Persica: Jindal ed plan draws ire in St. Tammany

New ed changes rile some in St. Tammany

There was a time when public schools were considered the great American success story. They were what helped America remain a land of opportunity, giving an extra tug on the bootstraps of those who were trying to pull themselves up, including the immigrants and children of immigrants who came to this country in enormous waves.

That’s no longer the popular conception of public education, however. For the past three decades or so, we’ve been comparing our educational system against Japan’s, for example, as well as other countries’, and we’ve found the American system wanting.

There have been a number of attempts to change that, including President George Bush’s “No Child Left Behind,” and a variety of approaches at state and local levels around the country.

In Louisiana, for example, the Legislature this year passed Gov. Bobby Jindal’s education plan, which includes vouchers — a hot-button issue whenever education reform has been discussed over the years — for children stuck in sub-par schools.

A philosophical linchpin of conservative efforts at school reform is the idea that public school systems should face market pressures and be forced to prove themselves against private schools. The money, the thinking goes, will flow to those schools that are showing the best results, so public schools had better improve their performance if they want to hold on to taxpayers’ money.

The idea is voiced in the Republican Party platform, which touts vouchers and tax credits and as a way to achieve “school choice.”

It was something of a surprise, however, when about 500 parents of public school students, as well as members of the St. Tammany Parish School Board, complained recently about the changes in state education.

St. Tammany is solidly conservative. When Jindal won the 2007 governor’s race with 53 percent of the vote statewide, he carried St. Tammany with nearly 75 percent. In 2011, when he won 66 percent statewide against anemic opposition, he clocked in at nearly 84 percent in St. Tammany. According to figures from the Louisiana Secretary of State’s Office, more than 72,000 of St. Tammany’s nearly 160,000 voters are Republicans. Democrats have about 43,700 voters registered, barely outnumbering the parish’s independent voters.

At two meetings earlier this month, parents and School Board members were up in arms about how the changes in the state’s education system have put a financial burden on the St. Tammany school system. The per-pupil allotment the parish gets via the state’s Minimum Foundation Program has gone down this year by nearly $300.

With some St. Tammany students taking advantage of vouchers to attend schools outside of the parish system, about $10,000 for each of those students comes out of the money available to the parish under the new education package. Parents and board members aren’t happy about that.

Of course, we can’t assume they represent a majority sentiment in the parish. No doubt there are many St. Tammany residents who hold a more skeptical view of public schools, too.

But the recent uproar shows that a lot of St. Tammany residents love their public schools. They’ve approved tax increases for education when asked, and the school system has returned the love with high performance scores. Just this week, it became one of only seven Louisiana school districts to get an A grade.

It’s ironic that, at least as far as education is concerned, a conservative parish like St. Tammany is showing us what government can do right, instead of what it can do wrong.

Dennis Persica is a New Orleans journalist. In his weekly column, he shares his thoughts and observations about people, places and issues in the New Orleans area. Persica’s email address is dpersica@gmail.com.


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (6)


1) Comment by whodum - 28/10/2012

Vouchers must be given years for assessment. The agenda is clear from the anti-voucher crowd: slam vouchers before they are implemented, slam vouchers after they are implemented, and keep on slamming vouchers. It is clear that teachers' unions are unhappy about vouchers. We understand that. We get it. Yep. We do. Vouchers will get a proper chance for success. Too bad the voucher slammers are unclear about that.

2) Comment by deutsch29 - 25/10/2012

Persica, your article glosses over a number of issues. First, don't compare US and Japanese education systems without getting some facts. I have been to Japan, and while there, I learned of the incredible stress on Japanese high school students to get accepted into the "best" universities. Once in, however, the students I interviewed (at Waseda University on Tokyo) told me that they breeze thru-- it's all in the university name on the degree. I alos learned that the highest suidice rates were among males in their 40s, those who felt they had nowhere else to go with their careers-- again, the pressure of "image." And now, Louisiana is stuck with both a governor and state superintendent consumed with image-- Jindal, with his veneer of La. success to gain him a national position, and White, the illusion of "reform" at the cost of student learning. Another issue concerns the "failure" of public schools. Have you noticed, Persica, that some of the worst :public" schools are those under the control of the state and ironically named, "Recovery" School District?? Finally (at least, my final point here), is the "success" of the voucher program. Fewer than 2% of all eligible students chose (there's the word) to participate in the program. Only 47 are allegedly from St. Tammany-- I write "allegedly" because White refuses to release the names yet charges St.Tammany top dollar for the "choice" of these unnamed students. Next go-round, Persica, give your effort more depth-- make your readers believe that you didn't attend one of those "failing" public schools.

3) Comment by tradewinns - 25/10/2012

a great learning experience would be for a student (or group) to research the educational decline of america's public schools and the "who, what, why and when" behind it. it needs to be actual without binding any facts so as to not hurt someone (a generalization) feelings. if you have a problem and do not know the reason(s) behind it, you CAN NOT fix it. i support our public education system as it has produced the greatest nation in the modern world. it does have a cancer eating away it's core which, if not stopped, will destroy education first and then the nation.

4) Comment by agagent - 25/10/2012

The article is short on facts. The St. Tammany Public School District is one of the top districts in the state. Even an excellent school district like St. Tammany has a few below average schools. In those cases I think it is reasonable to give parents a choice of where to send their children. We spend more per public school student than the value of the voucher. This opinion piece did not mention how many parents in St. Tammany Parish take advantage of the school choice program and how they feel about the program.

5) Comment by spqr - 25/10/2012

Children are not stuck in sub par schools. Far too often they are the reason for the sub par schools. Until you are a teacher who comes home with blood on your clothes from breaking up a fight, smelled marijuana on your students as they walk in class at 7 am, phoned parents with disconnected phone numbers on a regular basis, or added or dropped as many 40 students in one class per semester articles like this are lame. We do not need "journalists" reporting education. We need Dennis in the classroom as a substitute for a month in the inner city. Then file his report.

6) Comment by lontjr - 24/10/2012

This is a good article and points up the fact that sufficiently motivated people check their party affiliation or ideological differences at the door where their children are concerned. I can understand people being afraid that government is going to take away freedoms, force you into some bureaucratic nightmare, take all your money. But that kind of government only exists in totalitarian states, not here. Our government is made up of people just like us, doing their best within a large, not particularly efficient, organization. Public schools have an obligation to teach everyone. There is no such obligation found in home schooling, private schools, or charters. When these players meet that first obligation, I'll start accepting comparisons of how good they are doing in relation to public schools.