La. teacher certification declines

Just 54 teachers in Louisiana achieved certification in 2012 from a well-regarded national teaching organization, a fifth as many teachers as when the program was at its peak in this state.

The National Board for Professional Teaching Standards announced the results Monday. The totals are down from 102 in 2011 and 148 in 2010.

Louisiana’s peak for nationally certified teachers was 250 teachers in 2005.

Nationally, the trend is similar. A total of 4,930 teachers earned the certification in 2012, compared with 6,266 in 2011 and 8,600 the year before that.

The downward trend is likely to continue, at least in Louisiana.

Michelle Accardi, director of state policy and outreach, said the number of new Louisiana applicants for certification for 2013 is down 60 percent from where it was a year ago.

Accardi noted that the poor economy has probably made it harder for teachers to afford the $2,500 fee associated with national board certification. Also, she said Louisiana has made many changes in public education, including a new teacher evaluation system, and many teachers may lack the time to participate.

“It would be hard to have to carve out that kind of time,” she said.

Individual teachers learned in late November whether their year’s worth of effort — the average is 400 hours per candidate — has paid off. The public release of the 2012 results was delayed in deference to the Newtown, Conn., school shootings on Dec. 14, said April Jones, a spokeswoman for the certification organization.

As the numbers have declined, the Louisiana Department of Education has ceased promoting the annual numbers as it used to through its public affairs office.

In response to a request for comment from The Advocate, the department issued a short statement, saying it was proud that “these dedicated professionals teach in our state’s classrooms” and that Louisiana has “learned from the principles set forth by the National Board to implement performance standards and merit compensation in every school in our state.”

In 2011, in response to a similar trend, a department spokeswoman linked the decline to the state’s shift to rewarding “highly effective” teachers rather than those with certifications.

The National Board certification is considered a high honor among teachers. Teachers have to demonstrate to their peers through videotaped lessons, student work and reflection papers that they know what they’re doing. Only about half of the teachers get the certification on the first try. They have two more years to get across the finish line.

Besides prestige, national board certification comes with higher pay, though it’s not as lucrative as it used to be.

In response to the economic downturn, many states, including Louisiana, have cut back their support for the program. An Education Week survey in 2012 found the number of states offering a stipend for the certification declined from 39 to 24.

In 2010, Louisiana quit paying its annual $5,000 stipend, instead shifting that expense onto school districts.

In 2008, a dozen school districts offered complementary stipends, ranging from $1,000 to $5,000, to national board-certified teachers but most of those have been cut back or eliminated since.

The leading Louisiana school district this year was East Baton Rouge Parish with 10 new nationally certified teachers, down from 18 a year ago.

St. Tammany and Caddo parishes were next with just four teachers each.

A total of 102,327 teachers have earned the certification since the program began in North Carolina in 1987. Louisiana has contributed 1,838 of those teachers.

The National Board for Professional Teaching Standards is trying to highlight the success its teachers have on academic achievement.

“In today’s environment, the impact on student learning and achievement is the coin of the realm,” David Haselkorn, senior vice for institutional advancement for the organization.

On Monday, the organization highlighted a new Harvard University study of teachers in Los Angeles. It said students taught by National Board certified teachers in elementary schools showed two months more growth in math and one month more in English than their peers on California standardized tests.


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (33)


1) Comment by bourbon-soda - 09/01/2013

@teacherguy, this is consistent with a system based on merit badges rather than on results, and a rational response to it by practitioners - being sane in an insane place. Whether the system was sane before the "reforms" is another question.

2) Comment by Roux - 08/01/2013

White is a Jindal clone. He'll do or say whatever Jindal tells him. Sadly good districts and good teachers are being punished so Little Bobby Jindal can make it to the national stage. He has been a huge disappointment and is as lazy as Obama. FWIW I supported Jindal and have never been more disappointed than anyone is his poor performance. He's smart but really really lazy much like Obama.

