Letters: Choice will help enable students

Driving Louisiana’s highways, dotted by rivers and bayous, is an education itself. These trips also reveal much about the diversity of education in this state.

In big cities, like Baton Rouge, New Orleans and Shreveport, densely-packed neighborhoods may house several schools, while families across a 50-mile span might attend the same high school in rural parishes. And, in between, are rapidly-developing suburban parishes, like Ascension, Bossier, Livingston and St. Tammany, with new school buildings, adjacent to new subdivisions. When I ask what’s behind this growth, the response is always the same, “People move here for our schools.”

Louisiana families are exercising school choice. Nationally, we rank third for private school enrollment. Less noted, however, is growth in these suburban districts, where student performance and enrollment are both rising.

But not all Louisiana families can use real estate to change schools; they simply can’t afford to move. Yet, it’s these families whose children most often attend low-performing schools. While poverty makes teaching and learning more challenging, improvement is less likely when families have less clout to influence change. The cycle of under-education continues.

Gov. Bobby Jindal and our legislators recently gave families a tool to disrupt this cycle. Act 2 of the current session allows families below a moderate income level, with children attending C, D or F schools, to apply for scholarships to qualified private schools or A or B public schools outside their district.

While the nonpublic school component of the law is high-profile, the opportunity for public schools to welcome students from struggling schools in other districts has been largely unreported. Like nonpublic schools, public schools can choose whether to participate in the program, the number of students they wish to serve, and whether to provide transportation. Participating schools also receive the full per-pupil funding for transferring students, based on the parish where the student lives.

In tight budget years, opportunities to increase revenues are rare. More importantly, for higher-performing districts and schools, participation in this program represents a chance to show a child a new world — and change lives. Some suggest participation will result in problems families were trying to escape when they relocated or that participation will lower standards. But educators know better. We know good schools meet the needs of students who need it most — children waiting on a chance to flourish.

Last week, Zachary Superintendent Warren Drake announced Louisiana’s top-rated system would accept 30 scholarship students from outside the district. But pressure from the community led him to reverse his decision. With the May 18 deadline approaching, 68 other district superintendents now face the same choice. I urge these districts to open the doors of their A and B schools. It’s the right thing to do for our children.

John White

state superintendent of education

Baton Rouge


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (67)


1) Comment by teacherguy - 16/05/2012

Seniors wouldn't work because the foundation is built before that. However, Freshman in high school would not be such a bad idea.

2) Comment by Libby13 - 16/05/2012

Good idea, QRR. Maybe they can offer spots at the high school instead of the elementary school. Let a handful of kids start the Freshman Academy and see how that works out. Four years wouldn't bankrupt the district. Zachary High School offers SO many opportunities. There are things I don't like about the school, but overall, it's hard to beat the opportunities they offer young people trying to get started in life. They have the money, the resources, and the know-how to help a few lucky kids get a boost into a successful future.

3) Comment by QuietRiverRoad - 16/05/2012

If the concern is solely about funding over the next however many years, might I suggest Mr. Drake accept vouchers for #30 students who will be entering their Senior Year instead. Surely, our ZSD can afford that. Zachary?

4) Comment by Libby13 - 15/05/2012

I do live in Zachary. I've been here about 10 years now. My children started here in elementary school. I do not believe the issue is that Zachary cannot afford to accept any children into its schools on this voucher program. Zachary figured out how to build a successful school district. Zachary could figure out a way to afford to help a few children and in return teach its own children invaluable lessons in humanity. Just the opportunity for our students to see what offering a hand to a neighbor can do and the far reaching effects of kindness is worth the extra dollars. Some lessons cannot be found in textbooks and some things cannot be measured in dollars and cents.

