La. budget proposal released

Show caption
TRAVIS SPRADLING / 00033518a
Advocate staff photo by TRAVIS SPRADLING

Commissioner of Administration Kristy Nichols, right, hugs state Rep. Jared Brossett, left, D-New Orleans, with state Rep. Lance Harris, right in the background, R-Alexandria, as she greets legislators before her presentation of the new fiscal year state budget at a meeting of the Joint Legislative Committee on the Budget at the State Capitol Friday.

The Jindal administration kicked off a months-long state budget debate Friday by presenting a $24.7 billion budget that relies on the finalization of contracts involving public hospitals, property sales and other unresolved issues.

College tuition will increase, many parents will be required to make a co-payment for their children to receive therapy for developmental delays and the elderly no longer will get help receiving free prescription drugs.

“We’re proud of this budget even though this budget certainly has been a challenge,” Commissioner of Administration Kristy Nichols told members of the Joint Legislative Committee on the Budget.

Nichols said the Jindal administration had to hold the line on cost increases and find offsets because of a $1.3 billion shortfall in the revenue needed to keep state government services at their current level.

No new State Police troopers would be trained for another year. Several thousand state government workers could be out of a job. College tuition would rise by $75 million to help balance universities’ budgets. More than $1 million would be saved by no longer helping the elderly apply for free medicine through pharmaceutical company programs.

The presentation of the proposed spending plan for the fiscal year that starts July 1 is the starting point for a budget debate that will ramp up next month with legislative hearings. A final version of the plan that funds colleges, schools and other public services will be crafted in the legislative session that starts in April.

The governor’s proposed budget includes $7.9 billion in state general fund revenue and $9.7 billion in federal dollars. The biggest spending area is in health care, with the state Department of Health and Hospitals slated to receive $8.9 billion.

The most dramatic change from the current year to the next is in the LSU Health Care Services Division, which runs most of the state’s public hospitals. Total funding for the division would drop by $781 million in the governor’s proposal.

The Jindal administration wants to turn over most of the public hospitals to private business, saving the state money. However, only some of the agreements are in place, making legislators anxious about funding being stripped without any guarantees on who will provide health care to their constituents.

“We’re not even saying who that somebody is,” state Sen. Francis Thompson, D-Delhi, told Nichols.

The proposed budget that the Jindal administration put forth contains other uncertainties.

“I want to be cautious as we move forward with contingencies,” House Speaker Chuck Kleckley, R-Lake Charles, told Nichols.

The budget includes:

  • $47 million from planned property sales, including $10 million for a downtown Baton Rouge office building and $4.8 million from the sale of a lot next to the State Capitol. The Capitol lot was supposed to be sold in the current fiscal year but never was.
  • Saving $1.7 million by requiring some families to help pay for the therapy and other support their young children receive for developmental delays or disabilities through the EarlySteps program. The size of payments would be based on families’ income levels. Separate legislation is required to put the fee schedule in place.

Higher education funding would remain largely static, with tuition increases and one-time, or nonrecurring, revenue sources helping fill gaps.

The Governor’s Office argues that the tuition hikes they are counting on to keep higher education funding stable aren’t new increases because the law authorizing them was passed three years ago. The 2010 LA GRAD Act gives colleges the authority to raise tuition 10 percent annually after hitting certain academic benchmarks.

Additionally, without using $424 million from one-time revenue generators, such as, property sales, public colleges and universities would face a 19 percent drop in funding, Nichols said.

State Sen. Dan Claitor, R-Baton Rouge, complained that the Jindal administration’s approach to higher education funding is threatening LSU’s flagship status. He said staff is leaving and classes are crowded.

Higher education officials said later in the day that they still are looking at the governor’s proposal.

“We have not yet had an opportunity to fully assess the potential impact of the proposed budget, but we look forward to working with the governor, legislators and other state leaders in finding solutions for funding higher education in Louisiana,” LSU interim President and interim Chancellor William Jenkins said.