3) Comment by teacherguy - 08/01/2013

I specifically chose in 2005 not to get NCLB but to get my Master's instead based on the assumption if the economy went to pot...I would have a better chance to receive the increase in salary for having an advanced education degree while the NCLB incentive would likely be slashed from the overall budget. Glad I went with the "safe bet"...except our salaries have been frozen for the past 3-4 years, with tax/benefits increases digging into that.

4) Comment by Scrooge - 08/01/2013

Haitian parody might be more apt

5) Comment by Scrooge - 08/01/2013

Education has always been a low priority in Louisiana. If the storied free market principles are true, Louisiana got what it paid for. Teacher salaries have been woefully inadequate for years and to now blame teachers for the triumph of free markets is perniciously hypocritical. Isn't the mantra "you get what you pay for?" Now Louisiana will really reap what it sows not only in K-12 but higher Ed as well. Me I'm looking to get the &@!? out of this budding Haiti facsimile. Good luck.

6) Comment by Noel Hammatt - 08/01/2013

@bourbon-soda: I am with you completely on that part! Given the data set they are using,m I can find no real reason for supporting the program. However, given that I think teaching is much more that simply raising test scores, I again withhold judgement on the program itself. My points, of course, were addressing this administration's lack of support for teachers in general, highlighted in the current circumstances by the mixed messages they send. Or in the case of the total lack of attention to those encouraged to go through the program then ignored, the not so mixed messages. Just as White's failure to attend the Teacher of the Year events, it is clear to me that he does not respect the profession at all.

7) Comment by Scrooge - 08/01/2013

One can go to louisianaschools.net and look up the qualifications of any educator in Louisiana save two. Easy guess who might be missing.

8) Comment by Scrooge - 08/01/2013

Bourbon-soda , forgive me for yielding to the influence of the prejudiced, it is easy to succumb on these commentaries but ok let's forget ancestry and blame it on cognitive failure, a tabula rasa incarnate

9) Comment by bourbon-soda - 08/01/2013

@Noel - your characterization of my last remark is appropriate. Thanks for courtesy in posting it. I can understand that the teachers who participated in this program with the encouragement and support of their employers, feel betrayed. I am never sure what to do with the non-statistically significant result - the corresponding p value is a continuum, the cutoff, arbitrary. Still, for consistency, I tend to discount results that don't make it over the bar.

10) Comment by Noel Hammatt - 08/01/2013

@bourbon-soda: Here is where I differ with your final comments below. I don't believe that anyone who seeks to improve, as a professional, deserves derision, especially when they were encouraged to take these steps by the very people who "turned" who "turned" on them. To point out, there was some evidence that students benefited from teachers who received higher scores on the certification measures. Wasn't statistically significant, but again, my point is that no one deserves to be treated this way. As a final note, the State Teachers, Principals, and Superintendents of the year were recognized in a special colloquium this past year. Guess who failed to appear. Yep, John White. He has not shown any respect at all to the profession of teaching. Perhaps because he understands that he has none of the training or credentials of those who truly are professionals.

11) Comment by bourbon-soda - 08/01/2013

Thank you for trying to explain this to me. I can see why any rational organization would withdraw support for the certification described in the opinion. It sucks up a lot of money and a huge amount of time with no demonstrated increment in student achievement. Derision may even be appropriate.

12) Comment by Noel Hammatt - 08/01/2013

@bourbon-soda. As far as the studies, they fall victim to the same problems I have talked about before on here. The problem with "Spring to Spring" scores is that we are trying to access 100% of student growth when the teachers only have control over approximately 17%. For this reason, nearly every VAM system fails to account for losses students experience during the summer months, or other extraneous factors NOT included in the calculations. Now, about the reference to that which follows "The fact is:" The initial point I am making is simply to point out the factual history of recognition for National Board Certification by the state and the "reformers." Not many years ago, there were statewide reports on the number certified, there were celebrations held, and of course, monetary compensation was provided. Suddenly, the state (and the reformers) realized that this was not in synch with their national minders, and sudden;y there is no recognition, there is a failure of the state to continue promised incentives to teachers to get the National Board Certification, and the shift (actually a sea-change) was to temporary teachers, not to teaching as a profession at all! In fact, Jindal's people put out a POwerPoint presentation in which they equated a teacher's "Career" with 10 years! Not 25 or 32, but ten years. Not exactly a profession. The rest was simply stating a truth, that the reformers are lying, on a regular basis, about virtually every aspect of education! And getting away with it, if one looks at The Advocate, for example.