5) Comment by teacherguy - 15/05/2012

The legislature and governor by-passed public schools and changed the rules on teachers without hammering out details with teachers on things like teacher evaluations, tenure, and diverting public tax dollars to profit driven charters/non-publics. Education is the ONLY profession that everyone else thinks they can run. I'd like to see politicians mandate medical procedures, building practices, and restaurant policy without first gathering a group of doctors, construction workers, and chefs. John White does not have the support of public schools because he is in on the vicious attack on public school districts, teachers, etc. For all you union conspiracy theorists out there, teacher unions in LA are relatively impotent...otherwise, there would be a total stoppage of this crud with Wisconsin-like strikes and recalls. The best teachers have moved to the districts where they feel respected and are able to more effectively teach. If the worst districts want the best teachers...then pay them to leave the best districts and set the failing schools up with a culture to keep those teachers there. I'd leave my $40k job in Livingston Parish for a $75k job in EBR. Until then, I'll hang out where I feel safe and can TEACH! As for Zachary schools, these transfer kids become a trojan horse...30 this year, but once they are in they can stay till graduation. Their scores actually would not be counted against Zachary. However, in two years...the price to Zachary tax payers goes up to more than $300k. If these kids enter and stay...in ten years (adding a measly 30 kids per year) it would cost the Zachary tax payer $1.5million....Christian or not, God tells us to use common sense with our money and many of you are short- sighted. All John White does is chastise public schools in these editorials, no wonder he is experiencing "push-back" from all these districts.

6) Comment by QuietRiverRoad - 15/05/2012

I do understand. It's just I'll never forget the Zachary #30. How I wish Mr. Drake would stand on his word even if there is never a #31. Well, I have to go cut a Plavix in half so I can make it onto the Smuckers Jar one day. Good night, all.

7) Comment by jobbyb - 15/05/2012

That is a great name! Our stories are similar but I seem to be a tad younger. I am highly concerned for my Grand-children's, that aren't born yet, future living in the US. And honestly giving and paying more is not the answer. We built this system, it's now time to tear it down and start from scratch.

8) Comment by QuietRiverRoad - 15/05/2012

Again, I agree with you. I'm a life-long Republican. If the Catholic School in Natchez had not accepted me as a student after I knocked young Richard's eye out of its socket on the handball court, I would have been lost forever. Sister Full-Of-Love took me in at no cost and even allowed me to be the kicker on the GIRL's Football Squad. I was terrible child. But not really. Odds are, at my age, I'm not long for this world but if not for that kind gesture, I would die an old man full of regret. That's my story. I understand that little boy no one wants to help. Sister Full-Of-Love- what a wonderful name.

9) Comment by jobbyb - 15/05/2012

I would agree with that sentiment if I didn't believe that we, the tax paying citizens, are already doing more than our fair share for these families. The national debt continues to rise at an alarming rate for this reason. If we do not find a way to get welfare under control it won't matter how educated the kids are!! Per citizen, I did say citizen, the debt is in excess of $185,000. How many illegal kids do we pay to educate, provide health-care to, etc.....? Eventually it will all crash around us if we do not take a stand and stop worrying about what party we vote for.

10) Comment by QuietRiverRoad - 15/05/2012

I'm old-fashioned, I suppose. If Mr. Drake had never come forward and stated his belief that Zachary could and should accept #30 little ones, I might not have questioned this idea. Not only did Mr. Drake express his confidence in our finances and in our teachers, he insisted that this was the right thing to do and I believe him. I believe he believes it, too.

11) Comment by QuietRiverRoad - 15/05/2012

I agree with you, jobbyb. But the world can be awfully hard on little ones. Someone must give them a chance even if their parents can't or will not. We must.

12) Comment by jobbyb - 15/05/2012

Either way sometimes leading on a misguided and mislead movement is more detrimental in the long run. The problem is not the schools it is the parents of the kids attending the schools! Say what you want but a child's learning starts and ends at home!!

13) Comment by QuietRiverRoad - 15/05/2012

That's okay, jobbyb, we have family in WFP. It's a nice place to be.

14) Comment by QuietRiverRoad - 15/05/2012

We have no children and will have no children in the ZSD. It isn't about us. It's about being the best human beings we can be. Fear is not the way. And I believe this is about fear. I believe that.

15) Comment by jobbyb - 15/05/2012

Sorry I was under the belief you lived in WFP!

16) Comment by QuietRiverRoad - 15/05/2012

Not only do I live in Zachary, my grandfather lived here as well and that was a lot of years past. We own homes and property and pay our taxes and know , (we think) fairly well the financial situation here. I just sincerely believe we must lead or we fail.

17) Comment by jobbyb - 15/05/2012

But no one has answered the question about the finances involved. Central added a 1/2 % sales tax to make it work, I know Zachary's is still 9%, do any of you live in Zachary and know the situation? I know 'QRR' does not, but what about you Libby?

