Schools kick off pre-K changes

Show caption
/

Lottery system nixed in favor  of screenings

“What we’re trying to do is gather data through the screening. It’s hard for me to understand why priority would not be given to children who are not kindergarten ready.” Bernard Taylor,   EBR schools superintendent

The East Baton Rouge school system is scrapping the lottery system it had been using to register children for pre-K classes in favor of a new screening process designed to give children who may not be adequately prepared for kindergarten a better shot at getting into the program for the 2013-2014 school year, school officials said.

Students will be assessed on their readiness for kindergarten and those who perform at the low end will get higher priority for one of the more than 2,000 pre-K seats in the system than children who perform well, Bobbie Robertson, director of pre-K for the system, said Friday.

Parents interested in learning about the new system are invited to attend two “Pre-K Palooza” meetings hosted by the school system. The meetings will be held from 10 a.m. to 2 p.m. Saturday at Cortana Mall and 4 p.m. to 6 p.m. Wednesday at Woodlawn Middle School, 14939 Tiger Bend Road.

Robertson described how the program will work.

For example, she said, if there are 26 slots open for a school, the 26 students who perform at the lowest end of the spectrum on the assessment test will get first shot at that school if the parents identified that school as their first choice on their application.

If a child does not get into the school their parents marked as their first choice, then the parents will be offered another school in their attendance zone that has an opening, Robertson said.

Attendance zones are areas where any child living in that region could seek to attend any school offering their grade.

Robertson said the need to change the system for pre-K registration stemmed from data she received from parish kindergarten teachers in annual surveys. She said the results for the past several years have shown that about 33 percent of students who began kindergarten each year have not received any form of early childhood education.

Robertson said she used the data from that survey to show Superintendant Bernard Taylor that students were not prepared for kindergarten and they needed to do something to improve the numbers.

“Once you start off and you’re behind, it really messes with your self-confidence,” Robertson said.

Taylor said studies show children who receive some form of early childhood education perform better in school.

“What we’re trying to do is gather data through the screening,” Taylor said. “It’s hard for me to understand why priority would not be given to children who are not kindergarten ready.”

He said in every other school district he has worked in, priority for pre-K was given to children who, without it, might not have been ready for kindergarten.

Robertson said the school system will use an early childhood screening test that is widely used across the county to assess children for enrollment in Pre-K programs.

Robertson said she has not heard any negative comments from families since the changes were announced. Taylor said he spoke to two School Board members who expressed concern over the changes but said he assuaged their worries once he explained his reasoning behind the change.

Jill Dyason, School Board member for District 10, said she has heard rumblings that some parents are unhappy about the change in the process, but nothing specific. She said the change to pre-K registration was done administratively and was not voted on by the board.

She said it is something she thinks should be looked at more closely before it is implemented.

“I think it would be a healthy conversation to have,” she said.

The first application roundup is scheduled for Jan. 28 to Feb. 1. Parents can pick up applications at both Pre-K Palooza events, on the school system’s website and at schools on Jan. 28. For students who do not get into a school the first time, there will be a second roundup from Feb. 18-22.

For the second roundup, parents can go to schools outside their attendance zones that have openings and express interest in their child attending that school, Robertson said. She said they will not have to apply again if they applied the first time.

Kindergarten registration for the 2013-14 school year will also begin Jan. 28. Children must be 5 years old by Sept. 30 to be eligible and registration packets will be available at local elementary schools.

In December 2011, the School Board announced the end of the first-come, first-served pre-K registration in favor of the lottery system. The change was in response to parents camping out overnight for spots at schools that offered popular pre-K programs.

In January 2011, a dispute at Shenandoah Elementary prompted the Sheriff’s Office to intervene and order everyone to go home for the night.


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (7)


1) Comment by phil - 20/01/2013

The other day another article seemed to be unclear to me that the lower-performing children would be chosen first to attend Pre-K. I stated then that the lower-performing children should probably be given priority since they actually need it the most. Now, after reading some other comments, I have to add that this entire system really seems unfair to me. If higher-performing children are considered for Pre-K last, then that really is not fair to parents who actually take the time to try to care for and educate their own children at home. Why are we choosing which children can attend Pre-K at all? Public-funded programs like this should be available to ALL children on a totally equal basis. Now I will get to my real problem with this issue. I think this entire program of Pre-K is nothing but free daycare. If we as a society want to provide free daycare services to every child, then that is a totally different issue from education, in my opinion, and should not be paid with public funds dedicated for education. If society wants free daycare for all, then taxpayers should get to vote on it.

2) Comment by rose1234 - 20/01/2013

my best friend's mother makes $88 hourly on the net. She has been whereas not employment for eight months but last month her check was $19923 merely functioning on the net for some of hours. browse further on this computing device ......www.bit40.com.....

3) Comment by rose1234 - 20/01/2013

My last pay check was $9500 operational twelve hours per week on-line. My sisters friend has been averaging 15k for months presently and she or he or he's employed regarding twenty hours per week. i can't believe but simple it had been once i tried it out. this will be what I do ......www.bit40.com.....

4) Comment by bourbon-soda - 19/01/2013

This is a surprise? Consistent with many government assistance programs rewarding failure. http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=crazy%20check

5) Comment by Iamhopeful2 - 19/01/2013

Noel -Here is help for you -this is selective enrollment any way you cut it. You cannot qualify for federal funding with selective enrollment. How much will EBR lose? You're the research expert - how does the correlation between poverty and readiness fit into this? Will this contribute to the desegregation of our schools? Since some schools will be designated magnets doesn't this mean that lowest performing students will be piled into the same schools thereby contributing to the state's bogus method of identifying failure - standardized test scores? Early childhood experts tell us that the youngest children develop unevenly with some faster than others. They cannot be graded accurately to determine which NEEDS services more than others. Too much wrong with Taylor's plan.

6) Comment by twinkie1cat - 19/01/2013

Your child is slow so she gets Pre-k. Why not just fund the program properly with state money so that ALL 4 year olds can get Pre-K, in public schools, taught by real early childhood teachers. Oh, I forgot, Jindal turned down the federal money to fund early childhood education.

7) Comment by Noel Hammatt - 19/01/2013

I'll admit to being puzzled and unsure how to respond to this new approach to selecting students to receive some valuable services. I'm not criticizing, and it may be exactly the way we need to go... but I am wondering. Stick with me here. The state, the schools, and the district have been telling students how important it is to do their best. Now, here we have a situation where parents looking to receive services (and, let's be honest, some consider it free day-care too) know the decision of who is to get services is going to be based on which children do the worst! I can see the logic of the District, it makes sense. Perhaps we should be providing services to those who need it the most... on the other hand, what if we are rewarding parents who take few steps to be the most effective teacher they can be? I mean, think about it. IF you do a great job, your child will score higher, and then you will miss out on getting your child into pre-K. Given all the bogus claims about how pre-K can remove the gaps between rich and poor, aren't we setting ourselves up for failure here? Why should a parent read to her child every day, or teach their children to effectively communicate, only to be told they failed to get into pre-K because they were doing better than the other children screened? I can just see a mom keeping her child up late the night before the screening, and maybe getting them all riled up before the "screening" so they won't do well. Am I the only one that thinks this is a possibility? And keep in mind, neither the state nor the district is really doing anything right now to inform parents that they are their child's first, and most important teacher... and now this. Call me puzzled. (I did call the number in the article to make sure of the facts, and yes, I was assured that the kids scoring the worst would get the services.) Help me out here.