Southern University System President Ronald Mason said, “It still is early in the process.”

State Sen. Sharon Broome, D-Baton Rouge, said her constituents are unhappy about the speed with which the Jindal administration is shifting care from LSU’s Earl K. Long Medical Center to Our Lady of the Lake Regional Medical Center.

The shift is part of the governor’s strategy for private business taking over public health care.

Nichols said the partnerships produce savings that ensure the state still is able to provide health care.

Details of the governor’s plan to eliminate the state’s personal income and corporate taxes remain a mystery even though the administration has conceded that a state sales tax hike is likely to replace the revenue.

Nichols told legislators that the budget contains no tax increases. Afterward, she said any increases will not be viewed as such because the governor wants to make the eliminations in a budget neutral fashion by swapping revenue sources.

Koran Addo of The Advocate Capitol news bureau
contributed to this report.


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (37)


1) Comment by Scrooge - 24/02/2013

"Historically the State of Louisiana has spent much more and increased spending much faster than the private sector. " is a nonsensical statement, it means nothing. The idea that creating a government of, by and for profit is the solution to all problems doesn't appear to be mentioned in the constitution.

2) Comment by Scrooge - 24/02/2013

"Historically the State of Louisiana has spent much more and increased spending much faster than the private sector. " is a nonsensical statement, it means nothing. The idea that creating a government of, by and for profit is the solution to all problems doesn't appear to be mentioned in the constitution.

3) Comment by agagent - 24/02/2013

More than $300 million of the deficit is from filling the void of reduced federal funding for Medicaid, and this after filling an even larger mid-year Medicaid deficit. Medicaid is a liberal idea created and mostly controlled by the federal government. Jindal and the legislature did not create Medicaid or the Medicaid deficits, but they will have to take money from other parts of the budget to fund Medicaid. This will continue and even get worst until Medicaid is reformed to be more efficient with taxpayer funds.

4) Comment by agagent - 24/02/2013

The spending problem has been building for years. Historically the State of Louisiana has spent much more and increased spending much faster than the private sector.

5) Comment by zealer99 - 23/02/2013

How about a quiz? What happens when a student "C" student borrows $50,000 to complete a degree in general studies? My guess would be that he defaults because he can't find a job to repay the loan. But it is a student loan so it does not go away and it beats his credit rating to death. He can't buy a house because of his credit rating, so multiple that times hundreds of thousands billions of dollars in defaulted Federal Students and a reduction in home ownership. Even the students who graduate in "economically viable" fields experience a delay in home ownership as they reduce their student loan debts. Maybe we should consider reducing the number of students in fields that do not offer economic viability and focus on the fields that are needed.

6) Comment by Scrooge - 23/02/2013

Gosh agagent one would think that that lower unemployment rates would mean lower poverty rates, may be cutting higher education to the quick isn't so educated after all? Only so many hamburger maker jobs to go around. Self professed "conservatives" who have a need to blame others for the self-imposed problems may not have the capacity to actually think through the depth and breadth of these complex issues, not to mention the apparent incapacity to recognize reality. The "liberal" moniker applied to anyone who might question spurious claims is evidently more of an indicative code for the indolent cognitive capacity of the person spouting the moniker.

7) Comment by twinkie1cat - 23/02/2013

On the editorial page today were the pictures of the people the Advocate interviewed as to whether they thought Jindal was doing a good job. Most were white. Only one thought he was ok. Time to resign, Gov'na!

8) Comment by bettergovt - 23/02/2013

In the first picture, does anyone want to guess which one is the classified employee?

9) Comment by agagent - 23/02/2013

Liberals want us to try the Illinois solution to our budget problem . . . Raise taxes, keep spending, and then you will have an unemployment rate of 8.7% instead of Louisiana’s rate of 5.5%.

