Letters: Leaders should be humble

Today, America is a nation in deep debt. President Barack Obama alone has added $5 trillion to the nation’s debt since he became president. He still wants to spend more for his social agenda.

After all the spending by his administration, our economy remains sluggish with 8.2 percent unemployment. The high gas prices and food prices have made people’s lives much harder than before.

Now he is campaigning for a second term. Since there is very little to show for in the economy and Obamacare, his campaign strategy is mainly focusing on the slogan “bin Laden died and General Motors is alive.”

In his recent campaign ad, we saw him bring out a big gun, former President Bill Clinton, to do the propaganda for him.

As we know, Clinton is the best spin doctor in politics, and he could spin himself out of any trouble. So it is typical for him to brag about President Obama’s great leadership role in making such a tough and risky decision to kill Osama bin Laden a year ago.

It is OK to claim all the credit, but, unfortunately, he took a cheap shot at Mitt Romney who, he thinks, would not have the guts to make such a tough decision. This is uncalled-for and has backfired on them, defeating the purpose of the ad.

Just think how much nicer it would be if presidents Clinton and Obama had given some credit to the previous administration for setting up the plan to catch bin Laden, and some credit to the CIA and SEALs for carrying out the plan. The problem of these two presidents is they are too arrogant and have no humility. They don’t know the difference between self-respect and self-importance.

Remember, when people are humble and gracious, they earn more respect. Here are two good examples:

Sir Isaac Newton credited his success in discovering gravity to his standing on the shoulders of the giants.

The first Chinese cultural hero, Yu, who lived during the Hsia Dynasty, credited his success in the most-difficult mission of flood control of the Yellow River to his predecessors who died of humiliation for failing their mission.

When the king wanted to reward him for the great deeds, he respectfully declined, humbly saying that he only learned from his predecessors’ mistakes in building levee after levee that failed to contain the big body of flood water. So he took a different approach by deepening the waterways and channeling the huge river — and it worked.

For the sake of our country, we should be careful to elect good people who will put our nation’s interest above their party’s politics to divide the nation.

Chris Hsu

retired state employee

Baton Rou ge


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (33)


1) Comment by Whatnow - 12/06/2012

@ nimby? and jobbyb, right on, guys.

2) Comment by Whatnow - 12/06/2012

@Tea_Slayer, good, I never was talking to you in the first place. You always jump on everyone who you disagree with first with cocky gusto. It will be a breath of fresh air not to have to deal with you any longer. It's like talking to a cockalorum. Your political ideology blinds you just as well, but you are too superior (in your own mind) to see it. You wouldn't know a fact it it slammed you in the face. You ignore facts that are true, and twist them to your way of thinking. Think for yourself? If you think for yourself, then I am Michelle Obama. Now please try to remember that you promised to stay off my a $ $.

3) Comment by jobbyb - 12/06/2012

nimby? I agree with everything you said. As a country we hold our leaders to a much lower standard than most countries and do nothing to make it better. The citizens must demand the change, but complacency has killed this United States!

4) Comment by nimby? - 12/06/2012

I shall refer to an earlier comment I made , its' validity having been proven .... jobbyb ; no lifetime appointments , term limits , elimination of perks , restrictions on gifts/bribes , no lobbyists ...

5) Comment by Whatnow - 12/06/2012

@nimby, These blog bullies are often the same people who were the schoolyard bullies. And people with superiority complexes are insecure people because those who talk about and point out others flaws do so to take the attention off themselves.The world is full of insults that come from the mouths of not so intelligent people. There are plenty cockalorums in this world. Defined as; a boastful and self important person- Cockalorum

6) Comment by jobbyb - 12/06/2012

I am really growing tired of the constant blaming. The blame is on the bi-partisan system that leads to professional politicians. Our system was not set-up for people to make a living as a politician, this leads to corruption and the lack of care about the citizens and future of this country. How do we fix that? Any and all ideas will be entertained!!

