Budget cuts block anti-truancy effort

Show caption
/

Official laments end of LSU role in program

State budget cuts and a directive from Gov. Bobby Jindal’s office effectively ended LSU’s involvement with statewide truancy programs for at-risk youths.

The LSU Office of Social Service Research Development announced Wednesday that it will end its 16-year partnership with the Truancy Assessment and Service Center on July 1. It blamed the move on a $331,000 budget cut handed down from the state late last month.

An East Baton Rouge Parish school administrator, Domoine Rutledge, familiar with the program said removing LSU from the process could compromise anti-truancy efforts around the state.

East Baton Rouge Parish District Attorney Hillar Moore III, another vocal supporter of the TASC program, called it one of the most effective initiatives he’s seen and a model for similar efforts. He called LSU’s announcement “sad to see.”

Jindal did not respond to a request for comment Wednesday.

Kristy Nichols, Jindal’s commissioner of administration, said in a prepared statement released Wednesday night: “The Truancy Assessment and Service Center program itself is not ending, the centers did not get a funding reduction, and the centers still have $2.4 million in funding to continue their activities and core functions of reducing truancy and getting kids back in school in 21 parishes. Part of the midyear deficit plan, however, included finding efficiencies and savings of $331K in administrative costs.”

Created by the Legislature in 1998 to prevent students from dropping out and diverting at-risk youths away from crime, TASC targets K-5 students referred to the program by schools after a certain number of absences.

A TASC officer reviews the case and determines if the student is considered a risk for chronic truancy. If so, the officer works with the student’s family to craft a tailored service plan aimed at improving the student’s school participation.

Officers also follow up with students and monitor their progress.

When TASC gets involved, 85 percent of the students stay in school, said Cecile Guin, LSU’s OSSRD director. The program has served 82,000 children in 32 parishes over the years, she added.

Guin said she learned of the state budget cut in late December. LSU and three TASC program sites initially worked out an arrangement where LSU would absorb $250,000 in cuts and the program sites would shoulder the rest.

But Jindal’s office nixed that proposal and ordered that LSU would take the full brunt of the cut, effectively ending the university’s participation in the program, Guin said.

LSU handled the research and accountability components of the program, meaning it identified the specific reasons for truancy; assigned report cards to program sites; tracked student progress; and created a database of more than 100,000 children to be followed up with every year.

Guin said it was LSU’s job to gather the scientific evidence and demonstrate the programs’ effectiveness to legislators.

“We go to the Legislature and say ‘This is how much the project cost, this is who we’ve served and these are the outcomes,’ ” Guin said. LSU’s reporting to the Legislature was a major reason the program gets state funding, she said.

East Baton Rouge Parish TASC director Jenny Ponder said her program serves between 800 and 1,000 students at 19 high-risk schools each year.

She said LSU helped them “sustain a viable model” that will allow them to continue their work going forward even without future input from the university.

“We certainly appreciate all of the effort LSU has given the center,” Ponder said. “We also appreciate (the Jindal administration) for recognizing the services we provide and for allowing us to continue our work.”

Ponder said the program will look for a new partner to run the evaluation component in the future.

LSU’s role in evaluating the program played a significant role in the entire process, as it keeps program workers “on their toes” and likely prevents workers from cutting corners knowing they would be evaluated every year, argued Domoine Rutledge, general counsel for East Baton Rouge Parish’s public school system.

“Getting rid of LSU will probably be welcomed by some because they placed additional requirements on the TASC sites,” Rutledge said. “Hopefully, now that they have less work to do that won’t compromise their performance.”

But Rutledge acknowledged that TASC sites in the Baton Rouge area “are mature sites,” and not likely to experience decreased performance or quality of service.

“LSU was beneficial because of the research component they brought,” he said. “We certainly appreciate the approach taken to ensure the cuts aren’t going directly to the program.”


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (9)


1) Comment by Mygulfbleedsforu - 24/01/2013

President Obama doesn't need voters.

2) Comment by bourbon-soda - 24/01/2013

More Obama voters; what's the problem?

3) Comment by foldgers - 24/01/2013

First off, I really do wish Bobby would respond more to the press. The only time he speaks in public is to campaign or to give his responses to speeches made by Obama. As far as this story, just like I said with the CATS article where people were fighting to have expanded CATS bus routes for poor pregnant women, if you are unable to support a family, so NOT have unprotected sex. If you are too poor to support them, you should be using one of the MANY forms of cheap birth control, some free now. It is not my responsibility to help you out. I have no had kids yet because I know I am NOT ready for one. It sucks, because I really want one, but I will not allow the state's taxpayers to pay for it. I could not. It is not what this country was built on. It was built on working hard and making your own success. But, as long as the government keeps paying more money to the poor for each child they have, they will keep having them. If you are too poor to support even just ONE kid, I think that if you choose to have children, then each child after the first gets put into social services and put up for adoption by people who want and can support them. This government encourages unmarried women to have many kids and also discourages marriage by taxing married couple more in income taxes. What happened here???

4) Comment by HRoark - 24/01/2013

So tradeswinns' solution is to make poor people even poorer. Okay, I'll bite, please cite your primary sources from "other school districts" that this approach is effective. Otherwise, it sounds like a fabrication to provide credibility to your argument.

5) Comment by tradewinns - 24/01/2013

get real!! govt should not be in the business of keeping kids in school. that is the job of parents. so if we, the taxpayers, have to pick up where the parents fail, there should be a fine associated with truancy on the parents. a fine big enough to reimburse the state (taxpayer) their cost and big enough to encourage the parents to accept schooling as one of their responsibilities as parents. other school districts have already imposed this, and the last time i saw a follow-up it was working. and i don't care that the POOR cain't afford it, they are the ones that need schooling the most. they have to know their actions, or lack thereof, have consequencies which directly affect their comfort. only then will there be a change in their attitude. all other actions are bovine droppings which make lots of noise but do nothing to accomplish their stated goals.

6) Comment by shad-o - 24/01/2013

Bobby J's reign of terror in the state of Louisiana will set us back for years.

7) Comment by SuzanneMS - 24/01/2013

A program that works at keeping poor, at-risk children in school? Sounds like something Louisiana can do without. As we learned yesterday, the only research that Jindal and the rest of his ilk believe the university should be involved is in is research that directly supports industry. Let's ignore the reality that one of the reasons that businesses don't locate here is a the lack of an educated populace; another is the high crime rate, which is directly correlated with the high school drop out rate. Someone needs to tell Nichols -- and Jindal, if you can find him -- that "efficiency" means "doing the same job with the same results for less time and/money." It does not mean simply reducing costs by cutting off funds. Of course, this program is undermining his goal of destroying public education and replacing it with for-profit schools run by his campaign contributors, so it has to go.

8) Comment by lovemykids - 24/01/2013

I guess Jindal believes that LSU should not bother to help the citizens of the state. Who needs research at a university, anyway?

9) Comment by morellok2 - 24/01/2013

Why do the reporters even bother asking this governor for a comment? Guess Supt. White will echo his boss's opinion. Yes, everything they do is for the children-what a crock.