Louisiana special education plans to change

Faced with criticism from local superintendents, state Superintendent of Education John White said Thursday he is changing plans to overhaul the way the state funds its 82,000 special-education students.

Under a proposal that White spelled out to superintendents on Feb. 14, Louisiana’s funding method would be revamped over three years to improve the state’s 29 percent graduation rate, which is the second lowest in the nation.

Under the latest plan, the state would roll out a limited tryout of the new funding method for the 2013-14 school year, then examine the results.

Whether the new funding method will take effect statewide in 2015-16 as initially envisoned is unclear.

“I think we need to see what the impact is,” White said.

He said the changes show that state leaders are listening to local superintendents.

“We are heeding their caution,” White said.

Michael Faulk, who is chairman of the Superintendent’s Advisory Council, said Thursday he is pleased with the slowdown.

“We want a more careful approach,” said Faulk, who is also superintendent of the Central public school system.

“There is a lot of uncertainty out there,” he said.

White has repeatedly said that the state’s 29 percent graduation rate — ahead of only the 23 percent rate in Mississippi and Nevada — cries out for action.

The state now spends $313 million for special education.

Allocations focus simply on whether a student is categorized that way.

Under White’s plan, money would be spent based on a student’s disability, where and how the student is educated and academic performance.

Louisiana’s top school board is set to take up the topic on March 7-8 in connection with its annual public school funding request from the Legislature.

Faulk and other superintendents told White they were concerned about the financial impact on their districts, among other issues.

“I want to see what the impact budgetarily on the district would be,” said Ascension Parish Superintendent Patrice Pujol, who is a member of the Superintendent’s Advisory Council.

St. Bernard Parish Superintendent Doris Voitier, another member of the council, said her concerns are more fundamental than just the impact the changes would have on individual school districts.

“Is this the approach that we wish to use to fund special education?” Voitier asked on Thursday.

“That to me is a much bigger issue,” she said.

White said Thursday that, under his latest plan, the changes would apply to all 70 school districts in the 2013-14 school year.

However, they would be limited to just 10 percent of the state aid for special education students.

That means districts entitled to an additional $10 under the changes would collect just $1.

Those in line to lose $10 under the new plan would lose only $1, White said.

Faulk said using pilots to test the changes will help to find any flaws in the new system.

He noted that a plan to give principals more budget authority — it is called student-based budgeting — largely faded after pilot programs showed flaws in that approach.


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (2)


1) Comment by Iamhopeful2 - 25/02/2013

This is an attempt to reduce funding for special education. Absolutely no mention was made (nor do I remember anyone asking in The Superintendents' Advisory Council meeting) when presented with this proposal what the highest rate of funding would be for category 3. It is a given that category 3 would be funded higher than 2or 1. If this is passed by BESE, districts will e locked in and those students whose costs are unpredictable or complex circumstances will be underfunded. Because the law requires their needs be met, there will be no "pool" to draw from as there is in a lump sum payment mechanism. Additionally, no mention is made here of White's proposal to change gifted and talented funding. Guaranteed that parents will only be informed if districts take that responsibility. This will allow White to claim no opposition.

2) Comment by civitasiveritas - 22/02/2013

Does anyone know who is directly over more special education students than anyone else in the state? Superintendent John White. He has every right to determined how mony is spent on his schools (State School for the Visually Impaired and the State School for Deaf and Hard of Hearing, as well as all of his RSD schools. Taken together, they are the largest block of special needs students in the state (and, I might add, the lowest performing according to HIS measures.). Yet John White has never attempted to use his "new ideas" to increase the achievement of the students in his care? He doesn't need a new funding formula from BESE to try this out. Use it in his own failing schools. And let's face it, every school he is directly running is failing. White lies.