18) Comment by QuietRiverRoad - 15/05/2012

Yes. Lead by example.

19) Comment by Libby13 - 15/05/2012

A kindergarten student is just beginning and hasn't failed yet. What if we accepted "A" students or students that had to pass entrance exams or great athletes who have already proven they are trying to achieve? Would that change anything? And I don't think Zachary should change from being a leader and an example to the state to waiting around to follow other schools. I think Zachary has an opportunity they should at least try. If it fails, it fails, but we'll never know if we don't give it a chance.

20) Comment by QuietRiverRoad - 15/05/2012

A man's word has to mean something. If not, we are all lost.

21) Comment by QuietRiverRoad - 15/05/2012

Central voted No and many others will but still Zachary took the lead and offered #30 little ones placement within the ZSD. No amount of pressure should have changed that. It doesn't matter if private schools do not accept vouchers. Zachary needs to set the example and not cower behind the popular vote. It's childish. It's cowardly. It's wrong as two left shoes. Stand by your word or your word means nothing. Mr. Drake is losing his credibility and he knows it. Even those crying loudest to say No do not trust him. It's human. Mr. Drake knows what position he is in now no matter what so all I'm saying to Mr. Drake is "Be a MAN of your word. Make a noise; make a difference."

22) Comment by jobbyb - 15/05/2012

You two agree on almost everything! LOL Central voted no for a few reasons, but mostly it is a space concern for the extra students. T-buildings are expensive to rent, and if the students that are occupying those buildings don't live or shop in Central then the system loses money by taking the vouchers. Simple economics! I don't know why Zachary decided against it but it may be a financial concern as well.

23) Comment by 1ryben - 15/05/2012

You are right, I'm assuming the child is underperforming. If they are coming from a failing school I don't think I am going too far on a limb with my assumption. Would they raise scores? Even if it's a maybe, I'm not sure I'd take too many risks with my family's future on many mabies. Its tough enough educating the children public schools are legally obligated to help (unlike private/charter/magnents). Adding more would make it just that much tougher. Again, you say something I agree with, helping the future generation helps everyone. Helping one child does not help a generation though.Seriously thoug Libby, I think we agree more than disagree. The compassionate thing to do is help as much as you can. I'm really just trying to present the other side. Ask some of the questions that it seems like our educational leadership doesn't. I don't think the answers are as easy as what Mr. White presented. If it were, I'd find it hard to believe it took this long for someone to think of it. Eveyone is giving Zachary a tough time for going back on their decision, but where is the line of private schools accepting vouchers? Central voted no.

24) Comment by Libby13 - 15/05/2012

You assume the children from outside the district would be underperforming. If you get a 5 year old child and put them in a Zachary kindergarten class for a Zachary education, how do you know they would not raise the test scores? Just because their parents aren't wealthy doesn't mean they cannot learn. And again I say that helping the future generation succeed helps everyone in the long run.

25) Comment by 1ryben - 15/05/2012

Libby, I totally agree with the sentiment that you do what you can to help. Helping some is better than helping none. The problem is that it is just not as easy as just moving a kid from one school to the other and the problem is solved. Not when so much is at stake. I'm sure nearly every high achieving school system would like to help (at least I'd hope so), but even noble deeds come at a price. With such high stakes put in these performance scores I couldn't blame a school or system that may hesitate to take the chance of taking in underperforming students.I know that sounds harsh to turn your back on a student in need, but charter and private schools do it all the time. I know it's off topic, but if private and charter or magnet schools are so great and wonderful, why don't the educate every child....no excuses, no exclusions..."It's the right thing to do for our children." (sorry) Districts are faceless inteties, but really, it's families of the school personel that will pay the price if a school's scores start to fall. Look at the poor teacher, if they are labled and ineffective they have to go for extra training (sounds good, as it should be). If the training is during school hours, that class does not have a teacher for the day...enough days...scores won't improve. If its outside school hours, every hour in training is one less hour with their own families. See, the families pay the price. The true cost of something is not just measured in dollars and cents. Why do we seem to donate so much during the holiday season when there is need year round? We donate descretionary income or spare time. My kids may get a fewer gifts at Christmas to help a needsy family, but they are still getting something. Would you donate to the needy if it meant that you couldn't pay your mortgage? Sell your house, downsize to the smallest home possible to free up money to help buy a home for a needy family. I don't know of anyone that'll do that. They may point to and vonunteer themselves for Habitat For Humanity (great orginization). Even Habitat requires the homeowner to put in a certain ammout of hours building their own home. Isn't it time we require families to invest in their child's education? Especially when asking others to sacrifice for them. (sorry it's so long)

