Letter: Justice concerns all of us

This week marks the 50th anniversary of the U.S. Supreme Court’s Gideon v. Wainwright decision, which declares it an “obvious truth” that “lawyers in criminal courts are necessities, not luxuries.” The Gideon anniversary deserves recognition because its promise is so lofty, and because still — after 50 years — we are falling short of it.

The idea that “If you cannot afford a lawyer, one will be provided to you” reflects the value that we place on justice. By guaranteeing that every person has an effective advocate in court — regardless of how much money they have — we avoid putting justice up for sale and making it only accessible to people with means.

In Louisiana, and across the nation, more than 85 percent of all criminal defendants are eligible to be represented by a public defender. It’s a proposition that costs money, particularly because the law requires that defenders do more than just stand next to their client in court. Louisiana’s own constitution requires the Legislature to secure and compensate “qualified counsel for indigents” and the professional code for all lawyers in Louisiana requires certain professional standards — like ethical workloads and access to resources — whether the client can afford to pay or not.

Client communication, fact investigation, legal research, motion practice, trial preparation and sentencing advocacy are all essential components to effective, ethical lawyering. The more complex the case, the more time and resources it takes to do it right. Only when public defenders have the time and tools to “do it right” can the justice system hand down verdicts that are fair, correct, swift and final. The public should demand no less, because without accurate verdicts the justice system cannot protect public safety.

Despite Gideon’s promise 50 years ago, there are still insufficient resources for the state’s public defense function. While things have improved substantially with the Legislature’s vision in the Public Defender Act of 2007, there is still a long way to go. The Gideon anniversary is an opportunity for community leaders, elected policy makers and all criminal justice agency members to reflect on why both the U.S. and Louisiana constitutions require a right to counsel, to provide adequate public defense funding, and to work to together to achieve a better criminal justice system and a safer Louisiana.

Frank Neuner, chairman

Louisiana Public Defender Board
Baton Rouge


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (5)


1) Comment by Attila - 23/03/2013

You get what you pay for....if I pay for an excellent attorney I should get better representation. If you rely on the "public" you get exactly what you pay for....as it should be.

2) Comment by DMJ - 21/03/2013

The Gideon decision didn't glorify lawyers; it simply re-iterated what is contained in the 6th Amendment, which is the right to assistance of counsel. EVERYONE gets a lawyer in this country and if that lawyer is inadequate or incompetent, a judge can declare a mistrial. This ensures that we remain a nation of laws, not of men.

3) Comment by tradewinns - 21/03/2013

this is/was a ruling which glorifies the profession and of course makes it money. there isn't anything in the ruling which states society has to pay, that is "understood". well take it a step further. not only should i have a lawyer, i should have the best lawyer there is, period. why should i have to settle for less than the number 1 just because i cannot afford to hire them? basis for first appeal, which cost society even more money. IF society has to provide lawyers for both sides (which we pay both sides for years) then the only subject that should be "debated" is what actually happened. that elusive thing called the truth. not some daydreamed up possibility, not some technicality where john didn't make some public declaration prior to some action which resulted in the criminals arrest, but just the honest truth regardless of how the evidence is found/discovered. crime shouldn't pay, and that means anybody.

4) Comment by Being_Stupid - 21/03/2013

I enjoyed reading this letter to editor.

5) Comment by Bighug - 21/03/2013

Most lawyers assigned to a defendent who can't pay do just the minimum to get by, unless it is a high profile case. This should be corrected.