Letters: Stand up for religious freedom

On Friday, one of the biggest grass-roots rallies took place across the country in nearly 160 cities, including here in Baton Rouge. This peaceful demonstration is in response to a federal government mandate that violates the very core of freedoms guaranteed to every American under the First Amendment.

Under the HHS mandate, employers and organizations — not just faith-based groups — will be forced to subsidize a health-care plan to cover abortion-inducing drugs and sterilizations, even if this goes against their core beliefs and consciences, or pay severe penalties.

For the first time, the federal government is telling its citizens that our religious freedoms and consciences no longer matter, and that any conscientious objectors will be forced to act against their will. The so-called exemptions are so narrow that not even Jesus would qualify.

The impact of this dictatorial law will lead many religious charities, schools, churches, universities and hospitals who serve most of the poor, the homeless, the needy and the sick in our country to curtail their services unless they obey Caesar rather than God.

The right to act according to our conscience goes far beyond any party, race or religion and should rouse all people to voice their dissent. If Americans can no longer object to doing something contrary to their moral consciences, especially long-held religious beliefs, then we have to ask whether this is still the country that our Founding Fathers established.

Johnny Hebert

geologist

Baton Rouge


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (24)


1) Comment by Scrooge - 15/06/2012

The minor inconvenience of destroying higher ed in Louisiana in favor of "economic development" (really should specify whose economic development) and tax breaks ( whose?) doesn't bother voters like Your Brain on Steroids who voted for Jindal, as a matter of fact they won't even notice the difference for a decade or so. Mostly, the "tough budget times" were self inflicted, as always, Louisianians are their own worst enemy.

2) Comment by Scrooge - 15/06/2012

I'll wager that Your Brain on Steroids watches a lot of television, listens to a lot of talk radio at a menial job and never finished or even started college.

3) Comment by Warp7 - 15/06/2012

@your Brain on steroids & nimby? The more appropriate comment should have been conservatives can't see any further than the tip of their noses due to pea size brains, which prevent them from being able to think on their own. When the party says jump, the conservatives are quick o holler how high. Once again the right in it's protest can't seem to tell the truth and that they are the ones who steps on the rights of other Americans who don't follow their one side conservative thinking. They talk about freedom, but at the same time denie that same freedom to others. As one commenter stated " the mandate made sure that the individual , not the employer, has the right to decide which path is right for him or her. Why as Americans should we have someone else imposing their beliefs on us as to what our decision should be. Conservatives like to talk about freedom and the constitution, while at the same time denying freedom of choice to those who do not think as they do. They do not mind infringing on the rights of others. The Catholic Church needs to stop being a hypocrit.

4) Comment by DMJ - 15/06/2012

Turns out....steroids is not actually good for the human brain. Oh well...you live and you learn...

5) Comment by nimby? - 15/06/2012

Your Brain on Steroids ; beg to differ . usually liberals are the ones more concerned with facts , it's their arrogance that gets in the way ....

6) Comment by Your Brain on Steroids - 15/06/2012

This comment board is proof positive that while not all idiots are liberals, all liberals are idiots.

7) Comment by Preppy6917 - 15/06/2012

Nowhere in the HHS mandate does it specify that employers "will be forced to subsidize a health-care plan to cover abortion-inducing drugs and sterilizations". Why? Because no employer is mandated to provide health care at all. Additionally, many employers simply have a group plan that is 100% subsidized by the employees themselves. What DID the mandate do? It took a major healthcare decision, and made sure that the individual, not the employer (religious or not), has the right to decide which path is right for herself.

8) Comment by no1zson - 15/06/2012

Freedom does not mean you get to do (or not do) anything in the world you want (or don't want). If the church wants to run a business in America then they are going to have to submit to the same standards as every other business. If you disagree with those standards and do not want to offer that service then get out of the business world. Don't enter a regulated industry, try to skirt those regulations, and then cry "religious infringement" when you are held to the same standards as everyone else. I do not smoke, and hate paying for lung cancer patients who do, but you know what, that is basic healthcare.

9) Comment by Romad20000 - 15/06/2012

I'm amazed at how many non religious people are actually in Louisiana.

10) Comment by warreni - 15/06/2012

Wake me up when the religious loons have something interesting to say. . . .

11) Comment by nimby? - 15/06/2012

no problem , hardly an "issue" to make light of ....

12) Comment by Tea_Slayer - 14/06/2012

you asked yesterday what i considered your pet issue to be. i answered. got a problem with that? Above the fray? hardly...

13) Comment by chem - 14/06/2012

Mr. Hebert, like so many others when it comes to religion, wants to push HIS view on everyone else. Tea_Slayer said it best: If you don't want to take the pill, don't... UrbanModerate is also correct. No one is forcing private citizens to do anything. If a "religious" institution serves ALL of the public, such as a hospital, they cannot refuse medical care just because someone is an atheist or is not part of the same religion that the hospital is associated with. Likewise, if such an institution employs people of different faiths or no faith, it has an obligation to offer its employees choices just as any other employer. The right to religious freedom is not absolute. Just as there are limits to freedom of speech, freedom of religion does not mean that one can do anything he or she wants in the name of that religion. If a religion condones killing, even for minor offenses, a person committing such an act would be arrested and tried for murder, regardless of what that persons religion states.

14) Comment by Elderly Man - 14/06/2012

If the RC folks want government money, then they ought to play by the fair rules. It they want to discriminate against women, they do not merit the money.

15) Comment by nimby? - 14/06/2012

Tea_Slayer ; my people , their treatment , that they have been ignored in favor of others will always be my "pet issue" , you got a problem with that ?

16) Comment by Old Man Kensey - 14/06/2012

Off Topic, but a little tid bit for all you Ayn Rand fans. http://youtu.be/y6grCka0FOg As per usual-- Government programs are bad, until I need them.

17) Comment by Tea_Slayer - 14/06/2012

...and there's your "pet issue", nimby...

18) Comment by nimby? - 14/06/2012

Mr. Hebert , my people walked this continent long before the founding fathers established this country . perhaps we should consider their long-held religious beliefs .....

19) Comment by DMJ - 14/06/2012

If your religion requires you to stop caring for the needy because of birth control, then perhaps you should consider getting a new religion, one that doesn't put ideology over doing good works. Just a thought...

20) Comment by UrbanModerate - 14/06/2012

Nobody is forcing private citizens to do anything. This is a mere trade-off. You want government money, then you must cover certain medical expenses for YOUR employees. It's the employee's choice to have the procedure. It's the institutions choice to take or not take the federal money. You want the money? Cover the expense. You have a moral objection? Don't take the money. Simple as that.

21) Comment by Tea_Slayer - 14/06/2012

That's just it. There is no "meat. If you don't like teh pill, for religious reasons, don't take it.

22) Comment by jdk944 - 14/06/2012

@Tax-slayer - but IT IS made up of American citizens. Quit trying to dance around the "meat" of the problem Mr. Hebert discusses.

23) Comment by Tea_Slayer - 14/06/2012

" freedoms guaranteed to every American under the First Amendment." you even said it in your own letter. A catholic hospital or university is not an American citizen.

24) Comment by Tea_Slayer - 14/06/2012

religious freedom is an individual right. If you don't want to take the pill, don't...problem solved.