26) Comment by Libby13 - 15/05/2012

I have one child who is a junior at LSU, another graduating high school this year, and another still in high school. I don't plan on quitting work to homeschool at this point. I just think some children would be better off being taught at home than in some public schools that do more harm than good. Just because we cannot help everyone on the planet doesn't mean we shouldn't help anyone. That's why I suggested the school systems figure out the finances and try to help the number of children they are able to help even if it is only one or a few. During holiday season every year, we donate lots of food to the families in our surrounding communities even though there are starving people all over the world we are unable to help. You do what you can. Doing nothing when you have the opportunity to do so much is what bothers me. Maybe Zachary cannot afford 30 out -of-district students without a major impact on their resources. I don't know, but how many can Zachary afford? And why not let the members of the community vote on the matter?

27) Comment by 1ryben - 15/05/2012

Homeschooling is the answer for some families.Im n ot convinced. Not mine, maybe yours.

28) Comment by 1ryben - 15/05/2012

Libby, I understand your just one student argument. I really do, and you are correct, just one will have a very insignifigant impact on the school, but have a tremendous impact on that particular student. I get it. That's fine and dandy, but what about the other thousands of students who can't be helped? What are we going to do for them? The kids that can't get to the suburban schools? The kids whose parents wont attempt to even complete the paperwork to provide a better education for their child? Will you tell the other kids that they can't be helped? What will you tell the parent of a child in these districts that took on an extra burdon on themselves through higher taxes that their resources will be stretched even thinner. Even squeezing one student in takes resources from the others. Sooner or later, you keep taking from the successful and they can no longer be successful. If it's one now, how many later? There are many things these parents can do, right now, to help their kids that won't cost a dime. Did they do all of that? If a family has done EVERYTHING possible to better their situation and nothing else has worked then yes, maybe I'll be more inclined to agree to Squeezing them in. I guess my broader point was that there are many questions that are left unanswered or open ended.

29) Comment by Libby13 - 15/05/2012

The growing number of parents who choose to homeschool their children rather than send them to public schools might be on to something.

30) Comment by 1ryben - 15/05/2012

@Libby13, I can assure you that the public schools/districts that are failing can not be blamed on laziness due to the fact that no matter the score, they would still receive tax money. I am in no way saying that everything in public education is perfect, nor am I going to blame failure on laziness on the part of teachers and school districts (not that there are no lazy teachers, but I believe that is the exception, not the rule). The failure of the Louisiana public school system, and the solution is far too complex to be explained in soundbites.

31) Comment by Libby13 - 15/05/2012

1ryben - "these voucher students will create quite the burden on these districts" ??? Would one student create too much of a burden? Could two squeeze in without hurting anyone? At least some people are trying to change things up and do something to help children who, through no fault of their own, are in schools that are failing. Children who have a chance to succeed in life end up creating much less of a burden on society in the long run. I would fear for any "voucher students" though as it seems they are already labeled and ostracized and would probably have a hard time coping with the people who don't want them, especially children six and seven years old who still believe in Santa and goodness and would not understand adults who resent their intrusion into their world.

32) Comment by 1ryben - 15/05/2012

I wish these discussions/debates would/could have taken place during the ligislative session instead of railroading these bills through.

33) Comment by 1ryben - 15/05/2012

Mr. White. How are these underpriviladged children supposed to get to these schools? Lets assume some can bring their students to suburban school districts. Am I wrong to assume that it ould be the same parents that are currently engaged in their student's education. If I'm correct, then these are not the students most in need of help. You mention this as a way for districts to increase funding for their districts. Follow me on this one...We eliminate any MFP increases for years (consideriding inflation, that's the equivilant to a funding decrease) leading to teacher lay-offs, hiring freezes, etc. which then leads to increased class sizes. Now you say to districts that if you want more money, you have to take in MORE students, further increasing class sizes, directly impacting the QUALITY for student learning. You say that these students will arrivev at these districts with full state funding. What about the communities that pass EXTRA, local taxes to support their children and schools. How will these students make up for that funding gap. It seems to reason that these voucher students will create quite the burden on these districts. This assumes they are all well behaved, regular-education students. I look forward to your answers Mr. White.

