BESE approves state aid plan

Show caption
/
Louisiana State Superintendent of Education John White

Despite fervent opposition from special-education advocates, Louisiana’s top school board Thursday approved a $3.5 billion spending request for public schools.

The vote was 8-3 and followed six hours of testimony.

A final tally by the state Board of Elementary and Secondary Education is set for Friday but no change is expected.

The plan would then go to the Legislature, which begins its 2013 regular session on April 8.

The proposal, which is called the Minimum Foundation Program would freeze state aid per student for the fifth consecutive year amid disappointing state revenue collections.

It also includes funds for the state’s controversial voucher program, which has been declared unconstitutional by a state district judge and is set for review by the state Supreme Court on March 19.

But the key dispute that dominated the hearing focused on a proposed change in how the state funds about 82,000 special education students.

State Superintendent of Education John White, who initiated the new financing plan, said it would only amount to a few dollars per student initially.

White also said the proposal, which is aimed at improving the state’s 29 percent graduation rate for students with disabilities, includes considerable testimony from a wide range of advocates.

“We have taken a ton of input,” he said.

But dozens of witnesses took turns criticizing the planned change.

They repeatedly punctuated their views with frequent applause amid charges that the new funding method was hastily drawn and lacks enough real-world views.

“This is being railroaded,” said Lottie Beebe, a BESE member who lives in Breaux Bridge. “That is why we resent it.”

White, who is Gov. Bobby Jindal’s chief public schools lieutenant, said the proposed MFP maintains funding at current levels despite state financial problems.

He said voucher dollars are included because no final court ruling has been made.

Opponents included the Louisiana Association of School Superintendents, the Louisiana Federation of Teachers and the Louisiana School Boards Association.

Michael Faulk, president of the superintendents’ group, said last weekend more than 50 of his colleagues discussed the proposed MFP.

Faulk said they concluded that it would permit more funding cuts for local districts and the special education plan is far more than a pilot, as White calls it.

Scott Richard, executive director of the LSBA, said the MFP proposal fails to take into consideration a possible hike in the state sales tax as part of a tax overhaul, which he said would hurt the ability of local districts to renew or enact sales tax initiatives for schools.

The state now spends $313 million for its special education population, with aid based on the number of such students.

Under White’s plan, money would be spent based on a student’s disability, where and how the student is educated and academic performance.

However, the change for the 2013-14 school year would be limited to 10 percent of the state aid, which the superintendent said will allow educators to review how it is working next year.

Laureen Mayfield, who heads the Louisiana Special Education Association, disputed a key figure in the debate — the 29 percent graduation rate for special education students.

Mayfield said some other states with higher rates allow those students, unlike Louisiana, to earn a traditional high school diploma if they meet their individual education plan.

Walter Lee, the longest-serving member of BESE, urged colleagues to approve the MFP without changes in how students with disabilities are funded.

“I don’t believe we have ever had an issue where we had so many groups asking for more input than they have had,” Lee said. “That ought to tell us something.”

Lee’s motion died for lack of a second.

The vote technically represents approval from BESE’s Administration and Finance Committee.

However, since all 11 panel members voted — a sign of the issue’s high profile — the tally is tantamount to action by the full board.

Voting “yes” on the motion were Chas Roemer, of Baton Rouge; Connie Bradford, of Ruston; Jim Garvey, of Metairie; Judy Miranti, of New Orleans; Kira Orange-Jones, of New Orleans; Holly Boffy, of Youngsville; Stephen Waguespack, of Baton Rouge; and Jay Guillot, of Ruston.

Voting “no” were Beebe, Carolyn Hill, of Baton Rouge, and Lee, of Mansfield.


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (20)


1) Comment by Bouncer - 08/03/2013

@Traveler: I agree 100%. On a few occasions, when "Dr." Sadow has shown up and sock-puppeted for Jindal (wow...I just made up a new verb!), I have referred people to check "Dr." Sadow out on a site called ratemyprofessors.com. Were only a student here or there critical of him, his teaching style, and his arrogance, you might chalk it up to the ranting of a disgruntled student with an axe to grind. But when the same negative criticism appears over and over again, something is amiss with the instruction as well as the instructor. Sadow (like that other troll, markedwardmarchiafarva) puts in an appearance every once in a while to stir the pot, and then he disappears, in true troll-like fashion.

2) Comment by GardenVariety - 08/03/2013

Take Travelers sage words to Jeff Sadow, and apply them to the State Super and most who serve Chancellor Jindaltine, including all but a couple-threr on BESE, and you've got LA in a nutdhell.

3) Comment by Traveler - 08/03/2013

JeffSadow: one should never challenge the qualifications of an opponent unless one is very sure of his facts. You're not. The identities of a number of the commenters are known to me. Their credentials as educators are impressive and impeccable. Their former students and the parents of their former students praise them. Recently, a web site was called to my attention in which comments by your students at the institution where you teach are posted. I am sure that you are familiar with the site. Jeff, most of those comments by your students about your teaching style and effectiveness are not complimentary. It would appear that you have a great deal to learn about teaching.