10) Comment by redstickcitizen - 23/02/2013

@RodeoClown: Your analysis suggests we should re-examine our practices and keep more of our local money local. Seems like we would benefit from reducing State government bloat, reducing state income taxes (how about to a Texas zero?) , and state sales taxes, and,through our increased local taxes, gain greater accountability from our local public officials to keep our roads and schools in good shape. Seeing as how every other state bests us on various rankings, could it be their way might be better? Or do we all abhor the thought that LA could become a fiscally sound state like Texas where the roads are good and the schools even better? Instead we have a governor proposing to raise sales taxes to the highest in the nation. Prepare for a boom in Mississippi, Arkansas, and Texas for plumbing and hardware stores on our borders.

11) Comment by Bouncer - 23/02/2013

I can't recall seeing that many chodes in a room at the same time, anywhere. It is an historic occasion.

12) Comment by zealer99 - 23/02/2013

These cuts remind me of a comparison of vital functions of the human body that I encountered several years ago. A person who weighs 200 pounds can loose almost 100 pounds and still function in a healthy manner, depending on what weight is lost. But a 400 pound man, although he could stand to loose 200 pounds of body fat, if you removed a few ounces from the right places he would die. The State budget is much like that, the Jindal Administration should have spent the first four years planning where to make cuts and to make them carefully, maybe even making some temporary tax increases to give them time to work it out. But this is what we get.

13) Comment by RODEO CLOWN - 23/02/2013

CRAZYCAJUN, I respectfully disagree with you. The Louisiana constitution needs to be maintained. Jindal should go! The legislature should bring articles of impeachment against the little worm. Legally, I don't know if incompetence, stupidity and selfishness are indictable offenses, however, if they are, Jindal would be “guilty as guilty could be” and would be a “long gone pecan”.

14) Comment by RODEO CLOWN - 23/02/2013

REDSTICKCITIZEN: Your point concerning PA is well taken. However, the reason for the comparable size of each state's budget, PA vs LA, is the fact that PA's budget primarily reflects the cost state operations and only state operations. PA's aid to local governments-unlike Louisiana-is minimal at best. Local governmental bodies in PA, ie, counties, townships and cities, generate the preponderance of revenue required for local administration via local sales taxes, property taxes, use taxes and federal funds. The local jurisdictions do not plan on financial aid from the state and budget accordingly. In fact, some of the larger cities in PA such as Philadelphia and Pittsburgh even levy a local income tax. These revenues do not appear nor are the revenues part of PA's state budget. In fact, this is the revenue paradigm employed by the bulk of states not just PA. In Louisiana the revenue wheel turns in a somewhat different direction. The bulk of “local” revenue in Louisiana(as evidenced by the “hue” and “haw” concerning Jindal's proposed cuts)comes from the state and federal government. Granted, we pay property taxes, use taxes, sales taxes but not anywhere near enough to cover local jurisdictional cost.

15) Comment by crazycajun - 23/02/2013

We just need to totally get rid of the Louisiana state constitution and re[place it with the ALEC state constitution.That's what L'il booby wants anyway.What booby wants booby gets thanks to our spineless legislators.

16) Comment by RODEO CLOWN - 23/02/2013

Am I reading this part correctly? “The governor’s proposed budget includes $7.9 billion in state general fund revenue and $9.7 billion in federal dollars.”(Pp 7/LL1). The total budget amounts to $24.7 billion dollars, of which, $9.7 billion will come from the US government. Now whose talking entitlements? And, isn't this somewhat hypocritical on “Bobby-tye's” part? He has consistently maintained he doesn't want any part of “Obama Care”, costing the state to 100% of federal funding for medicaid. Yet, produces a budget relying almost 40%($9.70 B/24.70B=39.27%) on federal revenue to “balance” it? What a fake, a demagogue, a panderer to the base elements of society. The fact is “Bobby-tye's' and his “Jindanista's” are literally “counting their chickens before they hatch”. This proposed budget is dependent on “futures”. It depends on selling this property or signing that contract or hoping something adverse, such as a major hurricane, doesn't occur. The most pathetic part of this entire story is Louisiana has the money to run the state without cutting one employee, without closing one hospital, without any tuition increases, without cutting services to the public school systems, the needy citizens of the state, or the sick and infirmed. Or should I say the state “had” the monies until “Bobby-tye” gave the money away in “so called” business incentives. This is evidenced by the fact that 2011 collection of corporate franchise fees and corporate taxes were $771 million lower than collections for 2008. Now and for the foreseeable future, Louisiana will suffer revenue shortfalls because of Jindal's lack of fiscal understanding, underpinned by a philosophical belief that what is good for business is better for Louisiana. Bottom line is, it don't work that way. If you need a reminder, just look at Europe. Many of these countries have “pander” to major corporations. Countries such as Ireland, Italy, Sweden, etc, have either dropped corporate taxation all together or have instituted corporate incentives to the point that revenue from corporations is virtually nonexistent. Bobby, it hasn't worked for them and it will not work for Louisiana.