34) Comment by Frustrated - 15/05/2012

Mr. Drake made the wrong decision. All he has done is opened the door to problem students that will decrease Zachary's test scores and they will no longer be the No. 1 school district in Louisiana.

35) Comment by jobbyb - 15/05/2012

To add fuel to the conversation here. Central voted to not accept vouchers as well at the SB meeting last night.

36) Comment by 8.3 - 15/05/2012

Unless strong, even harsh discipline, parental accountability, early childhood programs, performance based high compensation for employees and even students, and protection from frivolous lawsuits are legislated, mandated and enforced, private or public will make no difference. Although a very small percentage of students from disadvantaged areas may benefit, the voucher push and choice is really about another agenda unless the state intends on building a bunch of private schools in poor rural areas or busing children en masse for several hours a day.

37) Comment by Libby13 - 15/05/2012

One reason private schools are generally more successful is because they are not run by the government - elected people paid by the taxpayers. If a private school is a mess, parents won't pay to send their children there. They have to do a good job to make a profit and stay in business. By contrast, a public school can fail and go on failing and still have taxpayer money pouring in. Say what you like about Jindal but reducing government in favor of the private sector helps everyone. Private industry including private schools have checks and balances that government does not have. Re Zachary: I guess I am just thinking about the children who live in failing school districts. It is prejudicial and narrow minded to think that every child in a failing school district is a thug or a bad influence who will corrupt our pristine, perfect children in Zachary. Let me tell you, Zachary kids are far from perfect and that includes my own children. Writing disparaging comments about kids you've never met based on stereotypes does not accomplish anything. Children have no control over what their parents can afford. Some people cannot afford to move and are barely making ends meet. Reaching out and helping children succeed no matter where they live helps EVERYONE. That one life you turn around might have been the kid who robbed your grandmother to pay for drugs or food had they not had the opportunity early on to succeed. Or the life that dedicated their life to helping others as they were helped and ended up changing lives to an immeasurable degree. Any act of kindness has a domino effect. Following your heart and leadership with heart is always the best way.

38) Comment by QuietRiverRoad - 15/05/2012

And as for moving to Zachary. The children aren't attending failing schools in EBR because the adults in their lives have had their hours cut. The children have no opportunity to move anywhere. Zachary has the opportunity to reach out to #30 little ones. Perhaps, as some fear, these children will bring their home-influence to school or perhaps these little ones will bring their school- influence back home. It won't be easy. The children in the neighborhood may ostracize them. Even their elders may resent them. Some may not make it for a variety of reasons beyond their 6 year old control. Some may use this opportunity to change a host of lives for the better.

39) Comment by QuietRiverRoad - 15/05/2012

Words. The first words out of most children's mouths are the words they hear most often - whether it be WalMart, MacDonald's, Air Jordans or whatever. This fact transcends all lines. It's worse than unfortunate; it's damaging. Priorities! I still believe an implied promise to accept #30 kinders was made by our ZSB and we, as a city, should stand behind that promise. Even if it's just this one time. This is also about the virtue of standing on your word. Not doing so sends the worst possible message.

40) Comment by Warp7 - 14/05/2012

John white is blowing air from the wrong end. He is now trying to convince people that the destruction of our public school system is a good thing. He tries to gloss over why families, in particular white families move out to the suburs. It is simply called white flight and it has been happening since the 60's. Yes some of the schoo,s need fixing and that is part of their reason for heading for the subs. However, the main reason they move out to the subs is to try mainly to get away from minorities. Their lack of support for public schools has helped to inflate the problem. One. Of the. Major problems not addresse by young White is the bad are disruptive kids our teachers have to put up with on a daily bases. Doe s anyone really think that these little bad a.. are going to leave their current schools! Let's get real here, the established private and parochial schools will not be taking them! And if a charter school takes them, they know that they can except them, kick them out and retain the funding for that pupil for the entire school year. Amazing that funding stays with them for a student no longer in their school. Keep listening to White sell his snake oil.

