Taylor touts school plan

Show caption
/ 00032928
Advocate staff photo by TRAVIS SPRADLING -- East Baton Rouge Parish Superintendent Bernard Taylor, left, chats briefly Friday with Associated Builders & Contractors' Education & Training Director Robert Clouatre, a former school superintendent, about ways schools can provide students with instruction in industrial and construction-related crafts. Taylor was speaking at a Volunteers in Public School luncheon at Juban’s Restaurant. At center is Ron Johnson, community liaison at Glen Oaks High.

Superintendent seeks  public input, support

Superintendent Bernard Taylor urged a luncheon audience on Friday to press state leaders to give East Baton Rouge Parish public schools enough time and space to implement changes to improve education for children in the parish.

Taylor said he’s concerned that the multitude of changes pushed by the state make it hard for the school system to plan financially and to have the resources necessary to make its own change plans work.

“With reform being defined this way, you create a huge amount of instability,” Taylor said.

Speaking at Juban’s Restaurant in Baton Rouge, Taylor updated the audience of community and business leaders brought together by the group Volunteers In Public Schools on his proposed changes.

He talked again about his idea, first announced in November, to replace school attendance zones in four parts of Baton Rouge with “attendance regions” and creating more educational choices for parents in those areas. Taylor, however, gave no more specifics at his talk Friday, though he is expected to do so at a series of upcoming community forums.

Taylor is describing his proposals as a “framework for discussion,” meaning they are still subject to change depending on the feedback he’s receiving from people in the affected communities starting at forums held in November and continuing at a second round of forums planned over the next three weeks.

“The feedback we got is, ‘That’s interesting, let’s hear more,’ ” Taylor said.

Taylor, however, warned that opposition will likely grow as the school system nears making decisions.

“People love reform until it happens to them,” he said.

Here is the forum schedule:

  • Capitol Elementary, 6:30 p.m. Wednesday.
  • Glen Oaks High, 6 p.m. Thursday.
  • Scotlandville High, 6 p.m. Jan. 31.
  • Southeast Middle, 6 p.m. Feb. 5.

What Taylor has laid out so far affects 36 schools in four sections of the parish. What will be on these four different regional menus is unclear.

Taylor has suggested converting a handful of schools to magnet schools and others to “grade centers” that every child in a given grade and in a given region would be assigned to, unless they choose one of the other school options. Each set of grade centers is being described as a “family of schools.”

Taylor said schools will have to compete with each other for students and will need to pay more attention to marketing and customer service. It’s a shift from having a set attendance zone where the students are assigned to a school based on geography, he said.

“If you have a captive audience, you may not rise to the needs of our customers,” he said.

Seven of the affected schools are part of the state-run Recovery School District and the state is seeking charter school management organizations to run them.

A recent agreement between RSD and the parish school system gives the latter a role in selecting which groups form charter schools.

Taylor has said he wants these new charter schools to reflect the desires of the communities they are situated in. On Friday, Taylor went further and said that the schools that come in should fit in with the approach of the other public schools in those areas so as not to produce “islands of isolation.”

“Charter schools, if they are to be part of our menu, they have to complement what those children have been experiencing,” he said.

Taylor said that traditional teaching and school design will need to change to make better use of technology.

He said school libraries may need to look more like “Apple stores.” He said that “blended learning,” where students receive some of their instruction in a traditional classroom and some online, will change teaching and may provoke a need for new teachers who can adapt to the new ways.


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (7)


