Our Views: Council move a bad policy

We have long heard public officials profess the idea that government should be run like a business. That principle isn’t always practical, but the notion that government should manage its resources with a shrewd eye to getting the most bang for the buck is a good one to keep in mind.

By that standard, the East Baton Rouge Metro Council failed miserably in its recent decision not to raise the salary range for the next director of the East Baton Rouge Parish Library. The relatively modest pay range for the position right now is a classic case of being penny-wise and pound foolish. The council’s refusal to raise the prospective pay for the next director could greatly frustrate efforts to find a good candidate for the job.

The current pay grade for the library director is $72,388 to $100,202. The top of that range might sound pretty good to many Baton Rouge residents, but it simply doesn’t reflect the realities of the marketplace — which is something, by the way, that good business sense is supposed to embrace.

Stan Bardwell, a library board member who isn’t known for being a spendthrift with public money, supported the failed effort to raise the salary range for the new director. He noted that the library system has a $33.7 million budget, more than 500 employees, 12 current branches, and $100 million worth of ongoing construction. A top salary of $100,000 just doesn’t acknowledge the scale of responsibilities involved with the job.

Consider, by comparison, that as director of the East Baton Rouge Parish Recreation and Park Commission, Carolyn McKnight-Bray is paid a salary of $150,000 per year and an auto allowance. Bernard Taylor, recently tapped to be the East Baton Rouge Parish School superintendent, will be paid a base salary of $225,000 per year, plus incentives for school system improvement.

Library board officials had suggested increasing the pay range for the next library director to $115,588 to $160,000. The Metro Council failed to approve that proposal.

Some council members suggested waiting on a decision to increase the pay range for the library director until a study about the pay of city-parish employees, including the library director, is completed in December. But the library system has been without a permanent library director for months. Postponing a decision on the library director’s prospective pay until year’s end was impractical.

We don’t need a study to tell us that the current pay range for the library director’s position is too low. Common sense tells us that this is the case. Bardwell noted that Mary Stein, the library’s assistant director is paid more than $100,000 after working 28 years in the library system. Under the existing pay scale, the new director would likely be paid less than at least one of the director’s subordinates.

The library director position is open because former director David Farrar resigned last year after revelations that he had been convicted of a felony several years earlier. Before taking the position in Baton Rouge, Farrar had led a much smaller library system in Alabama. His limited experience did not seem a good match for the responsibilities he faced.

In the wake of the Metro Council’s rejection of a proposed increase in the pay range for the next director, some candidates from the job have withdrawn their names for consideration.

The East Baton Rouge Parish Library system is a crown jewel of our community. We need a talented and experienced steward of this great community resource. Maybe we’ll get a great new director to lead the library. But the Metro Council, in its short-sightedness, seems to be doing everything it can to discourage that result.


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (11)


1) Comment by phil - 04/08/2012

Also I thought the library is supported with local property taxes. Don't pay your property taxes and see what happens. You will lose your property/home and equity and someone else will move in and pay the taxes instead of you. Or the RDA will move in an "redevelop" your property. I think the library system continues to get plenty of money even when the economy is down. Seems like property values STILL go up anyway, and so do property taxes. Ever hear about those millages being rolled forward AGAIN?

2) Comment by phil - 04/08/2012

Fact is when you are making $100,000 a year plus benefits or more then $100,000 a year sounds reasonable. However when you are living on of a limited income or on savings that now makes about 1 percent a year in interest at banks and taxes keep going up, then PAYING taxes to support that $100,000 a year salary seems outrageous. Guess the rich are still getting richer and the poor are still getting poorer. I think that is a fact.

3) Comment by SuzanneMS - 04/08/2012

You're welcome to your own opinions, but not your own facts. Revenue is down in this state because of Jindal's policies, despite the fact that employment is up. What makes you so sure, tradewinns? Are you some kind of expert on library directors? Mary Stein is the Assistant Director of the East Baton Rouge Parish Library. That is not "some other city." She isn't applying for the job because she'd take a cut in pay. Tell me one business that hires a manager who is paid less than his/her assistant manager. You all want to run government like a business, but you don't seem to have the first clue as to how to run a business. And as ex-louisianian says, government should be run like a government.

4) Comment by phil - 04/08/2012

The problem is that financial comparisons are made with other groups with salaries that are already too high, and then those comparisons are used to justify even higher salaries etc. This same tactic was used somewhat with the CATS tax issue because comparisons were made with other cities that use financial models that are not really working. So the upward trend of incompetence and high salaries continues on. Should we just follow that guy who is jumping off of the cliff too? Gee, maybe that is one reason the federal government is about $16 trillion in debt now.

5) Comment by ex-louisianian - 04/08/2012

"We have long heard public officials profess the idea that government should be run like a business. That principle isn’t always practical, ..." Of course it isn't practical. It's just rightwing stupidity dressed up in a churlish aphorism. I prefer my government to be run like a government, and accountable as only a government can be, thank you.

6) Comment by yDeacon - 04/08/2012

Shame, shame. It always becomes finger pointing between republicans add democrats. It almost never is" We, the people". Blame whoever you want for our current drowning in tax and debt situation. I can only assume that most people who peach that raising taxes and gov't wages either work for the government or don't work at all.

7) Comment by Elderly Man - 04/08/2012

SuzanneMS, thank you. Governor Jindal undermined government by giving away our tax base. If people want to live without government, I wish them well, but they cannot live without it.

8) Comment by tradewinns - 04/08/2012

yes taxes are down, so's income. just because the assessment of my home didn't fall, that doesn't mean i can afford to pay more or even the same. i have taken a hit on income. in fact taxes have increased due to new assessments! pay should be in relationship to the area. just because garabagemen make $60-80,000 in NYC, doesn't mean we need to pay ours a corresponding amount. i am sure they is someone local who is perfectly capable to conduct our library business at an acceptable, if not more so, level as anyone another "world wide" search will turn up.

9) Comment by SuzanneMS - 04/08/2012

The "hole" we are sinking into is entirely of our own making, and has been dug, to a great extent, by cutting taxes. Taxes have gone DOWN, not up. Jindal cut income taxes in 2008; since then, he has further reduced revenue by through additional tax exemptions, deductions, and rebates. If you insist on using a business metaphor, tell me how it makes sense to cut prices below the cost of the services/items, then increases sales and rebates, and so further reduce income? How does it make sense to reduce salaries, so that your best employees go elsewhere and you cannot replace them with equivalent candidates? We've seen what "quality" we get with the salary we are offering. Look at the money that has been wasted on yet another director search. What kind of "good business sense" is it to hire second-rate administrators, then spend time and money cleaning up the messes they leave behind, to say nothing of the resources that they wasted while in office and the quality employees they drove away?

10) Comment by yDeacon - 04/08/2012

How is it that people still do not understand that we are sinking into a hole? We have high unemployment, almost every facet of government is operating in the red, taxes never stop going up, but the answer to every problem its to throw more money at it? I agree that the director's pay should reflect what others are making. Reduce the others. Why do all Americans have to tighten their belts EXCEPT government workers? Doesn't make good business sense.

11) Comment by Elderly Man - 04/08/2012

Amen, thank you.