41) Comment by 8.3 - 14/05/2012

my bad, disregard "of police" although strict discipline is one crucial factor.

42) Comment by 8.3 - 14/05/2012

Something is missing here. According to provisions of the No Child Left Behind law, many of the low performing ("failing")EBR schools have had students from these schools to transfer to higher performing schools in the district (Choice) , the proposed SE district being among the schools that admitted these students. The outcomes apparently have not been notable enough to advertise. Nationally, Louisiana ranks at the bottom for ACT scores, including private schools. It obviously must be a priority to increase educational achievement, but feel good slogans and unresearched, untested politically expedient experiments with no data to support the claims doesn't work very well either. We have had those for years. It might be a positive step to put real education scholars utilizing tested outcomes and research in charge of police rather than politicians.

43) Comment by Whatchange - 14/05/2012

@DMJ; Just what I thought, no answer. @Libby13, so has/does East Baton Rouge Schools and I would say a lot more monies than Zachary, but I do agree with you. @enlightened1; as a property owner in Zachary also and while I understand where you are coming from I disagree with you.

44) Comment by enlightened1 - 14/05/2012

as a property owner in zachary if you want your children to attend zachary schools buy or rent property here. John White and Piyush fails to or is afraid to acknowledge the solution to the problem (lack of Parental support). Parents can't just want better they must actively be engaged in their child's education . Transporting the problem to other districts will not solve the problem. Parents instead of buying your kids the new Jordans how about buying them a book and having them read it to you. Parents are the child's first teachers. If a child can quote boosie lyrics by heart they should memorize their ABCs and times tables.

45) Comment by nimby? - 14/05/2012

priorities . .....

46) Comment by Libby13 - 14/05/2012

The Zachary School District has accepted a LOT of money in donations over the years. Sources include Georgia Pacific, FAZE, and I even read an article not long ago about $8000 donated by the estate of a former ZHS teacher, Marjorie Chaney. This is not money forced out of the pockets of taxpayers but donated to help children and happily accepted by the Zachary School District. Zachary has a chance to give back and help the children of its neighbors. If the district accepted ONE child, making a difference in that one child's life can affect the future in untold ways. What if that child grew up to be a doctor and saved hundreds of lives? You never know. I would love to see Zachary take one child this year and then study the finances to see how many they could take the next year and so on.

47) Comment by DMJ - 14/05/2012

I think we all know why Zachary citizens don't want to accept kids via the voucher program- They feel they can provide better education by not providing it to kids outside their district, right? Like I said...exclusivity. Or did I miss something? And for the record, I'm totally against vouchers. But since it looks like we're getting them anyway....let's at least allow them to work.

48) Comment by Whatchange - 14/05/2012

I do have a question though, how many people complaining on this comment board and the other 4 or 5 articles about Zachary taking and not taking the vouchers were completely against Governor Jindal and this voucher program. It just seams now all of a sudden it is a good idea.

49) Comment by Whatchange - 14/05/2012

@DMJ; he also said there are 68 other districts, now to be fair, let the bashing begin. I would say the Vatican is famously Christian, but Zachary. I would rather have a consideration than no thought at all, at least I know I was thought of and there might still be a chance. Lets consider this also, (take into consideration I was never good at math), Zachary spends I believe $9,000.00 or better per student, this voucher program offers I believe $4,000.00 per student to the accepting school district, that leaves an absence of $5,000.00+ per student, which split between 30 students is a lost of $150,000.00+, now while I believe Zachary has a surplus for it school system, it will not take long at all to eat up that surplus at the mention lost. Here is something else I don't understand, how is it that Zachary, which spends $9,000.00+ per student has a by far better school system than East Baton Rouge that spends $12,000.00+ per student. So, taking all this into consideration, is it really that hard to understand why some Zachary citizens don't want the voucher program. Anyway, taking all this into consideration, I still fell Zachary is wrong, they need to gives these kids a chance at a better life through a much better education.

