College not for everyone

As Gov. Bobby Jindal continues to cut funding for higher education, tuition prices at our state’s public universities continue to rise.

The rising cost of college tuition across the country has led to an increased discussion in the media about the value of a college degree.

Take it from a college professor, if you’re paying college tuition right now, you’re probably getting fleeced.

Not too long ago, American universities were both affordable and provided the best education in the world. Now, instead of being the NFL or NBA of higher education, our universities more closely resemble the World Wrestling Federation.

Professional wrestling gives the appearance of being something that it’s not — an athletic contest. It’s not that the performers aren’t athletic (they are), or that they don’t suffer real injuries (they do), but rather the competition itself is scripted and the outcomes are predetermined.

Similarly, our schools give the appearance of providing something that they’re not — real education. It’s not that students don’t learn anything (they do), or that they don’t appear to work hard (they do), but rather they learn almost nothing of value.

Many students graduate high school lacking practical skills and an appreciation for knowledge. They are unprepared to enter college or the workforce, or even think critically about the world around them.

College graduates don’t fare much better. Research by Richard Arum (NYU) and Josipa Roksa (UVA) has shown that most college students make no significant gains in critical thinking, analytic reasoning, or in written communication skills, improving by less than half a standard deviation.

Forty-five percent of students make no significant gains in these areas during their first two years, and 36 percent make no gains during their entire college career.

We shouldn’t be surprised by these results. Colleges no longer sell an education. They sell an experience. And for many students, college is simply a combination of an expensive adult summer camp and mediocre vocational training.

As a result, many students see formal education as a game. But what they don’t see is that this game has been designed to extract money from them while leading them to believe that what they’re doing is necessary for future success. By playing this game our students become economic losers.

According to the Institute for College Access and Success, U.S. education debt now exceeds $1 trillion. The average undergraduate graduates with $26,600 of education debt. Louisiana students don’t fare much better than this average.

Loyola students graduate with $12,597 of education debt, UNO students with $18,106, LSU students with $20,337, Xavier students with $26,106, Tulane students with $31,172, and Dillard students with $36,241.

Unlike almost all other types of debt, education debt cannot be discharged in bankruptcy. This fact, combined with students graduating with little knowledge, few useful skills, and a job market oversaturated with job-seekers like themselves, makes it almost impossible for many graduates to escape this debt.

We’re turning an entire generation into modern-day serfs.

The solution is simple: We must stop perpetuating the myth that success requires a college degree. Advanced work in the arts, sciences or humanities is not appropriate for the majority of our students, never mind all of them. For students not interested in, or lacking the intellectual aptitude for, the standard curriculum, other paths like vocational training must be available and encouraged.

Students have different abilities and different interests. Pressuring everyone to take the same educational path is both foolish and detrimental to the well-being of our nation.

Chris W. Surprenant is an assistant professor of philosophy at the University of New Orleans, where he serves as the director of the Alexis de Tocqueville Project on Democratic Ideals and Institutions. His email address is csurpren@uno.edu.


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (17)


1) Comment by bourbon-soda - 16/12/2012

It is a more a leftist than a rightist conceit that a much greater proportion of the population than now (or ever) would be able to succeed in college if not for a system does it wrong, and that some intervention in the system will fix the disparities in meaningful college attendance and graduation. The dogma of radical environmental determinism leads to the idiotic system where schools are judged by how many graduates go to college and where. The higher educators (and others) have played this like a fiddle for enormous amounts of money.

2) Comment by ultimateliberal - 16/12/2012

When we cease rating "good" high schools on the basis of the number moving on to college, all this nonsense will die down. There is absolutely NO BASIS for rating secondary schools on any criteria related to college entry. What we fail to determine is whether graduates are either working in a trade (to which they were apprenticed during high school), or continuing their education for a professional (graduate) degree--a survey at age 25 would make more sense. But, no, that would be too difficult. The high schools simply want to know to which colleges their darling seniors have been accepted. Whether they actually attend is irrelevant to future research on the value of their high school education, i.e., the reputation of the school in the eyes of the community. We have it all backwards--it's not the school with the reputation; it's the student who does the learning and attains success or failure who builds the school's standing.

3) Comment by bourbon-soda - 16/12/2012

Interesting that emphasis in the discussion is on differences in human abilities when most of the letter is about fraud and swindling.

4) Comment by SuzanneMS - 15/12/2012

Before anyone else points it out -- yes, if you're planning on a career in any of the Science, Technology, Engineering or Mathematics (STEM) fields, you also need to go to college (I'd edit my post, but the Advocate doesn't permit it). Those fields also need the critical thinking and analytical reasoning skills, and communication skills. But if you want a job as a user of technology, rather than a designer, a technical school is a better choice.

5) Comment by SuzanneMS - 15/12/2012

Dr. Suprenant did not say that no education beyond high school was necessary. He suggested that other forms of vocational training are appropriate for many, if not most, young people. If what you're looking for is training that will guarantee you a good-paying job with a fairly secure future, try plumbing, HVAC, auto mechanics, dental hygiene, nursing, radiology -- all of which can be obtained at a community college in two years or less. Become a licensed arborist or landscaper. Go to college only if you want an education in the humanities or social sciences and are planning on entering one of the professions which require the critical thinking, analytical reasoning and writing skills that are the purpose of an undergraduate degree. Then earn the graduate degree that gives you the foundation in the profession.

