Letter: Fiscal cliff would be harmful

Recently, the Bipartisan Policy Center held its annual summit at Tulane University. The summit is an opportunity to advance bipartisan solutions to the issues facing our country.

However, I couldn’t help but wonder if such bipartisan cooperation, at least at the federal level, was a bygone practice doomed to the dustbin of history.

Innovation, technological advancements, unparalleled competitiveness and the resulting economic prosperity were essential to making the United States the country it is today. But partisan politics in Washington, D.C., weakens our ability to retain these characteristics and threatens the future for generations to come. At the heart of this impasse is the inability of our leaders to agree on ways to reduce the federal deficit and manage our debt.

Failure to avert the pending fiscal cliff by Jan. 2, could start us down a potentially disastrous economic road. Instead of a judicious program of cutbacks, sequestration would force automatic, drastic reductions in discretionary spending across the federal government. These cuts would be counterproductive to our short- and long-term interests, thwarting our safety and security, our innovation and growth — the goals the United States must achieve to remain strong and competitive.

Since World War II, approximately half of the economic growth in the United States is attributed to innovation born out of scientific and technological discovery, much of which is done on university campuses. Reductions in federally funded research programs and financial aid will adversely impact the creation of new knowledge and the development of human capital.

At Tulane University, one of the largest private employers in Louisiana, our scientists and engineers have worked to develop treatments for cancer, diabetes, infertility and autoimmune disorders. We have developed materials used to clean up contaminated ground water, and have designed improved, environmentally safe dispersants to be used in the event of major oil spills anywhere in the world.

These projects, along with others at universities in Louisiana and across the country, have a profound impact on our country’s competitiveness and the quality of our lives. A continuing budget impasse jeopardizes this work and puts America’s entire future at risk.

Likewise, federal aid for students must remain a top priority for Congress and the president. All Americans, regardless of income, deserve the opportunity to attend college, to develop the skills necessary to succeed and to find meaningful and stable jobs.

While our nation’s long-term fiscal challenges require decisive action, such action cannot be at the expense of the innovation that has driven our nation’s economic success for generations.

Hopefully, Congress and the president will find balanced, bipartisan solutions to avoid the fiscal cliff. Adopting the collaborative approach advocated by the Bipartisan Policy Center would be a laudable and welcome start.

Scott S. Cowen,

president,

Tulane University

New Orleans


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (12)


1) Comment by InPVille - 28/11/2012

@Twinkie1cat: In addition to the 16 trillion dollar national debt, the U.S. also has about 43 Trillion dollars in unfunded Medicare liability, 21 Trillion dollars in unfunded Social Security liability, and etc on top of that. And you think it will not be difficult in the slightest to avoid going over the fiscal cliff ?!?!

2) Comment by InPVille - 26/11/2012

The continuation of the U.S. Government to operate with trillion dollar deficits will eventually lead to worse problems than going off the fiscal cliff will today. The current funded U.S. national debt is somewhere around $16 trillion. Unfunded Treasury liabilities are much greater. Interest rates on debt are now very low. Wait until interest rates go up to historically common levels as they surely shall if the debt is allowed to continue to rise at or near the levels of the last several years. This will make paying just the interest on the debt much harder to manage and will also impact the private economy. The Administration continues to cling to the false doctrine that government can spend it's way to economic prosperity in talk about their plans to invest/spend the huge amount of tax revenue they hope to generate. This provides little reason to expect an early exit from the nation's financial difficulties. It increases the height of the fiscal cliff and the size of the splatter we will make at the bottom when we finally go over that cliff.

3) Comment by bourbon-soda - 25/11/2012

1) A Tulane student debt horror story is included in [ http://finance.yahoo.com/news/9-unbelievable-student-loan- horror-stories-165512874.html ] and [ http://finance.yahoo.com/news/9-unbelievable-student-loan- horror-stories-165512874.html ]. Tulane is culpable in these cases, IMO; young people do not, as a whole, grasp the enormity of the trap of compound interest, and should be counseled away from such a university if attendance depends on this level of loan. 2) The fatuity of most government cuts is discussed at a recent _Advocate_ story, [ http://theadvocate.com/news/business/4514164-123/fiscal-cliff- how-to-judge ] .