17) Comment by RODEO CLOWN - 23/02/2013

****Comment Removed for Violation of Terms of Use****

18) Comment by Warp7 - 23/02/2013

What an amazing picture! Nichols presents a budget that will impact the citizens negatively with a once again increase in college tuition, lay off of state employees, closure of state hospitals, etc. , and a lack of new revenue, and this arrogant head of the Division of Administration is laughing about it. What is wrong with these people! The only ones being helped by this administration are the big time private companies that are getting multi-million dollar contracts since Jindal became governor. Government for the people and by the people does not exist in the Jindal mode of government. A smile on her face, how sad the state of politics has become in Louisiana.

19) Comment by Toldyouso - 23/02/2013

Ms. Nichols seems pretty pleased with herself, pretending to have balanced the budget with contingencies and one time money, in direct violation of the constitution. What's not to smile whe the elderly, disabled and college students are affected? Apropos of nothing, wonder when she's going to get her first DWI.

20) Comment by redstickcitizen - 23/02/2013

@SuzanneMS: no mystery about these figures, it took only 10 seconds to pull the numbers from la.gov, pa.gov and 2010 census. Why PA, because its budget is roughly the same as LAs. Bottom line is PA has to maintain prisons, roads, health care and education for a population 3x larger and does so with the same amount of money. I do not read about PA prisoners running free, PA drivers using dirt roads, PA people deprived of health care, or PA beings ranked lower than LA on education lists. Every state has to provide the same services. So maybe there is something we can learn by comparing ourselves to other states. Yes I suspect property taxes are higher due to a 35000 homestead not 75000 but sales taxes appear lower ( 8% max versus 10-1/2 max state+ local). I am not a PA fan, just believe in data and have yet to find any reason explaining why we in LA need a government that costs us 3x that of another states on a per capita basis.

21) Comment by SuzanneMS - 23/02/2013

And understand that the tuition increases are merely to offset the reductions in state funds -- they won't increase the amount available to colleges and universities. They are, in Bobby's favorite phrase, "revenue neutral." Meaning that Louisiana higher education will continue to be massively underfunded. All of you who are applauding Jindal for refusing the Medicaid expansion -- I hope you have the money to pay for your parents' and grandparents' prescriptions. Where did you get your figures, redstickcitizen? And why Pennsylvania? In any case, you might compare the amount that Pennsylvania is spending on prisons with what Louisiana spends -- flat or per capita. You might also compare the amount that the state spends on local projects in Pennsylvania compared with Louisiana. In most other states, local projects are funded with local money, primarily property and sales taxes. In Louisiana, "the state will provide," courtesy Huey Long and the Homestead Exemption. But understand that some costs -- particularly infrastructure -- are more or less flat costs. It costs the same to repair a bridge, regardless of how many people live in the state.

22) Comment by twinkie1cat - 23/02/2013

Approval rating for Piyush in the next poll, down from 37% to, oh maybe -10%. In other countries this would be a vote of "no confidence" and he would have to either resign or engage in a special election.