6) Comment by bourbon-soda - 15/12/2012

So at what point may we expect the demagoguery about expanding access and mandating graduation to stop? Oh, wait, there's a lot of money involved. I wonder what the wind-chill factor in the faculty lounge is for Professor Suprenant.

7) Comment by Bouncer - 15/12/2012

College is not for everyone? This is supposed to be some big revelation? Of course college isn't for everyone. "Going to college" as some sort of transformative rite of passage is one of our cultural myths....right up there with "you can be anything you want or do anything you want if you try hard enough." Bull. We are all limited by our intellect and motivation.

8) Comment by InPVille - 15/12/2012

Whether a college degree leads to higher earnings depends to a large degree on the major. http://money.cnn.com/galleries/2010/pf/1008/gallery.low_paying_college_degrees/index.html College degrees that don't pay: Social Work, Athletic Training, Recreation and Leisure, Art, Interior Design, Religious Studies, Horticulture, Education, Culinary Arts -[**]- http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-505145_162-37246116/20-best-paying-college-degrees-in-2011/ 20 Best-Paying College Degrees: Petroleum engineering, Chemical engineering, Electrical engineering, Material science & engineering, Aerospace engineering, Physics, Applied mathematics, Computer engineering, Nuclear engineering, Biomedical engineering, Economics, Mechanical engineering, Statistics, Industrial engineering, Civil engineering, Mathematics, Environmental engineering, Management Info. Systems, Software engineering, Finance -[**]- Notice the strong math and science trend on the best paying list. Notice the liberal arts emphasis on the doesn't pay much list.

9) Comment by Scrooge - 14/12/2012

" That does not mean that the decline is not real." Good example of the correlation vs causation conundrum. Redundancy does tend to implicate.

10) Comment by bourbon-soda - 14/12/2012

Arums and Roksas' findings in their book, I think titled _Academically Adrift_, argue that the standards for degrees in valuable, but not marketable, fields, have also declined significantly in the colleges and universities. That decline may be more difficult to demonstrate than that of monetary value of the cotton-candy degrees. That does not mean that the decline is not real.

11) Comment by Bighug - 14/12/2012

The letter omits one of the major benefits of a college education. I got a degree and paid off all my loans, including one from my mother. I'm not sure how much the education affected my lifetime earnings, but it certainly has been a great benefit in satisfaction with myself that I gave it my best shot. Not all knowledge is used to earn a dollar. Even if I were born rich and never had to work a day in my life, I would still want the education.

12) Comment by bourbon-soda - 14/12/2012

More correlation-causation confusion. Corroboration of the letter is at http://www.economist.com/blogs/schumpeter/2011/04/higher_edu cation or google [higher education bubble] and pick the cite of The Economist. I hesitate to preempt the site, but information-based jobs are easily vaporized by advancing technology and ease of outsourcing.

13) Comment by Tacony Palmyra - 14/12/2012

What a bad message. The unemployment rate for people who haven't been to college right now is 8.1% while it's 3.8% for those with a bachelors degree or higher (http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.t04.htm). People with college degrees earn more money than those without, and have an easier time finding work. Anecdotes of debt-laden unemployed post-college 20-somethings notwithstanding, the statistics point to college being a great idea in the US today. We're moving toward an increasingly information-based economy. The days when people could earn a living in this country doing manual labor are over. We'll continue to move those kinds of jobs abroad, and cities and regions that don't recognize this will be left behind.

14) Comment by bourbon-soda - 14/12/2012

@DMJ: "... statistically speaking, college graduates earn more than those without a college degree.... by some estimates,... an average of $1 million more in their lifetime." Good example of the correlation vs causation conundrum. Thanks.

15) Comment by ultimateliberal - 14/12/2012

Amen! Great observation and significant expose, Surprenant! It would horrify the American public if they knew how many college graduates are condemned to jobs as wait-staff, retail clerks, building custodial/valet/bellhop services, line cooks, and other $7.25/hr entry level jobs. And the longer they have to stay in them, the more credibility they lose in their chosen professions. I was a file clerk, with a Master's degree in school administration. My adult children are living off their savings and retail, minimum wage jobs--and one has a $97K student loan, but has yet to be employed in her professional level field after a year and a half job search. This is sad and sick.

16) Comment by DMJ - 14/12/2012

Noticeably absent from a letter from a guy who seems to like statistics is the fact that, statistically speaking, college graduates earn more than those without a college degree. In fact, by some estimates, college graduates earn an average of $1 million more in their lifetime. Should everyone go to college? Of course not. But should we be trying to convince people that a college degree is a bad investment? Definitely not. (Also, do those average student loan debts include post-grad? If so, this would alter his argument quite a bit)

17) Comment by bourbon-soda - 14/12/2012

Great article. The college = success scam is at least in part a consequence of massive attribution of causation to correlation. Financing of the scam by inducing the naive to take on student loans may be the most cynical and reprehensible part of the scam. That the scam is perpetrated by those who claim to teach critical thinking should mean a special circle in the inferno.