Our Views: Another hit for the poor

More than a quarter of Louisiana’s children live in poverty.

In Louisiana, a state with significant problems related to poverty, new rounds of census data on the problems of the poor ought to provoke some debate, rather than denial.

Second worst of the states in the original census report on poverty rates, Louisiana trailed only New Mexico, according to rough calculations by the Census Bureau released recently.

In the past, the Jindal administration has taken issue with Louisiana’s ranking and poverty rate in similar Census Bureau reports that placed the state second-worst. The administration prefers to cite the Census Bureau’s “American Community Survey,” which tends to show Louisiana with less poverty and a better ranking.

Jindal proved right, if by only a hair: Both Mississippi and New Mexico proved to be slightly worse off in the ACS numbers reported last week, in terms of families in poverty.

While the nation’s poverty rate was unchanged in the new ACS survey, Louisiana’s grew worse, up to 20.4 percent in 2011 from 18.7 percent the year before. The Census Bureau defines “deep poverty” as an annual income of $9,545 for a family of three; 9.4 percent of Louisiana families are so afflicted, up from 8.1 percent in 2010.

More than a quarter of Louisiana’s children live in poverty.

The liberal Louisiana Budget Project called the numbers an example of poor state policies, with public education, state universities and health care institutions facing big state budget cuts.

“As the rest of the country is showing signs of economic resurgence after the worst downturn in 80 years, conditions in Louisiana are still deteriorating,” Budget Project Director Jan Moller said. “This clearly shows the need for more investments in education, health care and infrastructure, the known building blocks of broad-based economic growth.”

Any way you slice these statistics, they’re not good news for Louisiana.

Further, the impact of the “Great Recession” that began in 2008 and continues to cost many households during a long and slow recovery will have effects that may be long-lasting.

Alan Berube, of the Brookings Institution, reported in a wide-ranging essay on the recession’s impact across the nation. It has resulted in “stable work even less available to individuals and families already living in poverty,” he reported. “According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the number of ‘working poor’ individuals — those whose incomes fell below the poverty line, but who worked for at least 27 weeks out of the year — increased by 1.5 million from 2008 to 2009.”

Unemployment rates last year remained 5 to 6 percentage points higher than their pre-recession levels for workers with a high school diploma or less, versus only 2 percentage points higher for college graduates. More households are dependent on less-than-full-time jobs.

“Much of the growth in unemployment during the Great Recession was thus concentrated among less-skilled, lower-income, disproportionately minority individuals,” Berube said. “It may take some time before the U.S. economy can generate job and wage growth sufficient to connect very low-income families to work, and eventually pull them out of poverty.”

This is a particular concern in the Southern states, not only in Louisiana, because of the heavy reliance for employment on cyclical businesses such as construction and retail. Even in oil and gas extraction, for which there should be a significant increase in Louisiana over the coming decade, jobs are relatively few and are also subject to the boom-and-bust cycle with which Louisiana is all too familiar.

Our leaders may quarrel over this data point or that, but the trend lines remain discouraging.


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (11)


1) Comment by twinkie1cat - 01/10/2012

I am hearing some of the usual conservative bull from Chucky and no Ducky luv about getting off your whatever and getting a job. The thing is, and the point of the letter, is that the poor have jobs, but their hours have been cut back and they are only paid as little as the Republican owners can get away with and no benefits. Face reality, yall. And now Jindal is also trying to keep them from getting an education so they can do better. As for Chucky's suggestion about getting some benefits like SNAP, some are eligible, but a full time minimum wage job will disqualify a single person for food stamps because the ceiling is very low. Another thing, and this is for Attila, since when does the Advocate only print the liberals. About 3 weeks ago there were 2 letters and a column that strictly expressed the most asinine of conservative views and every day there is some whiner in the paper as a column, or a letter. The Advocate does not cut out the conservatives by any means. It just lets the liberals speak sometimes also. Start reading Alexandria's Town Talk if you want to hear more conservative drivel. At least we have a paper that lets everyone have a turn (although a few more liberal columnists would be great.----less George Will and more E.J. Dionne. We already get too much of Will on Meet the Press.) Face it, conservatives made people poor and people are going to remain poor as long as the conservatives have control.

