Our Views: A new study of old issue

If there is a category of governmental Oscars that includes Studies that didn’t need to be-made, we have a nominee: yet another feasibility study of a passenger rail link between Baton Rouge and New Orleans.

This issue has been studied to death — and when planners ask the question of what infrastructure is missing from south Louisiana, it’s almost a no-brainer.

A 2009 study of rail service between the two cities envisioned passenger stations in downtown Baton Rouge, southeast East Baton Rouge Parish, Gonzales, LaPlace, Kenner and downtown New Orleans.

Before that, the Louisiana Speaks master plan for South Louisiana done in the wake of hurricanes Katrina and Rita came to the same conclusions about the importance and, yes, the feasibility of rail links.

We don’t want to knock efforts to move this process along. Regional planning agencies are spending money on a new commuter rail study, and maybe that will come up with some different bottom line than the studies before.

But this is commuter rail — not a futuristic high-speed train but a 75-mph or faster traditional train, such as those commuting between other cities. The idea that this is some kind of far-out risky venture that needs a slew of feasibility studies seems excessive.

One of the national planners who has looked at the issue is John Fregonese.

Fregonese says New Orleans and Baton Rouge, the two largest urban areas of Louisiana, need a stronger link so they can be considered sister cities such as Dallas and Fort Worth in Texas or Minneapolis and St. Paul in Minnesota.

“They have a lot more to offer together than New Orleans or Baton Rouge separately,” Fregonese said.

This is profoundly important to the long-term development of a more viable economy in Louisiana.

In 2010, the Louisiana Legislature approved a bill creating the Louisiana Intrastate Rail Compact, which aims to create a five-member panel to see if local governments along the proposed route would be willing to levy taxes and take other steps to support the rail service.

This sort of agency would be necessary even if Gov. Bobby Jindal had not spurned the chance, under the deceased federal stimulus program, for federal funds for tracks and trains for Baton Rouge and New Orleans.

Coordination of the commuter service with communities all along the route is part of a process of getting it going, and making it financially rewarding for the cities involved and the commuters.

Yet is there any doubt that much of the next study will be dusting off the previous studies, to reach the same conclusions?


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (9)


1) Comment by Old Man Kensey - 21/06/2012

Lastly, Dear Advocate, Please modernize. Take a look at some of the other news sites. People can use paragraphs!! They even have these little buttons where you can "like" or "dislike" the comments people make. I know the sky is always falling for half your readership, and the manufactured budget crises is scaring us all back to the late 1800's to a time where management must destroy labor, but the cost really won't be that much. It may even make your readers (customers) happy.

2) Comment by Old Man Kensey - 21/06/2012

And DMJ, you nailed it. The Gov'nor is too busy tearing this state down to contemplate doing anything that may benefit us. I'm sure if the feasibility study promised teaching creationism on the commute, he would get the federal money quick. His crowd has no need for a train and neither do the peasants.

3) Comment by Old Man Kensey - 21/06/2012

Not to mention the mobility it would bring to both cities. I could live in BR and work in Nola taking the train everyday. I am more than sure they could come up with a reasonable monthly price for working commuters. Football season-- People could rent out rooms in BR, LaPlace, and the out of state fans could ride the train to the game. There are all kind of possibilities this will bring. Except, we have to deal with the "never a tax" crowd, no matter how miserable a city that will bring. Y'all have no vision and your priorities are backwards.

4) Comment by Old Man Kensey - 21/06/2012

Tradewinns, you are absolutely wrong. I would ride the train to nola just so I wouldn't have to find a parking spot or worry about a long ride home after a night out. And yes, I would pay to do it. Right now, it cost me anywhere from 30 - 40 in gas to drive to Nola (depending on gas prices). I would be more than happy to buy a round trip ticket for 25 - 30. And extra 20 minutes at stops-- who cares.

5) Comment by DMJ - 21/06/2012

Did YOU read the above article where it said feasibility studies have already been done out the wazoo?? And you're correct....sort of....in that the government subsidies wouldn't cover full cost of implentation...only the tracks and the trains! Louisiana has a $25 billion/year budget and we can't come up with $13million/year to run rail service between our two largest cities? Pathetic. And you forget that gasoline taxes haven't been raised since Clinton was president. The result....giant backlog of road construction projects and daily traffic jams on I-10 from Baton Rouge to New Orleans. Please indeed.

6) Comment by captcouv - 21/06/2012

DMJ - did you even read the feasibility studies, and the requirements for the Federal monies? The Federal monies were a one-time shot and didn't cover the full cost of implementation of the rail service. Furthermore, the feasibility studies showed that the State of Louisiana would have to subsidize the service into infinity. So where would the cost differential for construction and the subsidy money come from? Education and Health Care, again? Please. And, thank you, Gov. Jindal.

7) Comment by DMJ - 21/06/2012

Thanks a lot, Jindal, for refusing the federal money that would have upgraded the tracks and bought the trains. Way to think ahead! God forbid tax dollars actually come back to Louisiana and be spent on infrastructure and transportation (and friggin jobs!!). Man, I can't wait for him not to be governor anymore. Then again, this is Louisiana. After Jindal is out, we'll probably just elect another yahoo. Then again....maybe not...

8) Comment by tradewinns - 21/06/2012

you can not stop at every town with any service and that service be economically viable. if the rail service takes more time than say 20 minutes longer than your private transportation, it's dead on arrival.

9) Comment by Elderly Man - 20/06/2012

I agree even though I like the idea of a rail link.