Letter: Compromise works better than zealotry

The state Senate Retirement Committee apparently didn’t like the governor’s original proposal for reforming the state’s pension plans. The committee has made substantial changes, and now Chairman Elbert Guillory says “We are asking more people to give us their ideas.” Guillory says it’s likely the retirement bills will be “polished and tweaked?” even further when they reach to the Senate floor.

If the governor’s retirement-reform package is receiving the benefit of input from the parties most affected by it, why wasn’t the package of so-called education reforms given the same consideration? I’d submit that on the basis of long-term impact on Louisiana’s future, improving the retirement system falls well short of the need to improve education.

Some of the issues addressed in the governor’s education package are good ones, but others are so toxic that they invalidate any claim to true educational reform. In testimony a few weeks ago, I asked the Senate Education Committee for one year to allow a panel of parents, teachers, administrators, school board members, groups such as PAR and CABL to work with the governor and the Legislature to “polish and tweak” a little, too. But the train had already left the station.

As the Retirement Committee apparently realizes, negotiation and compromise always have a better chance of producing positive results than zealotry ever does. But when education was the issue, zealotry prevailed, virtually guaranteeing litigation and years of turmoil in the effort to educate our children.

Russ Wise, member

St. John the Baptist Parish School Board

LaPlace


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (4)


1) Comment by 8.3 - 02/05/2012

rgeraldwallace@cox.net , exactly the point, why should there be "compromise" when you're never wrong and always right? Wonder how many times rgeraldwallace@cox.net has been married, probably is having difficulty finding a partner with "common sense"

2) Comment by gravityassist - 01/05/2012

Bighug “not accurate”? How democratic of you; you mean “lies?” Rgeraldwallace Our Constituttion needs an amendment to help its intelligent constituents deal with the self-defeating manipuolations of (what amounts to) ignorant traitors.

3) Comment by rgeraldwallace@cox.net - 01/05/2012

Why is it that "compromise" always means that those with common sense have to give in to those without it?

4) Comment by Bighug - 01/05/2012

Better education the issue? No, that is just what Jindal's toadies said about the two education bills. As it often is with polititians, what they say is not accurate. The purpose of one of the bills is to take tax money from public education and transfer it to religious organizations (parochial schools). The purpose of the other, a page out of Huey Long's book, is to put teachers at the mercy of the governor.