7) Comment by Tea_Slayer - 12/06/2012

Whatnow-- your religious and political ideology blinds you, but you like it that way. It's much easier than thinking for yourself. Every single one of your posts mirrors what a FoxNews talking head (or equivalent) has already said. If my "superiority complex" stems from the fact that I think for myself, do actual research, and form my opinions based on facts, then so be it. And every item i offer you proof of anything, you just say "well we can disagree because I get my news from conservatives and you get yours from liberals". And those kinds of statements say it all, that you are immune to the facts. I'm done addressing you directly. It's like trying to teach quantum mechanics to a 2nd grader. Have a great life, Dr K

8) Comment by Whatnow - 12/06/2012

@Tea_Slayer, Vitter did not lie under oath. And who says I didn't forgive Clinton? I just don't trust anyone who lies under oath to be advising the President. Vitter doesn't even try to do that. Your superiority complex is in full swing today, along with your keen sense of style with your insults. Until you can offer such proof, grow up and stop the name-calling, and accept that other people may validly disagree with you.

9) Comment by nimby? - 12/06/2012

and my 'pet issue(s)" are ? I attempt to make my point precise , using as few words possible , sometimes bordering on brutal honesty . no hidden message , no alternative agenda , just a few simple words . no explanation necessary . sorry you don't understand . while I do not agree with the letter I do agree with it's title(sometimes these can be mis-leading). in this me society where we each have become the center of the universe we all could stand to humble ourselves a bit , clear enough ?

10) Comment by Tea_Slayer - 12/06/2012

that's just it. you never have a point You really don't "get it" because you never really say anything..until your pet issue(s) are discussed...

11) Comment by nimby? - 12/06/2012

not above anything , sorry but I "get it" . it takes two sides for a conversation , or an argument . in a perfect world two sides can sit down , settle their differences in a manner beneficial to both . in the real world , as soon as one side or the other professes moral/intellectual superiority the conversation disintegrates into a schoolyard brawl ; insults are hurled , volumes are written stating eachs' points , nothing changes . I found out long ago if I wish to get my point across it was in my favor not to insult the other party . don't believe I've referred to anyone as a "shill" or "GOP tool' this morning . have a nice day ....

12) Comment by Tea_Slayer - 12/06/2012

nimby pretends to be above the fray (except when his pet issues are discussed)..humility? hardly

13) Comment by nimby? - 12/06/2012

more of "I'm right and you're an idiot" . humility ? bah humbug .....

14) Comment by Tea_Slayer - 12/06/2012

Whatnow "forgives" republican philanderer Vitter but spews hatred for Clinton. How christian of him, especially since Vitter led the charge to denounce Clinton and say that he should be removed from office. "He was even brought up on impeachment charges. That's pretty bad, don't ya think?" Not considering it was a republican witch-hunt. But Whatnow, being the gullible GOP tool that he has been shown to be, refuses to see that.

15) Comment by Whatnow - 12/06/2012

@OldManKensey, (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ClfpG2-1Bv4&feature=related) (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JUDppdVXeMw) How much clearer does it need to be? You must think the world is stupid or forgetful. How come want to put a spin on what Clinton did? He was even brought up on impeachment charges. That's pretty bad, don't ya think? Kind of lost his credibility with a lot of folks. And Rhonda(twinkie1cat), how is Obama delivering jobs? Making solar panels? Public sector jobs? What has he don't for the private sector, except those run by unions for their votes? And he's not a braggart? Girl, you are drowning in the Kool-aid! LOL! You would probably use Obama's toe cheese for perfume. Get a grip. He's just a man. He has no halo.

16) Comment by DMJ - 12/06/2012

Everyone's mum on the fact that (before we got Bin Laden) Romney said he wouldn't violate Pakistan's sovereignty in pursuit of terrorists. Were we not supposed to take him at his word?

17) Comment by Triple - 12/06/2012

Rhonda (T1Cat) delivered her hateful rhetoric as expected.  She was the first in the discussion to bring up race, assumes Mr. Hsu is a republican and not a disgruntled democrat / independent. She mis-represents the Clinton legacy and gives no credit to the Gingrich led congress for fiscal responsibility.  She continues to fill this forum with hate, race baiting and illogical, irresponsible assertions.  All posters to this site, regardless of ideology, should take offense to her tactics.

18) Comment by ABayouBoy - 12/06/2012

If I were worth an estimated $250 million, as is Romney, I guess that I could "afford" to appear to be "humble", too....

