Letters: ACA train has left the station

“I Bobby Jindal do solemnly swear that I will support the Constitution and laws of the United States and the constitution and laws of this state,” Jindal said as State Supreme Court justice Catherine ‘Kitty’ Kimball administered the oath. (Hindustan Times, Jan. 10)

That is the oath of office Bobby Jindal took, as do all elected officials. But to Gov. Jindal, constitutionality — whether at the national or the state level ­— is a moveable feast.

In the most-recent example, the governor has vowed that Louisiana won’t set up the insurance exchanges required by the Affordable Care Act, preferring to wait until after the November election and a last-ditch effort to repeal ACA, which is never going to happen.

This means that the federal government will do it for us, because, as Greg Sargent put it in The Washington Post, “The Affordable Care Act requires states to have exchanges. A state has several options: It can build the exchange itself, or it can collaborate with the federal government to build it, or it can let the federal government run it. The state has to tell the feds what path it has decided to take by mid-November. If the state does not want to run its own exchange, or collaborate with the feds to run it, the feds will begin setting up the exchange themselves in January.”

Ah, another federal intrusion. In Bobby World, you see, it’s all about politics, not what might be in the best interests of the people of Louisiana.

On the other hand, when individuals or groups challenge the constitutionality of using public money to fund tuition at private schools, the governor brands them as obstructionists, standing in the way of reform and progress — or at least the governor’s vision of progress.

What are we to do? It’s probably too late to rein in Bobby Jindal, so perhaps all we can do is remind him of his oath of office. ACA is now the settled law of the land, governor, and it’s your job to implement it.

Bill Huey

communications consultant

Baton Rouge


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (6)


1) Comment by gvm - 11/07/2012

should read: "Their desperation..."

2) Comment by gvm - 11/07/2012

I just love how these ardent constitutionalists like Jindal and his band of self-proclaimed patriots are balking at accepting the ACA - even though it has been deemed constitutional. If Justice Roberts hadn't provided them an out by implying that those who choose to opt out of insurance coverage would actually be paying a "tax" as opposed to a penalty, I don't know what they would've done. They're desperation is showing and it ain't pretty.

3) Comment by potkcalb - 11/07/2012

I'll second that DMJ--Well said Bill.

4) Comment by DMJ - 11/07/2012

So why would Jindal, a Republican, choose to let the Feds run a program that he has the power to run? I thought Republicans were in favor of state control vs. federal control. I'm confused... Is this some sort of pathetic passive resistance? Or does Jindal simply not want to take on something that helps the people he's been shafting since he was elected?

5) Comment by tradewinns - 11/07/2012

jindal has not, repeat not violated his oath. he will follow all the laws. the law states if the state doesn't do it the feds will. jindal decided to allow the feds to do it, no violation. your dislike of jindal is affecting your thinking. take a deep breath, let it out slowly. feel better? that's what republicans have been doing since obama was elected. thank goodness that's coming to an end.

6) Comment by DMJ - 11/07/2012

Here, here! Well said, Bill.