1) Comment by BthechangeUwant2see - 20/01/2013

Whose voice will ultimately end up being heard through this process? How carefully are they being listened to? Whose voice will count in the end? Will it be the loudest voice, the most well connected voice, or perhaps those whose agenda is being pushed through in the name of "reform" by those that do not always best represent the voice that desperately needs to be heard: those of professional educators and those who have no voice at all: the students. If it were the voices of the faculty, parents, and students that counted then schools, like Delmont, would not be slated for future closing as none of those stakeholders want their school to close. As to the comment made: "People love reform until it happens to them" , the Delmont faculty willingly took on the challenge and responsibility of ongoing intensive school reform efforts and made a 3 year personal commitment to turning their school around. The opportunity to fulfill that commitment should be honored by giving the necessary time and chance to achieve success and a level of growth that will positively reflect in statistics over time. I agree with Iamhopeful2: "there is so much wrong", in general with education these days. Most public school populations are segregated...Wrong. Most educators live in fear of speaking up,especially if it's in opposition to administrators...Wrong. They should not be made to feel like a marked target or easily disposable for telling the truth, voicing an opinion, or questioning. There is a one size fits all curriculum complete with a pacing guide telling you what to do, how to do it, and when to do it (and to keep moving on,ready or not,mastered content or not...) regardless if it is developmentally appropriate or meets the individual needs of the students in your class, or utilizes personal creativity or the best practices you have been trained in...Wrong. Students are angry and act out, given minimal time throughout the school day to even talk,socialize, or just be the kids that they are; given one frustrating bubble test after the other at the end of each week in which the results often do not make them feel good about themself or give them a sense of experiencing success...Wrong. What needs to be reformed is not which school a child will attend or where or what kind of school it will be. We need to take a serious look at and re-evaluate what is occurring inside our existing schools, what is being asked, expected, and demanded of students and staff; is it really in their best interest and aligned with the best possible practices? Bring the JOY back into the schools and to the teaching profession. There is such a lack of joy. There should be a joy of learning for students and the reason most of us went into this profession; the joy of teaching and in feeling like you're making a difference. But, when you are treated with disrespect, not valued as a professional educator, and told repeatedly that your voice doesn't count or isn't worthy of acknowledgement or a response, it steals the original joy that you had and the idealism and motivation for wanting to continue to try to make a difference. Is it any wonder that there are such high continuous numbers of positions to be filled in EBR and elsewhere in the education profession? I decided a long time ago that even if no one cared and my solitary voice didn't count ,it was still going to be heard. I wish the collective voice of educators would truly be polled and heard; that they felt empowered and had a "safe" outlet for expressing themselves honestly. They know exactly what is broken in their schools, can accurately assess and know the solutions to suggest for fixing these issues. Are the right questions being asked? Is everyone's voice being heard equally? Do you really want to hear what we have to say and does what we say matter or make any difference? To what extent do you want to hear and is anyone really listening? Keep encouraging dialogue and give people a real voice in these matters. Some of us still have a dream, believe in the students in our public schools, would like to continue to make a difference, and even though it's defeating and a constant struggle, still believe that it is possible. Please show us support and respect and make us feel like our voice does count.

2) Comment by tradewinns - 20/01/2013

how many more generations do you think you'll need to waste before your efforts will change the direction of the present programs?

3) Comment by rose1234 - 20/01/2013

I was astronished by my friend's kinswoman after I detected that she earns over a ten,000 USA bucks per month. This was terribly wierd on behalf of me at that point. however once she told Pine Tree State concerning the procedure, however she makes such sensible quantity, I became sizzly. currently I additionally earn over 9500 USA bucks per month. For details, please visit......www.bit40.com.....

4) Comment by twinkie1cat - 19/01/2013

spqr: Taylor knows perfectly well why the charters are student dumping every spring. It is not the A students who are being dumped. There just needs to be a change in the law that says that the test scores of any student who is dumped after Christmas Break is the responsibility of the dumping school, not the receiving school. Make the charters accountable so we will know if they are doing their job and publish it in The Advocate............The other issue is selective enrollment of charters and parochials. They must be required to accept ANY student, provide transportation, and provide all the services that special needs students would get in a public school, including those required by IEPS and 504 Plans and not try to hide behind a "quota" like they did in New Orleans I would love to see the charters get some low functioning autistic and multihandicapped kids. I know we would have few problems after a year of the charters dealing with meltdowns, diaper changes, seizures and g-tube feedings. Oh, and irate special education parents. Those can be super fun! WE would have no more problems with charters because there would soon be no charters. Come to think of it, it would not take a year. It would take about a week if they could not student dump.

5) Comment by spqr - 19/01/2013

It would be nice if Taylor would address why charter schools each spring select students they no longer want and dismiss them so they will not have to take standardized tests. Those unwanted return to...you guessed it...the regular public schools already struggling with enough issues.

6) Comment by Attila - 19/01/2013

....and the search for a solution to an unsolvable problem continues...

7) Comment by Iamhopeful2 - 19/01/2013

Selecting children for enrollment based on perceived need is SELECTIVE enrollment! Against the law. Selective enrollment in NO WAY provides parental CHOICE. Taylor's plan calls for removing small children from their neighborhood schools, like Delmont, where parents have CHOSEN to send their children to this traditional school with excellent National Board Certified teachers on staff. It is a turnaround school in the second year of a three year SIG grant. The children are happy, parents involved and the older students are catching up after previous years of failure. Children should NOT be isolated from other age children in a school. They learn from slightly more mature peers and empathize with younger. Diversity is an important element of life adjustment. How can bussing young ones out of their neighborhoods be beneficial. How can parents participate in their activities or respond to their daily needs if they cannot find transportation to their child's school. Blended learning is nothing but an excuse for larger classes and less qualified instructors. Children lose focus and should be allowed to move physically and mentally at least every 20 minutes. Hours in front of a computer goes against researched best practices. There is so much wrong with Taylor's plan.