13) Comment by crabby - 08/01/2013

Not too surprising since you don't need to be qualified to teach in Boobie's new charter school world. You also don't need qualified administrators ... anyone willing to exploit children for a profit will do.

14) Comment by bourbon-soda - 08/01/2013

@Noel, thank you for your thoughtful response, at least the part I think I can evaluate (up to "The fact is...."). As I understand this, the Harvard study mentioned in the opinion is based on an assumption that you can measure teacher effectiveness by student achievement. If this is not true, then the so-called validation of this national certification, is fatuous, being based on student achievement. A falling rate of such certification in LA or elsewhere would therefore not indicate anything about teacher effectiveness. If the headline and story are supposed to communicate a decline in standards, they are misleading IMO.

15) Comment by Noel Hammatt - 08/01/2013

@bourbon-soda: In a public Board meeting I chastised (I am a bit ashamed to say I had no choice but to do so publicly) a leader who falsely used raw student achievement data to promote the idea that NBPTS teachers achieved higher levels of student achievement. I argued then, as I do now, that comparing student achievement is a very, very difficult and complex task. This administrator had used dubious measures, especially after I noted that in a district with over 80-% of students qualifying for free meals that the cohort taught by the NBPTS teachers had less than 50% qualifying for free or reduced meal prices. I certainly make no claim about the higher academic achievement of nationally certified teachers. Do I think that they are highly motivated to begin with, and are likely strong teachers, both before and after. yes. The fact is, as @civitasiveritas has pointed out, they were encouraged to get the NBPTS, and then the state, at the same point that Teach For America and other groups were promoting their five week wonders, the encouragement gave way to derision. The use of student test scores to identify superior teachers is severely limited by the fact that less than 20% of student achievement can be attributed to teachers and the school. Sorta limits realistic evaluation of teachers based on student scores. And the lie often told by Barry Erwin and the Superintendent is that teachers cannot lose their tenure based on a low VAM score is just that. A lie. And no teacher is likely to EVER get tenure under the new system, since it is virtually a mathematical impossibility. And they know it. The only way the "reformers" can achieve their goals is to lie and distort the truth. The only way they can get away with that is with a ready supply of lazy journalists and a total lack of transparency of the data that they alone want to possess.

16) Comment by bourbon-soda - 08/01/2013

@scrooge - regarding your comment to 8.6, how much of his intelligence do you opine is genetically determined?

17) Comment by bourbon-soda - 08/01/2013

While slumming around Harvard web pages I also found > http://www.hks.harvard.edu/news-events/news/press- releases/pepg-study-june-2010 <. According to it, "a teacher's effectiveness ... is unrelated tot he preparation teachers [note politically correct aversion to personal pronoun] ... whether they received a major in education, or earned a master's degree.... in elementary math and middle school reading and math no gains - and some declines - in effectiveness appear in the second decade after a teacher has begun teaching.... Teachers receive extra compensation if they have a masters" but "were no more effective in the classroom than those that did not have the diploma."

18) Comment by bourbon-soda - 08/01/2013

I googled "harvard study nationally certified teachers" and found > http://www.gse.harvard.edu/~pfpie/pdf/National_Board_Certificat ion.pdf <. It is pretty heavy sledding, but as I read it, it establishes a correlation between willingness and ability to obtain this certification, and student achievement. My impression from the paper is that teachers who obtain this certificate are highly self- selected, leaving intact the hypothesis that they were superior teachers to begin with, and that obtaining the certification did not enhance that effectiveness. If this certification is validated by correlation with student achievement, why not just use student achievement to identify superior teachers and skip the time and expense of this certification?

