Our Views: Old values amid change

Amid all the calls for change in higher education, the pregnant question is what form will the changes take? Or, better, what forms? Because the nature of the changes is not clear just yet.

To their credit, members of the LSU Board of Supervisors set aside time recently for a thoughtful presentation from Jeff Selingo, editorial director of The Chronicle of Higher Education, a national newspaper on colleges and universities.

His theme: new technologies and new students, in terms of demographics and expectations, require a level of openness to change that will shake the ivy-clad walls of many institutions.

Government funding support to higher education has dropped, tuition is on the rise and people have started to question the value of the traditional university setting, he said.

He stressed the importance of dealing with the Internet. One estimate is that a third of students are taking at least one online course. Even elite schools are dipping into these delivery systems, a far cry from the days of chalkboards and bow-tied lecturers.

An important advocate for higher education is the Council for a Better Louisiana, and it has followed up the Selingo presentation with its own analysis of the importance of change in today’s systems.

CABL quoted Kevin Carey, an expert who works at a national think tank called Education Sector. He points to the collapse of major Wall Street banks and the bankruptcy of once mighty automakers and sees similarities in higher education:

“It’s tempting in such circumstances to take comfort in the seeming permanency of our colleges and universities, in the notion that our world-beating higher education system will reliably produce research and knowledge workers for decades to come. But this is an illusion,” he said. “Colleges are caught in the same kind of debt-fueled price spiral that just blew up the real estate market. They’re also in the information business in a time when technology is driving down the cost of selling information to record, destabilizing lows.

“In combination, these two trends threaten to shake the foundation of the modern university, in much the same way that other seemingly impregnable institutions have been torn apart,” he said.

Lest all this seem to be too much of barbarians-at-the-gates alarmism, Carey’s first point is worth noting: America has a world-beating system, one that remains a very valuable industry in the purely literal sense that students from around the world pay handsomely and compete vigorously for places in American institutions.

CABL noted that although change is coming, “that’s not to say that there won’t be a market for the traditional college experience. There will. And there’s really no clear replacement in sight for universities that do significant research and teach more demanding upper level and graduate classes. But what about the many schools in Louisiana that focus primarily on baccalaureate degrees and the liberal arts? They’re much more sensitive to the online market.”

That online competition can be from the University of Phoenix in the private market, or institutions far away, such as the University of California, in the public market.

If there is an impact for such smaller four-year institutions, then the impact may be greater on community colleges or other institutions that “cater more to working students and those who simply want to earn a degree as quickly as they can so they can get a good job,” CABL suggested. “Would they stand to lose traditional enrollment because their students have other options?”

With all this said, there remain far more questions in this debate than answers — kind of like a philosophy seminar, one might say. But in that old-fashioned seminar there is a “high touch” element of personal connection between teacher and students, a level of interaction that might be impossible online.

Even if the old-form seminar is superior, it remains dependent on institutional support to pay the professor and keep the lights on in the seminar room.

How institutions manage those challenges is what the questions are about, but not yet are there clear answers.


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (4)


1) Comment by nimby? - 20/08/2012

tradewinns , how true . in order to level the playing field we have lowered the bar , accepted mediocrity . everybody on the team gets a trophy , no feelings hurt ...

2) Comment by SuzanneMS - 19/08/2012

Colleges do not claim that a degree is a "utopia" -- particularly since a utopia is a form of a society. However, whenever anyone in higher education suggests that some students would be better served at a vocational or technical school, they are accused of being "elitists." Louisiana has not developed its 2-year public community colleges to the same degree as other states, so the challenge is not simply that the other programs are online. It's that the other programs exist. And, of course, online education takes money. It takes money to purchase the equipment and to maintain it and to upgrade it at least once a year; money for highly skilled technical support staff; money to train faculty in effective online teaching; money to provide faculty with the time to restructure their courses for the online environment. And Louisiana, under our "education governor" has been steadily eroding public financial support for higher education. Colleges and universities now take it for granted that they'll face a budget cut every 6 months. No business would attempt to retool under these circumstances.

3) Comment by rgeraldwallace@cox.net - 19/08/2012

Selingo accentuating the norm is not enlightening, it was a waste of money for him to tell them something they already knew, i.e. internet education is already the norm and is flourishing even at grade school levels so students, parents, and others have been taught to look to the internet for availability and viability of education. At all levels lesson material is posted online and students have to access it there and many times post their homework there; universities led the way and so must therefore accept that their own innovations are what has changed the landscape, especially in the area of continuing and adult education. All large corporations now expect their leadership to avail themselves of programs offered only online by educational entities, so the future is here and it's a combination of traditional and current methodology. Exhorbitant fees, tuition, living costs, and lifestyles have both demanded and enabled these changes; I think they're for the better.

4) Comment by tradewinns - 19/08/2012

everyone is not college material. even if a college degree is the utopia colleges claim it to be, once everyone has one, we're back to mediocrity because everyone has one. perhaps our society has exceeded the number of necessary degrees and we should look to increase only those degrees society needs, i.e. doctors. we have way too many lawyers and yet they are creating new law schools every year. now you know why our society is racked by lawsuits, and yet we have a health crisis.