Rise in suspensions eyed

As aggressive educational reform in New Orleans is lauded as a model for the nation, one component that garners less attention is the role high rates of out-of-school suspensions play in determining a school’s overall success.

Jolon McNeil, of the Schools First Project, said she feels that discipline practices have been overlooked, and while there is innovation happening in certain areas of education, more innovation is needed when it comes to discipline — particularly in using tools that keep students in school.

The Schools First Project is part of the Juvenile Justice Project of Louisiana and addresses what the group calls the school-to-prison pipeline. Its mission is to reduce the number of suspensions, expulsions, push outs and arrests in the school system.

If there is a correlation between academic achievement and time spent in a classroom, then there has to be a correlation between out-of-school suspensions and academic achievement, McNeil argues. “If we suspend kids,’’ she said, “where is the learning happening?”

In the 2008-09 school year, data showed that only 8 percent of schools in New Orleans had out-of-school suspension rates above 20 percent, McNeil said.

Last year, 34 percent of schools had out-of-school suspension rates above 20 percent. That means at least 20 percent of the school’s student body was suspended at least once during the year.

If reform is only focused on the academic side, McNeil said, “we are neglecting the social development part of our jobs — and making sure that kids are learning how to make good decisions.”

McNeil says there is too much reliance on suspensions as a way to correct behavior. And the potential consequences can be grave.

Overuse of suspensions often pushes students out of school, she said, increasing the likelihood that they will drop out and the likelihood that they will enter the juvenile justice system, she said.

McNeil also points to the complicated educational landscape in the city, in which numerous charter operators set their own discipline policies, making it difficult to keep up with the varying rules and expectations.

Her group created a chart that puts a school’s performance score next to its out-of-school suspension rate, data released by the Department of Education. McNeil noted that most of the schools with the highest out-of-school suspension rates also have low performance scores.

Of 30 schools in New Orleans with out-of-school suspension rates above 15 percent, about two-thirds received either D’s or F’s on school performance scores. Ten of the 30 schools had suspension rates higher than 30 percent.

In the Recovery School District, seven of the 10 schools with the highest out-of-school suspension rates received D’s or F’s. One school, John McDonogh Senior High School, did not have a 2011-12 score but was given an F the previous year.

At Sci Academy, which received a B, 49.2 percent of students were suspended, a rate second-highest to Sylvanie Williams College Prep, where 52.5 percent of students were given out-of-school suspensions.

While a majority of the schools with the highest suspension rates have low scores, at Sci Academy, the score has risen along with the rate of suspensions. Moving from a D in 2009-10 to a C and then, last year, to a B, Sci Academy’s out-of-school suspension rate moved from 32.8 percent to 38.1 percent, and last year to 49.2 percent.

But Ben Kleban, the founder and director of New Orleans College Prep, the charter operator for Sylvanie Williams, said the suspension numbers do not tell a comprehensive story.

“Low suspensions don’t mean high academic performance — or vice versa,” he said.

Kleban pointed out that while the data are released by the state, it is entirely self-reported.

There is no authority holding schools accountable to report or to check that the reported numbers are accurate, Kleban said.

Thirty-seven of 73 schools reported an out-of-school rate of less than 5 percent. Seven schools are listed without any suspension data for last year.

If scores are abnormally low, it should raise questions, he said. “We’ve always reported with integrity,” Kleban said.

But Kleban argued against the assumption that students are suspended at his school because they are not wanted — he said it’s the just the opposite and that has the data to back it up.

Less than 2 percent of his students are expelled each year, and less than 2 percent drop out, Kleban said.

Kleban also points out that suspended students are expected to make up their work and that teachers offer after-school tutoring.

“Our mission is to teach kids,” Kleban said. “We don’t want them missing instructional time. But sometimes a student has to be removed from the classroom to protect the learning of others. We do our best to ensure they keep up with the material even when that happens.”

Kleban said his schools, which also include Walter L. Cohen High School and Middle School, serve one of the highest-need populations in the city. He said his schools bring in high-needs students at higher rates than other public schools in the city, and that with new students, it often takes time to adapt and understand the expectations.

One positive change McNeil noted was the Recovery School District’s standardization of the expulsion process across all of its schools, including charters. The policy was approved in April and went into effect Aug. 1.

McNeil also questioned the accuracy of the data, and said she hesitates to rely too much on expulsion data because she has come across too many instances where students are strongly advised to leave, numbers that do not get recorded as expulsions.

Board of Elementary and Secondary Education policy calls for factoring in discipline data when deciding to renew or extend charters.

When New Orleans College Prep recently was approved to open a new school, BESE noted, “While the school’s discipline procedures are clear with regard to behavior, expectations and consequences, they seem to lack positive behavior support strategies to encourage positive behavior and support students encountering behavioral difficulties. The culture of the school would be well-served by addressing this issue.”

But Kleban disagrees with that assessment and lists a variety of positive behavior enforcing programs, such as daily opportunities to accrue points; rewards, including field trips and movie days; and sending positive reports home.

The positive reinforcement programs help to balance out the strict behavior expectations, he said, and when suspensions don’t work for a student, the school works on individual behavior plans.

Kleban said his schools are devoting resources toward reducing suspensions and have implemented alternatives, including restorative practices, that will allow students to stay in school. He said he expects to cut the suspension number in half this year, and as of November had reduced the suspension rate to less than 15 percent in all schools.