19) Comment by Traveler - 08/01/2013

To "Civitasveritas": Thanks for the thread of information----I intend to print it out for future reference!

20) Comment by Traveler - 08/01/2013

To Noel Hammatt: I believe that you are correct when you question whether decisions about Louisiana public education are even being made here. I have a question that may require some research on your part----and I know that there's no one better at doing this kind of research than you, so here goes.... You mention Broad, Gates, and Walton. My question is, where do those three link up, and what connection do any/all of them have to the following: American Diplomatic Project, Education Equality, Strategic Management of Human Capital, and Tough Choices,Tough Times. This may take some time, so if you don't have the answer already, I'll just wait until your comments following a future article. Thanks!

21) Comment by Caddy1 - 08/01/2013

You can thank the inexperienced State supt. of Education(John White) the yes man for Gov. Jindal. Between these two, and the BESE board the state will continue it's decline in education, and go to the absolute worst in the nation. John White has to be replaced with someone that is experienced and honest. He is neither. It's a disgrace to have this person in the position his is in with his background.

22) Comment by Noel Hammatt - 08/01/2013

@civitasiveritas: I suspect a Ouija Board would actually produce better results that those currently coming from BESE and White. Of course, this begs the question of whether these decisions are even being made within this state. Like others, I suspect the strings are being pulled by Broad, Gates, Waltons et al. One thing you have to admit, we have the best BESE and Superintendent their money could buy! (Of course, for their particular interests, and NOT for the interests of Louisiana.)

23) Comment by Michael Gary Scott - 08/01/2013

That Bobby Jindal sure is the "Education Governor", what a great job he has done with our public schools. NOT

24) Comment by Scrooge - 08/01/2013

Reason, logic and evidently intelligence are not 8.6's strong points. Give him a break, he can't help his genetics.

25) Comment by civitasiveritas - 08/01/2013

Amazing how @8point6 defines the truth as "whining" and truth- telling as "Jindal bashing." Reminds me of how John White refused to release documents that (perhaps) accurately described the process by which he gave out millions of taxpayer dollars to schools that exist only as a pigment of his imagination. (I suspect the pigment here is a currency -colored green.) Why not release the documents? Here are the best reasons for White NOT to release the documents outlining how he picked the schools. Reason number 5: Even an idiot could compare the list of those winning White's personal voucher-school lottery against the rolls of campaign contributions. 4: Someone (not an elected representative from Livingston Parish) might actually realize that the picking and choosing of religious schools based on their religion might actually violate the first amendment (remember the outcry over a Muslim School). 3: It might be apparent that they way they were excluding schools was based not on quality of the school, but on the degree to which the media was awake and reporting on the "schools." 2: The general public might actually not be impressed at the singular lack of ANY formal procedures for the selecting of voucher schools. And the number 1 reason for not releasing any and all documents relating to the process used to determine which schools were eligible to receive millions in taxpayer dollars? John White was told by his highly paid handlers that the public would NOT be impressed by his use of a Ouija Board for executive decision making! White lies. Even @8point6 might realize that

26) Comment by Traveler - 08/01/2013

To "8point6": I notice that you do not/can not refute the information in the article or the comments below the article. You simply don't like people having the facts and the courage to speak out.

27) Comment by 8point6 - 08/01/2013

My, my. My "progressive" friends are DOING some whining today. And, congrats to this medium for continuing the Jindal bashing in this new year with today's news articles/letters to the editor, etc.

