Our Views: More cuts for learning

In a world in which economic success is increasingly tied to intellectual capital, Louisiana seems on the wrong side of history in cutting funds for education and libraries.

Many state and local governments across the country are doing the same thing in the wake of a global recession. But in Louisiana, which has typically lagged behind much of the country in the literacy and educational attainment of its residents, those cuts are even more tragic. The dilemma was illustrated by a recent front page of The Advocate that included two grim stories — one about more cuts to the East Baton Rouge Parish school system, and another article about statewide cuts in financial assistance to public libraries.

The cuts to the East Baton Rouge Parish school system were prompted by flat state funding for education, cost-shifting to local school systems of costs such as pensions and private school transportation, and slow growth in local tax revenues.

Meanwhile, the recently approved state budget eliminates funding that helps local libraries across Louisiana buy new books, secure Internet service and purchase new computers. Paul Rainwater, the state’s commissioner of administration, suggested that in tough budget times, operations such as local libraries can be supported with local, not state dollars. We agree that local services should, ideally, be supported by local tax dollars. The state’s current tax structure, in which the homestead exemption hampers the ability of local governments to raise tax revenue, has encouraged towns, cities and parishes to rely excessively on state money for basic services, a relationship strained in tough state budget times. Even under the best tax policy, though, poor communities with limited local tax bases are going to be challenged in funding schools and libraries — two institutions that can help communities prosper.


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (6)


1) Comment by bourbon-soda - 19/06/2012

Scrooge - exactly. Note leap from expenditures for planned obsolescent books, internet service, and computers in the text, to "learning" in the headline. Within spectrum of American expenditures for education, I don't think there is any basis for this. The Academy of Pediatrics advocates limiting "screen time" for children. It is at least arguable that school should be a refuge from "screen time."

2) Comment by Scrooge - 19/06/2012

bourbon-soda, technology is a tool just like paper and pencil . For example, Exxon uses all sorts of amazing technologies but its employees aren't getting smarter by using them. You are correct that the human factors (motivation, relationships with family and teachers, communities, etc. ) are the determinants of educational achievement. Without those the technology is useless. One trend that may be of concern is that there appears to be a real deficiency in modern students of deep, reflective thinking in favor of a shallow multitasking which modern technology is fostering. According to teachers I have spoken with, Students are apparently showing up in schools expecting to be entertained every minute with new stimulations but have difficulty writing a complete sentence.

3) Comment by bourbon-soda - 19/06/2012

A case could be made that unremitting new versions of textbooks for basic information, internet services, and new computers might detract from more than they contribute to substantive learning, at least through about the 8th grade. A McGuffey reader would overwhelm most of today's students thought to be on "grade level.." Achievement has not risen with advent of these technologies. There were several articles about monetarily enriched school districts from the Haynesville Shale boom buying technological items for their schools. A report on subsequent measured achievement would be interesting.

4) Comment by twinkie1cat - 15/06/2012

Dictators have an easy time taking over countries with low literacy. That is why Bobby has no problem destroying the public schools, defundng public libraries, losing the grant for Internet service in rural areas and turning down the ones for early education. The more ignorant the people of Louisiana are, the more entrenched the Republicans can become and the more puppet-like their elected representatives will be because they won't even be able to read the bills. Then he can resurrect slavery, and pass laws to lock the gay people in concentration camps, and the old and disabled people in for-profit nursing homes with regular euthanasia days, just like the dog pound. Cutting the budget is a simple win/win for the Republicans when the people will vote for anyone who claims to be "prolife"! Is David Duke still waiting in the wings? Maybe Gene Mills can become the next governor.

5) Comment by Scrooge - 15/06/2012

Destroying education in Louisiana doesn't bother voters like Your Brain on Steroids who voted for Jindal, as a matter of fact they won't even notice the difference. Mostly, the "tough budget times" were self imposed, as always, Louisianians are their own worst enemy.

6) Comment by spqr - 15/06/2012

..."lagged behind"? Redundant.