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (5)


1) Comment by twinkie1cat - 27/12/2012

It is obvious what is happening, a favorite trick to get rid of students a school does not want is suspension. In Baton Rouge last year Capitol (charter) High shipped a bunch of students over to Tara (An EBR run public) right before testing time. I worked at a middle school in Atlanta where the principal suspended most of the low achieving students right before test day so they would either not have to take the standardized test or where the teachers would at least know what was on it specifically. Then, when the teachers were tired at the end of the year, she suspended about 200 in a week to lighten their load. It was pretty obvious what she was pulling. The way to reduce suspensions is to REQUIRE charters to be accountable for them and to suspend less than a certain percentage to keep their charter as well as requiring them to develop positive support programs in writing, which, of course, they won't know how to do because they are not teachers. The other way is to make sure that all students who are behind are tested for special educational needs and 504 accommodations and listing behavioral issues on their IEPs as part of their disability. That way, they cannot be suspended for anything related to their disability. This will put the amateurs on notice that they have to work with ALL the students, including working on social skills. Most students can be repaired with quality educational services and understanding of their needs. Throwing them out on the street not only eliminates learning it also puts them in the school-to-prison pipeline and keeps them from getting enough to eat. These charters and privates, in particular need to have specific requirements and regulations put on them so that the taxpayers get appropriate benefits for their money, namely children who are getting a quality education and who graduate. There is no fool who does not want to be in school if the school is meeting his or her need. But it takes professional, committed, career educators and administrators who will either help them if they are educators themselves or get out of the way of the teachers and let them do their job if they are not. And that is what the charters are not required to have. Oh for the job of state superintendent!!!! The amateurs and profiteers would hate to see me coming. A school with a high rate of suspension is simply a very bad school. And if a suspended student gets into trouble, the school must be held accountable.

2) Comment by ultimateliberal - 27/12/2012

Parents of misbehaving children need to be in the classrooms WITH the little darlings to control their disruption of others' educations. Teachers should NOT have to deal with idiots who don't want to comply with rules. Get rid of these fools who don't want to be in school. What we really need is a fine for parents who haven't trained their children to abide by school rules; we need suspension rooms manned by security guards, teachers, aides, and parents, performing behavior modification and individual tutoring with the smarty-pants delinquents. The suspension rate could probably double if we didn't overlook much of the undesirable behaviors. I never gave third chances to my students. On the third instance, you would strike out with a suspension.

3) Comment by Iamhopeful2 - 27/12/2012

To spqr - these are children we are talking about - an essential part of their education is socialization and learning their limitations. As a teacher I certainly don't advocate letting children run wild, but kids from all socio-economic and intellectual levels whether inner city or not test the limits. Some of my most most capable students were my most challenging and NONE of them were behavioural problems on account of their parents. Of course that doesn't always apply but regardless properly trained and capable teachers attempt to find solutions for these students so they can learn to be productive citizens. I guarantee that if you were able to sit in on classes at these schools you would have a different perspective. Some of theses schools tout their Behavioural Support Strategies as the last word in behavioural management. It's another trend that sounds good but in isolation is virtually worthless.

4) Comment by Iamhopeful2 - 27/12/2012

1). This article appeared in the Business Section of today's print edition - exactly where these charters should be. Many of these charters run (thanks to state law not requiring certified teachers or qualified staff and thanks to so-called autonomy meaning no accountability) like business to make money for their mgt. operators and vendors rather than to educate children as their bottom line. 2). Ask yourselves why John McDonogh Sr. High did not have an SPS for 2011/12 since this reporter did an incomplete job in getting to the root of this problem. 3). Ben Kleban himself said data is "self-reported" and "no authority holds (charter) schools accountable to report or to check that the reported numbers are accurate." 7 schools listed without suspension data last year. This is par for the course for RSD and LDOE and BESE is rubber stamping everything they do. McNeil also questioned the accuracy of the data saying she hesitates to rely too much on the data because too many students are strongly advised to leave, and those numbers do not get recorded as expulsions. 4). That being said let's look at College Prep.(K-10) It was awarded the charter of Crocker Elementary (preK-5) for next year (BESE would not renew). College Prep 11/12 38.2% students proficient or above (D-). Crocker 11/12 47.8% proficient or above (D-). Don't forget that the manipulation of other unreliable numbers contributes to the SPS score which gave College Prep a 67.6 and Crocker a 65.2. Additionally, College Prep is classified as a school in decline having lost 7.9 pts from the previous year while Crocker held almost stable. Ask yourself why White did not want to renew Crocker's charter. 5). This article reports that BESE policy calls for factoring in discipline data when deciding to renew or extend charters. REALLY? Ask yourselves what is really going on here? How about including in the reports the number of qualified faculty at these charters - degrees, experience, certification? White will be able to totally avoid that next year as he has demanded removal of those factors in hiring/firing and pay decisions. REALLY? And yet the mantra "for the children" is that they should all go to college? Why? They will all be able to supervise children in New Orleans charter schools while they sit in front of computers engaged in "blended learning."

5) Comment by spqr - 27/12/2012

I wonder how often McNeil takes a punch breaking up fights. "If we suspend kids where is the learning happening?" How about, "If we don't suspend bad kids it disrupts everyone from learning." Classroom cancer must be removed. Unless, of course, you are an overpaid campus know-it-all paperpusher who thinks they know about school violence having seen it from a distance.