Letter: Higgs boson has no religous aspect

High energy physics is not an area where plant pathologists and chaplains have any real expertise. But since Chaplain Chris Roussell made comments about the “purported” discovery of the Higgs boson, I would like to comment on his letter to The Advocate of July 17.

I see no conflict between science and religion, as Chris Roussell implies, where physicists are trying to explain such things as weak and strong nuclear forces, electromagnetism, dark matter and dark energy. Man has always tried to make sense of and to explain his surroundings, the world, the solar system, our galaxy and the universe. To suggest that current scientific efforts come from “a deep desire” on the part of scientists “to get rid of God” sounds patently silly. I suggest there is a wide range of religious beliefs among world scientists, including physicists, that includes nonbelievers, just as in any other large group of people.

Roussell also questioned whether the amount of evidence gathered and interpreted by two independently working teams at CERN (European Center for Nuclear Research) is sufficient to declare that the Higgs boson was actually found. The scientists involved were confident enough (confidence level of 99.99997 percent) in their evidence to announce to the world, at the International Conference on High Energy Physics in Melbourne, Australia, this past July 4, that the elusive boson had been found.

It should be noted that the 83-year-old Peter Higgs, who first postulated the existence of the particle that bears his name, was in attendance at the Melbourne Conference.

Gordon Holcomb

retired plant pathologist

Baton Rouge


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (10)


1) Comment by Whatchange - 28/07/2012

@8.3; one thing you can count on, I'm not trying to save anyone, i really don't care if one believes or not. A comment was made bout praying for god to transport one someplace and then using a car to get to the same place and seeing which one gets one there quicker, I just said think god I know the difference between the two, then another comment was made about beliefs, I just said we all have our beliefs, and the lost of a son hasn't swayed that belief, so bottom line, what are you talking bout.

2) Comment by 8.3 - 27/07/2012

Whatchange, maybe you should pray for the ability to make sense in your writing, then you might find that your mission to save people will be enhanced. Posting incomprehensible missives does tend to cast doubt on your credibility. If you are saying you lost a son, you have my sincerest sympathies and condolences, such circumstances do tend to sway the most ardent atheists. It would be helpful if you would write what you mean.

3) Comment by Whatchange - 27/07/2012

DMJ, we all have our beliefs, the lost of a son didn't sway my belief so believe me when I say, you want either.

4) Comment by DMJ - 27/07/2012

I find that praying to Joe Pesci produces the same results as praying to the god of Abraham. Sometimes it works out...sometimes it doesn't... and when it does, it only works out in a way that could happen without divine intervention. It's generally about 50/50. When I pray for something that could only happen WITH divine intervention, the odds fall closer to about....0%. Funny how things work out... Thanks, Joe, for never letting me get my hopes up.

5) Comment by Whatchange - 27/07/2012

Thank you my lord for the ability to distinguish between the two and the ability to understand the difference. I do know I can't pray to god to transport me, but I do know I can pray to god to ease my trouble mind, praying to my car won't do that. Its all a matter of choice, I chose to believe in both science and god and to use both to benefit me in my daily life. Again, thank you lord for the ability to know the difference.

6) Comment by DMJ - 27/07/2012

I totally get why religious people are scared of science. We now know the laws of physics would prevent any of the supernatural occurances that are written of in various holy books. It's just a matter of time before people start connecting the dots. Is it possible to change water to wine instantly, without adding grapes, sugar and yeast? Of course not. So why was it possible 2000 years ago? it wasn't. You see my point....

7) Comment by nimby? - 27/07/2012

there are times when I've prayed to or cursed a vehicle that wouldn't start . they seem to have equal effect ...

8) Comment by potkcalb - 27/07/2012

Well said Mr. Holcomb. I and I know many others have long wondered why some religious fundamentalists think that defense of religion requires an attack on science.

9) Comment by gary - 27/07/2012

Bighug, great comment!

10) Comment by Bighug - 27/07/2012

Why all this argument over religion versus science? A simple experiment will settle the question. The next time you need to go somewhere, pray to your god be transported there, then try using the vehicle science has provided for you and see which method gets you to your destination. No bias here, just a simple experiment.