District explores learning options

The Tangipahoa Parish school system is exploring ways to expand virtual learning opportunities in grades 6-12, but some board members are concerned about the program's ability to meet the needs of at-risk students.

Implementing a virtual learning program would allow the district to provide more opportunities for learning while addressing the system’s needs, including saving money, said Chief Academic Officer Melissa Stilley.

The options explored by the district include:

  • Full-virtual learning, which would provide online coursework with periodic in-person check-ins for students who are in the parish’s alternative program or are homebound, home-schooled or seeking a General Educational Development certificate.
  • Blended learning, which would combine online and on-campus classes for students who have failed certain courses, or are off-track but want to graduate on time, or want to take electives not available on campus.
  • Virtual tutoring, which would enhance campus courses for state tests, college preparation and support in the Common Core State Standards.

“This isn’t cutting edge, but it’s close,” Superintendent Mark Kolwe said. “There are not a lot of districts doing it, and some of those who are doing it are finding they have to make adjustments.”

Virtual learning could also save the district money by reducing textbook costs, brick-and-mortar overhead, Louisiana Virtual School fees and, if test scores improve, remediation expenses, Stilley said.

And if the program attracts previously home-schooled students, or those who would have enrolled in other virtual learning programs, the district would see an increase in state Minimum Foundation Program funds for each new child enrolled, she said.

“It’s more than just the students we presently have that we think we can reach out and touch,” Kolwe said.

Some School Board members expressed concerns, however, about equipping the parish’s at-risk students with the technology they would need as well as motivating them from a distance.

Whether a student is deemed “at-risk,” defined as those eligible for free or reduced-price meals, is based on federal guidelines for household income and the number of family members in the home.

Seventy-five percent of Tangipahoa Parish public school students meet the definition, according to the state Department of Education.

For the parish’s alternative program, which serves students who have had disciplinary problems in the classroom, the number of at-risk students jumps to 88.6 percent, Department of Education figures show.

“Many times the alternative program students would be the ones most likely not to have a computer at home and not be one to be on-task,” board member Ann Smith said. “That’s probably why many of them are there in the first place.”

District officials are considering providing laptops with Internet service cards to those students not able to afford them, Stilley said.

With reimbursements through the federal E-rate program, a $600 laptop could cost the district as little as $150-200, she said.

At-risk students also are more likely to need structure, Smith said, whereas a virtual learning system requires self-discipline.

“I know if they’d have given me a computer and sent me home, I’d have been shooting basketball all day, not sitting at the computer,” board member Al Link said.

Whether the learning environment is virtual or face-to-face, Stilley said, getting students to engage actively in their education is always a problem.

“We just have to be creative and work with the parent and student to get a work plan that can help them be successful,” Stilley said.

In cases where online progress monitoring, check-ins with teachers and discussions with parents are unsuccessful, the court system probably would have to get involved, she said.

Board member Gail Pittman-McDaniel said a lack of reliable Internet service on the north end of the parish also could limit the benefits for students in more rural areas.

“There are a lot of things we need to address so that all the children who want to benefit from this can do so,” she said.

Board member Brett Duncan agreed, saying, “I’d love to help get wireless to the north end. It’s long past due.”

“But I think this is an important step in the right direction for our system,” Duncan added. “As we are trying to compete with all these other folks under the (state’s) new reform laws, I don’t even know if we have the option not to do this.... We’ve got to do it, and do it better than anyone else.”

Expressing disappointment in the district’s state test scores, Kolwe said school officials may not have the final model for virtual learning figured out, but the traditional classroom model isn’t producing the results they want to see.

“We’ve got to do things differently,” Kolwe said. “This model here, I think, will eventually help move our students to where they need to be. We can’t stay status quo.”


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (2)


1) Comment by ByGeorge - 11/06/2012

Why is there no mention in this story of the two real drivers behind this decision? Since you fail to say, I will. First and foremost is the cost savings of several million dollars associated with transitioning to “virtual learning” for its "at-risk" students. (As the article notes, almost all school children in Tangi are "at risk".) This is the reason why even though “school officials may not have the final model for virtual learning figured out” they nevertheless have already made the decision to implement this type of program (whatever it turns out to be). The TPSS is not “exploring” this option as your article states, they are implementing it. But the other driver is equally important because it indicates that administrators are finally waking up to the fact that Tangi lacks the classroom teacher talent required to improve its ranking. It also indicates that in their efforts to survive, administrators will do anything. Over the past 20 years, Tangi tossed the education of our children out of the lifeboat while they debated the merits of prayer in schools, bibles in school, evolution and the influence of societal problems on why teachers can not teach inside their classrooms. Now in order to keep as many ineffective teachers on the payroll as possible (but apparently less involved in whatever minimum learning will occur in future Tangi classrooms) the TPSS seems ready to start tossing teachers over the side too. “The traditional classroom model isn’t producing the results we want to see.” Teachers, if you don’t know what this means, you are indeed as clueless as I know you to be. Read the idiot tradewinns’ comments. Agree with him if you wish. But realize that the losers of society on which the TPSS has quit wasting time are you teachers. I am not a teacher but I am the product of many good ones. I know that there is no replacement for an effective teacher in the classroom. Why is it that educators insist that there are? Why is it that teachers insist on looking outside of the classroom for reasons why they can't be effective. You have all lost your minds.

2) Comment by tradewinns - 11/06/2012

quit wasting time, energy and most important, resources on the losers of society. that's why we have so many losers. they can see at an early age that the ones who whine the loudest or cause the most problems get the most attention and the most benefits. those who do their best should be the ones who get the most. they will benefit society in our quest to better our quality of life. the most horrible part of our current actions of benefits for the useless, is it makes the useless comfortable and shows the impressionable young that it is easier to do it that way than to work hard to succeed. society should punish misbehavior. in the short run enforcement may cost more (given how far we have fallen), but in the long run society will win!