23) Comment by twinkie1cat - 23/02/2013

What challenge, Kristy? Keeping Bobby clean and happy so you don't get fired and he impresses the GOP?

24) Comment by twinkie1cat - 23/02/2013

Let's see. This year we hit up handicapped children, the elderly, and college students with budget cuts. Sounds like about the same as the last few years under Louisiana's little dictator. Strange how it is always the folks who don't vote----well, except the elderly who can, will, and should get their vindication. How many people could live better Jindal was paying fewer clones or at least cutting their salaries. Start with the unqualified Superintendent of Education, John White. He makes $250,000. I would do it for $100,000, maybe $75,000 and fully paid benefits and with 27 years in the public schools I am much better qualified. That extra money could go to therapy that will help little children who might otherwise become the next Sandy Hook killers. Or maybe a few more young adults could go to college and become middle class taxpayers instead of flipping burgers for minimum wage. Kristy Nichols with her big grin must be getting great accolades along with her big salary. She needs to be ashamed of how she is helping Jindal destroy Louisiana. Y'all prepare for the annual screwing.

25) Comment by markedwardmarchiafava - 23/02/2013

To answer your question, redstickcitizen, "robbed."

26) Comment by redstickcitizen - 23/02/2013

Louisiana population = 4.5 million, Louisiana budget = $28 Billion; Pennsylvania population = 12.7 million, Pennsylvania budget = $28 Billion. Do Louisianans really receive 3x better or 3x more government services than Pennsylvanians? What are we getting for our money?

27) Comment by markedwardmarchiafava - 23/02/2013

"Doing the same thing, over and over, expecting different results is insanity." Albert Einstein.

28) Comment by Crawdaddy - 23/02/2013

Same old contingencies, same old "efficiencies', same old stagnant budget....

29) Comment by phil - 23/02/2013

I think maybe if we hire one more million dollar coach at LSU we can fix this problem.

30) Comment by Pakistani - 23/02/2013

If you have not figured it out yet, Pakistani boy is a liar. Didn't he say coming into office, "I will not use one time funds for recurring expenses."

31) Comment by whodat70816 - 23/02/2013

Each fiscal year Jindal's budget relies on the sale of property and one time funds and each and every fiscal year there is a midyear budget cut because no one wants to buy that property next to the state capital and the one time funding was over projected. FY 2014 will be no different. It relies on the sale of property, one time monies, tutition increases (what happens if enrollment goes down?), and people paying some kind of fee for medical care for their children based on income. What do they say about doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result?

32) Comment by Grannee - 23/02/2013

I forgot to add, Jindal steals from the poor and middle class while paying his cronies and hench men six figure salaries. He should be given a standing ovation for balancing the budget on the backs of the down trodden. Way to go Bobby.

33) Comment by Grannee - 23/02/2013

Increasing college tuition is a tax increase on college students trying to get an education. Then Jindal turns around and attacks the elderly and poor but taking away services pertaining to their medications. They are on fixed incomes and the prices of some of their medications are beyond their reach. Attacking children, the elderly and poor is what this administration is good at.

34) Comment by Attila - 23/02/2013

Revenue neutral? I guess that means that taxes will go up for those of us in the middle, down for those who pay little or nothing now, and stay "neutral" for those at the top. Sounds like the same old Louisiana politics to me. Do yo\'all remember the Stelly plan. That was supposed to shift the tax burden to the so called "wealthy". When all was said and done I was astounded to find out that I was considered wealthy...and that is all it was...considered wealthy, because I am a far cry from it,

35) Comment by dday198 - 23/02/2013

“We’re proud of this budget even though this budget certainly has been a challenge,” Commissioner of Administration Kristy Nichols told members of the Joint Legislative Committee on the Budget. wow

36) Comment by jeffsadow - 22/02/2013

Certainly: http://www.doa.louisiana.gov/opb/pub/FY14/FY14ExecBudget.htm

37) Comment by innercloud - 22/02/2013

can we have a link to it please?