Our Views: The perils of diplomacy

The recent killings of the U.S. ambassador to Libya and three other Americans in that troubled country are a reminder that diplomatic service can be a dangerous thing. Not much has changed, apparently, since Elihu Washburne risked everything as the U.S. minister to France shortly after he arrived at his post in 1869.

All of this comes to mind because Washburne’s diaries and letters from that troubled time have just been published in a new book.

President Ulysses S. Grant had appointed Washburne secretary of state, but the chronically ill Washburne took to his bed with various ailments and resigned from that post after only 12 days. Once his health improved, Washburne was given the France assignment, one gathers, as light duty — a kind of rest cure.

But shortly after his arrival in Paris, France and Prussia — the precursor to the modern German state — went to war, which prompted the siege of Paris. While most diplomats left Paris, Washburne bravely chose to stay behind to help protect his fellow Americans who were trapped in the city. During the siege, Washburne endured desperate food shortages, cannon bombardments, bouts of ill health and a lengthy separation from his family.

Mike Hill, a researcher working for history author David McCullough, came across Washburne’s long-forgotten diary while conducting research for McCullough’s recent book, “The Greater Journey,” which chronicles the lives of Americans in Paris. McCullough suggested that Hill publish Washburne’s Paris diary and letters as a separate book. The result, “Elihu Washburne: The Diary and Letters of America’s Minister to France During the Siege of Paris and Commune of Paris,” was published this month.

“The medals and high commendations he so deserved were never bestowed on Elihu Washburne because he wanted it that way,” McCullough writes in a foreword to the book. That kind of modesty seems rare in today’s political culture, but one thing that hasn’t changed is the willingness of American diplomats to take tough assignments abroad.


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (11)


1) Comment by Whatnow - 20/11/2012

InPVille, Obama worshipers don't hear what is out there as facts. They just see it as another illusion to come down on their Master. They don't want to know the truth of the hearing. They think if the truth does come out, maybe smoke and mirrors will make it go away. They use the same tactics as Obama.

2) Comment by InPVille - 19/11/2012

@T_S: "You can sell this atrocity as some sort of conspiracy, but no cigar!" -[**]- In March, 2012 State Dept. Regional Security Officer Eric Nordstrom asked for additional diplomatic security agents for Benghazi, and did so again in July. No response to either request was received. On April 6, 2012 an IED was thrown over the fence of the U.S. consulate. On May 22 an Islamist attack was made on the Benghazi Red Cross Office. On June 6, a hole described by a witness to be big enough for 40 men to go through was blown in the U.S. consulate's gate. On June 10 the British ambassador's car was attacked by militants with an RPG. By the end of June both the Red Cross and the British had closed operations in Benghazi and left. "The Video" wasn't posted on YouTube until July. Not only was no additional security ever provided to our people in Benghazi but an SST team led by Lt. Col Andy Wood left the country Aug 14. Lt. Col Wood's has stated that Ambassador Stevens wanted them to stay. Don't know who ordered the SST team to leave. -[**]- Conspiracy? Can't say. However, apparently both the Red Cross and the British cared a great deal more for the safety of their personell in Benghazi than did the U.S.

3) Comment by Tea_Slayer - 19/11/2012

You can sell this atrocity as some sort of conspiracy, but no cigar!

4) Comment by Whatnow - 19/11/2012

"The recent killings of the U.S. ambassador to Libya and three other Americans in that troubled country are a reminder that diplomatic service can be a dangerous thing." No, Advocate, it is just a reminder that our President and his administration doesn't protect us, and didn't even try. You can soft sell this atrocity anyway you want, but no cigar!

5) Comment by rgeraldwallace@cox.net - 19/11/2012

Well then, I guess it's just a matter of tough luck for our ambassador and the three Seals in Libya.

6) Comment by bourbon-soda - 18/11/2012

The competitive nature of the positions and the abundance of people who want them suggest that these are some of the cushiest jobs on the face of the earth.

7) Comment by Chucky - 18/11/2012

Tough job, but if i must sign me up. No really, I can start today, will take any posting.

8) Comment by agagent - 17/11/2012

The State Department’s own security assessment said to use US forces in such unstable situations as Benghazi. The Obama administration ignored its own State Department’s security advice. Ambassador Stevens knew the situation and wanted more security. Instead, security had been drawn down before the attack, apparently to give the appearance of normality to match Obama’s rhetoric. There were warning of an attack and no plans were made to counter the expected attack. Assets were not used to respond when the attack was underway, and the Obama administration engaged in a cover up after the murder of 4 Americans. Yes, it is a huge risk to go to war with Obama’s rules of engagement or to man a diplomatic facility protected by Obama’s security plans.

9) Comment by nimby? - 17/11/2012

other coincidences ; Grant was not prepared to be a president , he was in over his head . his administration was one of the most corrupted with partisan politics being used for political gain . he was a name , a figurehead the party knew could be manipulated ...

10) Comment by bourbon-soda - 17/11/2012

The article above does not make much of a case for Washburn's situation as an analogy for the fiasco in Libya, From the article above, no one was specifically and deliberately trying to kill Walshburne or invade U.S. territory as a deliberate assault on America, and there is nothing about even the corrupt Grant administration trying to lie about what happened.

11) Comment by tradewinns - 17/11/2012

the assassination of our ambassador to libya was the first since the '70's.perhaps you can tell me again how dangerious that job is? name one other profession, outside of a protected government offical, where the death rate is LOWER. not many, in fact i can not think of any.