28) Comment by civitasiveritas - 08/01/2013

No one should be surprised that teachers are not flocking to an intensive, expensive certification process that was until recently recognized by the former State Superintendent as the ultimate preparation for professionals. Why the change? Within months of Pastorek's praise of NBPTS he got new marching orders from his national minders that he was NOT to push the professionalization of teachers. Instead, he was to promote 5 week wonders, and de- professionalize the teaching profession. Suddenly, we had Pastorek removing the incentives he had pushed for, and ignoring the teachers he had recently been promoting as some of the best of the best. Then we had our Governor, who has sacrificed the teaching profession in Louisiana on the altar of his pursuit of a higher throne for himself dismissing the teachers by his claim that they were getting paid for "breathing." Then all standards for teaching (in his beloved charter schools) were dismissed by the new Superintendent of Education, himself bought and paid for by the same handlers who corrected the error of Pastorek so quickly when he complimented the NBPTS for their work. So John White, who was never a professional in teaching, had none of the credentials that LABI and all the other "reformers" had fought for for years (and then rapidly dismissed) was quick to discount teacher education, professional pathways that included rigorous training and coursework; and his sidekick and fellow sycophant Chas Roemer went so far as to dismiss even a requirement that teachers have a degree. So, in a short span of less than a decade, the reformers bought and paid for two new Superintendents, dismissed with prejudice any notion of a "profession" dedicated to the teaching of students, and replaced it with one where you can be dismissed for a poor showing on a mis-guided value-added (VAM) evaluation system so shrouded in secrecy that NO ONE has yet released the actual formula. So much for transparency. But at least one thing is transparent! This administration cares not a whit about children or students, but cares quite a bit about ensuring that there is no profession left to counter the purchase of public education dollars by their national minders. Why become a professional, when you can be replaced at the whim of a principal who doesn't like your hairstyle, or a charter school board who doesn't like anyone asking questions, or because you rebuffed the sexual advances of a board member or the principal. We can always replace professionals with five week wonders, and then replace them every two years, all while the profiteers of privatization laugh all the way to the bank. Carolyn Roemer and Kira Orange are leading the pack to the bank! And lo and behold, the media, apparently bought and paid for by the same folks that bought and paid for Chas Roemer and Kira Orange, continue to parrot the press releases of the "Astro-turf" organizations like Michelle Rhee's "Stand On Children." When will the parents and citizens awaken to this travesty?

29) Comment by lovemykids - 08/01/2013

Maybe Jindal and his accessories(John White and BESE) can get people off of welfare by making them minimum wage teachers.

30) Comment by Scrooge - 08/01/2013

Heck, just recruit more teachers from the Philippines.

31) Comment by crazycajun - 08/01/2013

L'il booby's plan of demonizing the teachers is starting to come around full circle. Can you say "KARMA"?

32) Comment by Traveler - 08/01/2013

As fewer and fewer bright young high school graduates find the field of education an appealing career (thanks to the demoralizing efforts of BESE and the SDE), perhaps BESE and the SDE plan to staff our school faculties with the two-year Teach for America recruits. In 2002, the Academic Distinction Fund reported that "...a significant proportion of all ... teachers are inexperienced. In 2002, almost 20 percent of all EBRPSS teachers had three or fewer years of experience. At every level of the system, experience matters. Students with more experienced teachers do better----as measured by their scores on standardized tests----that their peers with less-experienced teachers." Statistics are showing that our experienced teachers who are eligible to retire are doing so in record numbers, because teachers have been so unfairly blamed and criticized for problems in our public schools. It's going to take more than money to get them to stay.

33) Comment by Traveler - 08/01/2013

The decline in the number of Louisiana teachers seeking National Board Certification was predicted. As Charles Lussier points out in the article, the State Department of Education discontinued the $5,000 annual stipend that NBC teachers once received, and many local school systems cannot afford to pick up that cost, so there is no financial incentive to earn the credential. Furthermore, a teacher with NBC can still receive an evaluation rating that is lower than "highly effective," if his/her students' scores on standardized tests are not in accordance with BESE's formula for achievement. What I'm waiting to see next is an article on the decline in the number of Louisiana high school graduates who choose education as a college major. This, too, is predictable. The current governor, BESE, and the SDE have so unfairly criticized teachers and have made the profession so unattractive that it's difficult to imagine bright, ambitious young people choosing teaching as a career, especially when better-paying alternatives are available.