Value of school waivers questioned

National report critical of Louisiana strategy to improve performance

A national report Thursday questioned one of the key strategies Louisiana is using to improve student performance after the state landed some highly touted waivers last year from the federal government.

“To counteract possible backsliding, it’s critical for advocates and citizens in every waiver state to do a thorough, clear-eyed assessment of these new accountability systems,” officials of the The Education Trust wrote in a report.

State Superintendent of Education John White, who pushed for the waiver, said the changes are working well.

“We are right in line with this report,” White said.

The group in Washington, D.C., calls itself an advocate of closing the achievement gap, especially between white and black students and students from low-income families compared to those from middle and upper incomes.

Louisiana last May was one of eight states that landed a federal waiver from “onerous” rules in exchange for major changes in how public schools and students are evaluated.

The waiver applies to the 2001 federal No Child Left Behind Act, which is aimed at improving student achievement.

The looser rules freed restrictions from $375 million in federal aid — 64 percent of the total — to give state and local educators more flexibility and less paperwork.

One of the strategies, White said last year, is a new method to aid students performing below grade level in math and English, which is a recurring concern among state education leaders.

He said those students would become a new “super subgroup” and schools where they made better-than-expected gains would benefit in annual school performance scores, which determine letter grades assigned to each school.

The report noted that other states are using similar approaches — student performance rather than demographics.

“The logic of this focus is appealing,” according to the report.

“There are, however, big risk here,” it says.

“Conflating ‘closing the achievement gap’ and ‘moving low-achieving students’ can send the dangerous message that gap-closing is only about raising the floor,” authors of the review wrote.

“This ignores the urgent need to close gaps at the high end of the achievement spectrum, too,” the study says.

White said the state’s approach follows what the group favors.

“We are doing just as they suggested, to focus on the lowest-performing of the lower-performing students,” he said.

White said that, in addition, the state still reports scores by race, gender, disability and other areas.

In another area, the review touted Louisiana as one of the leaders in efforts to upgrade schools that have failed to show improvements after state intervention.

One such push is the designation of seven schools in north Baton Rouge for special attention as the “Baton Rouge Achievement Zone.”

The schools are getting focus from White, who has called for sweeping changes.

A report last year by the Baton Rouge Area Chamber and the Baton Rouge Area Foundation said the schools amount to a breakaway district that may eventually number two dozen or so schools.

Michigan and Tennessee have followed Louisiana’s example, according to the study.


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (9)


1) Comment by Iamhopeful2 - 12/02/2013

http://dianeravitch.net/2013/02/09/the-waivers-are-worthless-and-destructive/ http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/02/07/no-child-left-behind-hearing- waiver_n_2632728.html?utm_hp_ref=joy-resmovits http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/02/07/no-child-left-behind-hearing- waiver_n_2632728.html?utm_hp_ref=joy-resmovits U.S. Senate Health and Educ Committee now hearing testimony from states on effects of waivers. Write members to report the destruction White has brought with our state waivers. See articles above and especially the comments.

2) Comment by 1ryben - 09/02/2013

Thank you for those links. I wasn't trying to insinuate that you were incorrect, just trying to point out the fallicy in Jeff's argument. He takes to the comment section frequently and makes these arrogant, ill informed shots at teachers and then cowardly disappears. Never returning to attempt to validate his claims. His behavior and selfrighteousness is unbecoming of someone of his stature. Or maybe not, he is the lowest rated political science professor at LSU Shreveport. His act is tired.

3) Comment by LAteacher - 08/02/2013

@1ryben: for a very detailed analysis of how White has rigged the new system to skew the School Scores beyond the very obvious bias introduced by the bonus points follow this link: http://crazycrawfish.files.wordpress.com/2013/01/2013_school_lett er_grade_manipulations_release.pdf

4) Comment by LAteacher - 08/02/2013

@1ryben here is a link to an explanation of the new School Assessment System sent out by John White in the 10/17/2012 EdConnect. http://stand.org/sites/default/files/Louisiana/RAISING_THE_BAR_6. 19.12.pdf Pages 4 through 6 explain the Bonus Points. Note that the document comes from the astro-turf organization Stand for Children.

5) Comment by 1ryben - 08/02/2013

@ Jwarren, you are certainly correct in that we should push all groups of students. When a student or a teacher's entire worth is tied to one test though, that's exactly what does happen. It's narrowing the curriculum, dumbing it down if you will.

6) Comment by 1ryben - 08/02/2013

Once again, Jeff Shadow's arrogance gets the better of his intellegence. Surely, If you were to read LAteacher's comment carefully, there is no way you'd think that the SPS scores of those two schools would end up being a fair comparison. You are not really that dense are you? Go back and read the comment again. There is no way its fair. No way an intellegent person would read that and say that it is fair. As an aside, I'm not sure if what LAteacher says is true or not. I'll look into it later, but if it is true, what a sham. You fools and your union blame. The unions here are worthless. Though I don't recall the exact percentage, a pretty small number of teacher in LA actually belong to a union. Thats just a worthess conservative talking point. Now listen close and pay attention, not a single teacher I know fears being evaluated. The issue is that the instrument being used is severly flawed. There is a mountain of research based evidence that points to VAM being highly unstable. Just google "criticism of VAM" and read for yourself.

7) Comment by jwarren - 08/02/2013

"Closing the achievement gap" is about planned mediocrity, bringing all groups of students to the same level. It ignores the students who are not behind. The goal should be to lift all students, not some. Do we want students in more advanced groups academically to stagnate so the rest can catch up? Or do we want to raise the performance of all groups?

8) Comment by jeffsadow - 08/02/2013

So your complaint is that a school gets more credit because it improves significantly the performance of more students in an absolute sense, when in a relative sense it may be equal to others? Isn't that the whole point of the waivers, to bring to more children increased quality? Your complaint makes no sense. Note also under the new evaluation system (at least where there can be scoring) that teachers whose students don't reach grade level still can be rated as highly effective if they bring them up enough in improvement. So why is there some bitter subset of them, backed by their union allies, complaining about the new system when you don't even have to have students come up to grade level to maintain tenure and stay employed?

9) Comment by LAteacher - 07/02/2013

And magically, the achievement gap closes in Louisiana! White is using this "Super Subgroup Bonus" to boost the recovery school district scores. Through his manipulation of formulas the currently low performing schools will appear to have closed the gap on the higher performing ones. How? School A is a good performer and has only 60 students below grade level. School B is low performing with 250 students below grade level. Say 40 percent of the eligible students in each school earn bonus points. School A gets 4 Bonus Points. School B gets 10 Bonus Points for the same achievement. Why? The bonus points are calculated by two separate and unequal formulas. One formula is the percent of students who earn bonus points times 0.1. The other formula is the number of students who earn bonus points times 0.1. (In School B, 250 x 40% = 100 students improve) The greater result is given to the school in bonus points. School B's score goes up by 10 points, School A's score goes up by only 4 points, so low performing School B closes the gap by 6 points. Instant miracle! Total Crock! And, by the way, it is NOT required that those students reach grade level to earn bonus points.