System redesign weighed

Show caption
/

Taylor hopes to provide more school choice with shake-up

Later this month, the East Baton Rouge Parish School Board could set in motion the most radical redesign of public schooling in Baton Rouge since the desegregation fights of years past.

Superintendent Bernard Taylor, who started in June, announced in November he wants to reconfigure and remodel dozens of public schools located in four areas of Baton Rouge into “attendance regions” with boundaries that would erase the neighborhood zones of the elementary and middle schools located in those regions.

Three of these regions are in north Baton Rouge and one is in southeast Baton Rouge. Taylor has said the regional boundaries would be similar, though not necessarily identical, to the traditional zones for the four affected high schools — Capitol, Glen Oaks, Scotlandville and Woodlawn.

The school system would set up regional “marketplaces,” pitting school against school in a competition for students and the per-pupil funding that comes with those students.

Under Taylor’s plan, many schools will get new principals, and current teachers in those schools will have to reapply for their jobs. Those not rehired will end up in the job market, pursuing vacancies inside, and perhaps outside, the school system.

“This is going to be a time of great unrest for a lot of people, not from a negative point of view,” Taylor said Friday. “I’m talking about soul searching and introspection of the sort that many of (our) teachers never have to deal with.”

Taylor, however, is also offering teachers a potential role in the restructuring of these schools.

If the School Board approves the changes Feb. 21, Taylor said, he plans to hold an immediate “competition of ideas” in which educators can submit proposals for educational themes and programs to help schools compete against each other.

The changes, if approved, would take effect with the start of the 2013-14 school year in August.

Taylor has refined his proposals based on feedback he received during a series of community forums in November.

Taylor embarked on a second round of forums Jan. 23 with two held so far. He did not sugarcoat matters at a forum in the cafeteria at Capitol Elementary School on Jan. 23, telling those who attended that the changes will be difficult and may mean some teachers lose their jobs.

But, he said, the changes are necessary for the school system to remain financially viable as it now faces outside competition from charter schools and private schools receiving publicly funded vouchers.

“If we don’t control our own destiny, our destiny will be decided by others,” Taylor said.

Another forum is being held at 6 p.m. Monday at Scotlandville High, 9870 Scotland Ave. A fourth forum that was supposed to be held Tuesday night at Southeast Middle has been postponed; no new date has been set.

Taylor said he wants to conclude discussions with the leaders of the state-run Recovery School District on the future of Glen Oaks and Prescott middle schools before scheduling a forum for the southeast area.

The two schools were taken over in 2008 after years of low academic performance, and the school system has sought unsuccessfully for years to get the schools back to relieve overcrowding at other middle schools in the parish.

Taylor said if he can get one or more of the state-run schools back, more students will stay closer to home. He said that would relieve crowding in schools in the southeast area.

A group of Southeast Baton Rouge residents were unsuccessful in an attempt in 2012 to break away and form an independent school district in the area. They have said they plan to try again this year when the Legislature reconvenes April 8.

Taylor’s plans have been hard to describe because the details remain in flux, and he has not laid them all out in one public document. Rather, he is releasing details piece by piece, region by region and forum by forum. Videos of four of the forums he’s held so far have been posted on the school system’s website, www.ebrschools.org.

Taylor said he will release a full proposal sometime after Monday’s forum at Scotlandville High.

The School Board is planning to debate Taylor’s plans at a meeting Thursday and vote on them at its Feb. 21 regular meeting.

Taylor said he plans to extend the attendance region concept to other parts of Baton Rouge in the years to come.

A consistent theme running through Taylor’s plans is an effort to give families more choices of where to send their children to school. In so doing, he is upending the “community sensitive attendance zones” that were the hallmark of its efforts in the mid-1990s to resolve a long-running desegregation suit.

In the affected regions, public schools would no longer draw primarily from the neighborhoods surrounding their school. Instead, students living in multiple neighborhoods across a much larger geographical area would select from a menu of options.

The regional menus would include new magnet schools, charters schools, schools with new grade configurations, and a range of new but yet-to-be-determined programs and themes. These menus would also include several schools now run by the Recovery School District.

Taylor has scaled down the number of new magnet schools he wants to create. In November, he talked about creating three new magnet programs and expanding a fourth one. Now, he’s talking about creating just one new magnet program at Claiborne Elementary School and expanding a Montessori magnet at Belfair Elementary.

Taylor said he’s still weighing whether to turn Mayfair Middle School into a magnet school as well.

In the case of Glen Oaks High, Taylor is proposing splitting the school in two with a more traditional high school competing with a new charter school. This is similar to an idea Taylor suggested when he was hired for superintendent of creating “educational malls” where schools of different types could compete against each other.


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (12)


1) Comment by Concerned_Parent - 05/02/2013

@Tea_Slayer....We can start legislating effective parenting by denying free handouts/state aid each month if your child has X amount of unexcused abscences. Or X amount of days where their homework was not done. Or if their GPA is below a certain level. Hand out fines to parents who call the schools and curse out the teachers and administration. If you want to take your kid out of school to go on vacation, you and your child will be required to attend school on a Saturday to make up missed work. There are ways to force the parents hand into getting involved, however it may cost someone votes at the polls and thus won't be implemented.