50) Comment by RedHead - 14/05/2012

"Choice" is one of those catch-words thrown around by the "privatize education" crowd. I mean, who would not be for CHOICE, huh? Everyone's for choice! (except when it comes to women deciding to use birth control or deciding what to do with their own bodies.) The word choice is kinda like "freedom." Hooray for freedom. Neither word means a darn thing unless you explain all the ramifications of how that word is used in what context. How can it be a choice when poor students can't afford the money, over and above the tuition scholarships offered by your taxes? Most private schools charge more than the scholarship offers...so how is that a choice for poor students? The whole purpose of this Charter Movement and Move Public Money to Private Schools Movement is to divide the races. Conservatives cannot stand that minorities have equal access to education that most whites have.....they want to go back to the time before Brown vs Board of Education when blacks were segregated into their own schools. Studies done on Minnesota charter schools show that after a number of years, the public school system ended up with the poor, black, handicapped and at-risk kids, while the white better-off students ended up in good charters in private schools. It is designed to work this way. You can't have those uppity minorities educated at the same level as their betters are educated, now can you? A Teach for America teacher in Mississippi wrote an editorial in the Washington Post which I urge you all to read. Just type this url into your browser: http://wapo.st/JAZ0tr Even after their "education reform" in that state, the blacks are still separated in inferior education....which was the intent in the first place. Wake up. Mr White is one of those who believes a quality education is only for the white elites who will go on to college and then on to positions of power in this country, deciding our laws and living conditions. When politicians spout words at you like Choice, Freedom, Free Enterprise....then you are being manipulated, because they never explain exactly the details you should be concerned with. But if you want to continue to be part of the non-thinking sheeple, go ahead....at least you will have Choice....if you are the right color and status.

51) Comment by DMJ - 14/05/2012

Whatchange, you make a fair point...but make it to John White. He's the one that wrote the letter specifically mentioning Zachary. I suspect he did this because the ZSD superintendant announced scholarships and then reneged because of pressure from the "community." They dangled the carrot only to yank it away. Like I said...not very Christian. And I'm sorry, but in my book, no points are awarded for mere consideration. (I considered donating to Doctors Without Borders, but I decided not to...... See how hollow that sounds?) For some reason, I don't see Jesus of Nazareth supporting the idea of exclusivity in public schools. And I bring Christianity into this because Zachary is a famously Christian place, is it not?

52) Comment by ex-louisianian - 14/05/2012

I would have no issue with Saudis, Emiratis, and Turks opening Islamic-based "charter schools" to accept these voucher cast-offs. In fact, I encourage it.

53) Comment by Whatchange - 14/05/2012

@DMJ; I find it funny weird that you use the word Christian. As a Zachary resident that pays my taxes with no problem or questions as I see where my taxes go, and who has put 4 sons through Zachary Schools, three before the break away and one who graduated last year, I feel strongly Zachary is wrong on this, these are Kindergarten and first grade students not middle and high school. Now, why is everyone on Zachary, why not go after the other Top 5 school, at least Zachary contemplated accepting the students.

54) Comment by spqr - 14/05/2012

If Czar John White would actually volunteer to get his little inexperienced hands dirty and spend a few weeks in an inner city school and actually teach he might learn that his politically correct words about the poor children are sheer nonsense designed to fool the unenlightened. White is not qualified to make any statements about education beyond what he is told to do by the corrupt among us that appointed him to that position knowing fully well we have substitute teachers who know more about this issue than he does.

55) Comment by QuietRiverRoad - 14/05/2012

It's even easier than that. From what I understand the parents will be responsible for transportation. I promise you if any parent is willing to drive their little one to and from Zachary from whatever distance they must then I feel confident that parent will do their utmost to see their child succeeds in the ZCS. C'mon Zachary, do the right thing.

56) Comment by DMJ - 14/05/2012

It seems that it's not about money or logistics...it's about exclusion. Not very Christian of the ZSD, if you ask me...

57) Comment by Libby13 - 14/05/2012

I am sure that someone employed by the Zachary School Board is smart enough to figure out the math or to find someone who can figure out the math on the cost of providing an extra student an education in Zachary, including transportation costs minus the funds the child brings with him/her. If "30" strikes panic in the hearts of the community, why don't we start with one? Why don't we see what we can do for one child from a Baker kindergarten class right up the street. Can we donate that much? Can we try it before we deem it such a threat? Making a difference at all to anyone is worth the effort. Would one child a year for 30 years be easier on our . . . "budget"?

