Letters: The system is completely backward

“In short, the system is completely backward.” That’s a line from a New York Times Op-ed on May 26 about Louisiana’s for-profit prison system, but it could describe any political system in the country today. (http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/26/opinion/blow-plantations-prisons-and-profits.html?nl=todaysheadlines&emc=edit_th_20120526).

For instance:

Congress should be a body of elected representatives who regularly convene in the country’s Capitol to express the will of “we the people” back home. Today Congress occasionally convenes to express the will of the lobbyists and corporations that pay their campaign bills. That’s completely backward.

Banks should turn aggregate deposits into lending capital and collect interest as profit. Banks today are “too big to fail” casinos betting on exotic financial instruments (Joe wagers Peter will or won’t pay Paul on Tuesday), requiring depositors to loan banks money when their billion dollar losses threaten to bring the world’s economy to its knees. That’s completely backward.

A “bottom-up” economic recovery policy, where $1 of spending from middle-class wallets is equal to $3, is the most efficient and effective way to stimulate crucial demand and fire-up a stagnant economy. A “top-down” approach that transfers middle-class wealth to the upper-class — folks who already own two-thirds of the nation’s wealth and Congress — is money that will likely never do a day of work in the economy, but go straight to a deposit account in an off-shore tax-shelter. That’s completely backward.

The federal government is the steward of the national trust, the protector of the people’s rights as set forth in the Constitution. Today it’s under attack by the very people it’s sworn to protect, folks riled up into an anarchistic frenzy by the very folk from whom they need protection most. That’s completely backward.

Before civil rights, America’s heart and soul — workers like Rosie the Riveter — voted Democrat, and capitalist factory owners — today’s Wall Street titans and Corporate CEO — voted Republican.

They had little in common: Rosie cared about day-to-day issues — a living wage, a safe work environment, health insurance, job security. The factory owner wanted freedom to maximize his profit margin, hold down labor and operating costs, a low tax rate and cheap money.

Finding a working compromise between Democratic and Republican viewpoints was never perfect, but it worked.

After civil rights, Republicans seized the opportunity to exploit the South’s bitterness and rancor with the Democratic Party, and began investing in propaganda to convince folks like Rosie that voting for the same guy as the factory owner somehow made sense.

Rosie’s been voting Republican for some 35 years now (and watching the Fox news channel for 15), and wakes up lately in an unsettling, backward-seeming world — irritated with someone.

Mirror, Mirror, on the wall ....

Pen M. Hutchinson

writer

Baton Rouge


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (9)


1) Comment by DMJ - 04/06/2012

Whatnow, I guess you haven't been paying attention. (big surprise) Obama put forth a jobs plan last September. Guess who killed it?

2) Comment by Whatnow - 04/06/2012

Mr. Wallace, I agree. Actions speak louder than words. And Mr. Reid is not an obstructionist? If the economy had been the first order of business, instead of Obamacare, when the Democrats held both houses, would things be any different? If Obama keeps saying things will get better, he must have some plans in mind. Does he have plans for job creation other than hiring more government workers? If so, why wait until he's re-elected? Why doesn't he en-lighten us with his plans? He promises things and delivers nothing. Where's the job creation?

3) Comment by gravityassist - 03/06/2012

@Mr. Wallace: I’m so sorry. I see now that you exist in a realm beyond the reach of reason. For the sake of anyone happening upon this discussion in – say 2050 – I think it should be clarified that in the real world (the one inhabited by the people who aren’t under the mind-control of some weirded-out conspiracy nonsense) , the only “anachronistic formulas” that “have never worked” for America have been the ones that Republicans have been trying for some 40 years now – particularly the one that goes: “You give us all your money and we’ll let some of it trickle back down to you.” It doesn’t work (and feels rather like someone peeing down your back).// Since “supply-side economics” befell us, we’ve seen $79 Trillion worth of middle-class wealth redistributed – NOT OVER to “unions and fringe elements,” NOT even DOWN to the poor folks on welfare – but UP to the wealthiest in America. A scant 1/3 of the population now possess more wealth than the bottom 2/3s combined.//So, here we are, in the Gilded Age all over again.//Are you a wealthy plutocrat, Mr. Wallace? If you are, congratulations on being a member of the 1/3! It’s a small, eclectic group.//President Obama has not been given the opportunity by Congress to put into effect any Keynesian economics - the more progressive economic ideology that WOULD result in a swift economic recovery (which is exactly why Republicans are obstructing progress; it would make him look good). Early on, with the help of two, sensible female Republican Senators (Snow/Collins), Obama got a small stimulus package through, that did help a lot, but was not enough. It is a deep hole Republicans left us in// So, if you’re not a plutocrat, and you’re really “into” watching “what they do, not what they say, “watch Republicans try to insist that what we need is MORE of the old, tired, “anachronistic” stuff that got us in the mess we’re in today in the first place. That would be “backing up,” and yes, it truly is “… all simple when the nonsense and propaganda is swept away.” Good luck to you. (I suspect the conspiracy business is going to get a whole lot more heated in the next six months.)

4) Comment by 8.3 - 03/06/2012

In Louisiana, seizing control of government by cloaking the real agenda and then trying out formulas that have never worked while desperately looting the Louisiana treasury in a "redistribution" effort that seems to go only to supporters, corporate and wealthy interests, and carpet baggers whose real education and health "reforms" mainly concern profit for the select few.

5) Comment by rgeraldwallace@cox.net - 03/06/2012

Negative, negative. Think Harry Truman. It's all simple when the nonsense and propaganda is swept away. Remember, watch what they do, not what they say.

6) Comment by gravityassist - 02/06/2012

“’You can fool some people all the time, and you can fool all the people some of the time, but you can't fool all the people all the time.’ Honest Abe had it right.”//@ ReginaldWallace. Yes, Mr. Wallace, they’re counting on you to continue believing that…and laughing… all the way to the bank.

7) Comment by 8.3 - 02/06/2012

rgeraldwallace@cox.net is a great example of the results of a half witted "education" where the creative side is marginalized in favor of a rigid ideology so that any divergence from the official party line and thought is not relevant or even capable of being comprehended, much like the USSR of old. All that are needed now are reeducation camps and a gulag in the swamps. Y'all still gots football to prove your worth , though, ain't ya?

8) Comment by gvm - 02/06/2012

Might I point out that the "looting" that you refer to seems to have occurred in the previous administration as well. Billions of dollars redistributed via "no bid" contracts that oftentimes went to "supporters and fringe elements" (Haliburton and Blackwater) for instance. It appears some folks believe when the treasury is looted to fund an illegal war and a "redistribution effort" via tax cuts, then that's free enterprise at work. Hypocrisy of the highest order in my opinion.

9) Comment by rgeraldwallace@cox.net - 02/06/2012

Backwards is what happens when you're backing up. Seizing control of government by cloaking the real agenda and then trying out anachronistic formulas that have never worked while desperately looting the US treasury in a "redistribution" effort that seems to go only to supporters, unions, and fringe elements is what has the people riled up. "Compromise" today means only giving in to such chicanery just to get along and then lying to the people about it. Remember Mr.Hutchinson: "You can fool some people all the time, and you can fool all the people some of the time, but you can't fool all the people all the time." Honest Abe had it right.