4) Comment by twinkie1cat - 08/03/2013

jeffsadow: Don't challenge the credentials of the commenters. Several of us are teachers, including me. My credentials are better than White's or Jindal's---- Bachelor's, Master's and nearly an Ed.S from accredited universities in 3 states including Louisiana and 27 years in the classroom. All special education. Don't go there!

5) Comment by twinkie1cat - 08/03/2013

jeffsadow: Lottie Beebe is one of the few friends on BESE that public education has. And if her campaign was funded by the unions, that's fine because the UNIONS ARE THE TEACHERS. They are funded by the teachers. They are run by the teachers and only the teachers can save the public schools>>>>>> As for Holly Boffy the worst thing anyone can say about a special education teacher is that she is A DISGRACE TO SPECIAL EDUCATION. And that is what Boffy is. How dare her! Gifted Education or not, she was still Special Education! She should know better, but she sold her soul to Bobby for those 30 pieces of silver he gave her for her campaign. YES, I SAID IT. Only another special ed teacher can say that. I don't care if she was Teacher of the Year. Often that is no more than a popularity contest and is dominated by the social butterflies who put on shows for dignitaries and keep their room immaculate but have no souls. Frequently, at the school level it goes to the teacher who brown nosed the principal the best. At higher levels you need to be a good writer too. But it is basically about who you know and how you express yourself----like a Miss America contest.

6) Comment by twinkie1cat - 08/03/2013

The Jindalclones strike again. We need to recall that the purpose of Jindal's education 'reform" is the destruction of the public schools in order to help for profit businesses and conservative religious groups who will give to his campaign and that of other Republican politicians and propel them into national office so they can destroy America. I can see Chas Roemer, his kids carefully stashed in parochial school so that his decisions cannot harm them, saying "Duh, Is this what Bobby wants? Well I'm for it then, even if it doesn't make sense." And John White, well push the button on his back and out comes the previously recorded message from his boss.>>>>> Legislators, its time for some bipartisanship among the Republicans who want to think for themselves and the Democrats to stop Jindal and take away his power to appoint committee heads, department heads and BESE. And while you all are at it, cut his budget for out of state travel off and give the money to the pubic schools, ok!

7) Comment by jeffsadow - 08/03/2013

" the BESE committee voted to follow the orders of the puppet masters who bought them their seats." Quite so; about 80 percent of Beebe's campaign resources came from teacher unions and allied organizations. At the least most of the remainder can think for themselves. Including Boffy, a special education teacher once named state teacher of the year who supported the formula. I suspect none of our commenters here have either qualification.

8) Comment by twinkie1cat - 08/03/2013

Basing special education funding on "academic performance" shows a lack of comprehension on the part of John White of the nature of special education. We cannot repair our children except in the case of some EBDs and SLDs. We cannot make a child no longer retarded or autistic. We make them where the can function in the world and sometimes get a job and live on their own. We also teach them values and judgment much more directly than you would see in regular classes. Many special education students are on functional programs and more are or should be on modified academic programs and never take regular standardized tests but make amazing progress when they have a good teacher. For example, in New Orleans I had a severely retarded 10 year old with a mental age around 3. He had not had a real teacher in several years. At the beginning of the year he could say three words. At the end he could say 27 words and three sentences. He could also wash clothes. Not college prep, to be sure, but an individual who was able to do a lot more than the year before. This is the kind of kid who would be a pariah under such a plan, him and many like my moderately retarded girls in Ascension. They read poorly by regular ed. standards but great for moderates (2nd-3rd grade level) and could shop and cook a full meal.>>>>>>>>One thing that would help in Louisiana is to have a Special Education Diploma. Going to school from the time you are 3 until you are 22 and all you get for that is a Certificate of Achievement encourages quitting among those who understand what it means-----NOTHING. Any student who does quality work to the best of his or her ability and has an IEP should receive a real, state certified diploma. And it would help if those who pass vocational courses get an endorsement for that. For a lot of SLD and EBD and some mildly retarded students this is the way to go. A kid might not read very well but if he can weld or repair cars he can get a really good job.>>>>>>>>>>>>>>John White is not a teacher and he is for sure not Special Ed. Apparently there are no Republican members of BESE who have special needs children. However, there is no excuse for Holly Boffy to go along with such a program. She is a special education teacher. Gifted Education IS special education in its most rariafied form and she really should know better and not bring destruction down on the family that is Special Education. Maybe, like John White she was just a temporary in a special education position instead of a real teacher. Well that would be the same as White being something that is not qualified for his job either. This is n NOT good at all.