2) Comment by Tea_Slayer - 04/02/2013

To determine whether this is a "cultural" problem (black culture, that is), let's look at some statistics: Graduation Rates: White - 66% , Black 51.6%. Population of each demographic under 18 years of age: White - 619K (59%), Black - 422K (41%). Looks like about the same number. Extrapolating (since I could not find the exact number of each of the demographic groups that dropped out), it looks like it's not just a "black" cultural problem. That is why when you point to just the black community having a problem with education, you are not looking at the whole picture and it could be construed as racism. Like tradewinns has stated many time (and I agree) , it has to do with lack of parenting. The problem is, how do we legislate "effective parenting?"

3) Comment by tradewinns - 04/02/2013

mj6338; you, me, and everyone else can only express their concerns and recommendations. it does irrate me the school system continues to reinvest in the same failed ideas they tried for 20-30 years in various forms. most failing schools are in poor areas. why are these kids failing while other areas are not? funding is at least the same. in some areas of the country, failing areas get more money than schools that are suceeding, yet they continue to fail. funding is therefore an excuse to cover the real problem. failing schools actually have more time available for children because they normally stay at school longer (until they get old enough to begin skipping) so opportunity is greater at failing schools, another excuse. there are lots more excuse. the thing or things missing are the REASONS. until politicians are willing and couragious enough to state the actual problem and DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT, the only change we'll see is even more money being flushed down the toliet of public education.

4) Comment by BRmoderate - 04/02/2013

What's going to happen when the "good" schools are full and kids have no other choice but to go to the "bad" ones???

5) Comment by BRmoderate - 04/02/2013

I'm all for school choice. But the playing field must be leveled first. Rebuild/renovate each school. Let them have the same level of quality in terms of classrooms, libraries, gyms, and buses. Then let principals build their faculty accordingly. Give them the same funding for extra curricular activities. You can't expect a school that is already "failing" to be able to pick them selves up without some assistance from the district.

6) Comment by Doll2000 - 04/02/2013

Taylor's plan will be a big mess!! Schools competing with each other for students! Come on!! The EBR school system is slowing destroying itself! Teachers will not want to teach anymore. This whole reform with White and Jindal is awful. Things started going bad with NCLB with Bush. He and Jindal both got horrible education advice! I would love to see White teach in one of the schools mentioned in this story! They would eat HIM for lunch!! LOL

7) Comment by Concerned_Parent - 04/02/2013

And how will this work in conjunction with Jindal and White's reform package? How will you use the data to determine if a teacher/school is showing growth with a student when the students all get reshuffled. If a student does well one year and then poorly the next, is it the former schools fault or the new school? Will the new teacher loose their effective rating b/c they are now teaching a classroom of students who are adjusting to a new environment, new classmates, etc.?

8) Comment by rockynoggin - 04/02/2013

Here's the problem nobody wants to talk about - teachers, in general, don't want to go to work at old schools in bad neighborhoods. Taylor's scheme is basically trying to force that and in return hope that parents in those neighborhoods will elect to keep the kids closer to home instead of busing them to the southeast. It's not going to work and it's going to result in a lot of good teachers leaving the EBR system.

9) Comment by phil - 04/02/2013

“This is going to be a time of great unrest for a lot of people,..." I am beginning to think that is the plan. The time for unrest is way past and I think now we are just all waiting for some rest. I have a plan - teach students in the regular public schools the way they are supposed to be taught and stop creating new schemes that just create more and more unrest , waste taxpayer money and possibly make some people rich in the process.

10) Comment by mj6338 - 04/02/2013

tradewinns: I completely agree with you. But when I submit that the parenting issue relates to cultural problems I get called a racist. I feel most people today (of all races) are too uncomfortable confronting this and so problems persist; we just spend more money ineffectively dealing with it.

11) Comment by Iamhopeful2 - 04/02/2013

There are so many red lights going off with this new superintendent. The fact that he is African American in no way forgives his attempts to re-segregate our public schools which is exactly what he is proposing. In the new wave of reform, one strategy is to create "magnet" schools and "special academies" some called "accelerated" schools although they only accelerate low performing or misbehaving students out of the system - and all for the sake of improving school performance scores. Removing children from their neighborhood schools rather than properly funding and improving all schools not only destroys the communities and their ability to develop the pride and initiative to improve, but prevents parents from actively participating in their children's education and school improvement. Not to mention the lost hours children spend on school busses and the attendant costs. Most importantly however it has to be understood that this plan will in fact REMOVE the CHOICE that these reformers have sold to their customers (parents). The enrollment process for these "zoned" schools will be selective by design most certainly in the form of a lottery but definitely without transparency or control by parents. Taylor is right about one thing though. "if we don't control our own destinies, it will be controlled by others." That OTHER is Taylor and he doesn't even see the contradiction or hypocrisy of his words. "Soul searching and introspection of the kind that teachers never have to deal with. . . ." Obviously this man has no soul, no heart and no concept of the human side of teaching. I can only hope that parents and other community members will show up in force at these next two school board meetings and will contact the board members to let them know that they are elected officials and pledged to serve the needs of their constituencies NOT this man who would drive a stake in a public education system that is a foundation for democracy.

12) Comment by tradewinns - 04/02/2013

lots of thunder and lightning but alas there will be no improvement. the core problem with the public school system is the lack of parental involvement in their children's education. put the kids in any school they/you want and they are not going to improve unless their parents improve. quit wasting time, money. effort & children. bust the parents for not doing their job and the quicker the better for everybody.