2) Comment by ultimateliberal - 25/09/2012

Let us also realize that many who EARN under $10K/yr are HARD-WORKING retail clerks, warehouse and dock workers, waiters/bussers, and fast-food cooks. Where would we be without them? It is a travesty and an insult to these people that many now have NO BENEFITS and have had their HOURS REDUCED in the name of cost-cutting measures that fatten the wallets of conglomerates' executives. Time for the second American Revolution. NO ONE should be forced to work for less than $25.000 per year! THAT is a subsistence wage--NOT $9,000!

3) Comment by Bouncer - 24/09/2012

I'm wondering why all 30+ comments under the story "Wealth gap hits black families in U.S., La. " have magically gone "Poof!" Most of them had a decidedly "conservative" bent to them, and it's a shame that The Advocate removed them for that reason.....if that was the reason they were removed. An issue such as poverty is a multi-sided issue with many different stakeholders involved. Because it is so complex, there is no one quick, magical solution. Nonetheless, to be fair, ALL sides should be heard.

4) Comment by Whatnow - 24/09/2012

@Attila, I know. The Advocate has been cutting off any input from Conservatives when Liberals spout their nonsense. And people say the Advocate is un-biased? Yeah, right....

5) Comment by Attila - 24/09/2012

How come the Advocate never presents an article reporting "Another Hit on the Taxpayer? Or maybe I should say the Income Tax payer....I also note that the Advocate will not allow comments on some letters that contain contain that will "stimulate" the conversation, especially from the Conservative point of view. I wonder; why is that?

6) Comment by Chucky - 23/09/2012

The working poor have numerous ways to supplement low working wages with government help, they need to access this help and budget accordingly. To actually see the working poor go to Mexico or India they do not have SNAP, 'free' health care, nor food banks.

7) Comment by phil - 23/09/2012

Also relative to other comments here. I personally agree that there is probably a small percent of the people who are just lazy and misuse the system. However I also think there are a few percent of people at the top who also misuse the system. It is the few percent at the bottom plus the few percent at the top that I think are causing many of the problems in the USA today. This is not just a liberal vs conservative debate. This is really an arguement about corruption on all levels and how to fix it.

8) Comment by phil - 23/09/2012

We are a poor state with a lot of wasted taxes and possibly corruption. There is always money available for pro football and pro basketball and special projects (follow-the-money projects) etc, downtown parks etc on a local level, but never any money for essential services. Then after all of that money is wasted, local taxpayers get hit with more local taxs. It does not take a smart person to figure out that there is a lot of poverty that is actually created by government with too many pet projects that waste our tax money and make a few people rich.

9) Comment by ex-louisianian - 23/09/2012

From the editorial: " ... the heavy reliance for employment on cyclical businesses such as construction and retail. Even in oil and gas extraction ... jobs are relatively few and are also subject to the boom-and-bust cycle with which Louisiana is all too familiar." For benefit of the commenter who evidently can't read beyond a headline, job growth in Louisiana is concentrated in service sectors that pay little. Pay scales in retail and hospitality, particularly, are so slight as to guarantee poverty. LA's embarrassingly low percentage of adults with health insurance (even after factoring in the Medicaid population) is tied to this as well, as service "jobs" and LA's traditional small business sectors seldom provide health benefits. But, please, continue with your puerile right wing slogan shouting -- no, actually, don't.

10) Comment by Chucky - 23/09/2012

I think a course on how to manage government entitlements would help, the 'poor' obviously do not know how to handle free money.

11) Comment by Duckyluve - 23/09/2012

How about get up off your lazy rearend and get a job????