Our Voices: Get serious about drunken driving

A photograph in this newspaper a few days ago was powerful enough to bring tears. Five coffins, spread about 30 feet wide, were front and center.

Even if I used the best thesaurus the world has to offer, I would be unable to find the adjectives to describe the sadness and despair that the photo evoked in me.

But, my feelings can’t reach the depths of pain of the Gaines family. Authorities allege that a drunken driver, heading the wrong way down a highway, killed John Gaines Sr.’s wife of 50 years, a daughter and three grandchildren. Senseless. Foolish. A tragedy beyond the scope of imagination.

Closed in those five caskets (seven people eventually died) and buried forever are dreams, love letters, hugs, kisses, smiles, Christmas presents, proms, Father’s Day salutes, Mother’s Day celebrations, school events, fun at barbecues and crawfish boils, and a possible cure for cancer.

When I looked at the photo, I recalled the first bond —- $256,000 — placed on Brett Gerald, the alleged drunken-driving killer. It meant each of the five dead bodies came to about $51,200, or less than the cost of a nice luxury car.

Gerald, of Greensburg, was taken into a custody later after a sixth person had died, and the bond was set at $1 million, increasing the value of the dead to $166,666 or so.

Then when the seventh person died, their value dropped to about $142,856.

And there’s the tragic irony of the deadly car accident happening in an area near a town called Slaughter.

When will we ever get really serious about driving while drunk? If we really want to get serious, here are few suggestions:

Charge a person who drives drunk the same way a person arrested for firing a weapon into a crowd of people is charged.

The charges should be, at least, driving under the influence and attempted murder, whether someone is injured or not.

If a drunken driver kills someone, the charges should be at least DWI and first-degree murder, and the long sentences that go with a conviction should be imposed.

Folks who chose not to take a Breathalyzer test would automatically forfeit the right to possess a driver’s license until a trial is held on the charges.

Driving a car, while under DWI arrest, should mean an automatic minimum prison sentence of three years and five years forfeiture of a driver’s license and a $10,000 fine.

Of course these would be extreme measures. Some might say Draconian.

Maybe.

Do you think Gaines and the families of those here and across Louisiana care about tough measures on drunken drivers?

The Gaines family deaths brought the seriousness of drunken driving into our hearts and minds because there were so many deaths.

We usually just shake our heads about the occasional DWI-caused deaths or injuries.

There should be no more three DWIs before someone does serious prison time. District attorneys and lawmakers, do what you are supposed to do. Form legislation that will be swift and sure.

Or,just wait until some three-time-arrested drunken driver slams into a busload of children and you have to deal with the grief-stricken families.

It’s on you now.

Ed Pratt is a former editor for The Advocate and assistant to the chancellor for media relations at Southern University. He may be contacted at his email address: epratt1972@yahoo.com.


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (11)


1) Comment by Whatnow - 18/06/2012

@ABayouBoy, I'm sure families of those killed by drunk drivers could care less about whether a drunk driver has a future. I would rather a potential driving murderer go to prison than to be his next victim.

2) Comment by ABayouBoy - 17/06/2012

How do you put a price tag on a human life?. It's like the line by Clint Eastwood - "When you kill a man, you take away all that he's got, and all that he ever will have"... But, how do you impose a penalty that is justified, but that does not also place a burden on society if it causes that person to lose their job and possibly make it difficult to obtain one in the future due to their arrest record?

3) Comment by Chucky - 16/06/2012

I do not drink so i may not know the problem, but if it kills people then the Penalty should be harsh.

4) Comment by Elderly Man - 16/06/2012

Do away with probation, pre-trial diversion, and other nearly worthless responses. They helped but we now need zero tolerance.

5) Comment by ScotB - 16/06/2012

It is pretty amazing that the law allows people to get into a two ton missile and kill people with little real consequence, isn't it? What is really surprising to me is that there have so few cases of vigilante justice after the fact in many of these cases! How can so many people watch careless, insensitive people escape real justice through the system and then manage to resist the urge to deliver their own justice? I remember reading of a lady who killed a baby and injured her mom who was sentenced to a few months in a halfway house and then house arrest. Now she has killed someone else! I think the law should require these people to submit to random substance abuse testing the rest of their lives and if they are caught stoned, they should go back to jail.

6) Comment by jdk944 - 16/06/2012

@spqr - sorry but I totally disagree with your statement!! In this country we still have some liberties of free will - even though Mayor Bloomberg and others would have government decide these issues for us. NO ONE is forcing any person to purchase alcohol and then requiring them to drink it and then drive!! Again this is about personal responsibility.

7) Comment by bourbon-soda - 16/06/2012

The legislature and district attorneys probably spend more time on monkey business pretrial diversion and other chutes-and-ladders type cicrcumvention of prosecution than on the state's real business. Maybe it's because the legislators are afraid they'll need the shenanigans.

8) Comment by nimby? - 16/06/2012

too many loopholes with few consequences ....

9) Comment by spqr - 16/06/2012

As long as we allow barrels of beer sitting in crushed ice to be purchased to go at every convenience store we must admit we are our own enemy.

10) Comment by Elderly Man - 16/06/2012

We are not about revenge but about prevention. I love recovering people. But addiction is not an excuse. It just is not. Mr. Pratt your work is fine.

11) Comment by Elderly Man - 16/06/2012

Thank you. I deeply appreciate your opinon.