9) Comment by unity - 08/03/2013

Well I'm still trying to figure this one out. The language in the proposed MFP formula has changed overnight. Yesterday the formula proposal included language that amounted to making the following changes: " At the current time school districts receive an additional 60% in funding for a G/T exceptionality. The state is proposing changing the funding formula—according to the new formula high school students would only be funded at 30% (half of the current amount) and only if they met the academic requirement of scoring excellent in Geometry and Algebra I and scoring a 3 or higher on the AP exam or scoring a 4+ in an International Bachelorette Course. Those students who do not meet the academic requirement would not receive any funding. This ties funding for the Talented Arts Program to academic performance." Today, when I clicked on the same link as yesterday: http://www.boarddocs.com/la/bese/Board.nsf/files/95GKKP52170 B/$file/AF_4- 1_FY_13_14_Proposed_MFP_Resolution_Mar2013.pdf, (see page 6) the document has changed significantly. Now the Gifted and Talented funding is in a separate category from the High Standards Weight. Either way the highschool gifted and talented program's funding is being cut by at least 50%.

10) Comment by jwarren - 08/03/2013

One has to always keep in mind that the overall motive of Jindal, White, and their minions at BESE is the destruction of public education in Louisiana. Everything they do has to be considered in that context.

11) Comment by Scrooge - 08/03/2013

The explanation is that neither experience, educational attainment, research expertise or even common sense have anything to do with the qualifications of the leadership of the Louisiana DoE. They are obviously making things up based on a mish mash of ALEC inspired dictates, right wing think tank conjecture, deluded self-importance, and of course, voodoo. But they believe that somehow the belief that only money and profit can inspire will carry the day. Talk about unsustainable.

12) Comment by LawyerDan65 - 08/03/2013

The decision to cut funding to Gifted and Talented programs, with only th ehope that the progress of traditional students will help off-set the cuts puts at risk Gifted and Talented education in Louisiana.

13) Comment by 1ryben - 08/03/2013

That has to be the most ridiculous thing ever (ok, I stretch a bit, these people come up with many a ridiculousness). Why would a kid's needs in the arts have anything to do with math scores? Try as I may, I can't see any reasoning to this. Can someone explain?

14) Comment by Iamhopeful2 - 07/03/2013

Tryben - now talented students would have same criteria as gifted students to receive funding. i.e. an 8th graded gifted OR talented student would only receive 1/2 of the previous enhanced funding if he/she did not score excellent on an Algebra 1 end of course test. 9th graders will receive NO funding unless they score excellent on geometry end of course test or three or higher on an AP exam - 10th graders 3 or higher on an AP exam - 11th graders 3 or higher on AP or 4+ on IB course. If they meet this criteria they will make half the current funding enhancement.

15) Comment by Warp7 - 07/03/2013

Did anyone actually expect the Board to vote differently. These are Jindals picks, thay are going to say yes to what ever he tells them. White and Roemer are Jindal's little lap dogs.these folks like Jindal do not care for anyone's input but their own.

16) Comment by Noel Hammatt - 07/03/2013

One of the most painful moments for me was when the mother of a student with multiple challenges pointed out to Superintendent John White that there is no standardized test appropriate to measure the progress her son is making against incredible odds, and asked why everything had to be measured using standardized tests (Which admittedly are a stupid way of measuring Individual progress on an Individualized Education Plan (IEP). The answer from John White? It is too difficult to measure individual progress without a standardized test. What a sad understanding... I wonder if he EVER had a student with special needs?

17) Comment by Noel Hammatt - 07/03/2013

In a surprise to no one, the BESE committee voted to follow the orders of the puppet masters who bought them their seats. In lockstep for the most part, they heeded the advice of no one, & in their total arrogance, put no stock in the testimony of parents, teachers, Principals, Superintendents and School Board members, in spite of the fact that collectively, the entire senior management team (privatization and propaganda posse you might call them) of the Department of Education has not a single member who has ever run a school, a special education program, or even prepared for their work in education by actually going up through the ranks. That, apparently, is for mere mortals, the Supercreatures running the DOE don't need training, experience, or even a sense of their own lack of knowledge. They just need marching orders, and the pull of their strings by those paying their bills. Watching the meeting today made my physically ill. Louisiana's students, parents, and teachers should rise up and overthrow these neophytes who are bent on destroying public education. All together the management team doesn't have the experience of almost any single teacher who spoke today. How much are these members paid to sell their souls? How much more can Louisiana afford? Rise up and stop the madness!

18) Comment by 1ryben - 07/03/2013

Arts tied to math performance? That was not mentioned in the article. Please explain.

19) Comment by jwarren - 07/03/2013

They're just following orders, unity. The hearings were a charade. Everyone already knew what the vote would be. They don't care about the children of Louisiana. They are just doing their leader's bidding and probably feel very proud of it.

20) Comment by unity - 07/03/2013

So the plan is to fund the unconstitutional voucher program by cutting funding to children with disabilities and tying arts programs to scores on math tests? Do any of the BESE board members have children who attend public schools?