Our Views: Lincoln was deft politician

With the arrival of “Lincoln” in movie theaters across the country this month, Americans will get a fresh reminder of the unique leadership abilities of the nation’s 16th president.

The brainchild of filmmaker Steven Spielberg, who drew upon historian Doris Kearns Goodwin’s “Team of Rivals” for inspiration, “Lincoln” evokes the legendary chief executive’s eloquence and intellect, but the film also touches upon a less-celebrated aspect of Lincoln’s character. Although he’s revered today for his above-the-fray nobility, Lincoln could also excel at the messier aspects of political calculation — the art of the possible that, in Washington, D.C., so often falls short of the ideal.

Lincoln’s willingness to accept less-than-perfect political deals is “something that I wish more people would take to heart — people I talk with about politics, especially people I agree with,” writer Roy Blount Jr. said of the movie. “Today, as in 1865, people tend to be sure they are right, and maybe they are. ... What people don’t always want to take on board is that people who disagree with them may be just as resolutely sure they are right. That’s one reason the road to progress, or regression, in a democracy is seldom straight, entirely open or, strictly speaking, democratic. If Lincoln’s truth is marching on, it should inspire people to acknowledge that doing right is a tricky proposition.”

Blount’s remarks, published in a recent edition of Smithsonian magazine, have obvious resonance in today’s political climate in Washington, where newly re-elected President Barack Obama and GOP lawmakers must reach a deal by year’s end to avoid huge cuts in the federal budget.

Here’s hoping that both sides acknowledge that progress often involves uncomfortable compromises.

It was true in Lincoln’s day, and remains just as true today.


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (8)


1) Comment by bourbon-soda - 12/11/2012

The literary allusions lately are something else. First there was the headline about the GOP bearing a Kiplingesque "burden," now it's "Lincoln's truth ... marching on." In the "Battle Hymn of the Republic," it's the Lord's truth. Maybe this reflects the current tendency to deify politicians.

2) Comment by lovemykids - 12/11/2012

No matter what else, Lincoln was a great vampire hunter.

3) Comment by Bouncer - 12/11/2012

The Lincoln depicted in the movie is not the historical Lincoln. Too bad that most people are so uncritically accepting of what Hollywood churns out that they won't investigate for themselves.

4) Comment by prbeav - 12/11/2012

“Deft politician” does not equate to “contributor.”>>>>For example, when the US Supreme Court rendered its Dred Scott decision (1857), Lincoln could have used his talents to lead America to emancipation of the slaves; could have proposed amendment 13 of the US Constitution. Instead, he abused the Declaration of Independence, citing “ . . . all men are created equal,” to trump the US Constitution. He continued to so dismiss the Constitution while boasting of defending it, even citing 1776 (confederation of states) instead of 1787 (nation) in the Gettysburg Address. Lincoln’s grave error overshadows the minds of many Americans today; Americans who hold the Declaration in higher esteem than the Constitution..>>>>Perhaps focus on ethical contribution rather than political ambition would have cost Lincoln his presidency yet avoided the Civil War with 775,000 dead and wounded Americans.>>>>The 13th Amendment, ending slavery was ratified on December 6, 1865, and its contribution must be attributed to the men who died and women and children who lost, not Lincoln; may he rest in peace.

5) Comment by bourbon-soda - 12/11/2012

Should Lincoln have compromised with the slaveowners, maybe just get them to be nicer to the slaves?

6) Comment by DMJ - 12/11/2012

"Isn't a compromise not to go either way but to remain where you are?" No, it isn't. That's not even close to what compromise is. You remind me of this youtube video I saw of a Sarah Palin book signing. This guy said something to the effect of," I like her because she doesn't compromise. 'Cause when you're right, you don't have to compromise. Compromise is for people who are wrong." The poor rube didn't even realize he looked like a total fool.

7) Comment by tradewinns - 12/11/2012

one side wants to go left, while the other wants to go right. isn't a compromise not to go either way but remain where you are? any movement isn't a compromise but a surender.

8) Comment by Mr. T - 11/11/2012

Isn't it against the law to copy material out of a publication like Smithsonian Magazine and use it in a newspaper editorial? If it isn't illegal, it ought to be.