. I'd welcome either one of these.

7) Comment by potkcalb - 29/11/2012

DMJ is right Mr. Hsu sounds smug and condescending in his sneering and simpering comments.

8) Comment by postscript56 - 29/11/2012

I've read Mr. Hsu's letters before and while I don't always agree I also don't consider him to be among the radicals. But I take exception to claiming Reagan led the economy into a "big recovery." There was a moderate recovery, followed by a mild recession, followed by stagnation until HW Bush raised taxes (against his campaign promise) and applied that to the debt. That started a period of growth that Clinton took credit for. I was working during the Reagan years. I remember junk bonds, Michael Millikin, hostile takeovers, and coining the word "downsizing" to mean layoffs. Not a fun time to be a working man. This revisionist history stuff cuts both ways.

9) Comment by nimby? - 29/11/2012

the truth ; when reality sets in it will continue to take bigger bites ...

10) Comment by DMJ - 29/11/2012

"Rather than say President Obama won a second term, Clinton was the one to win himself a third term." Yeah. It's easier than admitting the truth, right? Kind of like Eastwood debating an empty chair. Reality bites; fantasy is fun!

11) Comment by Whatnow - 29/11/2012

Yes, he did Mr. Hsu, since Obama was giving mostly the same speeches he gave in 2007 and 2008. Great letter!

12) Comment by DMJ - 29/11/2012

I gotta hand it to Mr. Hsu. It's not easy to sound smug and condescending after losing yet, somehow, he did just that. Well done, sir.