58) Comment by phil - 14/05/2012

Gee that transportation subject is a good one to discuss. Who will pay to transport students to schools that they choose to go to? It doesn't seem like that has been discussed in very much detail. How do poor people who decide to send their children to a public, charter, or private school all the way across town actually get their children to that school? Seems like someone will have to pay - I wonder who? Maybe they can ride a CATS bus?

59) Comment by QuietRiverRoad - 14/05/2012

Libby- Exactly. ZSD has such surplus as it would never feel the effects of the #30 little ones. What I have been told by friends who are opposed to ZSD accepting the children is there remains the question of how many more children next year and the next. You are correct, we receive requests through the mail each year asking for money to support our schools AND we deliver even knowing about the surplus. The beautiful bldgs. are great but honestly we all know ZSachary can help #30 each year for infinity without missing a beat. I still refuse to believe this was Drake's decision. This reversal will not be overlooked by everyone. Eventually the Zachary #30 will become that which we dare not speak. I'm disappointed, however ZSD has #3 days to reverse their reversal and set an example for all successful school districts.

60) Comment by Libby13 - 14/05/2012

Zachary originally agreed to accept 30 students. Kindergarten and first grade students. The Zachary "community" complained. Who is the community? The "community" did not vote. Vocal members of the community complained, supposedly about money, but, really? Is it money keeping Zachary from offering opportunity to 30 young children? Why do we raise money for charities far and wide but will not participate in this program which offers enormous opportunity to children but a few miles away? Helping these children will help everyone - their families, their communities, AND the Zachary community. How often do we encourage our children to help those less fortunate - to donate our time and our money to make the world a better place? What message is Zachary sending its students now? There are lessons worth learning that cannot be found in textbooks.

61) Comment by DMJ - 14/05/2012

Wait...so are Zachary public schools public or not? Why does John White need the permission of the Zachary school board to make them accept students from other areas? What's the point of a school being public if it can choose who attends? I'm confused....

62) Comment by rgeraldwallace@cox.net - 14/05/2012

John White would do well to forget all about his "social justice" nonsense and concentrate on "fiscal justice" or "actual justice" instead of beating the political correctness drum that has become such a dread burden that school districts are collapsing from it. School districts have to govern themselves and mostly see to their own fiscal well being and they don't need or want a dictator telling them what's right and good for "the children". They already have the union and its dupes dictating to them.

63) Comment by SuzanneMS - 14/05/2012

Interesting the way that he refuses to use the term "private school," opting to call them "nonpublic." Does he really think anyone is fooled? Now, as to choice -- what "choice" will those who live in the rural areas have? The ones that only have enough students to support one school in 50 miles. What will their choice be? To attend a school more than 50 miles away? How will they get there? I will ask again, Mr. White, what, precisely, is it that the A and B schools are doing that the D and F schools are not? And what, in this plan of Jindal's, will enable those D and F schools to become A and B schools? How will reducing the funding support those schools in their efforts to improve? Or is it possible that the A and B schools understand the the real problem is with the parents and the students, not with the teachers, and this is why they are not "opening their doors?"

64) Comment by nimby? - 14/05/2012

wondering how many of our elected officials have their children in public schools ...

65) Comment by QuietRiverRoad - 14/05/2012

I've voiced my opinion about this enough. The only comment I have is while reading through this letter , I kept thinking how great it was that the staff of The Advocate possessed such good writing skills. I had no idea this was written by our state school superintendent. Kind of made me chuckle. In a good way.

66) Comment by Bighug - 14/05/2012

What about the school the student leaves? This program won't help the kids from families who can't afford to pay the remainder of the costs of private schools after the voucher is used. This isn't about education, it is about transferring our tax dollars to churches via church-run schools. One thing certain; John White knows how to protect his job from King Jindal's axe!

67) Comment by hemogoblin - 13/05/2012

I can see a couple of problems in addition to the one Superintendent White mentioned, that I hope will be worked out: 1. "full per-pupil funding for transferring students, based on the parish where the student lives"--suppose that taxpayers in Zachary vote for taxes to support their schools. If a student comes from outside the district, the parish funding will follow the student, but what about the extra per pupil that the students in Zachary schools would get? Who pays for that? 2. The Zachary School District may worry that taking in students from D and F schools will lower their own test scores. Since the State bases school grades on test scores, that is a serious concern.