4) Comment by speakthetruth - 24/11/2012

I am one that wants us to fall over the fiscal cliff. I am ready to sign up for government health, social security, and anything else I can get. I am ready for my employer to say "no more" and cut back on employees. Where do I sign up for my "check". Obama did not win in a landslide. The country is more divided that it has ever been. Obama does not know how to reach across the isle, so lets all (for 4 years) get on the government wagon. I am very serious and encourage all Republicans to do the same. Find out what government hand outs we can get and sign up now!! The hell with the dept, lets become one of them and quit working, sit on the porch and get to know the mail person.

5) Comment by bourbon-soda - 23/11/2012

@Whatnow - you don't know the rules. Republicans are supposed to propose budgets so Democrats can dump on them. It is also interesting that those offended at the characterization of the one 47% now now want to disenfranchise the producing 47%, telling them to shut up, go to work, and pay for the welfare state.

6) Comment by Whatnow - 23/11/2012

@twinkie1cat, how do we know that you're not a racist against whites? You never can tell by your blatant hate for Republicans. I guess it's the Republicans fault that Obama didn't get one vote for his budget proposal. Not one. Not even obstructionist Harry Reid or the Black Caucus. InPVille, I'm doing just that, sitting back and watching the Democrats and the Obama administration fix it all for their vision of utopia or watch them bury themselves in corruption. Too bad the other half of the country has to go along for the ride.

7) Comment by InPVille - 22/11/2012

@twinkie1cat: If you really believe that "load" you just wrote, the wisest thing you could have done would have been to keep it to yourself. "Never interfere with an enemy while he’s in the process of destroying himself. -[**]- Isn't it interesting that while telling Romney supporters they need to immediately get over their recent loss, we have here an example(only one of many I am certain) from that side not having gotten over the reality of their election loss of twelve years ago. Oh, the humanity!

8) Comment by bourbon-soda - 22/11/2012

@ InPVille, Take a look at Tulane's tuition. Great for rich wastrels, but enticing a student to take out loans for 4 years (usually minimum) for a degree without economic utility, is cynical. Getting taxpayers to foot it is only slightly less cynical. I doubt that any sector of the economy has inflated like college tuitions. Dr. Cowen has a conflict of interest here, IMO, and if he is smart and educated enough to be president of a major university (Wiki says he is a professor of business and economics) he knows exactly what he is doing. I am not saying that education per se is worthless - I think strongly to the contrary - but some perspective on economic reality is part of education per se. Obama actually said something about outrageous increases in college tuition once, but quickly backed off because the professoriat so strongly supports him because it is in the club car of the obamafoam gravy train. The simultaneous decline in content of college education for most students, multiplies the insidious and cynical inflation of tuition, IMO.

9) Comment by nimby? - 22/11/2012

when will this administration grow up and accept it's share of fault ?

10) Comment by twinkie1cat - 22/11/2012

It will not be the slightest bit difficult to avoid the fiscal cliff. The Republicans simply need to cooperate and pass the reforms that America needs and stop trying to embarrass and destroy the president. They need to represent their constituencies, who, by the way, re-elected the president. Face the facts, Teaparties. Yall are as dead as George Washington. And if you force America into another recession the Republicans will be destroyed for a whole generation. When Louisiana's own dictator announces that the GOP needs a facelift, even though that is all it will be, not a true reconstruction because he is too far to the right to ever move back, you know there is a problem. So get on the bandwagon and support America. 47% indeed! Despite the determination of the South to be one issue voters and never tolerate a black president, he won! And he won by enough of a margin that, unlike the president who pushed us over the cliff, George W. Bush, he won without any cheating brother and hanging chads. Keep this up and your districts will recall you and the moderates among you will outvote you racists and we will have a Democratic majority for the next 40 years.

11) Comment by InPVille - 22/11/2012

Good point, bourbon-soda. With the greater number of college attendees you would think we would see economies of scale and the cost of education decreasing rather than increasing. Instead with federal college loans, the college are able to keep costs rising. Colleges get the money and the students get the debt.

12) Comment by bourbon-soda - 22/11/2012

1) When has the federal government ever accomplished an actual "judicious program of cutbacks?" 2) Federal aid to students is largely a self-perpetuating driver of escalating education (and excuse-for-education) costs requiring ever more financial aid to students.