19) Comment by twinkie1cat - 11/06/2012

Mr. Hsu is just another tired Republican saying whatever he can to discredit the president. I like how he brought up incidents from another culture, however. I learned something.

20) Comment by twinkie1cat - 11/06/2012

****Comment Removed for Violation of Terms of Use****

21) Comment by twinkie1cat - 11/06/2012

Mr Hsu needs to get things straight. Clinton balanced the budget. Obama has tried to do things to strengthen the economy, put people to work, get rid of Al-Qaida, and provide America what it needs to make it a better place to live. Obama is not a braggart, but George W. Bush, who ran up the debt was definitely one. Obama strikes me as quite humble, but being an intelligent black man, anything he does is gong to seem arrogant. Bush ran his mouth without putting his brain in gear, like when he declared his war over when it was just getting started good. Clinton, I am sure he has a big ego. He looks egotistical plus his morality issues indicate that he would. But he was a good president who, like Obama made considerable progress in spite of a Republican Congress.

22) Comment by gvm - 11/06/2012

Mr. Hsu, your remarks would carry more weight if there was at least a scintilla of logic in them. As it stands, they are so skewed that even your ideological brethren can only offer a tepid defense of them.

23) Comment by Old Man Kensey - 11/06/2012

And, it is amazing after all the bashing of Obama because he is not humble, it is ironic that the author had to turn to China and Isaac Newton as examples of "Humble Leaders." What is the problem-- no examples in the modern Republican Party?

24) Comment by Old Man Kensey - 11/06/2012

Whatnow, get your facts straight. He did not say that under oath.. Frankly, asking politicians if they have sex is a sign that you don't have anything real to use against them. And it is amazing how all the conservative commentators now call Bill the moderate liberal.. Seriously, aren't you tired of hearing.... "The most liberal since... insert any name. ... At least President Clinton left his predecessor a surplus and not the biggest recession since the Great Depression. Don't y'all ever get tired of cutting off your noses to spite your face? Republican are the big spenders...

25) Comment by Whatnow - 11/06/2012

Anyone who would use Bill Clinton for credibility is very desperate. Mr. "I did not have sex with that woman", while lying under oath, should not be taken seriously as a influential partner. But, with some of the help he's been giving Obama lately might be an attempt to push his wife's agenda for 2016. But, hey, any person who has to do so much backtracking for his "misspoken" errors in his re-election speeches shouldn't be taken seriously either. Either the man can't read, or he needs to fire the person who writes for his tel-prompter and the person who gives out wrong economy data. And DMJ, who wants to stand next to someone who only talks about himself all the time while blaming you for all his mistakes? What a bore!

26) Comment by DMJ - 11/06/2012

Obama asked Bush if he wanted to join him at the commemoration ceremony after Bin Laden was killed. He declined. Of course, if you watch Fox News, the headline was probably something like "Arrogant Obama takes all the credit."

27) Comment by DMJ - 11/06/2012

For the record, Obama asked Bush

28) Comment by tradewinns - 11/06/2012

humble? our "leaders"? are we still talking about the united states of america? they should not be humble, they should be embarressed!

29) Comment by DMJ - 11/06/2012

Fact: Mitt Romney said he would not violate the sovereignty of Pakistan in order to find Bin Laden. I don't think it's too much of a stretch to say that, if President, Mitt Romney wouldn't violate the sovereignty of Pakistan in order to find Bin Laden, considering he said he wouldn't. Oh, but lemme gues....Romney would have flip-flopped on that too, right? Pathetic.

30) Comment by Mygulfbleedsforu - 11/06/2012

How can you say "President Barack Obama alone has added $5 trillion to the nation's debt" then proceed to blab about how no one accomplishes anything all alone?

31) Comment by 8point6 - 11/06/2012

Great letter. Thank you, Chris.

32) Comment by lovemykids - 11/06/2012

I didn't realize the Yellow River was under control. I thought the Chinese government was still spending millions and evicting people off family land to try to do the job.

33) Comment by gvm - 11/06/2012

President Obama wasn't the only president to add to the deficit. Just thought I'd point that out...